False Neutrality


September 10, 2012

False Neutrality

by Josh Hong(09-07-12)@http://www.malaysiakini.com

I am growing tired of the so-called Malaysian elites who see themselves as rising above politics. They look askance at the Opposition parties for a variety of reasons, being skeptical of PAS’ theocratic agenda or Anwar Ibrahim’s chameleon character. I know many are also disdainful of the way Lim Guan Eng conducts himself.

It is fine and in fact natural when members of a society have different opinions and are allowed to express them peacefully. This is called democracy.

However, what I cannot tolerate is the holier-than-thou attitude of this particular group of elites who claim to be neutral, and it is this pretense that has driven some of them to feel so cynical about the ordinary men and women – already hard pressed in life thanks to the 55 years of mismanagement and corrupt rule of the Barisan Nasional – who now put their faith in the alternative front.

I earnestly wish there is such a thing as neutrality in politics. But some Malaysians are so gullible that they, after much propagation by BN mouthpieces, too begin to think social activism such as BERSIH and other environment-related movements should remain ‘neutral’ and ‘non-political’.

But how can BERSIH, Gerakan Mansuhkan ISA, the Anti-Lynas Campaign, Bukit Koman and the less publicised Pengerang residents remain apolitical when there are issues of justice, fairness, integrity as well as life and death at stake? To me, anyone who follows the BN’s script and calls for these movements to be de-politicised is naïve, plain stupid, or shrouded in his or her own elitist bigotry.

Granted, our country is becoming partisan and political by the day and I am certainly not losing sight of this fact. But one must be cautious enough to not condemn blind loyalty to the Opposition to the extent that existing abuses, transgressions and excesses by the powers-that-be are overlooked or made to seem as secondary or unimportant.

One good example of this false neutrality was the flimsy argument put forward by some that they refused to join the series of BERSIH rallies because ‘the movement has been politicised and is linked to the Opposition’. What these people have failed to understand is that it was the BN parties that had turned down the invitation to join in the effort for clean and fair elections in the first place!

Ideally, one would be happy to not interfere in Malaysian politics but live a serene life. Unfortunately, one’s personal circumstances cannot be improved by seeing one’s life being constantly disrupted and worsened by undesirable politicians and the best way to fight them is to become politically involved.

Divisively partisan

And it is rather rich of some to scorn at the mass following enjoyed by the opposition parties, for I know quite a number of them have worked closely with BN-associated bodies before, including the Perdana Global Peace Foundation with Mahathir Mohamad as the patron. Obviously people like these have conveniently forgotten that Mahathir has never ceased to be political as well as divisively partisan.

This trait is common to some Chinese Malaysian dailies, too. While Utusan Malaysia, The Star and News Straits Times have no qualms admitting that they are serving the agenda of the ruling parties, the Chinese press in general is adverse to being perceived as partisan. So what they habitually do is to report stories from both sides of the political divide and pretend the job is done. Or is it?

When a college student was expelled from school and a 19-year-old girl handcuffed by the Police, both for ‘showing disrespect to the Prime Minister’, the mainstream media covered the news but did not bother to explain why questionable characters such as (Tun) Ling Liong Sik and (Tan Sri) Chan Kong Choy escaped the same fate even though they have been charged with much more serious offences.

In attempting to be seen as ‘fair’ and ‘impartial’ by giving both parties – both the Police and the ‘offenders’ – a chance to speak, the news only ends up getting distorted. Meanwhile, the real cause of these incidents – an expanding Malaysian population disgruntled with the failure of the government to restore public integrity – remains obscured.

As Arianna Huffington, founder of the Huffington Post, has said, ‘one of the worst things the old media do is present two sides of a story as if the two sides had equal value, creating a false neutrality that often does not exist’, and that they fall back on ‘the illusion of neutrality instead of ferreting out the truth’.

It would, hence, be better for these self-righteous critics to get down from the wall of false neutrality and see for themselves what are the real issues that are plaguing our country, before they become devoured by the sheer force of the corrupt regime that they are happy to turn a blind eye to for now.

8 thoughts on “False Neutrality

  1. Reblogged this on The right of reply and commented:
    Article like this pun dapat highlight? When PR take higher moral ground despite the practice being contrary it’s fine and not a word of condemnation. People are now more exposed lah Josh. People now see politicians always say its right if they do it but it’s wrong if the other does it. This is devoid of any right value. It’s a symptom of corrupting mind. So when people highlight that it’s wrong when one party condemns the other of a budget deficit but claim its a good budget when they propose a similar deficit budget, it’s not because of neutrality. It’s because they’re so “amazed” by the “stupidity” of partisanship to address the issue. In the end these partisan gets nowhere coz both PR and BN are for deficit budget. Similarly with merdeka issue. People see not only bn politicizing it but also PR too. And at the end we Malaysians lose it.
    So don’t berate you’re against neutrality. You know partisanship is wrong but because you yourself are partisan and unable to argue and defend the partisan position you hold, you write condemning neutrality. What a dumb write.

  2. Our politics is now dangerously divisive as political elites on both sides jab and trade blows at one another using issues of race and religion.Throughout 55 years of history as an independent nation, we have not been able to put such divisive matters aside and learn to respect for the dignity of difference, which is our source of strength.

    Unity in diversity is a common phrase but in reality, we have yet to act as Malaysians bonded together by common destiny. Our destiny is that we have co-exist as one people. To do otherwise would mean that we are too obsessed with ourselves to worry about the future of our country.–Din Merican

  3. Dato,

    If i may add… Feudalism, it exist with varying degree within all of us… It is greater within the asian culture and that is evident when an asian goes to a western dominated area (vice versa but it is more prominent in asian)…

    So, what is this writer rambling about? In feudalism it is either you are with us or not. It is as simple as that or if you must choose the middle ground then stand aside. It may sound harsh or brutal, but that is the reality.

    There is another option… And it is similar to the evolution of any language, it is called adaptation. For example, the english language… It adapts and evolve… Absorbing latin all the the BM (i.e. amok) … But the thing is… Will our culture (i.e. the Malay culture for example) evolve further (add in in new values, reviewing existing one, maybe discarding some?)… Is this possible (like it or not, it has already, refer “balik kampung” – how to do this if there is none..i.e. duk kat flat?)… If this is managed carefully and thoughtfully, then feudalism can be managed… Hey, here is a thot, is there such a thing as a Malaysian culture??

  4. I can agree with you dato. But I think we’re divided not only on race and religion but on everything now. We’ve become too partisan. Even on merdeka we cannot unite simply because of partisanship. I blame both bn and pr. The message of Merdeka by both is that we should celebrate separately. This is sad. Then we have people condemning the other for politicizing the celebration but they approve their leaders for doing the same. No one actually say that merdeka is for all and both should celebrate together. We have drifted apart and not knowing when to stop being divisive.

  5. We have drifted apart and not knowing when to stop being divisive. – Ellese

    in your educated opinion, who is responsible? directly you are blaming the rakyat for the havoc wreaked by the government of the day. the people have been purposely brain-castrated by them in order to stay perpectually in power. and you say we the people are being divisive. don’t you know it is easier to divide and rule than rule an united nation. kapito?

    are you really seriously saying a government in power for FIFTY5 years is corruption free? my God, you are getting screwed from behind all the while and you still speak in support of these people.
    a sure case for Bendover Singh to put right.
    the seeming neutrality you try to display is very shallow.

  6. “Our politics is now dangerously divisive as political elites on both sides jab and trade blows …” Dato Din Merican

    Trade blows?? That would be enough to make Bendover Singh turn pink.

  7. Reeper,
    Is this the first time you know ellese? I have known this clown from dr raffick blog. Till now, dr raffick has stopped writing in his blogs. I hope it’s not because of this clown.
    His tactics are very subtle. Quick to defend the govt position. Even to the point of defending the indefensible.

    Eh bean,
    Ellese probably is a lawyer. Why not you engage on the matters of law

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.