Fareed Zakaria on DJT’s Tomahawk Missile Strike on Syria


April 10, 2017

Fareed Zakaria on DJT’s Tomahawk Missile Strike on Syria–Congratulations, Mr.President, but what’s the strategy now?

Editor’s note: An earlier version of this column was published Thursday before news of President Trump’s decision to strike a Syrian air base. This version has been updated.

Image result for The Trump Missile Strike on Syria

There is much to applaud in President Trump’s decision to attack the Bashar al-Assad regime this week. It punished a regime that has engaged in war crimes against its own people. It upheld an international norm against chemical weapons. It ended Trump’s strange flirtation with Vladimir Putin on the Middle East. And, most significantly, it seems to reflect a belated recognition from Trump that he cannot simply put America first — that the president of the United States must act on behalf of broader interests and ideals. Trump, as candidate and as president, had avoided the language of global norms and international order. Yet in explaining his actions Thursday night, he invoked both and ended his remarks with a prayer that President Barack Obama would never have dared to make: “God bless America — and the entire world.

Image result for The Trump Missile Strike on Syria

But as former Defense Secretary William Cohen pointed out Friday, “One strike doesn’t make a strategy.” U.S. policy on Syria remains unclear. The Trump administration had repeatedly announced that it had shifted away from the Obama administration’s calls for regime change in Syria. In fact, Trump had indicated that he was happy to leave the country to Assad as long as this would help defeat the Islamic State. Last week, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson basically affirmed that approach. On Tuesday, the day of the chemical attack on Idlib, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer reiterated it. The missile strike appears to have reversed that policy.

If so, it is a major shift and raises important questions: Is the United States now engaged in the Syrian civil war? Will it use military force to help oust Assad? Do these actions help the Islamic State and al-Qaeda — which are fighting against the regime? And what happens next in the overall war against the Islamic State?

Many of our allies have expressed support for the strike. But in an increasingly complicated global system, these countries look to the United States for a consistent strategy that can be relied upon over time. Trump’s foreign policy seems to change with every meeting, event or crisis. Having bashed Japan during his campaign, he invited its prime minister, Shinzo Abe, to his first Mar-a-Lago summit and extolled him as a true friend and ally. Having threatened to upend the one-China policy, Trump wound up meekly affirming it in a phone call with President Xi Jinping.

Trump does not deny his changes of mind. In fact, he embraces them as a virtue, describing himself as — flexible. “I’m proud of that flexibility,” Trump said this week, adding that he also likes to be unpredictable. But there is a difference between unpredictability and incoherence. This week’s strike does leave one with the impression that foreign policy in the Trump administration is not being made by carefully evaluating a situation, assessing various options, weighing costs and benefits, and choosing a path. Instead, it is a collection of reflexes responding instinctively to the crisis at hand.

Trump’s military advisers provided him with a tactically brilliant option — a small air base, whose destruction would produce fairly little physical or diplomatic fallout. But the strike will have minimal impact on the balance of power. Assad will remain in place, as will his opposition. If anything, the strike might embolden some opposition forces to fight on rather than surrender, and the bloodshed will intensify. The long-term prospects for peace in Syria remain gloomy.

Image result for Fareed Zakaria congratulates Trump on Syrian Strike

Donald Trump and his National Security Team

No matter the complications, in the short term the President struck a blow against evil, for which I congratulate him. And if he was moved to this action because he saw heart-rending pictures of children, that’s fine. I would only ask that he look again at those images. Perhaps they would move him not simply to drop bombs, but also to provide more aid to those war-torn people. Perhaps they would even move him to let some of those people escape their misery and find a home in the United States.

 

10 thoughts on “Fareed Zakaria on DJT’s Tomahawk Missile Strike on Syria

  1. When DJT’s canaries started singing to avoid the birdcage,all the smokescreens in the world will not stop the Democrats from chasing him all the way to Timbaktu.There will be a President Pence in the next couple of years time.

  2. American leftists such as Zakaria are simply too smart to understand Trump’s simple notion of “Making America Great Again.” The civil war of Syria is not and should not be the preoccupation of Trump and Americans. 800,000 died in American civil war in 1864; So far 400,000 dies in Syrian civil war. The missile strike, while is prompted and is justified by the death of children shown in video, is for stopping the chemical weapon usage and international stability for US. President Trump is just acting as a lead gangster punishing the smaller gangster in the lawless gangster land so that gangster land is still stable enough for the lead gangster to do regular business. In case you have not noticed, President Trump even asked German Chancellor and all gangster land residents to pay the “protection fee”, like that demanded by Chinese triads.

  3. Drumpf is flexible? Is that any different from being a Contortionist?

    Of the 4 nations suffering from famine right now – i.e Nigeria (NE), Southern Sudan, Somalia and Yemen – none are salvageable, because of the political climate and internecine war.

    Syria and the rest of MENA? America stay out, unless there are further acts of chemical or biological barbarity and genocide. Turkey might end up turning turtle, if that wannabe Caliph continues with his regressive anti-Ataturk brand of Islamism.

  4. Quote:- ” The Trump administration had repeatedly announced that it had shifted away from the Obama administration’s calls for regime change in Syria………..The missile strike appears to have reversed that policy”

    I disagree.

    That “missile strike” was not meant to be a punitive strike. Forewarning was given to the Russians knowing full well that Assad would be notified immediately.

    The one-off strike was to say to Assad, OK my man, bad as the gassing was, we’ll still leave you alone and not bring you down like what that silly Obama wanted, but from now onward you better listen hard to what Trump has to say in how you run your little piece of desert.

  5. This proven plagiarist and opinion piece writer wants more refugees from war-torn Middle-East to be re-settled in the US. I wonder what is in his inner-mind?

    Better still, elect him as the US President. He will turn America upside down to the delight of ISIS and its open and silent supporters. Hail Fareed Zakaria!

  6. It’s bad enough to get involved with dysfunctional competing regimes in that part of the world but when it’s a proxy fight between US and Russia, the solution is never to blink first no matter how hard it is not to blink.

  7. Pre-election time, Trump kept mentioning how important it was to get his country working again… now that he is President there still is not much news on his long term jobs policy… instead, continuing to kill foreigners seems to be on the table… up to now, the number of missiles exceed the number of meaningful jobs created…quite a record for an incoming leader…

    “…international norm against chemical weapons…” really? and practised by whom and since when?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s