UN man dumbfounded by Malaysia’s resistance to ICERD


December 26, 2018

UN man dumbfounded by Malaysia’s resistance to ICERD

Gün Kut says there is a misunderstanding over ratifying ICERD in Malaysia.

KUALA LUMPUR: A member of a United Nations (UN) committee tasked with monitoring the implementation of ICERD said Malaysia is now seen globally as accepting racial discrimination by not ratifying the international treaty.

This follows Putrajaya’s decision not to ratify the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) this month, which led to a mammoth rally to give “thanks”.

“When the United Nations Human Rights Council asked me to come to Kuala Lumpur to talk about ICERD, I had no idea I would be falling in the middle of a serious controversy. I thought it would be a standard meeting,” Gün Kut, a Turkish national who is part of the 18-member Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) based in Geneva, Switzerland, told a forum here.

He questioned how ICERD could become extremely politicised in Malaysia when it is an international convention for the protection of individuals against racial discrimination.

Image result for icerd malaysia

“Racism and racial discrimination is everywhere, so no state, country or government can claim there is no discrimination.

“When you look close enough you may find cases often unheard of… yet it’s there,” Gün, speaking in his personal capacity, told a forum last week on strengthening national unity through the Federal Constitution and ratifying ICERD, organised by the Malaysian CSO-SDG Alliance at the Royal Lake Club here.

Image result for icerd malaysia

Gün said Malaysia now found itself facing more pressure than ever because it seemed as if it did not accept non-discrimination.

“Which is not the case,” he said. “All I see is a misunderstanding”.

He said he still found it difficult to understand why Malaysia refused to sign the treaty.

“We look at who is not signing it (ICERD) and why. I have an explanation for Nauru. I have an explanation for North Korea. But what should I think about Malaysia?” he asked.

Gün lumped together Nauru, an island country in Micronesia northeast of Australia, North Korea and Malaysia as three countries which had not ratified ICERD without a good reason.

ICERD obliges parties to eliminate racial discrimination in all forms, including in public institutions as well as in government policies, the issue at the heart of the opposition from a number of Malay groups.

They say ratifying ICERD would undermine the special position of the Malays and the natives of Malaysia, including provisions to allow quotas in public institutions.

They also oppose the ICERD’s timeline on member countries to end affirmative action programmes and benefits, which they say would sound the death knell for Malaysia’s decades-old pro-Bumiputera policy.

But Gün said the treaty would never “insist” on a time frame for affirmation action policies to be stopped as that discretion lay with the respective member states.

“It is up to the government to decide how they wish to act on our recommendations. This is not a peace treaty. It is a convention which creates a mechanism for states to voluntarily follow international standards.

“It is for the government to commit itself (to ICERD) vis-a-vis its own people.”

He said governments voluntarily signed ICERD “according to the letter and spirit of the convention” while dealing with “issues in their territories” on racial discrimination, saying this could be customised.

“But if it is seen as something that gives a defined group preferential treatment forever, that’s a different matter,” Gün said.

“If positive measures go beyond redress for victims of one particular group… then… that would be discrimination.”

However, Gün said ICERD could intervene in issues that intersected with race, such as religious conflicts among ethnic groups “provided that there is discrimination on the basis of race that so happens to involve religion”.

Asked why CERD did not seek an audience in Parliament to explain to MPs about ICERD, Gün said this would make it seem like the UN was pushy.

“It would be difficult to promote ICERD to a non-signatory state and put pressure on member states. It would backfire, and seem as though the UN is imposing something (forcefully),” he said.

The debate over the ICERD followed a speech by Dr. Mahathir Mohamad at the United Nations General Assembly in September, 2018 where he said his government would ratify the remaining human rights conventions endorsed by the world body.

But the Prime Minister admitted that this would be difficult to do, and his office later announced that ICERD would not be ratified.

Malaysia has only signed three UN treaties since 1995.

 

 

6 thoughts on “UN man dumbfounded by Malaysia’s resistance to ICERD

  1. Perhaps some one should have asked this bloke if the countries who have signed the convention have experienced better harmony in their countries? And perhaps he could name the countries. Of course we would all like this equality of races but very often this needs time to be implemented. Years? Decades? Who knows! But the acceptance must come from all the races. Well and good for the UN to pursue these lofty principles but they should be studying why countries who have signed on now have so many difficulties. No wait, this will only give these people at the UN more reason to spend other people’s money. They should just pull back and these countries to resolve their own problems at their own pace.

    • /// Of course we would all like this equality of races but very often this needs time to be implemented. Years? Decades? Who knows! But the acceptance must come from all the races. ///

      Needs time? There will never be a good time to implement this. How long has the NEP and its derivatives been around? Almost half a century. Still not enough time? Still needs time? If acceptance must come from all the races, it will never be implemented.

  2. What is UN going to do with the countries failed to cooperate to rectify the Icerd? Let us see what are your actions for the resistance of Icerd to these countries. An affirmative action to these countries would serve better lesson but again were there countries that had benefited by rectifying Icerd to convince of the UN charter?

  3. In truth, it is political expediency. TDM is not truthful when he said that we have no parliamentary majority to change the special position of the bumis. He is not prepared to tell the truth.

    No Malaysian leader is willing to speak the truth about ICERD.they don’t have the political will to stand for the truth. It is a sad day for the country. There are so many things that are very wrong about this country, but no leader wish to speak about it. We can be a great country and everyone can prosper but yet we chose to be heavily in debt with bad policies to suffer for! Sad indeed.

  4. No other faith followers of any religion are as absorbed and directed to their faith as much as the Muslims by Islam. Their total commitment to Islam is visible. Some of them claim that in time to come Islam will dominate the world – how? by over populating themselves by having multiple children compared to others? Frankly and in general term-wise Islam is not overly attractive to other faith followers or free-thinkers. The most popular religion that people jump into is Christianity. Intense faith belief is personal. It is a sort of relationship between man and his maker. There should be no role for others.

    • /// Intense faith belief is personal. It is a sort of relationship between man and his maker. There should be no role for others. ///

      If only the followers of the various religions will keep this in mind – the world would be a happier and more peaceful place. However, there is an inherent tension and contradiction in the above paragraph. If they have intense faith, it is axiomatic that they would want to convert others. In fact, for the Abrahamiac faiths, it is a duty to convert others to their religion.

      Therefore, the only solution is to ban such superstitions. Failing which, there should be a separation between church (or mosque or temple) and state.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.