The Malay Crab Mentality


September 25, 2013

The Malay Crab Mentality

by Mariam Mokhtar@www.malaysiakini.com

What have these states in common – Terengganu, Perak and Kedah? They were once opposition-held states, each with a PAS Menteri  Besar (MB). Selangor which currently has a PKR MB, could soon follow.

The story of these states is one of betrayal, misplaced trust and missed opportunities. Events in these states showed that one person thought he was more important than his party and worst of all, the people who elected him to office.

First, the story of tin, in Perak. Former PM Mahathir Mohamad attempted to corner the tin market on the Dr.MahathirLondon exchange in 1981, and because of one man’s folly, Perak, one of the richest states in Malaysia, became one of its poorest.Billions of ringgits were lost because of Mahathir’s greed, and commerce in Ipoh practically ended. Its people left, some to wash dishes in restaurants around the world. The youth were soon forced to join the exodus.

Second, an assault by frogs. After 1981, Perak trundled on as best as it could, and by 2008, things were looking brighter. In 2009, Perak was hit by another cataclysmic event. As PAS MB Nizar Jamaluddin was about to put the silver shine back into Perak, three frogs did what frogs do best – they jumped – and precipitated the fall of the opposition-led coalition in Perak to UMNO Baru.

The main protagonists ignored the wishes of the people. No Perakian has forgotten or forgiven those responsible for the events of 1981 and 2009. The same fate may soon befall the people of Selangor.

Third. Memali, Kedah. The massacre at Memali in 1985, is a scar on Malaysia’s political scene. It was when Muslims turned against Muslims. Some say it was an uprising of the masses against tyranny. Others believe that the massacre was an act to remove a political threat.

Malaysians were deceived. The authorities said that a charismatic preacher, Ibrahim Libya, was practising a cult-like version of Islam. He and 13 villagers were gunned down by 400 members of the police special forces, armed with assault rifles. Four policemen were killed in the crossfire. The villagers were armed with changkuls and farmers’ tools, trying to protect their leader, who resisted arrest under the Internal Security Act (ISA).

Ibrahim LibyaIbrahim Libya had eroded the influence of UMNO in Kedah. With an election around the corner, the UMNO politicians were worried that they would lose. How convenient that Ibrahim Libya was ‘removed’ and with him, the threat to UMNO!

Last March former Deputy PM Musa Hitam revealed that Mahathir was skulking in Malaysia and had not yet travelled to China. Mahathir and Musa played a role in the slaughter, although both would like us to think the other was responsible.

After Musa’s revelation, one would have thought that PAS would have demanded a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) into the chain of events which led to the brutal killing of many innocent villagers.

One should make a pilgrimage to Memali and see that the village has not benefited from the New Economic Policy (NEP).

Playing the jilted lover

Fourth. Terengganu. Former MB of Terengganu Ahmad Said was on a winning streak when he managed to attract Najib Abdul Razak’s attention by his resignation. For a few days, Ahmad played the jilted lover, until he was wooed, in ways that we cannot mention, without attracting a charge of ‘sedition’.

During his term, Ahmad Said had arranged for an all expenses trip for himself and his extensive entourage to Antarctica. Is Ahmad a closet scientist, or an opportunist? How did the people of Terengganu benefit from that trip?

Fifth: Confusion. In PAS President Hadi Awang’s final speech at PAS muktamar on September 20, 2014, HadiHadi3 publicly humiliated and insulted the two PAS assemblypersons, Saari Sungib and Hasbullah Ridzwan, who supported Wan Azizah Wan Ismail for MB. He called them “barua” and alleged that they had been “bought over” by his Pakatan partners.

In one fell swoop, Hadi inflicted maximum damage on PAS, himself and his coalition partners. Hadi’s outburst against the PAS assemblypersons and his condemnation of Wan Azizah’s candidacy as MB of Selangor is a lesson for all.

With friends like Hadi, who wash their soiled linen in public, there is little need for saboteurs from UMNO Baru to cause the break-up of PAS and Pakatan.

Sixth. The party constitution, Selangor. On Sept 6, 2014, Hadi claimed, that as party president, he had the prerogative to submit the names of three candidates for the post of Selangor menteri besar.  He said, “In PAS, we have always operated according to the constitution.”

Why bother with a central committee?

Seventh. The Malaysian constitution. On September 14, 2014, Hadi claimed that PAS had delivered three names to the sultan of Selangor. Hadi had reportedly said, “The right to pick the next Mentri Besar is not mine but Tuanku Sultan” (sic).

Hadi has, throughout this imbroglio, acted like someone who is willing to act against his party and the people.  Hadi is not content with destroying his party and his reputation. Like a coward, he has hit the ball into the sultan’s court, presumably so that he can be absolved of any blame.

Malaysians will wonder if we really have a constitutional monarchy. Which is the greater threat? UMNO Baru’s version of democracy, with its accompanying injustices, corruption and cronyism, or PAS’s ideology of political Islam?

9 thoughts on “The Malay Crab Mentality

  1. I am sure that this “crab mentality” is not a peculiarly Malay cultural trait. Machiavelli devoted an entire book titled The Prince on the subject and how we should deal with it. Shakespeare’s tragedies (e.g. Julius Caesar, King Lear, Hamlet, Macbeth, Othello to name a few) and historical plays dealt with the failings and toxic qualities of man too. –Din Merican

  2. As pointed out, change of these things almost always by “fortune” or by “criminal virtue”. Truth is Malays have already been too lucky, the opportunties for such change wasted away by arrogance and weak-will. So its why “criminal virtue” is the only real probability of change of these things. Its why Anwar flaws make sense for reform, its why Khalid virtues does not and flaws unacceptable. But Anwar is likely to have already wasted the opportunity and its why if Azmin abuses Selangor, even if its for his own ambition of PMship, it may be the least worst of bad choices. The real misfortune is that they all fail…

  3. The Malay/Muslim ‘ leaders ‘ have failed to address the issue of Islam-facism when it strongly emerge within the Muslim community in the 70s. Instead they took full advantage of it for politics of race and religion….this create damaging divisions in society till today.

    It is little wonder most Malay/Muslim yound men feel angry, frustrated and confused as they are constantly being told what they can and cannot do by their self serving career politicians and numerous religious authority…in particular in their relationship with Non Muslims.

    That they are easily swayed by the dramatic propaganda spewed out by their ‘ leaders’ is a great concern and indicates the ‘values’ being thought in schools, mosques and within their homes are not compatible to a modern and progressive multi racial and religious society.

  4. This “crab mentality” is also found in the Chinese, Indian and other society. There is a German term for something quite similar – Schadenfreude.

  5. Yeah, the malaise affects all races not the Malays alone. We call it PHD – “Penghianat, Hasat dan Dengki”. It’s about not wanting to see your own race succeed. Or more exact, not wishing to see your siblings and friends better off than you.

    The trait is so evident in the great Kerala cloth merchant. No one should be better than him.

  6. the crab mentality of a malay is that a muslim must belong to a so called religion of islam. That is the greatest mistake a man can make. A person’s faith and belief in God is between himself and God. It can be of any faith. Religions can be very divisive, morally damaging, conflicting, disharmonious, racial hatreds, culturally damaing …. that will lead to the end of civilisations beacause of religions. So why have religions. I do not have a religion if I believe in God. So it is between me and God. So if we do away and abolish with religions, it will do away with fanaticism, extremism, terrorism, wars and conflicts as it is the root causes of all evils!

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.