Mahathir justified in pulling out of Rome Statute

April 8, 2019

Mahathir justified in pulling out of Rome Statute

Opinion  |  S Thayaparan

Published:  |  Modified:



“And if we find whoever breaches the law – we don’t care who they are – we will take action, whether they are prince or pauper, we will take action. That is our stand.”

– Dr Mahathir Mohamad

COMMENT | If certain quarters assumed that “forcing” the Pakatan Harapan government to pull out of the Rome Statute was some sort of victory, reading the transcript of Mahathir’s press conference should be a reality check for them. If anything, the pugilistic response – even in defeat – is more of a slap in the face than anything in the Rome Statute.

Image result for Statute of Rome

Some people are disappointed that Harapan pulled out of the Rome Statute. Some people are disappointed with the non-Malay political operatives for supporting this move. It makes the Harapan government look weak when the far right forces, in collusion with certain members of the royal houses, disrupt a democratically elected government from carrying out policy decisions.

Foreign Minister Saifuddin Abdullah rightly points out that the deep state – my term is the deep Islamic state – is mounting a vigorous offensive to usurp the democratic process in Malaysia.

This anti-democratic element must feel great that they have managed to usurp the legitimate aspirations of people who voted for the Harapan government.

This anti-democratic element must feel great that they have managed to derail a democratic process in the name of race and religion

This anti-democratic element must feel great that they have managed to make the prime minister of this country bend to their will and, of course, the non-Malay political operatives sit silently while Malay power structures flex their muscles.

This may sound strange, but I have a lot of sympathy for Lim Kit Siang  when he says this decision was forced upon them. This Rome Statute fiasco was initiated by elements who are not democratically elected, but who have the influence to plunge this country into a protracted constitutional crisis that could derail any form of reform, however small.

While Kit Siang wonders how people’s minds could be poisoned, the reality is that the “people” had nothing to do with this. The Rome Statute issue was not fuelled by populist sentiment in the Malay polity, but rather the machinations of certain individuals to erode the legitimacy of a democratically-elected government.

There was nothing Harapan political operatives could say or do, which would mitigate the damage done by individuals who have a stake in the intersection between commerce and royal prerogative, which has had a deleterious effect on the political process, but which has been condoned by the Malay political elite (in collaboration with non-Malay power structures) since independence.

Which is why Anwar’s response to this plot to destabilise democracy was predictable and disappointing. Mahathir was not “wise” to withdraw from this. It is never wise to withdraw from something that Anwar admits “is good for reforms, transparency and rule of law”.

Claiming that some concerns should be “assuaged” is bone-headed since we know, Harapan knows and anyone with a smidgen of intelligence knows, that there were never any legitimate concerns, only the concerns of individuals who decided to challenge a democratically elected leader, using the toxic politics of race and religion.

This is the issue here. What we have is a member of a royal house leading the charge to usurp the democratic process. The only options were:

(1) Confront those institutions which are hampering reforms head-on by signing the statute and probably creating a manufactured constitutional crisis (a royal showdown), or

(2) Reminding those people that even if the statute is abandoned, they will still be held accountable for any malfeasance they commit and the false hope that their station in life protects them from legal consequences is just that, a false hope.

The only viable option is to play the shadow game until Harapan gets its acts together by demonstrating that, even without the symbolism of such international treaties, it is willing to carry out reforms which, so far, Harapan has lacked the backbone to do.

This is payback for the Malay political elite who, for years played this race and religion game, are now confronted by genuine democratic impulses of a Malaysian polity restless for real change and stymied by the very institutions they defended for years.

Now, if Bersatu is the sole protector of race and religion that it wants to be, then things would be different. Suddenly the people would be knowledgeable and those individuals whose agenda is to stir up trouble would be bereft of political influence.

This is why Bersatu strategists and political operatives have been texting and calling me, pointing to this situation as the perfect example as to why Bersatu needs to beef up its presence in Harapan.

The prime minister is on his own here. While I may have a little sympathy for the ruling Harapan elite, this is the fault of Malay power brokers who have weaponised institutions and religion for years against the rakyat.

For years they used the royal institutions for their own purposes. Now the royal institution is flexing its muscles to curtail the agenda of democratically-elected leaders because the reality is that Harapan does not have the majority of the Malay community behind them.

If you think the attacks against the prime minister is getting harsh, think back on the fascists’ attacks against someone like Fadiah Nadwa Fikri (above) who is being investigated by the Harapan state for comments made about royalty.

In order to take on the anti-democratic forces in this country, Harapan has to commit to serious reforms, many of which would lay bare the toxic confluence of religious, racial, royal and corporate power in this country.

They have to stop demonising citizens like Fadiah Nadwa and commit to an agenda of reform, which does not necessarily mean signing on to international treaties, but rather, legislating and creating policies that empower the people and not merely anti-democratic institutions.

If Harapan does this, it will not be forced to do anything by the anti-democratic forces in this country and Malaysians will come to understand that all roads lead to Rome.

S THAYAPARAN is Commander (Rtd) of the Royal Malaysian Navy. A retired barrister-at-law, he is one of the founding members of the National Patriots Association.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

7 thoughts on “Mahathir justified in pulling out of Rome Statute

  1. Can anyone actually change Tun Dr’s opinion? If so, Malaysians with integrity could have hope that Tun Dr would release the Reid Commission to the public. There is no reason to hide such a historical document.
    Malaysians with integrity should suggest that they will not vote the next election if Reid Commission is not released to the public . Tun Dr could then do whatever he wants with such a Welayu state.
    With this, at least some of the second caste ministers would at least have hope to gain their souls back as opposition leaders.

  2. The real reason why Rome statute is an issue? Because the Johor Sultanate has a score with Mahathir and still does not like Mahathir and they are a bit over-entitled.

  3. @hawking.eye tell us more why rereleasing the Reid Commission would be inimical (harmful) to Malay interest? Only a fair Malaysia would be beneficial to the Malay interest, who truly own the land of Tanah Melayu in all measurable metrics. Not releasing the document hurts the Malays, and mostly it hurts the Malay political elites and royalty the most. When there is nothing meaningful to govern, there is no point in governance.
    An Islamic response is to be truthful. To be Malay is to value Islam.
    When the political elites dare to face the truth, such leaders would unite. If it doesn’t, it would be the will of Tuhan. Noone could tell the will of Tuhan. But, for some, inherited text is really what we have. In the long run, being truthful is a core innate yearning of being human.

    Of course, next generations could not change the mind of Tun Dr. But, they are always free to write to their own story about Tun Dr in the future. That is not what Tun Dr could control.

    There is a group that would benefit most from the nondisclosure of Reid Commission. I call them the kiasu (fear of missing out) kind.

    On the matter if it is rereleasing or mere releasing, I would argue that the text of Reid Commission was never released to the public, though its’ existence was not a secret in the past.
    Else, I would expect more to comment.

    • The British have always been mindful of the interests of the non-Malays when dealing with the Malay-led administration and the Sultans. They seeking citizenship for resident Chinese, Indians and others at the time of their departure is a case in point.

      What is fair Malaysia to the Chinese, Indians and others may not necessarily be fair Malaysia to the Malays. It is likely that the British-led Reid Commission could have been too liberal in granting concessions to the non-Malays with which the Malays could not have been too happy with. The best thing to hide them is to put a lid on it.

  4. I am not sure if the Reid Commission report/recommendations were made public or not. The Commission would have made many recommendations covering the interests of both the Malays and the non-Malays, may be not quite reinforcing the favoured status of the Malays and the entitlements due to them. The lack of sufficient tilt in favour of the Malays coupled with generous offerings to the non-Malays could have discredited the work of the Commission in the eyes of the Malays. Perhaps the damage was already done, making the Malay ground angry, before anything could be done to restore the status quo.

    The Malays may see giving in too much to others ( as conveyed by Reid Commission perhaps) may be inimical to their interests.

    • In any case, we are all talking about a Reid Commission that neither you nor I have seen. I have no way to verify a copy that I read online. Inimical, or not.. harm is already done, and will continue to unfold unless Melayu could find the courage to face a possible reality of hiding a signed understanding of 15 year sunset clause in a most “hideous” manner. Just like some who don’t believe in a sweet Jesus, I couldn’t find a single reason to not look down upon a phoney people who talk about following the teaching of a just Prophet and yet go against the Prophet’s teaching at the same time. I see a very different teaching from the Prophet’s last sermon. I cannot see how such a Prophet would not condemn a Welayu who lives in a shadow of creating an unjust world. Hawking.eye, glad Reid Commission does not exist for you. Welayu would is the world you would want to build. I rest my case. Sorry for the digression.

  5. No one moral or ethical, or even religious, in any modern sense – can be justified in rejecting the elements found in ICERD and the Rome Statutes.

    So we are in the process of surrendering to the Politics of Extreme Exceptionalism, Fascism, Discrimination, Apartheid and Eugenics? Nothings changed for the better politically, financially and ideologically. Just as Balless as ever in the name of political expediency.. Hahaa..

    The problem is the incompetency of the PH government and their inability to determine what are the actual ‘Low Hanging Fruits’ (Balls) of their Manifesto. It’s the Economy (that ain’t Encumbered by a Trillion RM Debt Crisis) Stupid! Not yet the hi-falutin’ ideals that frighten the BeJesus of the Ignorant Ensoiled and Inbred Feudalists.

    Are there really no capable social psychologists and propaganda specialists in the whole PH junk? Even leaky sampans and pirate ships (prinisi) have better ‘consultoids’.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.