September 15, 2015
COMMENT: It is rather unusual to me that Reuters should highlight Mr. Shanmugaratnam’s influence on the recent resounding victory in the recently concluded General Elections.
As someone who followed this election coverage on Channel News Asia, I get the distinct impression that voters in Singapore gave Mr. Lee Hsien Loong and his team a strong mandate because the PAP had a very outstanding track record of governance over the last 50 years, and because they believe that PAP will be able to guide their country through a period of uncertain and difficult times ahead. One man could not have made such a decisive difference. Even the affable and erudite Mr. Shanmugaratnam will acknowledge it.
The late Mr Lee Kuan Yew (May Almighty God Bless his soul) left a very good system of recruiting talent for the PAP (I read he used the Shell system which identifies people with character and a helicopter view on things). He ensured there was an abundance of brilliant talent (philosopher-king types) to take over from him. Mr. Shanmugaratnam happens to be among them.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is the leader of the current crop of able and competent ministers. By sheer talent, hard work and dogged determination, he is the first among equals (primus inter pares) and has the confidence to hold his own against the best in his Cabinet. That is what it takes to be a successful leader in a merit-based society like Singapore.
These men and women in PAP leader did not burst onto the political scene in Singapore by chance. They were carefully selected, nurtured, mentored, tested in practical politics and governance and evaluated over a period of time before they are placed in positions of high responsibility in government. That is what happens in a culture founded on meritocracy where integrity, honesty and competence matter.–Din Merican
PAP’s rising star–Tharman Shanmugaratnam
Singapore’s ruling party is celebrating a resounding re-election victory, thanks partly to its economic Tsar, an ethnic Tamil politician whose voter appeal poses an awkward question for its leaders: can a non-Chinese ever become Prime Minister?
As the People’s Action Party (PAP) settles down to another five years in power, the guessing game of who will succeed Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has begun – and the name of keeps coming up.
The odds of Shanmugaratnam, who is Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, making it to the top job should be long. All three of Singapore’s Prime Ministers to date have been of Chinese origin and, in a country where three-quarters of the residents are ethnic Chinese, it would be hard to break that tradition. Just one in 10 Singaporeans can, like Shanmugaratnam, trace their roots back to South Asia.
PAP officials declined to comment on the question of who will come after Lee, 63, who has hinted that he may step down by 2020, because it is a sensitive subject in a party that is in any case instinctively secretive.
Lee has said that the chances of a non-Chinese becoming Prime minister are better for the new generation of leaders but a lack of Mandarin, widely spoken here, could be a problem.
For some Singaporeans, though, the idea is as outlandish as a non-Malay Prime Minister in Malaysia or an Indonesian from outside the political heartland of Java becoming President.
In a book published two years before his death this year, Lee Kuan Yew, Lee’s father and the deeply respected first Prime Minister of this tropical city-state, listed four ethnic Chinese men as the new generation of up-and-coming leaders.
Still, Shanmugaratnam’s hustings performance in the run-up to last week’s election was so impressive that even an opposition candidate, Paul Tambyah of the Singapore Democratic Party, openly longed for him to lead a grand coalition of parties.
“People would like to see Tharman around to set the tone for a new PAP leadership,” said Catherine Lim, a long-time political commentator and critic of Lee Kuan Yew.
“It’s time now for a completely different one, and the only person whom I can think of to set that tone convincingly and who can appeal to Singaporeans across ethnic groups would be Mr Tharman,” she said.
Shanmugaratnam, 58, said in July he was not keen on the Prime inister’s job, though he expected Singapore to have a leader from one of its minority ethnic groups at some point. He was not available to comment for this article.
A transitional Prime Minister?
The PAP won almost 70 percent of the popular vote in the election, a stunning recovery from its record low of 60.1 percent in 2011. In his own district, Shanmugaratnam led a handful of lawmakers to a win with about 80 percent of the vote.
Analysts say that rebound was helped by a wave of patriotism after the death of Lee Kuan Yew and independent Singapore’s 50th birthday celebrations, but also by a slight shift from unbridled capitalism to Western welfarism that was led by Shanmugaratnam.
In his campaign speeches, Shanmugaratnam pressed the right buttons for an electorate that has in recent years begun to question the hard-nosed growth-at-all-costs policies of the PAP that left many marginalized and struggling to make ends meet.
In a calm baritone and with his trademark avuncular style, he crunched numbers to show how social welfare is working.He also explained changes the PAP has embraced after 50 years of unbroken rule, but conceded still more were needed.
“It used to be a top-down government, often quite heavy-handed,” he told one rally. “It’s no longer that way … Strong leadership is listening, engaging, moving with people.”
Shanmugaratnam spoke some Mandarin on the campaign, and when he quoted from an ancient Chinese poem at one rally the crowd exploded with cheers.
He was educated at the London School of Economics, Cambridge and Harvard, and spent most of his career at the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the island state’s central bank and financial regulator.
He got into a legal tangle in the 1990s when he was fined for failing to protect the secrecy of official information after economic data was published in a newspaper ahead of its release. Shanmugaratnam had pleaded not guilty.
He is also well known on international circuits: a darling of international investors, he was appointed chairman of the International Monetary Fund’s policy steering committee in 2011.
Eugene Tan, a law professor at Singapore Management University and a political commentator, said one obstacle for Shanmugaratnam is that he is seen as part of the Prime Minister’s generation, when perhaps ideally a new generation would be coming forward.
“However, if it is assessed that a transitional prime minister is needed while the fourth generation is ready to take over, then … Tharman is well-positioned to step up,” Tan said.