Leadership Dilemma in Malaysian Politics


February 14, 2012

Leadership Dilemma in Malaysian Politics

by Rusman*

For going on four years now there are some who continue to question why Malaysia’s political opposition has yet to produce a single leader who could operate at the national and international levels in place of the charismatic Anwar Ibrahim.

This discussion ramped up in the lead up to Anwar’s January 9 court date in which 99 percent of all people predicted would end in Anwar’s conviction and eventual incarceration. Even still, rather than name a successor, allies in PAS and DAP rallied behind Anwar to say that even if he is in jail, he is still  Pakatan Rakyat’s Prime Minister.

Is this madness?

On the contrary, it’s at least one sign that the coalition is holding together. Whether or not Anwar Ibrahim is guilty of the crimes he was accused of committing is a matter for the courts to determine. And few people can deny that the court’s proceedings were anything but just. So why capitulate to the powers that be in the face of this injustice by relegating Anwar to the dustbin. The solidarity around Anwar and PKR demonstrated espirit de corps.

But the question still remains why does Pakatan not have real leaders other than Anwar? It’s a fundamentally flawed question. It’s also a privileged question people ask as a result of the work Anwar has done in cementing the opposition coalition together.  Who even cares who replaces Anwar in the absence of Pakatan Rakyat? People do now, because Pakatan matters.

Let’s look at the other side. Where are the great leaders in UMNO-BN? Ever since Tun Mahathir resigned in 2003, UMNO leaders have been one sorry disappointment after another. Tun Abdullah Badawi was a dismal failure as a leader. He was lucky to have been chosen as successor by Mahathir, who later publicly stated that he had made a wrong choice and then campaigned vigorously for his ouster.

Has Najib shown great leadership? Hardly. He has spent over 100 million ringgits hiring the best experts money can buy to craft economic policies that he can hardly get passed by a government that his own party controls. He literally bought airtime on BBC and other networks yet his public image is no better than what it was the day he assumed office.

Everywhere he goes Najib is still hounded by questions of corruption, scandal and murder. Even a simple holiday to Australia is marred with the scandal of his wife, self-appointed First Lady of Malaysia (FLOM) buying too many clothes. How frivolous and unstatesmanlike.

If Najib did not directly or indirectly own the television stations and newspapers that sing his praises on a daily basis, do you think his approval ratings would still be above 50%? Doubtful.

And who else is there in UMNO? The respected Tengku Razaleigh has, in the  midst of this moment of tectonic shifting in Malaysian politics, has been unimpactful, ineffective and largely a non-factor. If Anwar Ibrahim is a man who only cares about being Prime Minister and nothing else, at least he’s doing something about it. Razaleigh, on the other hand, is a bystander.   Ku-li is also known as someone who cared a great deal about becoming Prime Minister. He felt it was his right. What is he doing about it? Pretty much nothing. He clearly has no chance of circumventing the power structures in UMNO.

Yet Ku-li refused to throw his lot in with the opposition – something that would have been so natural and appropriate for him in 2008-2009, because he couldn’t be certain that he would be the first person to be the Prime Minister. And so he’s done nothing.

After that you have the likes of Muhyuddin, Hishamuddin and others. These people are nothing but mafia bosses. These men are not cut from the same cloth as Mahathir or Anwar. They don’t inspire people. They have no vision. They have nothing to contribute.  Some talk about Khairy having PM material in him. How much of that was because he was the son-in-law of the former Prime Minister. I think his performance in the debate with Rafizi shows that he still has a ways to go before he can be credible at the national level. Wearing nice suits doesn’t cut it.

Why is it so surprising that Pakatan does not have someone to replace Anwar when UMNO has yet to find someone to replace Mahathir – after almost 10 years and with unlimited resources to bring to bear.  Both figures are larger than life. Even in his old age, Mahathir makes UMNO rank and file stand at attention with greater fear and respect than the current UMNO president. Media flock to TDM’s house when he walks out to pick up his paper only to see what story he reads first. In the meantime, they may care that Najib tweeted. Maybe not.

In the Opposition you have figures who are not tainted. You have figured who stand for something. Who has a vision of the country. Certainly they don’t have the pedigree of Anwar. No matter what his opponents throw at him, Anwar keeps coming. He can’t be deterred. That sort of ambition is rare. It’s not exactly the worst quality to find in a head of state. Ambition is important and must be tempered by humility. Does Anwar have that. Did 6 years rotting in jail give him a sense of humility to temper the experience of being in government for 2 decades. He has a leg up on his competition and so you can see the moon and stars when the sun is shining but when it sets then all of a sudden things become more clear.

*Rusman is an occasional commenter on this blog. As a researcher, he has in recent years become a keen observer of  Oppositional Politics, Democracy and the Malaysian Economy.

35 thoughts on “Leadership Dilemma in Malaysian Politics

  1. ” No matter what his opponents throw at him, Anwar keeps coming. He can’t be deterred. That sort of ambition is rare. ” – by the author.

    Yes precisely – that sort of ambition is rare .

  2. Thanks, Rusman for this piece. I am sure you will soon be reading reactions to it. The first opener by Cetus is complimentary. Others may not be.That what makes this blog exciting. My readers are brutal and frank. Let us wait and see what is in store.–Din Merican

  3. Third World leaders in government and opposition are like a giant oak tree. They do not allow living anything in their ambit to grow. Suddenly when you look for a successor the only thing you can say is, ” please do no go. We need you”

  4. thanks for the article on the statuses of our leaders.
    ” No matter what his opponents throw at him, Anwar keeps coming. ‘ the opponents are not to be underestimated. umno/bn is with all its might and unlimited funds, thanks to the taxpayers, able to keep Anwar at bay. his kampf is more like the biblical David against Goliath!
    as he says there are budding future leaders but they won’t come to shine now because Anwar is the brightest star , the sun. you can’t see the stars as long as the Sun shines.

  5. The rallying behind Anwar by PAS and DAP is simply an acceptance of reality… that without him the hastily formed coalition has not a chance in hell to survive. It is not a sound proposition on which to plan a future for a party that has national ambitions. And it is one reason why I keep saying that PR is not ready for Putra Jaya.

    Single-leader groupings have always been the bane of developing countries … groupings that dovetail so often to dynasties. Our best long term solution is still a type of coalition at national level… but how do we bring this about?

  6. This author is quite sharp but not sharp enough to read between the lines. He thinks its about Anwar & Mahathir being “larger than life” what the reality is Mahathir behind closed doors stopping Anwar from becoming PM ( or anyone esle Mahthir doesn want)and Anwar knows this and so he wont stop trying. Mahahtir is Anwar’s nemesis or vice versa. Its personal. The people are ‘collateral damage”.

  7. Imperfect yes, flawed yes, but still the best hope for Malaysia as an alternative to the plunder and abuses since the time of Mahathir as PM. Anwar understands the levers of power having served as DPM for years and work out the necessary compromises to win support from other predominantly Malay institutions of power viz the military and police which would be essential for a successful transition of power in Putra Jaya . Remember Najib’s infamous …OVER OUR DEAD BODIES speech to UMNO assembly at PWTC !!

  8. “And it is one reason why I keep saying that PR is not ready for Putra Jaya.” Isa Manteqi

    Cleary a flawed argument by someone who would rather see his country ruled by a rogue regime whose proven experience in exploiting the country’s resources to enrich themselves, their families and cronies is legendary. Their committment to public office is seen by them as a legitimate trade-off to the spoils of office. It is time to abandon such misconceptions of public office.

    Obama was only a state senator and legislator prior to becoming elected U.S. President. He had no executive experience. But he has good competent people with unblemished track records under him who are appointed from among both Republicans and Democrats.

    Here is something that rises to a ‘model’ if you will, if you are looking for one. There are Old Guards in UMNO whose experience and talent could be tapped to benefit the country. They need not be left to languish together with their talent.

  9. “Anwar was in government for almost 20 decades.” Last para.

    Spoilt my dinner. 200 years is a very, very long time. Some chosen people see deliverance, only after walking around in circles in the desert for 4 decades. Shows you why we are seriously screwed, typo error or not.
    ____________
    2 decades or 20 years. I take full responsibility for that typo error, not Rusman –Din Merican

  10. Leadership dilemma?? What leadership dilemma? The dilemmas of leadership maybe?
    ____________
    Whatever it is, Mr. Pimp, you got the message. The choice before Malaysians in GE-13, like it or not, is either Anwar or Najib for the leadership of this country.Both have their flaws and their strengths.–Din Merican

  11. There is a crisis of leadership brewing in UMNO. Leadership dilemma as in Malay dilemma? Haven’t we had enough of the crock. You are itching for more?

  12. Is the choice of leadership between Najib and Anwar between one of visionary and charismatic leadership which dies with its leader and one that is not charismatic that does not die with its leader but has the continuity that could be passed to his successor? Unfortunately, we do not have separate elections for Prime Minister from which we could choose the different types of leadership. We have no more control on who becomes Prime Minister than we have over when Kathy rides Sir Lancelot next.

  13. CLF, Kathy…it was an ‘inadvertent error’ among a couple others which should be overlooked. that is why I repeated it in my comment. let’s not be petty.

    Isa Manteqi,

    that is what they want us to think, like all other third world leaders who think that they are godsend and only They can protect, educate and feed you. on top of that they are so great that only they can PROTECT GOD.it is a pity that you fell for that.

    And now the spinmeister Mahas..t is at it again spinning that Anwar is the tool of Israel and the United States.

  14. Huh? Makcik’s comment deleted?

    But even in pre-trial discovery, information not admissible during trial because it is hearsay can be sought and must be given by the party so long as it leads to evidence that may be relevant?

  15. You are itching for more?

    Have you come accross this!

    A teacher notices that a little boy at the back of the class is squirming around, scratching his crotch and not paying attention. She goes back to find out what’s up. He’s quite embarrassed and whispers that he has just recently been circumcised and he’s quite itchy. The teacher tells him to go down to the principal’s office, to phone his mum, and ask her what he should do about it. He does this and returns to the class, sits down in his seat and suddenly, there’s a general commotion at the back of the room. Back down she goes, only to find him sitting at his desk with his penis hanging out. “I thought I told you to call your mom” she says. “I did” he says. “She told me that if I could stick it out till noon, she’d come and pick me up from school.”

  16. The story reminds me of my married GP teacher who’s Chinese (and non-Muslim) who has to lose his foreskin if he wants to be able to carry out his marriage vows. A good thing his wife didn’t ask him “to stick out for some air”. He would have been arrested for indecent exposure.

    Had he been arrested and made to appear before a judge, the judge as is usual in cases like this would have to balance the constitutional rights of the individual as against the rights of society at large. What relevance has this story to the thread here?? It has every relevance.

  17. Son: “Daddy, I have to write a special report for school, but I don’t know what Politics is.”

    Father: “Well, let’s take our home as an example. I am the bread-winner, so let’s call me Capitalism. Your Mum is the administrator of money, so we’ll call her Government. We take care of your need, so let’s call you The People. We’ll call the maid the Working Class and your brother we can call The Future. Do you understand son?”

    Son: “I’m not really sure, Dad. I’ll have to think about it.”

    That night awakened by his brother’s crying, the boy went to see what was wrong. Discovering that the baby had seriously soiled his diaper, the boy went to his parents’ room and found his mother sound asleep. He went to the maid’s room, where, peeking through the keyhole, he saw his father in bed with the maid. The boy’s knocking went totally unheeded by his father and the maid, so the boy returned to his room and went back to sleep.

    The next morning he reported to his father.

    Son: “Dad, now I think I understand what Politics is.”

    Father: “Good son! Can you explain it to me in your own words?”

    Son: “Well Dad, while Capitalism is screwing the Working Class, Government is sound asleep, the People are being completely ignored and the Future is full of Shit.”

  18. Anwar is PM material and he stands head and shoulders above every single Malay politician in this country. He is charismatic, intelligent, loveable and hardy.
    No other Malaysian could have gone through such cruel baptism of political fire and still walk out of the fire to fight his enemy. He is no loser, no defeatist, no coward. He has vision.
    All the mighty UMNO horses and PDRM kingsmen and stooges in the AG chambers and all government machinery and UMNO media have failed to take on this one man.
    Tell me, who else has so cruelly been vilified and demonized in this country?
    At this point in time Anwar is larger then life in Pakatan. He is our ONLY hope. And it is not wrong to have dreams. What’s wrong in him wanting to be PM.
    As for Kuli, he is a coward who hopes the PMship will be delivered to him on a silver platter.

    As for Najib. He is a colourless politician who wallows in gutter politics. I will not waste my time on him.

    Incidentally, Lim Kit Siang is also PM material but “unfortunately he wears a wrong skin”. How sad.

  19. reeper, i don’t mean to sound pedantic, but it serves to remind us that when it comes to politics – trust no-one. Dato’ may have made a Freudian slip, and Kat sometimes see things the way i do – which brings us to Bean’s insight about circumcision (8:11pm). He asked a rhetorical question which is valid.

    Under Anwar, how exactly will Religion figure in nation building? Very public (Talibanization-like), status quo (mess that we are in) or moderation. If you can answer that by remote, be my (er, Dato’s) guest.

  20. MR. BEAN – Sorry, but I cannot see how the US model can apply here. ANY change is not what we should be aiming for., but a change for the better.

    I know, I know… what the chorus will be to this : how do we know PR is unfit unless we give them a chance? And this will lead to the frying pan into the fire theme… and so the story will go round and round.

    Not much point going down that road yet again…

  21. sorry CLF, Kathy,
    “My readers are brutal and frank. Let us wait and see what is in store.–Din Merican”
    I was only disappointed with the comments, I was expecting you people to dissect this article, drag it through the mud and crucify it.
    brutal? brutal as a puppy?

  22. Reeper I was being polite to the author. The article is somewhat unsure of itself. It is not commanding any attention. He seems to think its only about being larger than life. It is devoid of reflection .Perhaps at another level the two seem larger than life considering what Mahthir is willing to go to to stop Anwar and what Anwar has gone through, in that sense yes I agree but I would not condone using that phrase because than we the people will still be giving away our power to another and the cycle will start all over again. What we need to do is select cautiously and be exacting in our standards, then they may just deliver.

    Actually I meant what I said and that this is personal. I dont discard the fact that Anwar has gone to hell and back but at the primal point of the two of them this battle is very personal ,very. It is their battle. I don’t really know if Anwar will be a good PM simply because he is from Umno but I am willing ot give him the benefit of the doubt and after all better a change than stagnation .

  23. And because it is so personal/ primal this battle , (after all Mahahtir did choose Anwar and Anwar showed his gratefulness by wanting to take over didnt he ), they have not really or even stop to think who will be their replacement . So I think it all points to a very personal battle.

    Since Anwar has shown his quality of resilience, determination he will battle on to get to Putra jaya. I just hope whne he does get there he will deliver somewhat and those that support him ardently will not be dissapointed.

    So this article is off the mark somewhat to just reflect on the surface and not what is really hidden behind this.

  24. btw I am still a puppy though.

    No one is larger than life. M’sia is going through and unsure phase at the moment. all we can do is concentrate on change. What change, who what results of that change are all anyone’s guess isnt it? We are not sure of who we are as a collective yet we want change.

  25. btw the people are the collatral damage in all this dont you think? Since we are yet to find any replacement for a leader with vision, wisdom selflessness or a spirit of sacrifice with humility all in one package? Anwar does fit into this category since his incarceration I do believe, but who else is there? Who? Has Anwar given it a thought.

    Every one is to meek to get into politics since we have witnessed this epic battle what it can do to a man’s life, what Umno ( read Mahathir) is willing to do if its not one of them who kowtows to the machinery that is Umno.

    Who dares? So the poeple suffer in choices . In the mean time no economic transformation is happening and the basic needs are left unattended because of this epic battle going on.

  26. Kathy

    You raise a good points. The article was not supposed to get into the depth of issues comparing opposition and government. It was supposed to only focus on this battle and the constant need for people to find out who is after Anwar. I say – be thankful you have Anwar still. He’s an asset more than he is a liability for certain very specific reasons.

    Frankly, as much as I can consider weaknesses of Pakatan, i really see the choices in this election as clearly as night and day. I find it odd that people spend so much time thinking about it. Perhaps people want to feel that living in a democracy requires that they wrestle with these choices in a sort of muscle-flexing exercise. In the end, we know that if UMNO stays in power, things will probably not change much and as a result life will probably get worse. If PR comes to power, things MIGHT get better. They might not. But that’s better than the alternative.

    You’re right in raising the point about who actually gets involved in politics. One of BN’s great successes is developing a political culture that scares away all of the right minded, decent people. Who really wants to go through all this pain and agony, only to have virtually no impact on the decadent system. Most people won’t. People criticize Anwar for having a marshy complex. But i doubt there are many people in the country who would have tolerated the kind of abuse he’s taken for this long. The first time that I met him after he was released in 2004, I was shocked how un-affected he seemed from the whole ordeal. Some people spend a year or two in regular jail (let along solitary confinement) and come out deranged or just really angry.

    You’re also right that in the end the people suffer. It shouldn’t be about individuals but about issues. But in order for Malaysia to really get to that point, there neeeds to be a breaking point. UMNO has had about 9 years since Mahathir left and for the most part UMNO leaders have sacrificed the well-being of the country for their own parochial interests, with a few exceptions.

    Billions of dollars embezzled, lost, misused, misspent takes a severe toll on a nation and a people. Malaysia isn’t so rich these days it can just absorb those losses. So the suffering isn’t just because of the games powerful people play. THe suffering has become institutionalized in the form of a slow, agonizing rot that you don’t even realize is eating away at you in the form of traffic jams, intellectual un-freedom, high prices, lack of innovation/entrepreneurship, and so on.

  27. Rusman, Thanks for that clarification. However in as much as you need to understand or explore why the need for people to find out who is after Anwar it is partly because they have no other way out of this trap or slow rot as you put it rightly and they dont want any more harm to come to him who can help them and partly because they are thankful and in awe of this man who went through this and as you say he came out unaffected. For a people that have been sieged for so long this is the person to effect this change, to help them out of this hell.

    I personally would have liked you to go in depth for the reasons behind all the points you brought up . It deserves the in depth and time into it. That is because those in Umno can reflect on this, if at all. Evil doesnt rest and neither can we. I believe if we identify reasons for the current situation we are in politically we can somehow face them step by step. Not everyone is aware, not every one will out think the situation like us, you need to bring it to the fore. People are battling normal life challenges , they dont have the time or energy for this. We do and we need too, its our responsibility.

    When we do ,we are also assisting our country in terms of wanting change wont we and will also keep whoever in check for when he does become the leader and the suffering as you correctly put it trickling down to the people right now will be lightened because you/we are keeping those at the top in check by telling them , we are no fools, we know exactly whats going on here and we will change you again and again and again if you dont serve the people. However it is because of these games that “powerful” people playing that the people are suffering.

    I look forward to your thoughts on M’sia.

  28. yes, Kathy, I share your opinion. Rusman has put the raw facts before us. there is nothing to dispute. Anwar is a born leader, so seen even during his student days. Najib is not a leader but a underdog, he lacks the quality which makes a leader. we have no choice but to opt for a change, Anwar is the best at the moment. umno/bn will lead us to ruin if they remain at the helm for another four years.
    look at what the ‘bundle of shit’ mahathir is saying now, that the govt has no money for 1health-care so now the poor labourers slogging in the sun are going to pay for the health services of the rich umnoputras.
    if the govt has no dough then why buy the unsinkable subs, planes and weapons? to fight whom?? its own citizens if it can’t win the election!!

  29. “In the end, we know that if UMNO stays in power, things will probably not change much and as a result life will probably get worse. If PR comes to power, things MIGHT get better. They might not. But that’s better than the alternative.” – Rusman

    One for Isa to ponder.

  30. “… things MIGHT get better. They might not. But that’s better than the alternative” AI TZE quoting RUSMAN.

    Not much to ponder, actually. I too was elated in 2008 when PR came within a whisker of unseating BN, based on their pre-election rhetoric. But then came the reality of a coalition ill-prepared and at odds with each other. If they are at each other’s throats over irrelevant issues BEFORE a GE. one shudders for the country should they be sent to Putra Jaya just yet.

    My opinion, for all it is worth, remains unchanged. For the moment,let PR run as many states as possible – even ALL the states. In the meantime press for some coalition arrangement to reflect the correct proportion of votes won by either side.

    Coalition is our secret… we must not ditch it.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.