Overzealous JAWI: Drop your case against Nik Raina


July 26, 2012

To Overzealous JAWI: Be Sensible and Drop Your Case against Nik Raina

by Azrul Mohd Kalib@http://www.themalaysianinsider.com

Here we go again. The holy month of Ramadan has just started and instead of taking advantage of this opportunity to focus on how to be better Muslims by doing good deeds for oneself and for others, we are already having to grapple with overzealous religious officials who are more focused on bringing down, shaming and persecuting other Muslims through the enforcement of what they have determined to be the Islamic way of life in this country.

The news that the Federal Territories Islamic Department (JAWI) was successful in its application to bring forward its case against Berjaya Books staff Nik Raina Nik Aziz over the distribution and sale of Irshad Manji’s controversial book “Allah, Liberty and Love” was disappointing to say the least. The case, which was initially scheduled to be mentioned in the Syariah High Court on September 19, will now be on August 7.

There will be many of us who will be there, in body, soul and spirit, in support of this brave young woman whose case is becoming yet another example of the injustice, lack of fairness and tyranny which exists in the implementation of syariah law in our country.

For those catching up, here are the facts of the case:

● She was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Syariah High Court for distributing and selling the book on May 23 under the Federal Territories Syariah Criminal Offences Act of 1997, which carries a RM3,000 fine or a maximum two years’ jail or both.

● The Home Ministry only gazetted the ban on the book as well as its translated version “Allah, Kebebasan dan Cinta” on May 29. The gazette was only published and publicly available on June 14.

A person has been charged in court for the alleged offence of distributing and selling a book which, at the time of the so-called offence, was not yet officially banned, and was not identified or announced to Berjaya Books to be banned. Oh, by the way, book banning is also under the purview of the Home Affairs Ministry not JAWI. Yet, JAWI, for some reason only known to it, is hell bent on going after this young woman.

If you cannot understand why JAWI is going ahead with this case, neither can I. It just doesn’t make any sense.(I still don’t understand why the book was banned in the first place. Nobody has been able to explain it to me. Must be one of those books, which tengok aja, terus jadi lesbian.)

There is a saying: “There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action.” From several reports, based on their own admission, they had not read the book and had no clue as to its contents. What they were sure of was the author’s support for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual issues.

So they assumed that whoever published, distributed and sold the book must be lesbian, gay, bisexual or transsexual themselves. “Are you a lesbian?” Yes, this was one of the questions demanded to be answered by those who were interrogated by the JAWI goon squad. Not only was this outrageous, humiliating and stupid, it was also a form of discrimination and institutional persecution.

The staff who was interrogated by JAWI was also denied access to legal counsel, a right guaranteed under the Federal Constitution. Examples like this bring shame on how Islam is practised in this country especially when we keep harping on the moderation of religious practice. It demonstrates the failure of our Islamic religious authorities to understand that they too need to abide by the law.

JAWI’s application to the Syariah High Court to bring forward their case with the excuse that it needs to answer to bloggers and the media would have been laughable (they never cared a hoot about bloggers and the media before) if it hadn’t been successful.

It is now becoming evident that it appears that JAWI is trying to circumvent the hearing of the stay application filed by Berjaya Books which the civil High Court has fixed for July 30 and the judicial review hearing for September 5.

This case and the conduct of the religious bodies bring into question whether JAWI, or the Kuala Lumpur Syariah Court for that matter, respects the civil courts or the separation of jurisdictions. In case anyone needs to brush up on their Federal Constitution, the syariah court is subordinate to the civil court.

We must question and hold our religious bodies and authorities to the same standard that we would like to hold our civil institutions. The arrogance that JAWI has demonstrated implies that a mindset continues to persist amongst our religious authorities that they don’t break the law because they are the law. That they are not accountable to anyone and are a law unto themselves.

JAWI’s persistence and arrogance in wanting to find someone to go after in the case of this book is perplexing to onlookers, and dismaying to us Muslims  Even more so when it was clearly evident that JAWI was actually looking for a Malay Muslim to persecute.

Businesses in this country are observing this case very closely. Make no mistake; this case has tremendous implications to the different industries which employ Muslim employees. This was not even a shop selling religious contraband (e.g. deviant books, pictures of haloed bearded personalities, prayer beads, teapots) or selling substances that are forbidden or haram to Muslims (e.g. cigarettes, alcohol). This is a bookshop.

If a bookshop can have its staff and its business tyrannized by religious officials for supposedly selling a banned book, how about other businesses? Whether you are working in an airplane as a flight attendant, behind the counter at 7-Eleven, mixing drinks at a restaurant, at the front desk of a hotel, or on the production line of a factory, are we all at risk of persecution simply because we are Muslims? Are we sending a message to businesses that Muslim employees are a liability?

In the Berjaya Books case, the religious authorities couldn’t go after the business (owned by non-Muslims) so they went after the next best thing, the manager of the bookshop outlet who is a Muslim when they raided it. Whether we would like to admit it or not, such arbitrary actions, as demonstrated by this case, will result in depriving Muslims of the opportunity to work and be employed.

There is a continuing naiveté amongst the Muslim population in our country that because these are the religious authorities, what they do must be right and just. That they can’t do anything wrong. That is not always true. Injustice exists in many shapes and form. This Nik Raina case is one of them.

This is part of an on-going conversation about how Islam is perceived to be practised in Malaysia, how we would want ourselves to be perceived as Muslims, and how Islam as a way of life should be about fairness, justice, compassion and humanity. Islam is not a truncheon to bludgeon others into submission.

Such arbitrary application of syariah laws not only makes a mockery of the laws themselves but also reduces the credibility of the religious bodies. JAWI, you give Islam and Muslims a bad name when you behave in such a manner.

We have a duty as Muslims and as stakeholders of this country to stand up and put a stop to this nonsense. What does this say about us as Malaysians and Muslims if we allow such injustices to continue?

* The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the columnist.

8 thoughts on “Overzealous JAWI: Drop your case against Nik Raina

  1. Senator Dato’ Seri Jamil Khir bin Baharom (born in Yan, Kedah), the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department in charge of Islamic Affairs, a fellow Kedahan, too should come to his senses and stop this persecution of a young Muslim woman, who has not broken any law, civil or syariah. He cannot assume that ordinary folks do not see that a grave injustice is being perpetrated by JAWI officials. Orang Kampung pun tahu apa yang adil dan apa yang zalim. Forget this at your own political peril, Jamil Khir.—Din

  2. Unfortunately the religious authorities in Malaysia are more political in nature.

    They also see themselves as another government machinery and work to expand their sphere of influence and power. With their Islamic label, many ordinary Muslims are afraid to voice their opposition or even apprehension with whatever action taken by the religious authorities. Syariah laws are easily passed in the state legislative assemblies because no ADUN wants to be seen as opposing Islam. Even the judges in our highest courts refuse to hear cases that have the slightest ties to syariah issues.

    We even have a syariah law that requires a person to have accreditation to preach and another law that makes it a crime to publicly voice opposition to a mufti’s or the state Islamic department’s proclamations. Hence more and more syariah laws are passed to intrude into the everyday lives of Muslims and even non-Muslims.

    Aren’t Malay Muslims taught from young that the ulamaks and ustazs know best and to oppose them will jeopardize their chances to go to heaven ? As long as they believe in this fallacy and refuse to take personal control of their religious beliefs and practices, we might very well be heading towards a mullah state.

  3. Haish. In Malaysia it’s very difficult. Especially in matters concerning Islam. Even a simple, harmless question about Islam can be construed as impertinence. Malays are being taught not to question their religion. Because of that some couldn’t even be bothered to learn about their religion. Nothing is more dangerous than to follow things blindly. It’s really scary how some Malay Muslims think it is their Islamic duty to support the prosecution of Nik Raina.

  4. “This case and the conduct of the religious bodies bring into question whether JAWI, or the Kuala Lumpur Syariah Court for that matter, respects the civil courts or the separation of jurisdictions. In case anyone needs to brush up on their Federal Constitution, the syariah court is subordinate to the civil court.”

    I do not know who the writer is and what legal training he has had. But it seems to me he has legal training.

    He is wrong on both issues. First that in Malaysia you have a right to legal counsel. Kindly show me where in the federal constitution does it say that? Secondly, he says syariah court is subordinate to the civil court and he quotes the federal constitution. Again where in the federal constitution does it say that? What the law says is that syariah law – by a controversial amendment to the federal constitution – has exclusive jurisdiction in all matters pertaining to the religion of Islam. The key word is “exclusive”.

    Since the passing of the controversial amendment i.e. Article 121 (1A) in 1988 case law shows that syariah law ousts civil law in the event of a conflict. We first saw that in a conversion case in the ‘90s when a dying man said to have converted to Islam had his thumb print affixed by religious officials as evidence that he was indeed a Muslim. In that case the issue that went before the High Court judge was the issue of whether a man barely conscious knew why his thumb print was being affixed to a piece of paper by strange looking men he never met before.

    The issue was clearly a civil matter. Not a religious one. Yet the High Court judge in that case refused to take on the case and sent it on its way to the syariah court. Since that case we have had another case defended by civil rights advocate Harris Ibrahim which went up to the highest court in the country. Federal justices who heard that case refused to take jurisdiction over one of the issues (whether a Malay could change his religion) and the case landed on the lap of the syariah court judge like a hot potato. The rest is history.

  5. Ini macam banyak gelap. It reminds me of a visit I made to a place in Hong Kong where you are required to purchase a large match long enough to light the room for some minutes. You could see eetan mooi or bare breasted ‘fish ball’ girls as they call them. Maybe it reminds Dato of a similar visit he made somewhere.

  6. Funny that I had just discussed this case with a lawyer friend just now,well according to him, JAWI will use the term, Has acted in Good Faith in pursuing it’s case,well when I heard that,they probably will.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.