Fareed’s Take on Trump-Kim Singapore Summit


June 17, 2018

Fareed’s Take on Trump-Kim Singapore Summit:

“U.S. weakens its 70-year alliance with South Korea.”

by Dr. Fareed Zakaria

https://fareedzakaria.com/columns/2018/6/14/this-should-have-been-the-real-headline-of-the-trump-kim-summit

Image result for Lee Kuan Yew

 

“America will remain the world’s dominant power in the 21st century only if it is the dominant Pacific power,” the late Lee Kuan Yew often said to me. Lee, the founder of modern Singapore and one of the smartest strategic minds I have ever encountered, spoke about this issue late in life, as he worried about the breakdown of the stability that had allowed for the extraordinary global growth of the past half-century. The key, he was certain, was deep U.S. engagement in Asia, which was quickly becoming the center of global economics and power. Alas, President Trump appears to be doing everything he can to violate Lee’s dictum.

The media got it wrong. The real headline of the Trump-Kim summit — ironically held in Singapore, the city-state that Lee built — should have been: “U.S. weakens its 70-year alliance with South Korea.” The most striking elements of Trump’s initiative were not simply that he lavished praise on North Korea’s dictator, Kim Jong Un, but also that he announced the cancellation of military exercises with South Korea, adopting North Korea’s own rhetoric by calling them “provocative.”

The President must have missed his briefing. In fact, it is North Korea that provokes and threatens South Korea, as it has done since it first invaded the South in 1950. North Korea is thought to have about 1 million active-duty troops, almost twice as many as the South, and it has constructed perhaps as many as 20 tunnels to possibly mount a surprise invasion. North Korea also has more than 6,000 pieces of artillery that can reach South Korea, including some whose range is so long that they endanger 32.5 million people, more than half the country’s population, according to a study by the Rand Corp. The Defense Department estimated in 2006 that if North Korea opened artillery fire on the South, 250,000 people would be killed in Seoul alone, the Rand study notes. Of course, about a decade later, North Korea now has up to 60 nuclear bombs, complete with the missiles to deliver them. South Korea’s “war games” with the United States are necessary defensive exercises undertaken in the shadow of an aggressive adversary.

Image result for China benefits from Trump-Kim Summit

President Donald Trump takes South  Korea for granted

Even worse, Trump signaled that he would like to end the U.S. troop presence in South Korea. He is wrong that this would save money, unless he plans to demobilize the troops — which would mean cutting the United States’ active-duty forces, the opposite of his policy. Since South Korea covers almost half the costs of U.S. troops stationed there, moving them to, say, Georgia would not be cheaper. But that’s beside the point. Through bitter experience, the United States has found that it is much better to have troops ready, battle-trained and with knowledge of the local geography rather than keeping them all in the United States, only to be sent abroad when trouble breaks out.

Image result for China benefits from Trump-Kim Summit

A few commentators have pointed out that the big winner of the Singapore summit was the great power that was not even there: China. That’s exactly right. Consider what China has always wanted. First, the stabilization of North Korea. Until recently, there was much talk of the impending implosion of the North Korean regime. For China, this would be a nightmare, since unification would take place on South Korean terms. This would mean a large democratic state allied with Washington, housing U.S. troops right on China’s border. That nightmare looks unlikely now that the United States is promising security guarantees for North Korea and dangling aid and investment.

China’s second great desire has been to rid Asia of U.S. troops, especially from the mainland. Trump appears inclined to do this as well. After the Cold War, many Asian countries got nervous that the United States would withdraw from Asia, leaving its allies to the tender mercies of a rising China. To assure them otherwise, Joseph Nye, a top Defense Department official in the Clinton administration, formulated a report and initiative that committed the United States to maintain a forward troop presence in Asia of about 100,000. Were Trump to follow through on his impulse to withdraw troops from South Korea, the United States would fall far below that threshold.

For China, the Trump administration has been the gift that keeps on giving. Trump began his term in office by pulling out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which was created by a group of U.S. allies to stand as an alternative to the Chinese market. The partnership was a bulwark against Chinese power that could have proved attractive to other Asian countries. Now the rules of the road are being written in Asia, and they are being written in Mandarin.

Lee was right. The long game for the United States over the next few decades is how to handle the rise of China. And right now, we are quitting the field.

(c) 2018, Washington Post Writers Group

11 thoughts on “Fareed’s Take on Trump-Kim Singapore Summit

  1. Its likely true BUT fact is US losing its dominant world power is perhaps inevitable given its fiscal, social problem in particular aging and income distribution.

  2. I’m still picking my jaw up off the floor over what happened in Singapore this week. Sure, the cultists in tinfoil hats who worship Donald Trump are convinced he has saved the world through that purported denuclearization agreement he signed with Kim Jong-un. But surely the rest of us can see past the bombast and facade.

    The historic Trump-Kim nuclear disarmament accord merely states that North Korea “commits to work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean puninsula.” Surely, signing up for a humble iTunes account with Apple requires a much greater commitment. iTunes makes it clear to users that “you will not use these products for any purposes prohibited by United States law, including, without limitation, the development, design, manufacture, or production of nuclear, missile, or chemical or biological weapons”.

    The North Koreans offered nothing of substance to Trump. Our self-proclaimed “Great Dealmaker” stunned even his own people by giving away much more than anyone could have imagined. Christmas came early for North Korea, even if the hermit kingdom doesn’t celebrate it, and China bagged the best goodies from Santa Trump’s sack without even having to hang the proverbial Yuletide stocking by the fireplace.

    By far the biggest bonanza for Beijing from the Singapore summit was Trump’s offer to halt the war games the US regularly holds with South Korea. China has sought an end to the military drills for decades, seeing them as another plank of US hegemony in its neighborhood. Wish granted. And, in another unexpected gift for China, the man with no brain raised the possibility of calling home nearly 30,000 American troops stationed in South Korea. You can imagine what a boost that would be for Beijing, seeing the US alienate South Korea its traditional regional allies and let China fill the vacuum to further its own strategic interests.

    Speaking of undermining alliances, what happened at the G7 summit in Canada enabled China to reap another unexpected windfall. In a nutshell, Trump threw a temper tantrum over tariffs and, toddler-like, retracted his endorsement of a joint communique with his nation’s closest allies. Contrast that with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit held at the same time hosted by China in Qingdao, where member countries discussed and agreed on trade and security like adults, unhindered by egos and petty personal politics. Even India and Pakistan who participated for the first time as members did not make any fuss against each other.

    How ironic that a country which has often been vilified for its own trade practices is now becoming the beacon of hope and rallying point for global trade floundering in the darkness after Trump switched off the lights. Talk about China winning big, thanks to an idiot who is constantly pouring contempt on “losers”.

    Remember those “Make America Great Again” hats that Trump and his fanatical followers like to flaunt? Perhaps it’s time to change the slogan to a more accurate “Make China Great Again”. Say, aren’t those silly hats make in China anyway?

  3. Like many articles from “liberal” comentators this article missed the most important point, that is, peace is what Koreans on both sides want. We can agree or disagree and talk about geopolitical or other stuff, but we cannot insist that the welfare of the Korean people North and South should be subservient to the interest of any other country, whether Japan, China, or the United States.

    • lcrenoir,

      “…we cannot insist that the welfare of the Korean people North and South should be subservient to the interest of any other country, whether Japan, China, or the United States”. I endorse that. That is not understood by Trump and his cabals and previous American administrations going back to LBJ and Nixon.

      They have not learned the Lessons of Vietnam and the genocidal Khmer Rouge in Cambodia. Relatively recent interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and the other Middle East nations reflect the arrogance of American power.

      Trump is poking his nose in Cambodia today, hoping to install the pliable Samy Rainsy. They will again fail. The proud (I chose this word) Cambodian resent American policy because of what America did to them during the Vietnam War. The Americans under Nixon and Kissinger bombed their country. The CIA engineered a coup against Prince Sihanouk in 1970, and brought chaos and mayhem to his small but prosperous nation.

      America needs to deal with its own problems like poverty (16 million Americans live in abject poverty), racial discrimination and religious extremism of the Christian Right.–Din Merican

  4. Din, as usual, you’re so right. Even the so-called American middle class are often one paycheck away from becoming homeless. I know this not only from observations, but also from personally feeling the effects when one of my kids was retrenched for some months a couple of years ago. The wealth gap is too wide between the super rich and the rest, and if the middle class are in a precarious position only God knows how the lower classes survive. Yet some in the ruling class still think nothing of spending billions on the country’s 800 foreign bases, including the very expensive one in Korea. In a sense, the Koreans are the most unfortunate people in Asia’s northeast: after suffering for about half a century under Japanese colonisation they still find themselves divided and their future dependent on the whims of big powers near and far, especially the one that calls itself the world’s only superpower. For all his faults, Trump’s willingness to jaw jaw with Kim should be applauded. Let’s hope he doesn’t go back on his words, like most people said he would.

  5. Din, I posted a more detailed comment hours ago but don’t see it now. Anyway, what you said is, as usual, on the mark and from my readings of non-mainstream US media the majority of Americans apparently are sick and tired of unending wars and just want some of the money spent on domestic infrastructure, education, childcare, etc. Trump seems to be deliberately doing things different from his predecessors and I hope he will ultimately leave small countries like Cambodia, Laos, and even Malaysia alone.

  6. The Koreans, N or S want peace.

    The Chinese want America out of the area.

    The Japanese & Taiwanese want the Americans to stay.

    The rest of East and South Asia are divided.

    Russia waiting and seeing.

    What do the Americans want?

    No one really knows.

  7. The Koreans have suffered unnecessarily for long enough, being used as pawns and unwitting proxies to serve the geo political interests of two oppossing powers.
    It’s not unlike a courtship between a bridegroom from the country side and a bride from the city. Nontheless, the Koreans from both sides of the divide want peace and will eventually work towards reunification which may sound lunlikely for now but not an unrealistic goal.
    LIke all arranged marriages, it takes sincere, honourable intentions and trust for the union to work and it may work if the Koreans are allowed to work out their differences, free from intervention from nosy outsiders.
    A strong and cohesive ASEAN + 3 ( China, Japan and a unified Korea will be a good working bloc to build on, to keep the zone free from foreign intervention.

  8. Ocho Onda, you’re so right! ASEAN + 3 would be a powerful means of keeping peace in the Northeast and other parts of Asia. Asia must not be divided like over a hundred years ago, when foreign powers simply came in and divided our continent among themselves. However, each and every Asian country must have the will to stick together towards this goal.

    • That was Tun ‘s original game plan. India, NZ and Australia will make it ASEAN +6.
      Together with OBOR, it will truly make the Asian century a reality.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.