In defense of the elites


February 5, 2019

In defense of the elites

 

by Dr. Fareed Zakaria

https://fareedzakaria.com/columns/2019/1/31/in-defense-of-the-elites

This year’s World Economic Forum, more than usual, prompted a spirited round of elite-bashing, which has now become the trendy political posture on both the right and left. On one side, President Trump and Fox News hosts slam the out-of-touch establishment that, according to them, has run things into the ground. On the other side, left-wingers decry the millionaires and billionaires who, in one author’s phrase, “broke the modern world.”

Underlying these twin critiques is a bleak view of modern life — seen as a dysfunctional global order, producing stagnant incomes, rising insecurity and environmental degradation. But is this depiction, in fact, true? Are we doing so very badly that we need to bring back the guillotines?

On the simplest and most important measure, income, the story is actually one of astonishing progress. Since 1990, more than 1 billion people have moved out of extreme poverty. The share of the global population living in these dire conditions has gone from 36 percent to 10 percent, the lowest in recorded history. This is, as the World Bank president, Jim Yong Kim, notes, “one of the greatest achievements of our time.” Inequality, from a global perspective, has declined dramatically.

And all this has happened chiefly because countries — from China to India to Ethiopia — have adopted more market-friendly policies, and Western countries have helped them with access to markets, humanitarian assistance and loan forgiveness. In other words, policies supported by these very elites.

Look at any measure from a global perspective and the numbers are staggering. The child mortality rate is down 58 percent since 1990. Undernourishment has fallen 41 percent, and maternal deaths (women dying because of childbirth) have dropped by 43 percent over roughly the same period.

I know the response that some will have to these statistics. The figures pertain to the world in general, not the United States. Things might have improved for the Chinese, but not for the denizens of rich countries. That sense of “unfairness” is what is surely fueling Trump’s “America First” agenda and much of the anger on the right at the international system. (More bewilderingly, the left, traditionally concerned about the poorest of the poor, has become critical of a process that has improved the lives of at least 1 billion of the world’s most impoverished people.)

When criticizing the current state of affairs, it’s easy to hark back to some nostalgic old order, the modern world before the current elites “broke” it. But when was that golden age? In the 1950s, when Jim Crow reigned in the United States and women could barely work as anything more than seamstresses and secretaries? The 1980s, when two-thirds of the globe stagnated under state socialism, repression and isolation? What group of elites — kings, commissars, mandarins — ran the world better than our current hodgepodge of politicians and business executives?

Even in the West, it is easy to take for granted the astounding progress. We live longer, the air and water are cleaner, crime has plunged, and information and communication are virtually free. Economically, there have been gains, though crucially, they have not been distributed equally.

But there have been monumental improvements in access and opportunity for large segments of the population that were locked out and pushed down. In the United States, the gap between black and white high school completion has almost disappeared. The poverty gap between blacks and whites has shrunk (but remains distressingly large). Hispanic college enrollment has soared. The gender gap between wages for men and women has narrowed. The number of female chief executives at Fortune 500 companies has gone from one to 24 over the past 20 years. Female membership in national legislatures of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development member countries has almost doubled in the same period. No countries allowed same-sex marriage two decades ago, but more than 20 countries do today. In all these areas, much remains to be done. But in each of them, there has been striking progress.

I understand that important segments of the Western working class are under great pressure, and that they often feel ignored and left behind by this progress. We must find ways to give them greater economic support and moral dignity. But extensive research shows that some of their discomfort comes from watching a society in which these other groups are rising, changing the nature of the world in which they’d enjoyed a comfortable status.

After 400 years of slavery, segregation and discrimination in the United States, blacks have been moving up. After thousands of years of being treated as structurally subordinate, women are now gaining genuine equality. Once considered criminals or deviants, gays can finally live and love freely in many countries. The fact that these changes might cause discomfort to some is not a reason to pause, nor to forget that it represents deep and lasting human progress that we should celebrate.

(c) 2019, Washington Post Writers Group

8 thoughts on “In defense of the elites

  1. The ‘elites’ don’t need defending. Defenestrating perhaps but that’ll never happen. Yes we’ve made huge progress, mostly DESPITE the elites, not because of them. Do you honestly think the establishment welcomed the Welfare State, higher taxes, Universal Healthcare etc?!

    This whole article is an exercise is cognitive dissonance, unworthy of publication.

    • I don’t need to ‘defend’ my comment. It’s written in plain English. Fareed was conflating scientific and social progress with the existence of ‘elites’; in my opinion, he was talking crap. Has India (or Malaysia, or any other country for that matter) progressed because of the existence of gilded ‘elites’ that benevolently guide and shape their country’s advancement? The idea is laughable. Of course the so-called ‘elites’ supported policies that helped them get even more powerful – that doesn’t mean they were responsible for any uplift of the masses.

      BTW The video should have had a separate entry (as it is barely connected to the copy & pasted article underneath with which I originally disagreed).
      ___________________
      tesseractorion,

      Thank for your comments. Rest assured. Will do better next time.–din

  2. like India, Malaysia lacks a strategic vision because it has abandoned ” Bangsa Malaysia” under Mahathir 1.0. Today. It is a Malay- centric vsion under Mahathir 2.0.–Din Merican.

  3. The elites don’t need defending, though it’s almost obligatory that those propped by their largesse do so.

    As Vijay Prashad noted in his article on Davos:

    “There are currently 2,208 billionaires in the world, twice the number since the global financial crisis of 2007-08. Most of them are from North America and Europe. They currently have more wealth than ever before, according to a new report from Oxfam International. The combined wealth of the richest 26 among these 2,208 billionaires reached US$1.4 trillion. This amount of wealth is equivalent to the total wealth of the planet’s 3.8 billion poorest people. That means that only 26 individuals have as much wealth as 3.8 billion people.”

    https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019/01/22/reality-starting-creep-billionaire-oasis-davos

    • Fake fact. No way 3.8billion or half the world population have only less than uSD400. Its mathematically wrong.

  4. People are as different as the five fingers in our right hand. And if each of our five fingers are give a dollar each they will spend it or invest it in different ways. If by some magic we are able to take away the total wealth of the five fingers and then give each finger the same amount as start up Capital you will find that the same fingers that invested their capital will be rich five years down the road. There are no easy answers. Man by nature always looks for the short -cut if the laws allow it. But twenty percent will break the laws if they can get away with it.
    So it all boils down to enforcement. While I am on this may I suggest that people who pay their bills and compound fines on time are the one ones who should be given a discount. That will make a great contribution to the rule of law in our new Malaysia.

Leave a Reply to lcrenoir Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.