Who understands our times, Bernie or The Donald?


April 13, 2019

Who understands our times, Bernie or The Donald?

by Fareed Zakaria.com

https://fareedzakaria.com/columns/2019/4/11/who-understands-our-times-bernie-or-the-donald

There are many explanations for Benjamin Netanyahu’s victory in this week’s election that have to do with Israel’s particular situation — its economic boom, stable security climate and the prime minister’s political talent. But he is also part of a much larger phenomenon: the continued strength of populist nationalism around the world — and the continued inability of left-of-center parties to respond to it.

Image result for BERNIE AND TRUMP

 

The case for populist nationalism goes something like this. It’s a nasty world out there. People are trying to take our jobs, undermine our security, move into our country. The cosmopolitan urban elites don’t care; they benefit from these forces. So we need a tough guy who will stand up for the nation and against the liberals in our midst.

In some variant or another, this is the argument made by Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Narendra Modi, Viktor Orban, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, Jair Bolsonaro, the Brexiteers — and, of course, President Trump.

In 1972, the philosopher Isaiah Berlin wrote that nationalism “expresses the inflamed desire of the insufficiently regarded to count for something among the cultures of the world.” He placed the roots of modern nationalism in Germany, a country obsessed with finding its place in the sun. But the sentiment — a kind of victim mentality — can be found in almost all modern variations, even among rich and powerful nations.

Look at Putin’s claim that Russia has been pushed around by the West since the Cold War, the Chinese obsession with their humiliation since the opium wars, the Israeli right’s complaint that the world is biased against Israel and Trump’s constant refrain that all foreigners — from Mexicans to Chinese to Europeans — take advantage of the United States. These leaders promise to rectify the situation and restore their countries’ proper standing in the world.

Trump’s embrace of the word “nationalism” illustrates the simultaneous attacks on domestic elites (with their politically correct language) and on perfidious foreigners. “We’re not supposed to use that word,” Trump said in October. “You know what I am? I’m a nationalist, okay? I’m a nationalist. Nationalist. Nothing wrong. Use that word. Use that word.”

When asked the next day what he meant by the term, Trump responded, “I love our country. And our country has taken second fiddle. . . . We’re giving all of our wealth, all of our money, to other countries. And then they don’t treat us properly.”

Netanyahu, for his part, has long argued that Israel deserves a much better “place among the nations,” a phrase that was the title of his 1993 book that argued for a robust Israeli nationalism that is aggressive and unapologetic. Though Israel’s strength and security have grown immeasurably, as its historical enemies — Saudi Arabia and Syria, among others — have either become buddies or basket cases, the argument that the world is against it has somehow persisted.

In fact, despite the pose of victim hood adopted by most of these populists, nationalism is probably the most widely held ideology in the world today. Which American politician today does not speak up for the United States? The real debate is whether nationalism should be informed and influenced by other values such as liberty and equality and, if these two sets of values conflict, which one should be preferred. That’s why the most ardent capitalists — from Friedrich Hayek to Milton Friedman — have always been in favor of globalization and economic freedom above nationalist protections and controls.

The danger for liberals is that they underestimate the power of these raw, emotional appeals. For centuries, liberals have assumed that nationalism was a kind of irrational attachment that would grow weaker as people became more rational, connected and worldly. In fact, Berlin wrote, like a twig that is bent in one direction and has to snap back, as globalization grew in its reach, nationalism would be the predictable backlash.

Populist nationalists understand the core appeal of their ideology. I recently asked a Bolsonaro supporter whether the Brazilian president’s economic policies (which are free-market-oriented and reformist) or his cultural nationalism was the key to his appeal. The supporter’s answer: Nationalism is the party’s core; the economics is simply about efficiency and growth.

Meanwhile, liberals in the United States still don’t seem to get it. The Democratic Party continues to think the solution to its woes is to keep moving leftward economically. This week, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) revealed his new Medicare-for-all plan, which was immediately co-sponsored by four other presidential candidates. The plan will probably require an additional $2 trillion to $3 trillion in annual tax revenue.At the same time, Trump tweets about the Democrats’ love of “open borders” and insists he will protect the country and enforce its laws. What if Trump understands the mood of our times better than Sanders?

(c) 2019, Washington Post Writers Group

 

10 thoughts on “Who understands our times, Bernie or The Donald?

  1. America’s health crisis is real. Making America Healthy Again is to Make America Great Again. In order to make America Great Again is to first make America Healthy again.
    Each of us may be responsible how we choose to stay healthy. But, it is unAmerican to be a uncaring bunch.

  2. When the State gets involved in private sector that is what you get. Very strong Corporation wanting a political say.

  3. If Trump is insisting on populist nationism, he is at liberty to choose, from day 1 of his presidency, he should abide by all the agreements the nation of United States had signed and committed to his people and/or others, NOT unilaterally renegade in the names of his national/interests to fish for votes.

    That is Unacceptable to those committed. It is an unforgivable act of bad faith and in the eyes of the free trade globalised world, US has become a rogue nation. To his country’s liberal capitalists, he is a man of rogue President, though may an angel to his supporters.

    Finally, it is the people of US and rest of the world are victims of his Bad Faith.

  4. Americans largely are oblivious to the happenings of the outside world, especially the Asian countries and the current Asian Century.

    They will react only when they feel the bites of the rising cost of living skyrockets, as consumers goods become too expensive and their income stagnated as a consequence of Trump’s over zealous populist nationism actions in promoting and practicing protectionism unilateralism.

    Bernie’s liberalism could stand a good chance against Trump ,if he can scale down his excessive opposition rhetoric to capitalism , where the combo ideology are to be made more palatable and sustainable to the Americans across nation. These, Trump may have missed in his time ?

  5. Neoliberalism and its policies are resulting in a backlash in the form of the rise of populist neofascism in USA (Trumpism) and Europe (Hungary, Poland, Italy, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Denmark, Marine Le Pen and her political party in France, Brexit-associated English nationalism in England).

    Is Fareed Zakaria asking for more neoliberalism to counter Trumpism and other forms of neofascism ??

  6. Fox News hosted a town hall event in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania with Senator Bernie Sanders. The alt-right host, Bret Baier, tried to humiliate Sanders of his “Medicare for All” health care system but got hilariously backfired.

    After explaining that the audience is filled with folks of all political ideologies, Baier asked: “I want to ask the audience a question. If you could raise your hand here, show of hands of how many people get their insurance from their work, private insurance, right now, how many get it from private insurance.”

    Most people raised their hands, including Sanders himself. As a senator, he is legally obligated to purchase insurance under the Affordable Care Act, although the federal government subsidizes his plan.

    “Okay,” said Baier. “Now of those, how many are willing to transition to what the senator says, a government-run system?” Almost every hand in the crowd remained raised, and cheers went up.

    Outside of the Trump-Fox News bubble, expanding health care is a popular idea. It’s simple: The American people agree that in the richest country on earth, health care coverage should be a right, not a privilege that only the wealthy can afford. Public polling has repeatedly shown how popular universal health care is — 60% of Americans support a single-payer health care system.

  7. We are now three decades deep into the Internet Age. Maybe, the time is now for us to review our adversarial appeoach towards political , legal and main stream news system. Political observers, legal pundits and journalist may have to move away from the adversarial approach leaving that to the hundreds of blogs that flood the internet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.