Book Review: Chinese Politics in the Era of Xi Jinping


May 21, 2015

Phnom Penh

BOOK Review

Book Review: Chinese Politics in the Era of Xi Jinping

by John Berthelsen

http://www.asiasentinel.com/book-review/book-review-china-politics-era-xi-jinping/

Renaissance, reform or retrogression?  By Willy Wo Lap Lam. Routledge, 323 pp, softcover, available in local bookstores

China by JBIt often appears there are two Chinas – one fast-rising, showing an aggressive face to the world, building an infrastructure empire, a network of Silk Roads that stretches from Pakistan’s Gwadar Port to the corners of Southeast Asia, dominating the South China Sea, pillaging resources from as far away as Africa, with all roads leading to Beijing much as they led to Rome in the Roman Imperium.

There is a second China, however, that is in a welter of ferment.  It is this China that preoccupies Willy Wo Lap Lam, a widely recognized authority on China, who has formerly held senior editorial positions with the South China Morning Post, CNN and Asiaweek and is now an academic. From the very introduction of this book onward, it is clear that he is a pessimist on China and is not a fan of Xi Jinping, who has battled his way to the top.

“While China is on course to overtake the United States as the world’s biggest economy soon,” he writes, “Chinese who do not belong to the ‘red aristocracy’ – a reference to the unholy allowance between top cadres and their offspring, on the one hand, and big business groups, on the other, see no cause for optimism.” 

Certainly Xi represents a dramatic change from his predecessor Hu Jintao, who with Premier Wen Jiabao presided over historic economic change while the party stultified and fell into a stew of venality. But although Xi has kicked off the biggest anti-corruption campaign since the advent of Communist government, with as many as 200,000 people arrested or otherwise disciplined, it is still unclear whether the cleanup masks a surgical expedition to clear out Xi’s enemies and potential rivals.  The  biggest to fall is famously Zhou Yongkang, “Uncle Kang,” the former head of China’s security apparatus and an ally of Bo Xilai, the now-imprisoned boss of Chongqing and a major opponent.  Zhou is the highest public official ever to be prosecuted. But Xi has also cleared out the entire top of the country’s oil and gas sector – where Zhou’s son was a top official.

Lam’s 323-page analysis of Xi’s rise to power is deeply detailed and essential reading for anybody who is interested in the China that lurks behind the confident consolidation of government that has gone on since he became the head of the government in November 2012.  In particular,  of interest is the reversal of philosophy from that put in place by Deng Xiaoping, who in the wake of the terrors and capricious actions that characterized Mao Zedong’s later years, created a collegial and collective leadership. 

Xi is clearly having none of that. He has sidelined or pushed aside most of his rivals. The first to go was Li Keqiang, the prime minister put in power as his Sancho Panza, who quickly learned that he was a distant number two. Li rose through the ranks in the Communist Youth League and was an ally of Hu Jintao, the former leader. Hu was unceremoniously dumped by Xi in the 2013 party conference that brought Xi to power, unable to retain any of his former titles including those connected to the military. Although Li is a trained economist and touted “Likonomics” at the outset of his premiership, Xi is clearly in charge of economics, along with everything else.

“…Compared to both ex-presidents Jiang Zemin and Hu, the leader of one-fifth of mankind is a relatively simple person committed to defending what he regards as self-evident truths,” Lam writes. Including those is a notion that “the nature of the Party will never change.”  There has been no  thought of democratization and no letup on the war on intellectuals, the press and those who do not believe in communist orthodoxy. “Any idea that the party will undergo ‘peaceful evolution’ is out of the question.”

The Internet, perhaps the most opportunistic venue for subversion, is being tightened even further. Since Lam’s book has come out, the “great cannon” has been added to the “great firewall” as a new tool for censorship, pouring massive sprays of traffic against enemies in an attack called “distributed denial of service or DDOS target two anti-censorship sites in the US and closing them for days.

David Shambaugh, for decades one of China’s most optimistic backers in the west, shocked the world of sinologists by saying the China system was inevitably doomed.  Is Lam that pessimistic?

“Even more than factors such as shifts in China’s foreign and defense policies,” Lam writes, “the most important determinant of the trajectory of China’s development in the twenty-first century will be domestic questions. Foremost is whether China will pick a development path that favors the construction of a real market economy and a just and passionate society that embraces values such as the rule of law and equal opportunity.”

The next decade of China’s development under Xi probably isn’t going to meet those goals. Lam quotes Xi as saying the country could be undermined by “subversive mistakes.” What he meant, Lam says, “are economic, social or political policies that would compromise the monopoly on power that is enjoyed by the CCP – or more specifically, the party’s ruling elite, also known as the “red aristocracy.”  That is not a cause for optimism.

One thought on “Book Review: Chinese Politics in the Era of Xi Jinping

  1. “Chinese Politics in the Era of Xi Jinping”

    Dato’,

    A very interesting insight on Xi Jinping.

    Just to share this…

    “…What has also become increasingly common, Lam writes, is what the Chinese call “drinking wolf’s milk”, namely absorbing the ferociously nationalistic views of leaders such as Xi, and especially their “extreme nationalism and [efforts] to render class struggle absolute and one-sided”. This has led to threats to neighbouring countries, sweeping maritime claims and an insistence on a global status commensurate with China’s comprehensive strength…”

    http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/books/chinese-politics-in-the-era-of-xi-jinping-by-willy-wo-lap-lam/2019460.article

    “Dr. Willy Wo-Lap Lam is a Senior Fellow at The Jamestown Foundation. He is an Adjunct Professor at the Center for China Studies, the History Department and the Program of Master’s in Global Political Economy at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. He is the author of five books on China, including “Chinese Politics in the Hu Jintao Era: New Leaders, New Challenges.”

    http://www.jamestown.org/details/?tx_bzdstaffdirectory_pi1%5BshowUid%5D=29&tx_bzdstaffdirectory_pi1%5BbackPid%5D=60&no_cache=1

    “The Jamestown Foundation was founded in 1984 after Arkady Shevchenko, the highest-ranking Soviet official ever to defect when he left his position as Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations, defected in 1978.

    William Geimer, an American lawyer, had been working closely with Shevchenko, and established the foundation as a vehicle to promote the writings of the former Soviet diplomat and those of Ion Pacepa, a former top Romanian intelligence officer; with the help of the foundation, both defectors published bestselling books.[2]

    The CIA Director William J. Casey helped back the formation of The Jamestown Foundation, agreeing with its complaints that the U.S. intelligence community did not provide sufficient funding of Soviet bloc defectors.[3][4] The foundation, initially also dedicated to supporting Soviet dissidents, enabled the defectors from the Eastern Bloc to earn extra money by lecturing and writing.[5]

    According to its website: “The mission of the Jamestown Foundation is to inform and educate policy makers and the broader policy community about events and trends in those societies which are strategically or tactically important to the United States and which frequently restrict access to such information.

    Utilizing indigenous and primary sources, Jamestown’s material is delivered without political bias, filter or agenda. It is often the only source of information which should be, but is not always, available through official or intelligence channels, especially in regard to Eurasia and terrorism.

    “The Foundation describes its “unique ability to elicit information” from those who have first-hand experience with the regimes and groups that threaten U.S. national security”.[2][6] It claims to have “contributed directly to the spread of democracy and personal freedom in the former Communist Bloc countries.”

    Board of directors – In the past, Jamestown’s board of directors has included Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Advisor to U.S. President Jimmy Carter.[7] Jamestown’s current board includes “Brookings Institution” Senior Fellow Bruce Riedel, who has served in the Bill Clinton White House and in 2009 was tasked by President Barack Obama to overhaul U.S. policy on Afghanistan and Pakistan.[8]

    As of 2010, the foundation’s current board includes General Michael V. Hayden, Bruce Riedel, Carlton W. Fulford Jr., Kathleen Troia McFarland, Bruce Hoffman, James H. Burnley IV and Frank Keating,[9] while the Jamestown’s fellows included David Satter, Michael Scheuer (let go in 2009, he claims he was fired because of his criticism of the U.S.- Israeli relations),[10] Vladimir Socor,[11]

    Willy Wo-Lap Lam, a Hong Kong-based China specialist, and Stephen Ulph,[12] a leading expert on Jihadist ideology.”

    “…The Jamestown Foundation has been criticized by the Institute for Policy Studies for advancing a conservative agenda.[3]

    In 2007 Russian government accused the research institute of spreading anti-Russian propaganda by hosting a debate on violence in the Russia’s turbulent region of Ingushetia. According to a statement by the Foreign Ministry of Russia: “Organisers again and again resorted to deliberately spreading slander about the situation in Chechnya and other republics of the Russian North Caucasus using the services of supporters of terrorists and pseudo-experts. Speakers were given carte blanche to spread extremist propaganda, incite ethnic and inter-religious discord.”[24]…”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jamestown_Foundation

    Tavistock – Brooking’s Institute – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZG0b02zCdg

    “During the Cold War, China watchers centered in Hong Kong and many of them were American government officials or journalists. Mutual distrust between the United States and China and the prohibition of travel between the countries meant they did not have access to press briefings or interviews.

    Therefore, China watchers adopted techniques from Kremlinology, such as the close parsing of official announcements for hidden meanings, movements of officials reported in newspapers, and analysis of photographs of public appearances.

    One analyst for the American Central Intelligence Agency explained it was “no semantic accident that observers of the Chinese political scene are more often called ‘China-watchers’ than ‘Sinologists,’ while analysts of the Soviet Union are frequently referred to as ‘Kremlinologists.’

    She went on, the “art of China-watching is imprecise at best, and hardly deserves yet to be called Sinology.”[2] Those sympathetic to the Chinese Revolution[disambiguation needed] sometimes criticised the China watchers for their Cold War views.[3]

    In the years since the opening of China, China watchers can live in China and take advantage of normal sources of information. Others remained in Hong Kong, however.

    The Hong Kong journalist Willy Wo-Lap Lam has been called the “quintessential China watcher, practiced in the art of Pekingology,” whose “scope is wide, but the focus of his analysis is the Zhongnanhai and factional manoeuvring among the political elite.”[4] Ethan Gutmann’s writing on China is widely published.[5][6]…”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_watcher

    You be the judge.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.