January , 2017
Populism ‘not inevitable’:
January , 2017
September 19, 2016
I admire and respect Singapore’s Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam for his intellect, eloquence and leadership. He is a living example of what a meritocratic society can produce, irrespective one’s race, colour, religion and political bent. It is a culture of integrity and competence that makes Singapore what it is today. Malaysia pales by comparison.
DPM Tharman’s official resume (below) is impressive.–Din Merican
The Deputy Prime Minister of Singapore
DPM Tharman has served as Deputy Prime Minister in the Singapore Cabinet since May 2011. He was also appointed Coordinating Minister for Economic and Social Policies on 1 Octöber 2015. He is in addition Chairman of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), Singapore’s central bank and financial regulator.
He has spent his career in public service, in roles mainly around economic policy and education. He served as Minister for Finance for eight years, over 2007- 2015. He was Minister for Education for five years, over 2003-2008. He spent much of his earlier professional life at the MAS, where he was the Managing Director before entering politics in 2001.
Among his current responsibilities, he leads the Skills Future initiative, which seeks to build the skills of the future among Singaporeans, and empower them to learn at every stage of life.
He was appointed by his international peers as Chairman of the International Monetary and Financial Committee (IMFC), the key policy forum of the IMF, for an extended period of four years from 2011, and was its first Asian chair. He is also a member of the Group of Thirty, an independent global council of leading economic and financial policy-makers and academics.
He chairs the International Academic Advisory Panel that advises the Government on strategies for the university sector. In addition, he chairs the International Advisory Council of the Singapore Economic Development Board.
Besides his responsibilities in Government, he chairs the Board of Trustees of the Singapore Indian Development Association (SINDA), which seeks to uplift educational performance and aspirations in the Indian Singaporean community. He also chairs the Ong Teng Cheong Labour Leadership Institute.
He was first elected as a Member of Parliament in 2001 in Jurong GRC, and has been reelected three times since. He was elected to the Central Executive Committee of the People’s Action Party in 2002, and was appointed 2nd Assistant Secretary-General in 2011.
He did his schooling in Singapore, before studying at the London School of Economics and Cambridge University for undergraduate and masters degrees in Economics. He later obtained a masters in Public Administration at Harvard University, where he was named a Lucius N Littauer Fellow.
He is an Honorary Fellow of the London School of Economics. He was also made the fifth Honorary Fellow of the Economic Society of Singapore, in 2010.
Married to Jane Yumiko Ittogi, a lawyer by background and now actively engaged in community work and the non-profit arts sector. They have a daughter and three sons.
Copyright @ The Government of Singapore. All rights reserved.
September 10, 2016
by Mergawati Zulfakar
Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte in Laos–with a strong message for change in ASEAN
ONE is the new kid on the block in the international arena while the other is making an exit.
Their appearance at the 28th and 29th ASEAN Summit and Related Summits in Vientiane this week did not fail to excite the media. Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, who made his maiden appearance, hit the headlines for the wrong or right reason depending on how you look at it.
US President Barack Obama, a regular attendee at these summits, made his swan song but not before talking tough on the South China Sea issue.
All the drama this week in Vientiane seemed to be generated from one source, to the extent that even host Laos had to take a backseat while other ASEAN leaders, including first-timer Myanmar’s Aung Sang Suu Kyi, happily stayed out of the spotlight.
Chinese officials and their premier, always being hunted by the media for a line or two on the South China Sea territorial and maritime disputes, must have been quite relieved that the attention was elsewhere.
The headlines surrounding Duterte’s rants and his absence from several meetings at the summit have overshadowed the positive outcome on other issues. For one, ASEAN leaders were able to get their eight dialogue partners to issue a declaration on migrants and human trafficking.
he East Asia Summit (EAS) declaration is in support of the ASEAN Convention Against Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (Actip) signed during last year’s ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur.
Actip’s objectives, among others, are to effectively prevent and combat human trafficking, especially women and children, and to protect and assist human-trafficking victims with full respect for their human rights.
The EAS declaration precedes the UN General Assembly’s summit on Sept 19 to address these problems. EAS also decided to issue a strongly worded statement expressing grave concern over the missile tests conducted by North Korea.
The statement, among others, urged North Korea to abandon its nuclear tests and ballistic missile programmes, and condemned its nuclear tests conducted early this year.
An ASEAN official noted that although the previous EAS had issued a similar statement, the language used this time was stronger and an achievement considering that China, an ally of North Korea, agreed to the language.
As the statement was issued on Thursday, the US Geological Survey (USGS) reported a 5.3-magnitude earthquake close to North Korea’s nuclear test site yesterday. USGS said the shallow depth and precise timing of the quake suggests it was man-made.
North Korea has threatened to hold another test as it presses ahead with its nuclear weapons programme in defiance of international sanctions.
On the South China Sea issue, some ASEAN officials agreed that Beijing had a big role in making sure the issue was not played up at a summit hosted by Laos, which is pro-Beijing.
Although the leaders after their ASEAN-China summit issued two statements – one to commemorate the 25th anniversary as a dialogue partner and the other, the usual ASEAN-China statement – there was no mention at all of the international arbitral ruling that sided with Manila, stating that China has no claims in the South China Sea.
An official felt that Duterte was probably “conciliatory” in how Manila should treat China. “The Philippines already won the ruling. The important thing is how to manage relations with a big power like China,” the diplomat added.
Obama’s Parting shot to Malaysia’s First Couple?
Obama’s parting shot at the summit was that the ruling against China “was binding” and “helped to clarify maritime rights in the region”.
There will be more interesting times ahead as far as the South China Sea issue is concerned. ASEAN and China have agreed to come up with a framework for a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea by the middle of next year, which lays out how the claimant countries – Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam, China and Taiwan – should behave.
Laos has passed the ASEAN chair to the Philippines for the next year. Just like the previous ASEAN chair, Manila’s theme for next year is “Partnering for change, engaging the world”, which Duterte said reflected the Philippines’ resolve to consolidate ASEAN to enable it to take its rightful place in the international community.
“We will pursue initiatives and enhance cooperation with global partners to ensure that ASEAN citizens live in peace, stability, security and growth, all the while retaining ASEAN’s centrality, unity and solidarity, which we will maintain for all time,” he said in his acceptance speech.
Yes, ASEAN unity lately has been tested and as Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said (as if his views mattered–Din Merican), it is important for ASEAN to stay together for the grouping to be respected as a credible community.
August 24, 2016
by Wan Wei
I’m proud of my Prime Minister! And how many citizens of the world can say that of their Prime Minister?–Wan Wei
Wow, I was watching the live streaming of the National Day Rally 2016 from Helsinki, and my heart skipped a beat at this moment, when our Prime Minister basically paused awkwardly and felt ill.
Loong created by SE Wong
So today I just want to write a brief note about why Lee Hsien Loong (LHL), the Prime Minister of Singapore, is so respected in and outside of his own country.
Tonight GBA’s event is testimony of that– he could have chosen not to continue the speech. But knowing that this event would probably appear on the global press the next day (well, it IS a big deal that Singapore’s prime minister sort of “collapsed” briefly during its own National Day Rally), he had to and wanted to finish the speech.
The position of Prime Minister of Singapore–in spite of its perceived huge pay cheque– is hardly enviable. For one, Prime Minister LHL probably has to worry about the issues of this small country all the time– will we survive another 50 years? Will we be the next targets of terrorism? etc. It doesn’t take much for Singapore to suddenly perish as a country–after all, small cities have risen and vanished in the past.
Then anti-government folks always complain about lack of freedom of expression, lack of support for local arts/sports/entrepreneurship, lack of human rights in Singapore. Oh yes, and huge income gap of course. Then it is always the Prime Minister’s fault and of course the 69.9% (including me since I vote for PAP) who are blamed.
I don’t think the “Singapore system” will ever change in the next 20 years, but apparently for most Singaporeans, it works fine. And to head this system as Prime Minister with no doubt, with compassion and with the utmost mental strength is absolutely admirable.
June 21, 2016
by Sahabat Seperjuangan
“The influence of Dr Mahathir Mohamad has waned among the Malays. The older generation still remember him as a leader who, while making Malaysia prominent by fast-tracked materialistic development, indulged in dismantling the checks and balances which he saw as a hindrance to his autocracy. They are not prepared to have him and his ilk again. It remains to be seen whether the Citizens’ Declaration will survive this setback, and whether the motley crew of Opposition politicians, NGOs and NGIs with thinly-veiled political ambitions will continue to forlornly prop him up.–Sahabat Seperjuangan
Once in a while, an event occurs that leaves a profound effect on the political scene. While some rush to label such events with less compassionate terms like divine intervention, others simply prefer to call it neutral serendipity.”–
Now that the by-elections have come and gone in Sungai Besar and Kuala Kangsar, what are the lessons that can inform the future course of the political parties involved in the fight?
1. The support base of PAS is still intact. Efforts by Parti Amanah Negara (Amanah) have failed to make inroads into the rural strongholds of the Islamist party. The liberals in Amanah can garner some support from the chattering classes in the towns but they have not found fertile ground among country folk accustomed to finding solace in a more spiritual outlook to tide them over hard times.
2. PAS, alone as a political party, contributes as many votes as the other three political parties grouped together in Pakatan Harapan. If DAP is counting on Malay support from PKR and Amanah to boost its chances for federal power, it has got to have a serious re-look. Whoever underestimates the hardy “jentera” of the committed Islamists, and the ideology which makes them tick, is making a serious mistake.
3. The semi-rural Chinese in these communities can swing their votes just like their brethren in the urban enclaves. We have seen many examples of this before. What bothers them is their livelihood more than all the political intrigues and all the national issues which the less deprived middle classes are so fond of. Whoever can put food on their tables looms large in their thoughts when they mark the ballot.
4. What were the other factors which made those Chinese swing? Disillusionment with the endless squabbles among the politicians in the Opposition (and government in the case of Selangor)? Or simply a dawning realisation that they’ve been had, that politicians who gained power in their name have pulled a fast one on them by using political office to acquire material assets, leaving them to look foolish and still neglected.
5. PAS has failed to gain Chinese support. While its call for hudud is definitely able to rally the party faithful to withstand the onslaught of a DAP-backed Amanah to break their ranks, the same issue still spooks the Chinese. They still see it as a frightful threat of harsh punishment being visited upon them, and not an issue which boils down in the end to letting a part of a diverse nation exercise its democratic right to practise a religion the true way as the followers see it, without infringing on the rights of the other parts of the nation who do not believe in the same religion.
6. The influence of Dr Mahathir Mohamad has waned among the Malays. The older generation still remember him as a leader who, while making Malaysia prominent by fast-tracked materialistic development, indulged in dismantling the checks and balances which he saw as a hindrance to his autocracy. They are not prepared to have him and his ilk again. It remains to be seen whether the Citizens’ Declaration will survive this setback, and whether the motley crew of Opposition politicians, NGOs and NGIs with thinly-veiled political ambitions will continue to forlornly prop him up.
Sahabat Seperjuangan is a non-Muslim grassroots activist in a Muslim political party.
May 1, 2016
Earlier today I posted this April 21, 2015 Lecture
by the 42nd President of the United States, President William Jefferson Clinton, to guests, faculty and students at Georgetown University, Washington DC–where he attended the Walsh School of Foreign Service in 1968 before going to Oxford and Yale– on Facebook of The Techo Sen School of Government and International Relations, The University of Cambodia, Phnom Penh for the benefit of my colleagues and Masters and Doctoral students.
In his Lecture, President Bill Clinton spoke about inclusive politics and inclusive economics and the purpose of public service, citing many examples of leaders in politics, business and civil society when he was in the White House. I hope my fellow Malaysians in Kuala Lumpur and other parts of our country, my associates and friends and readers who support my blog can get the drift of Bill Clinton’s message and reflect on his thoughts about the true purpose of public service.
I am sure our Prime Minister has own purpose to be in public service. But you can bet that Najib’s purpose is not something the 42nd President of the United States has in mind.–Din Merican