Death of Kevin Morais: MACC should settle and let him rest in peace

September 23, 2015

Death of Kevin Morais: MACC should settle and let him rest in peace

by Din Merican

Mahatma-GandhiFreemalaysiatoday (FMT) and all the news portals reported about the effect of Kevin Morais’ death on the case of  abuse of power and malicious prosecution that my brave and brillaint friend Lawyer Rosli Dahlan had initiated against former A-G Gani Patail, Kevin Morais, Abu Kassim and 11 other defendants.

A case that can teach MACC to be humble


These are the people who did bad things to Rosli. FMT correctly asked what has become of the MACC and the key players that are supposed to combat corruption but instead was used as a tool of oppression against an innocent man?

It appears that the MACC is now almost decimated and its reputation in complete tatters. The MACC’s No. 1 and No. 2 are now nowhere to be seen since the 1MDB fiasco and RM2.6 billion found in PM Najib Razak’s Private Banking account.

MACC’s Adviser Tan Sri Rashpal Singh, Head of AMLA Jessica Gurmit Kaur, and prosecutor Ahmad Sazilee Abdul Khairy were arrested together with two MACC directors Bahri Md Zain and Rohaizad Yaakub, who were then transferred to the Prime Minister’s Department..

ts-abu-kassimMACC’s Tan Sri Abu Kassim (above) named as the 1st Defendant in Rosli’ suit is said to be recovering from a back surgery as a camouflage for MACC’s inaction. Many including me remain unconvinced and have called him a general who abandoned his troops in the middle of a battle. MACC officer Mohan Muthaiyah, who brutally arrested and handcuffed Rosli until his wrist bled, was himself charged for corruption and was convicted.

Rosli-DahlanA-G Gani Patail himself was unceremoniously sacked and has totally disappeared from public eye. And most recently, Kevin Morais’ dead body was buried cast in cement in an oil drum. Such a tragic and grisly death. So what happens to the case against them?

FMT mentioned about Rosli’s 2012 letter to Abu Kassim which is very prophetic:

“I implore you not to allow this sacred institution (MACC) to be used as tool of oppression and persecution in the guise of false prosecution against innocent citizens. Otherwise, you will one day see your own hands in the destruction of t‎his institution.”-Rosli Dahlan

Instead of settling, the MACC and Gani Patail chose to test their  immunity in court which resulted in Judge Wazeer Alam Mydin Meera delivering this damning judgement: “The claim of absolute immunity is anathema to the modern notion of democracy and accountability and against the Rule of Law.”

Kevin MoraisI wrote previously that at times I sympathise with Lawyer Rosli seeing him soldiering on with his case despite all the obstacles. The latest now is that Kevin’s death will force a substitution requiring Kevin’s Estate to be made a defendant. And Rosli was so magnanimous expressing deep sympathy to Kevin’s family and agreeing to give them as much time as is needed to sort out the technical issue of substitution.

On the other hand, MACC seemed unremorseful. MACC is still playing  the PR game using Kevin’s death to boost its image. MACC recently announced that it had named its moot court after Kevin in his honour. It is such a cheesy thing to do instead of doing something really meaningful.

A moot court is a play court not a real court. If MACC seriously wants to honour Kevin, they should not allow this case to drag on where Kevin’s estate will now be a defendant. It will be as if Kevin’s ghost lingers on without finding peace. It will be as if the ghost of Kevin’s past will not be allowed to rest.

This is one case that the forces of nature has not favoured the MACC and these defendant officers from the beginming. This is one case that God is showing His might and power of retribution. This is the case that Attorney-General Chambers  should not tempt God to show what else can happen. This is one case that the MACC should learn some humility by apologising to Rosli and settle, and let the ghost of Kevin Anthony Morais rest in peace! Let justice prevail.

Read also :

Opinion: Malaysia’s Broken System by John Berthelsen

August 22, 2015

Opinion: Malaysia’s Broken System

by John


It is ironic that a chorus of leaders from the United Malays National Organization(UMNO) have accused critics of scandal-scarred Prime Minister Najib Razak of “seeking to destroy parliamentary democracy in Malaysia.” There is no parliamentary democracy in Malaysia.

Malaysia’s government is broken. Every institution that exists in a normal democracy to protect the people does not work. That includes the parliament, the courts, the police, the mainstream press and the religious establishment, which all act to perpetuate the ruling coalition – primarily UMNO – in power.

I Berlin Quote

“Constitutional democracy has taken a new meaning in Malaysia and that is the status quo of the incumbent power,” one of the country’s most prominent constitutional lawyers said privately. “There are threats even against me for having acted in my professional capacity as a constitutional lawyer for those who desire to seek change.”

‘Our parliament is a rubber stamp; our judiciary is compromised; our civil service is mediocre and incompetent’

The situation is not new. Najib, who is accused of stealing hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money by critics – but not by law enforcement agencies – is not the cause of the breakdown. He is only a symptom of it. While UMNO has dominated politics since independence in 1957 under the Barisan Nasional, the current system was largely built by Mahathir Mohamad during the 23 years he was in power.

It’s been a long time coming

najib-mahahthirThe breakdown began decades ago, even before the subversion of the courts by Mahathir in the 1980s, although that was a major contributing factor. The Barisan Nasional inherited a series of repressive laws from the colonial British, including the Internal Security Act, which allows for indeterminate detention without trial. Although the ISA was supposedly suspended as a reform by Najib in 2012, it was replaced by an almost equally pernicious statute, Section 124 of the Penal Code, which allows for the arrest of individuals “for activities detrimental to parliamentary democracy.”

Another is the Printing Presses and Publications Act of 1984, which replaced similar colonial laws and requires all printing presses to secure an annual license from the Home Affairs Ministry.

The British also bequeathed the Sedition Act of 1948, which banned speech that would “bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against” the government or engender “feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races.”

The sedition act has been used repeatedly as the current scandal has grown in proportion, with its most notable potential victim Clare Rewcastle Brown, the UK-blogger whose Sarawak Report has played an instrumental role in exposing corruption connected to 1Malaysia Development Bhd, the state-backed investment fund that has amassed RM42 billion in debt. Scores of others including opposition politicians, activists, academics, journalists and cartoonists are being investigated or have been charged.

“Our parliament is a rubber stamp; our judiciary is compromised; our civil service is mediocre and incompetent led by a bunch of apple polishers; our police force, which is headed by an Inspector General of Police, treats us like enemies of the state, not as taxpayers and citizens who should be protected from criminals,” said Din Merican, a Malay university professor now teaching in Cambodia. “Our fiscal management is in a total mess because we have a Finance Minister who regards our national coffers as if they were his own and mismanages our economy. We have rampant corruption and abuses of power.”

Rigging the game

Things really began to go downhill in 1986 when the country’s highest court ruled that the government’s cancellation of the work permits of two Asian Wall Street Journal correspondents was unlawful. That was followed by the High Court’s decision to issue a habeas corpus writ for the release of opposition leader Karpal Singh from detention.

Justice Harun Hashim

Then Justice Harun Hashim (above) declared UMNO illegal and dissolved the party. An outraged Prime Minister Mahathir fired the chief justice and subsequently moved parliament to amend the constitution to say that the courts would only have judicial powers “as may be conferred by or under Federal law,” making Malaysia the only Commonwealth country whose courts do not have judicial powers unless the legislative branch says so.

As a result, the courts are clearly in thrall to the governing party, as witnessed by the two farcical trials that put opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim in prison against all evidence, and a long string of decisions that have cleared government leaders despite strong evidence of their guilt.

Democracy itself is broken, with gerrymandering keeping the opposition in its place. Witness the 2013 parliamentary election, which the Barisan actually lost, 51.39 percent to 47.79 percent, although it retained 133 seats to the opposition’s 89. It was an election won on vast infusions of apparently illegal money, if the latest revelations are true that Najib’s US$681 million “donation” diverted into his account was to help him fight the election. Top leaders of the ruling party are ignoring the deepening scandal because the prime minister has paid them continuing rounds of ill-disguised bribes to keep their loyalty. In addition, the election commission comes under the purview of the prime minister’s office, rendering it toothless.

Broken presses

In addition to being muzzled by the printing act, the idea of a free press, which would keep a watchdog eye on the government, has been subverted by the fact that virtually all of the major media, both in English and Malay and including newspapers, television and radio, are owned by constituent parties of the Barisan. Najib used his powers recently to shut down the two most critical newspapers, both owned by The Edge Group, for three months after they reported on the 1MDB mess. Neutral or hostile online media, which is freer but subject to partisan pressure, are constantly threatened with lawsuits that can’t be won in the kept courts, or by sedition or other charges.

Bad religion

The ruling party also has become adept at using Islam as a cudgel to beat other races, particularly the Chinese, and to scare the kampungs, or rural villages, back in line while splintering the opposition.

Opposition leaders and others have accused Najib, with some justification, of being behind a “unity government” strategy to support the fundamentalist Parti Islam se-Malaysia in its effort to implement hudud, or harsh Islamic law, in the state of Kelantan, which it controls. The idea is to destroy a shaky opposition coalition cobbled together seven years ago out of disparate elements. That effort appears to have succeeded, with PAS splitting the opposition coalition earlier this year.

It is the use of religion for cynical political ends that may be the most dangerous part of the UMNO strategy. The so-called Group of 25, consisted of senior civil servants, former diplomats and others, issued an open letter in December calling for moderation; they have renewed their call, saying the imposition of hudud would tell the world that the country has abandoned its once-moderate path.

Ketuanan_zawawi“We have become a racist and theocratic state led by men and women who no longer uphold the traditions of public duty,” said Din Merican. It is hard not to agree.

Malaysia: Time for Public Servants to seek Legal Recourse for Violations of their Rights

August 8, 2015

Malaysia: Time for Public Servants to seek Legal Recourse for Violations of their Rights

Recent sackings and perceived constructive dismissals are shocking to say the least and unprecedented and unwarranted. It is just politics.

Our public officials having been doing the jobs finally; although the consequences are dire, they have shown that they have enough moral courage to  stand up against those in the political leadership who are corrupt and morally bankrupt, and who act without regard to the principles of natural justice.

Even the Malaysian Public Services Commission which is established under Article 144(1) of the Federal Constitution has been sidelined. As a result, public servants are exposed to intimidation and abuse of power by UMNO politicians.

rosli-dahlan2Lawyer Rosli Dahlan

There is hope yet for them to seek legal recourse in our courts. All those in  MACC and other civil servants who have been removed, transferred, raided, or subject of smear campaigns by the mainstream media or bloggers can come to lawyers like Rosli Dahlan and others.

They stand ready to provide legal services to enable the aforementioned public servants to sue, seek reinstatement and obtain injunctions and various orders including damages to make these violators accountable in the civil court and subject them to  grilling cross examination.  They can  take judicial review action and all the remedies under O.53  RC 2012. [ ]

Lawyer Rosli Dahlan successfully took action against Malaysian Anti- Corruption Commission (MACC), The Star, Utusan Malaysia and The New Straits Times. The case against Attorney-General Gani Patail, MACC Chief Commissioner Abu Kassim, DPP Nordin Hassan and 12 0thers (filed in 2008 till 2013) were won by Lawyer Rosli Dahlan.

The nation owes a debt of gratitude to YA Wazeer Alam  who wrote in his judgement that “absolute immunity is anathema to modern notion of democracy n accountability.” It is God’s way of helping this nation in anticipation of these things happening 3 years later.  God works in mysterious ways, indeed.–Din Merican

 MACC No 2: Return my men, take me instead

by Malaysiakini

MACC's Shukri

Vexed over the sudden transfer of two directors, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Number Two Mohd Shukri Abdul has demanded their reinstatement.

Mohd Shukri, who is currently attending a course in the United States, said he was willing to be made the sacrificial lamb instead. “Take me, but return the two MACC men,” he told Malaysiakini in a text message. My officers acted based on my instructions,” he added.

Asked for further comments, a disappointed Mohd Shukri replied, “I have no mood now.” He was responding to the immediate transfer of MACC special operations division director Bahri Mohamad Zin and strategic communication director Rohaizad Yaakob this evening.

The pair was transferred to the Prime Minister’s Department purportedly for disciplinary reasons. However, there has been no official confirmation on the transfer.

Bahri had openly criticised the police for interfering in the MACC probe concerning the Finance Ministry-owned firm SRC International.
He blamed hidden hands for the police action and vowed to uncover the culprits.

His division’s probe also focused on the transfer of RM42 million from SRC International subsidiaries to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak’s personal bank accounts between late 2014 and early this year.

Najib is also The Finance Minister.

Najib-It takes a worried man

The Police have denied interfering or acting on external orders, saying it was investigating leaked documents from the SRC probe. Meanwhile, Rohaizad landed in trouble after meeting with opposition leaders and lawmakers who went to the MACC headquarters in Putrajaya to express support yesterday.

Mohd Shukri was named in certain blogs as those conspiring to topple Najib alongside other high-profile individuals such as Bank Negara Governor Zeti Akthar Aziz.

Malaysia-The New Attorney-General

July 29, 2015

COMMENT: The appearance can be misleading. Malaysia’s newly minted Attorney-General, Mohamad Apandi Ali, 65, looks like someone belonging in the same class as  Chief Secretary Hamsa Ali and Treasury Secretary Siregar–men of mixed parentage.

Malays of mixed parentage  seem to be Najib’s favorite people forDin Merican and wife, kam senior posts in his government. Another  Malay who bears my family name, Reezal Merican, is now Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs.  I suspect that this is because Malays of mixed parentage going back to Nor Mohamed Yackop and the late Governor Ali Abul Hassan of Bank Negara Malaysia during the days of the Mahathir Administration are apparently boss pleasers, and can be trusted to do their duty to the Prime Minister, our King and country (in that order) without fear or favour.

Of course, one’s parentage or ethnicity should have no bearing on any appointment be it in public service or in the business world. But in practice public service appointments are political decisions made by the Prime Minister, not strictly on merit.

Mohamad Apandi Ali, 65,In appointing a former UMNO man as Malaysia’s top legal man with powers under Article 145 of our Constitution, our Prime Minister is creating a dangerous precedent  and so is he in the case of the sacking of Gani Patail.

For all my criticisms of the former Attorney-General, I think Gani Patail’s unceremonious sacking violates the Article 145 (6). This hurried decision makes me suspect  that he may be on to “something big” with regard to the 1MDB scandal that could affect Prime Minister Najib’s political future.

Even the recent Cabinet changes reflect Najib’s quest for political survival and as such, it is a strategic move to have all his 1MDB bases covered. Loyalty is the criterion. So, there is nothing to be excited about the latest Cabinet reshuffle . “Nothing is more important than the needs of Malaysia and the people – I will always put their interests above all others,”says Prime Minister Najib Razak. Trust him? Given his track record since taking over from Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in 2009, that statement is trite and hollow. Even the Marines (with due respects to the USMC) will not buy it.

It may be worthwhile to remind ourselves of Article 145 of the Federal Constitution which makes the Attorney-General  a powerful principal legal adviser to the Government.

Article 145 of the Federal Constitution provides:

(1) The Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall, on the advice of the Prime Minister, appoint a person who is qualified to be a judge of the Federal Court to be the Attorney-General for the Federation.

(2) It shall be the duty of the Attorney-General to advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or the Cabinet or any Minister upon such legal matters, and to perform such other duties of a legal character, as may from time to time be referred or assigned to him by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or the Cabinet, and to discharge the functions conferred on him by or under this Constitution or any other written law.

3) The Attorney-General shall have power, exercisable at his discretion, to institute, conduct or discontinue any proceedings for an offence, other than proceedings before a Syariah court, a native court or a court-martial.

3A) Federal law may confer on the Attorney-General power to determine the courts in which or the venue at which any proceedings which he has power under Clause (3) to institute shall be instituted or to which such proceedings shall be transferred.

(4) In the performance of his duties the Attorney-General shall have the right of audience in , and shall take precedence over any other person appearing before, any court or tribunal in the Federation.

(5) Subject to Clause (6), the Attorney-General shall hold office during the pleasure of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and may at any time resign his office and, unless he is a member of the Cabinet, shall receive such remuneration as the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may determine.

6) The person holding the office of Attorney-General immediately prior to the coming into operation of this Article shall continue to hold the office on terms and conditions not less favourable than those applicable to him immediately before such coming into operation and shall not be removed from office except on the like grounds and in the like manner as a judge of the Federal Court.

The new Attorney-General has awesome power and and with it, the heavy responsibility to uphold the Rule of Law, not Rule by a desperate Prime Minister whose only desire is to remain office by all and any means. As for his predecessor, we should ensure that the Najib administration observes the letter and spirit of Article 145(6) of our Constitution. –Din Merican

Anwar Ibrahim: A Lone Voice from Prison delivers a Message of Hope

July 25, 2015

MALAYSIA: A Lone Voice from Prison delivers a Message of Hope

Anwar --The Prisoner

Anwar Ibrahim


With the Najib Administration facing even more pressure now to explain the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal, Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim has seized the opportunity to rally his supporters, saying although tough times are expected ahead for Malaysians, the country’s growing opposition cannot be silenced.

Anwar, who was given the opportunity to pen an Op-Ed for the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the international daily now facing the possibility of lawsuit by Malaysia’s Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, said Malaysia is ready for the change long-trumpeted by the federal opposition, one that he claimed would see a return to the underpinnings of the Federal Constitution.

The PKR de facto leader, now five months into his five-year jail sentence for sodomy, also said a “brighter future” is possible with good governance and the rule of law.

“We believe in the dismantling of Malaysia’s system of race-based privileges that has devolved into nothing more than rent-seeking for the privileged few. We believe that corruption is a slow bleed that robs future generations of the education and business opportunities that will make them prosper,” he wrote in the piece.

Anwar, who was the Deputy Prime Minister from 1993 to 1998, said his decision to stay in the country to face prosecution had not been easy and had put a “tremendous burden” on his family but insisted that he had done so because he believes the country is ready for change.

“Malaysia is ready for change.This is why, rather than flee my country, I chose to stay and continue the fight for peaceful, democratic reform from my prison cell,” he said.

He also said in four decades in public service, this was the first time racial and religious sensitivities have become so inflamed, and at the same time so poorly managed by the country’s political leadership.

He said the “real danger ahead” is that Malaysia could devolve into a failed state after several decades of economic mismanagement, opaque governance and overspending.

“The irresponsible manner in which the current leadership is handling religious issues to curry favor from the extreme right is fueling sectarianism.Increased political repression may drive some to give up on the political system altogether and consider extralegal means to cause change, thus creating a tragic, vicious cycle,” Anwar added.

The only way out of this “mess”, he said, was to uphold the Malaysian Constitution, to ensure better checks and balance in the administration, keep the elections free and fair; and a media that is not afraid to challenge authority.

The Najib government is currently under pressure to explain the 1MDB scandal, following the series of exposes by media outfits claiming to be in possession of documents that show impropriety in the state investor’s allegedly opaque deals.

In its July 2 exposé, WSJ, citing documents from Malaysian investigators currently probing 1MDB’s financials, said a money trail showed that US$700 million (RM2.6 billion) had been funnelled into what is believed to be Najib’s accounts.

Rosli Dahlan Vs Gani Patail and Cohorts

July 22, 2015

COMMENT: I have  been following and writing about  theDin MericanUC plight of my good friends, Dato Ramli  Yusoff and Lawyer Rosli Dahlan over a number of years. I continue to be critical about the MACC Chief Commissioner, and the Attorney-General  and former Inspector-General of Police (IGP) and the present IGP.

My view is that they all have acted with impunity and must face the consequences of their actions against Dato’ Ramli and Lawyer Rosli. It is now in the hands of the presiding Judge to decide and deliver the verdict based on all evidence before him.  I am convinced that justice will prevail in the end. These public officials deserve whatever is due to them for failing to do their duty with due diligence and high sense of responsibility. The Attorney-General can tell the Martians that “All actions thereon were taken against the plaintiff (Rosli) premised on and in accordance with the law”. –Din Merican

Attorney-General Gani Patail : No Malice in Lawyer Rosli’s prosecution

 by FMT Reporters

Attorney-General Gani Patail claims had ‘reasonable and probable cause’ to pursue criminal action, but observers are unconvinced.

Rosli-DahlanLawyer Rosli Dahlan

Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail and his ten co-defendants have labelled as a “misconception” the facts which senior lawyer Rosli Dahlan set out in his statement of claim which the latter says amounted to abuse of power, malicious prosecution and a conspiracy between Gani, former Inspector-General of Police Musa Hassan, current Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Chief Commissioner Abu Kassim Mohamed and several other Police and MACC officers.

In a joint statement of defence dated July 10 filed in court by the Attorney-General’s Chambers in response to Rosli’s statement of claim, the defendants had claimed that all facts, inferences and implications pleaded by Rosli in his statement of claim could not amount to any cause of action entitling him to bring the lawsuit against them.

“The onus is on the plaintiff to plead clearly a complete cause of action, not merely hurl accusations without basis,” the defence states. “The plaintiff is put to strict proof of each of his allegations.”

The AG and the rest

Gani and his co-defendants also claim that they had “reasonable and probable cause” to pursue criminal action against Rosli as they believed him to be an associate of Ramli. They added that the two notices to Rosli had been validly issued by the MACC under section 32(1)(b) of the Anti-Corruption Act 1997 and that the practising lawyer had failed to comply with the said notices.

“MACC has evidence and proof that show that the plaintiff had a good relationship with Ramli and that he had acted for Ramli in several transactions involving property and companies which Ramli is believed to have owned,” the defence states.

“MACC, therefore, has reasonable cause and evidence to believe that Ramli was involved in corrupt activities and was liable to be investigated under the Anti-Corruption Act 1997.

“All actions thereon were taken against the plaintiff (Rosli) premised on and in accordance with the law,” the defence reads further.

Gani also claims in the defence that the pursuit of Rosli’s prosecution and appeals against the decisions of the courts in respect thereof were entirely matters within his discretion in his capacity as public prosecutor of the federation pursuant to Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution and that the discretion was exercised after giving due consideration to public policy and were based on the outcome of investigations which had been conducted.

“All actions were taken in good faith and without malice,” he pleads.

Other points raised by the defendants in their defence include that the current action was duplicitous given that it was largely similar to a parallel case presently on-going before Justice Su Geok Yiam in another High Court.

The defendants also claim that the plaintiff is time-barred from bringing the action by reason of the provisions of the Public Authorities Protection Act, 1948. Section 2 of the Act provides that all actions must be commenced within thirty-six months of the accrual of the cause of action.

Observers following both this and the parallel case, however, have expressed surprise and reservations as to the contents of the defence put forward.

They note that a large portion of Rosli’s statement of claim narrates facts and findings which have either already been determined by the criminal courts which heard the prosecution’s case against both Ramli and Rosli or which have already been the subject of much of the testimony already adduced in the parallel case.

In particular, they told FMT that in the criminal case against Rosli, Sessions Court judge Abu Bakar Katar had in his decision delivered on December 20, 2010 found that the prosecution in the case before him had failed to disclose that Rosli was Ramli’s associate. He also said that the notices were issued without basis and that the prosecution had failed to prove that Rosli had intentionally neglected to respond to them.

Apart from that, they say that Utusan Malaysia and the Star have already issued admissions and apologies to Rosli, while the New Straits Times and MACC itself have been found liable to him for defamation and were ordered to pay him RM300,000 in damages, both arising from the publication of matters which are at the heart of the case.

They also suggest that Gani and his co-defendants have put up what is largely a ‘bare denial’ defence, i.e. a defence which merely seeks to put Rosli to strict proof of his averments without offering an alternative version of the events which transpired.

In addition to that, the parallel case has already seen former MACC prosecutor Kevin Anthony Morais admit as untrue allegations that Rosli had acted as Ramli’s lawyer in property transactions.

The defence of limitation raised by the defendants also appears likely to fail as the very same arguments have already been canvassed and were rejected by the Court of Appeal, although an application for leave to appeal to the Federal Court on that decision is pending.

Finally and probably most startlingly, the suggestion that the defendants had reasonable and probable cause to pursue Rosli’s criminal prosecution appears to fly in the face of evidence already given in the parallel case, although no decision has been rendered on it as yet.

Under rules of procedure, Rosli is entitled to file a reply to the defence within fourteen days of service. Thereafter, Justice Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera is expected to issue directions at case management which will lead to the matter coming up for trial.

Gani and his fellow defendants had delayed for some eighteen months in the filing of their defence to the case, much to Rosli’s despair and annoyance.

On May 28, High Court Judge Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera instructed Gani and his co-defendants to file their defence within 30 days. It is understood that the deadline was extended upon requests by Cecil Abraham, who acts as lead counsel for Gani and his co-defendants.

Vazeer will preside over the next case management of the case on July 29.