UMNO-BN Bribing P-36 Voters won’t work


http://www.malaysiakini.com

Will the KT electorate vote for change?

Kim Quek | January 13, 2009
In the most daring act to ‘bribe’ the electorate of Kuala Terengganu (KT) to date, Deputy Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak dished out 583 government contracts in a “lucky draw” fashion to each and every Class F contractor present at the Wisma Darul Iman in Kuala Terengganu on Jan 10, the fifth day of the KT by-election campaign.

MCPX

These contracts (valued between RM30,000 to RM200,000 each), which were claimed to be for infrastructure works in the local township, were distributed in random by having the contractors come on stage to click on the computer.

najib and kuala terengganu by electionAnd upon pressing the button, a contract would be awarded to the contractor, details of which – nature of works and contract price – would instantly appear in a big screen in the hall. Thus the contractor would walk home with his “prize” (a contract with a pre-determined price), with no question asked on his track record or suitability for the works assigned.

Najib, who launched these innovative awards, proudly claimed this as “a world record”, saying that: “In this lucky draw, everyone wins. Everyone gets a contract.”

He further added that if Barisan Nasional wins in the coming Kuala Terengganu by-election, there would be more and bigger such contracts, so that the Class F contractors (confined to Malays, for small contracts) would “continue to make money and the country’s economy would continue to grow”.

kt by election 070109 yes we can billboardWhile Najib may be entitled to claim he has scored “the world’s first” for having satisfied every one of the hundreds of contractors present, few can share his pride over such bizarre method of disposing government infrastructure projects.

For a start, contracts for infrastructure works are usually awarded gradually over a period of time, as and when the needs for such works arise, as determined and initiated by the engineers and the local authorities.

These contracts are never awarded in a torrent of hundreds within a single day anywhere in the world. Granted that this may be part of the stimulus package announced earlier to counter current economic hardship, there is no possible justification to cram such a staggering number of projects in one go, especially when these are confined to a small township like Kuala Terengganu.

Needless to say, massive wastages and redundancies will be the inevitable consequences.

‘Irresponsible act of public squandering’

Then, what about the track records and skill compatibility of the contractors with respect to the projects at hand? Without proper interview and scrutiny of the awardees, how can the government be certain that the projects are awarded to the right contractors?

Next, there is the question of price. Without tenders or negotiation, how can the government ensure fair pricing?

In fact, over-generous pricing is expected, or else Najib would not have said: “I see everyone present here is jubilant and clapping his hands, every one has got a government contract, how can they be not grateful to the government and not strongly support Barisan Nasional?” (Sin Chew Daily, Jan 11)

It is clear that this “lucky draw” award of contracts is an irresponsible act of public squandering aimed at inducing voters to support BN.

For this move, BN was promptly condemned by the National Institute of Electoral Integrity as abusing government machinery to dish out financial benefits during election campaign.

Deplorable as the act is, this is but one of an endless series of similar monetary inducement amounting to tens of millions of ringgit in the form of cash payments and allocations handed out by BN in the KT constituency since the run-up to polling which will be held on Jan 17.

Goodies for Chinese community

china town in kuala terengganuIn fact, on the same day (Jan 10) as Najib handed out the “lucky draw” contracts, he also handed out RM8 million to 20 religious schools, which are mainly located in Terengganu state.

Recognising the minority 8,787 Chinese votes (11% of total) as pivotal in this election, the Chinese community has been bombarded almost daily with allocations and cash payments totalling no less than RM 12 million, such as:

(1) RM3.3 million for construction of a new community hall.

(2) RM2.8 million for furbishing a completed hall in a Chinese school.

(3) RM3 million for 10 Chinese schools.

(4) RM2.7 million cash distribution to 9,000 Chinese for the coming Chinese New year (this annual payment was brought forward to reap the goodwill of Chinese electorate for the coming poll), and;

(5) Miscellaneous payments to temples, guilds and other community bodies.

All these financial bonanzas, handed out within the few days since nominations on Jan 5, are clearly intended to induce voters to vote in favour of the BN candidate. It therefore constitute “bribery” as defined in paragraph 10 of the Election Offences Act 1954, for which the culprits are punishable as prescribed in paragraph 11 of the same Act.

Regrettably, the election commission under the new chairman Abdul Aziz Yusof, who vowed to ensure clean and fair election, has remained silent over these BN offences.

Neither has the newly-formed Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), which prides itself as a replica of the famed Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) of Hong Kong, been stirred by such glaring corrupt practices.

Complete mockery of our election

Such monetary assault on the electorate, combined with the daily brainwashing by BN’s propaganda machines, also known as the mainstream media (local newspapers and TV channels), has once again made a complete mockery of our election as a cornerstone of a democratic system of government.

With all the institutions tasked to uphold the rule of law either unwilling or incapable of fulfilling their constitutional roles, it is now left to the 80,000 electorate of Kuala Terengganu to play as guardians to uphold justice and democracy by disciplining the wayward ruling party with a negative vote.

In this connection, it is heartening to take note of how the neighbouring Kelantan state has valiantly fought off similar corrupt assault by UMNO/BN for the past two decades.

Under the corruption-free administration of PAS, the people of Kelantan, who are almost completely Malay Muslims, have proven themselves to be people of high moral fibre.

They have successfully overcome the persistent coercion and temptation presented by the UMNO/BN federal government through abuse of federal authority and improper monetary inducement.

No doubt, their devotion to Islam, which abhors corruption as a grave sin, must have been an important factor that contributes to their moral courage.

Will the Terengganu Muslim constituents, who form 88 percent of the KT electorate, prove to have the same moral strength as their Kelantan brothers by rejecting the decadent values of UMNO/BN?

kuala terengganu by election dap dinner 110109 crowd clappingAnd will the minority Chinese constituents gaze beyond the immediate monetary gains to vote for change – a change that would mean the rejection of a defunct political power and one step closer to turning a new leaf for the nation?

Coming at a time of power transition following the political tsunami of the Mar 8, 2008 elections, the outcome of this KT by-election will have significant impact on the future direction of country’s political development.

It is therefore earnestly hoped that the people of KT will rise to the occasion to make the right choice for the nation.

KIM QUEK is a retired accountant and a member of opposition party PKR.

21 thoughts on “UMNO-BN Bribing P-36 Voters won’t work

  1. “Najib, who launched these innovative awards, proudly claimed this as “a world record”, saying that: “In this lucky draw, everyone wins. Everyone gets a contract.”

    Yep. Soon we’ll be seeing bridges to nowhere and roads to nowhere; and also nowhere to be seen are these contractors. Of course nowhere to be seen is also Najib who would be in an undisclosed location enjoying his loot.

  2. Rosmah and Najib Circus is now performing in Kuala Terengganu.
    Let the circus keeps the show moving.

    Once the music end, the performers will replace animals in their cages. The only question to ask is “when”.

  3. Malaysia Boleh! WIN AND WIN for everyone in KT.

    Class F contractors Lucky Draw 30K to 200K value ? win
    Religious School 8mil win
    KT Orang Cina 12mil win
    BN Wang Ehsan, Petroleum Royalties Billion??? win
    YB Wahid Endut For M.P. Belum tahu
    Everyone win, Everybody happy.
    Now, what about YB Wahid Endut? All KT voters should give him your votes so that he also WIN and everbody will be happy.
    All chinese voters suddenly become very valuable, but remember
    you are only valuable for the election, after that,to umno you all are still pendatang.

  4. the contracts, fundings and what have you, to the people of kuala terengganu, are given back what is rightfully theirs since the first oil royalty. so one can say BN is returning almost, nearly everything but at this opportune time. but they don’t own them their vote.

  5. The BN can waste all their money for all I care. Their pathetic scams will not work !
    If they are targeting the Malays – it won’t work because the majority of Malays are decent,hard working, and religious folks who may be mostly not rich but they have too much” maruah” to be bought.
    If they are targeting the Chinese – the Chinese may accept their offers but they are also smart enough to see through BN’s insincerity. They will just accept the offer and will not be beholden. What they receive is after all a “lottery win” and the “prize” is after all the rakyat’s money,which has stolen from the rakyat in the first place.
    that

  6. Art Harun raised a very strongand valid point ! It is not the charity act that is in question. It is the contributor and his dodgy motives, that is in need of scrutiny and hence, needs to be strongly opposed.

  7. Another thing. It sounds too good to be true ! So simple,just at a click of a computer button and viola, be in for the lucky draw ! That’s how the Devil lures Humans to temptation and ruination !
    And worse still, how do we know that the “declared winners” of the “jackpot” are not all BN cronies !
    That’s how the casinos cheat because all their gambling machines can be programmed . And that’s why electronic voting is frowned upon even in Europe because they know the machines can be manipulated ,by DIRTY politicians !

  8. Quote:”Najib, who launched these innovative awards, proudly claimed this as “a world record”, saying that: “In this lucky draw, everyone wins. Everyone gets a contract.”: End quote

    This begs the question. If everyone wins (meaning everyone gets a contract), why must there be a draw in the first place? What kind of a draw give everyone a win?

    Oxymoron?

  9. It is an outright scam ! Better check to see who all the eventual winners are !
    Again. a strong message to the Chinese voters in KT – prove to the nation that you are the aces and not the jokers of the pack.
    You ask for change now is your chance to make the change – the future of the nation is in your hands.
    You can take their bribes but on polling day make sure you vote for the moon ! 🙂

  10. Art,
    The draw is probably to decide the quantum each contractor receives. I read that it ranges from RM30,000 to RM200,000.

    iT IS SIMPLY A GIVE AWAY AND i DOUBT THAT MUCH WORK WILL BE CARRIED OUT. IT A FREE LOTTERY WITHOUT HAVING TO INVEST.

  11. Art-harun’s comments on election favours and the consequences in the UK are very interesting. But that is the UK.

    The question for Malaysia is, has there been any case law where the losing candidate has alleged the granting of favours, whether in the form of “treating” or bribery or other favours, and taken it up in the courts or have the election authorities done anything themselves? For that matter has the ACA or as it is now known the MACC, especially when this practice of announcing projects and handing of cash to the poor etc in the various constituencies, is common for the BN and still is? Are our special election judges sufficiently independent, mature and learned in lore and common law and as well read as art-harun, likely to take an independent line? There is plenty of precedence in the Uk and other Commonwealth countries but by the time these issues a re tried and tested, several elections would have passed! Unless there is a change in Govt that believes in the rule of law, transparency and the welfare of its people, we can speculate on case laws. Let the voters of KT vote first and let the PR momentum move forward.

  12. There have been allegation of vote buying at individual level in some election petitions before. But it is hard to prove that the candidate knew about it. It is also near impossible to establish the link between the bribery giver and the candidate.

    However, large scale treating or corrupt practices have, as far as I know, not been raised in any election petitions yet. No petitioner has ever argued the incumbent government’s acts as the one reported in this blog as treating or corrupt practices yet. Perhaps, this should be tested in Court soon.

  13. In advanced countries, the main complaint is of people offering bribes to politicians to buy favours, whereas in developing countries, the complaint is about politicians offering bribes to people to buy votes ! 🙂

  14. Honestly, what is there to fret about ? It is not something new,like. They have just up the ante, that’s all. Before the going rate for a vote was RM 300, now it is costing them more. They must be very desperate to win !
    They can be accused of being unethical but it cannot be proved that they have done anything unlawful because they will simply say that they are doing a social good to uplift the well being of the people without expecting any benefit in return ,unless it can be proved that the money or contract offered was an exchange for a vote.
    One way of interpreting the situation is that it can also be an indication of the amount of confidence both the parties have for their candidates, that BN feels that they will lose unless they bribe and that PR feels that they will lose if BN resort to bribery !

  15. “In advanced countries, the main complaint is of people offering bribes to politicians to buy favours, whereas in developing countries, the complaint is about politicians offering bribes to people to buy votes !” Ocha

    It is quite the reverse, really!

    In the United States, they have a term for that, giving it an aura of respect – pork barrel and the poliltics of the pork barrel. It is essentially vote buying by politicians so they would be re-elected. How do you think roads and bridges to nowhere get built??

  16. “In the United States, they have a term for that, giving it an aura of respect – pork barrel and the poliltics of the pork barrel. It is essentially vote buying by politicians so they would be re-elected. How do you think roads and bridges to nowhere get built??” – Mr. Bean.

    “In advanced countries, the MAIN COMPLAINT is of people offering bribes to politicians to buy favours, whereas in developing countries, the complaint is about politicians offering bribes to people to buy votes !” I did not say that vote buying do not exist in developed countries !
    A classic example of “pork barrel” politics ,which for your information is a derogatory term, very rampant during the Tammany Hall era, is the “bridge to nowhere case” that you mentioned.
    In the 2008 U.S. presidential campain, the Gravina Island Bridge (also known as the “Bridge to Nowhere”) was cited as an example of pork barrel spending. The bridge, pushed for by Republican Senator Ted Stevens and Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, was projected to cost $398 million and would connect the island’s 50 residents and the Ketchikan International Airport to the Alaska mainland.[6] Palin, who initially supported the project, later stated she supported a bridge, but not this costly one. 🙂

  17. Encik Din

    Do you know that most of the Class F contractors are UMNO members who are also delegates to the General Assembly. Most of them are only registered contractors without an iota of knowledge in the industry. Guess who will eventually get the job? Some of them I know have more than 1 registered so they get more contracts. What else is new in this country.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.