Malaysia: Exorcising racism from our institutions

May 30, 2018

Malaysia: Exorcising racism from our institutions

If the Mahathir 2.0 Government is serious about reforming Malaysia exorcising racism and racial discrimination from our nation’s institutions is the primary and most significantly transformational change it needs to bring about.


 It is promising that UMNO and MCA have recently mooted the idea of opening their party doors to all ethnic communities. After 61 years of racially based political parties and policies, this is progress. If the new Government is serious about reforming Malaysia, exorcising racism and racial discrimination from our nation’s institutions is the primary and most significantly transformational change to bring about.

Multi-ethnic parties

Image result for parti pribumi bersatu malaysia logo

Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia

The first reform is certainly to call an end to race-based political parties. And logically, once we ratify the International Convention on the eradication of racial discrimination (which we haven’t yet done), our race-based political parties will have to go. It would be a gracious example by the Prime Minister if he shows leadership by example and renames and reformulates his “Pribumi” party into a multi-ethnic one. If all the erstwhile race-based parties can do that, then our country will be truly on the way to building one nation.

Needs-based policies

Image result for End Racism in Malaysia

The second essential reform will be to replace race-based policies with needs-based measures that truly benefit the lower-income and marginalized sectors. The NEP was supposed to end in 1990 but has become a populist never ending policy to win over the Bumiputras while benefiting mainly the political elite. It makes democratic and economic sense to utilise taxpayers’ resources wisely so that poor rural Malaysians are assisted based on need in their particular economic sectors. The ethnic Indian working class and the indigenous peoples in both East and West Malaysia are among the poorest communities in Malaysia; the former and the Orang Asli cannot rely on “Bumiputera” privileges, while the indigenous peoples of East Malaysia do not enjoy the same amount of state largesse as the Malays in West Malaysia even though they are categorized as Bumiputeras. Thus, only a needs-based approach can solve the endemic problem of sectoral poverty and marginalization.

Inclusive institutions

It is heartening to see the calls for reviewing the BTN. Racism has been thoroughly infused in all the national institutions, including racist indoctrination of ‘Ketuanan Melayu’ (Malay dominance) in state institutions such as the BTN which has been well known for years. There are other public institutions crying out for reform.

Image result for Radio Television Malaysia

The national broadcasting authority, RTM should not be expected merely to “shape up” as the new Minister has recently warned them. After 61 years of Government propaganda and exclusion of the Opposition and cultures considered to be “mainstream”, we expect a truly independent broadcasting authority which is fair to all Malaysians. This means that RTM must be accountable to Parliament and not the Information Minister. This institutional reform is crucial. A parliamentary committee assesses RTM’s performance, its content and output, ensures fair and effective competition and regulates how its commercial activities interact with its public services.

The RTM Board needs to be headed by a respected, non-partisan and creative Chairperson with other directors of similar qualities including a Director-General and Editor-in-Chief. This Board is responsible for setting the strategic direction for RTM; establishing its creative remit; setting its Budget; determining the framework for assessing performance.

After so many years of mediocre and partisan fare, dare Malaysians dream of a national broadcasting authority that is as independent, creative and dynamic as the BBC?

Merit and diversity in public institutions

Today, with the lack of ethnic diversity in the Bumiputera dominated institutions such as Mara, UiTM, the civil and armed forces, it is surely time that recruitment and promotion in these services be open to all ethnic groups based on merit if we are serious about inter-ethnic integration and promoting excellence. In fact, a common complaint in these Bumis-Only institutions is that there is not enough competition which leads to complacency and mediocrity.

Any affirmative action must be based on need by under-privileged sectors and class and NOT on race while a means-tested sliding scale of education grants and loans should be instituted for all who qualify to enter tertiary institutions regardless of race, religion or gender. I dare say this inclusiveness of our public institutions will produce a new attitude, energy and drive to spur our nation to greater heights.

Outlaw racism, racial discrimination & hate crimes

“Hate crimes” are criminal acts committed as intimidation, threats, property damage, assault, murder or such other criminal offence. Hate crimes violate the principle of equality between people and deny their right to achieve full human dignity and to realize their full potential. Their negative impact on the greater community cannot be emphasized enough. In order to nip this tendency in the bud, “Incitement to racial hatred” needs to be made a criminal offence. This includes attempts to deliberately provoke hatred against a racial group; distributing racist material to the public; making inflammatory public speeches; creating racist websites on the internet; inciting inflammatory rumours about an individual or ethnic group, in order to spread racial discontent.

In Malaysia, an Equality Act and an Equality & Human Rights Commission are needed to specifically deal with hate crimes and incitement to racial hatred. We already have a National Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM) which can extend its jurisdiction to incorporate an Equality Commission for after all, equality is an intrinsic part of our human rights. Its work would be to encourage greater integration and better ethnic relations and to use legal powers to help eradicate racial discrimination and harassment. Thus, its ambit would cover racist stereotyping in text books and the press; racial discrimination in the public sphere, employment, education, social services, advertisements. Such an independent commission would be empowered to issue codes of practice and be invested with powers to conduct formal investigations and to serve notices to furnish information or documents in order to enforce the law.

Finally, for an administration to convince Malaysians that it is genuinely keen to institute reforms for better ethnic relations and equality, our country should immediately initiate moves to ratify the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) and the International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights (ICCPR).

Reforming for greater democracy

The road toward uniting the Malaysian peoples is through a concerted effort for greater democracy not only in the political realm but also in economic, educational, social and cultural policies. The basis of unity rests fundamentally on the recognition of the equality of all ethnic communities.

After 61 years of racial division, discrimination and demonization, Martin Luther King’s poser is particularly appropriate:

Image result for Martin Luther King Jr quote: “I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality.”

Dr. Kua Kia Soong is the adviser for SUARAM.


11 thoughts on “Malaysia: Exorcising racism from our institutions

  1. Kua Kia Song pontification means very little if he cannot answer this. Truth is MCA does NOT need to be a multi-racial party even though they volunteer to be multiracial. It is UMNO that need to be a multiracial party because non-Malays will never vote UMNO/BN unless UMNO/BN is multiracial. MCA is only venturing into multi-racial because it knows it must before its even possible for UMNO to. Without non-Malays, UMNO only path to return to power is to merge with PAS. BUT why should UMNO be multi-racial if MCA does not really need to, only doing it so its not a reason for UMNO not to? Why the paradox?

    Kua Kia Song does not answer such a paradox, he rather just sweep it away with a “bigger” picture rather than drill down to the deep real schism that exist. He does not want to because he really has no answer, his answer simply to lets just sweep it all away in the quest for universal humanity..

    Simplism is not answer, its avoiding hard answer.

    • In the brave new world, there are only Malaysians and non-Malaysians. Why pretend with the label of a Multi-racial party when the solution is staring us in the face?

  2. I think it is time time for this Kua fellow to shut up and give room to New Government to function. This Kua fellow speaks with prejudicial mind of Tun Mahathir. Don’t you have anything better to write of the new Malaysia. I’m getting very agitated each time I see his face.
    Somu, please don’t get personal. I will give Dr. Kua Kia Soong all the space he wants as I would do you. I agree we must give the Pakatan government time (100 days?). But what I can see is that they are already talking big, promising a lot and raising high expectations. Right now, it is sounding like old wine in a new bottle.

    Do you remember what Najib did with his 1Malaysia gambit? Now Najib has become a 1Malaysia crook. I hope Pakatan Harapan can deliver.–Din Merican

    • Dr Kua is influenced by his Marxist orientation, with its economic determinism and (over)emphasis on class relations.

      It is easier said than done in the real world of hardball politics and Machiavellian politics. Ideologies such as fascist racism, race supremacy (largely a product of European imperialism, the slave trade and expansion into the rest of the non-white world) are loosening their grip but will still be a potent force for decades to come.

    • Dr Phua, a little surprised by your reply. For the longest time, I thought you like a more ‘social’ Norwegian model.
      I didn’t see anything particularly ‘Marxist’ in Dr Kua’s writing. Do advise if I have missed something. After all, DSAI has also suggested on the need to transition to need based.

    • Dear katasayang : Yes, my ideological orientation is the Scandinavian Social Democratic model and I hope that Malaysia can make it into the top group of the world rankings of social well-being within 10 to 20 years time, with good governance. Along with nations such as NZ, Sweden, Norway, Finland etc.
      But I am also a realist when it comes to politics. Racist ideas and racism have gained a pernicious hold on the psyche of many people (including multi-ethnic countries such as Malaysia). A long time will be needed to change this. Social scientists need to do our part, by getting the ordinary people to realise that ethnicity (race) is “socially constructed” and is used by unprincipled politicians to divide-and-conquer.
      Yes, Dr Kua is a Marxist. I like what he writes – but like many other Marxists, they tend toward utopianism and focus too much on the “class struggle” whilst ignoring other things that affect human social behaviour such as vicious ideas like race supremacy, intolerant religious extremism, and so on.
      Check out the BBC series on racism and its history, on YouTube.

    • Dr Phua, I see. I guess you and Dr Kua must have chatted at length. I find myself having difficulty in seeing how an ideal marxist economy functions. Inevitably, I see a need for money, and the working of invisible hand, no matter how diligent a Central Banker tries to do his/her work, more in line in something Paul Krugman shared on this experience.
      Debt and money is inevitable. Bitcoin would not solve the issue. I did see the BBC youtube on Masters of Money.
      For Malaysia, as a realist, I can only see how Melayu would flourish only when it treats other non-Melayu as equals. Else, it will face more issues than it could handle in the years to come. I still find it difficult to see other alternative. Of course, I am biased and not very imaginative.

    • Dear katasayang

      No, I do not know Dr Kua personally. He spoke once at my old university (Monash University Malaysia), but I doubt he remembers me. I have read many of his books though.

      Marxists often attribute many things to “false consciousness” on the part of the working class (proletariat). They are, in the final analysis, economic determinists e.g. of the Louis Althusser kind.

      Marxists can successfully mobilise people in anti-colonial struggles and in revolutions against repressive local elites. But their record in terms of managing the economy leaves much to be desired. They have quite negative views of people like me, i.e. insufficiently radical Social Democratic sell-outs to capitalism 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.