Why Hillary Clinton lost the election

November 12, 2016

Why Hillary Clinton lost the election

by Dan Roberts


Dan Roberts is the Guardian’s Washington Bureau chief, covering politics and US national affairs. Previously, he worked as the national editor in London and was head of business. Follow him on Twitter and Instagram


Image result for Why Hillary Clinton lost?

As Democrats grapple with their loss to such an unpopular and divisive rival, persistent problems with Clinton’s campaign offer some explanation.

How Hillary Clinton managed to lose an election to a candidate as divisive and unpopular as Donald Trump will baffle observers and agonise Democrats for years to come. Once the shockwave passes, some glimpses of rational explanation may become visible.

Incumbent parties rarely hold on to power after eight years in office. George HW Bush, following Reagan, was an exception, but politics has become steadily more polarised since and pendulums have a habit of swinging.

Trump’s defiance of expectations has itself also become somewhat of a golden rule in American politics in 2016. Written off repeatedly during the Republican primary, and only rarely taken seriously during the general election, he nonetheless epitomises the same anti-establishment mood that led Britain to vote to leave the European Union and Democrats in 22 US states to nominate Bernie Sanders. Fairly or not, it is an establishment with which Clinton could not have been more closely aligned in the minds of many voters if she tried.

The economy

“It’s the economy, stupid” was a phrase coined by her husband’s adviser James Carville in the 1992 election and, in many ways, it ought to have helped Democrats again in 2016. Barack Obama helped rescue the US from the financial crash and presided over a record series of consecutive quarters of job growth.

Unfortunately for Clinton, many Americans simply did not feel as positive. Stagnant wage levels and soaring inequality were symptoms of the malaise felt by many voters. Trump successfully convinced them to believe this was caused by bad trade deals and a rigged economy.

Despite being pushed in this direction by Sanders in the Democratic primary, Clinton never really found a satisfactory response. Her volte-face on trade sounded – and was later proved by leaked emails – unconvincing at best; deeply cynical at worst.

Neither socialism nor the proto-fascist homilies of Trump offered much in the way of coherent alternatives either, but the bottom line was that Clinton simply failed to articulate a convincing defence of modern American capitalism.

Neither socialism nor the proto-fascist homilies of Trump offered much in the way of coherent alternatives either, but the bottom line was that Clinton simply failed to articulate a convincing defence of modern American capitalism.


Image result for Why Hillary Clinton lost?

Henry A. Kissinger–America’s Foremost Flipflopper with Hillary Clinton

One big problem which undermined many otherwise plausible policy positions was a lack of trust. Paid speeches to Goldman Sachs and a murky web of business connections to the family charity left many Americans doubting Clinton’s sincerity on matters of money and much else.

That the Federal Bureau of Investigation was investigating the Democratic candidate until just two days before voting with a view to bring possible criminal charges for her flouting of data security laws was just the most extreme manifestation of the issue.

It was damaging not just that the FBI bungled its timing of what ultimately proved to be a dead-end investigation but because it played into the notion that the Clintons behaved as if the law did not apply to them.

Message vacuum

It also did not help that what Clinton was selling was mainly herself. The campaign’s strongest message was that she was uniquely qualified to become president. This was largely true, especially when compared with the grotesquely inexperienced Donald Trump, but big ideas took a backstage role.

There was a cast of a thousand policy prescriptions, from tweaks to the healthcare system to a watered-down version of the Sanders college debt proposals. Few were memorable, even among supporters.

Image result for Why Hillary Clinton lost?

Bernie a better Candidate?

Campaign slogans are notoriously vacuous. Obama’s “hope and change” turned out to be more of the former than the latter. Yet Clinton’s “stronger together” only really began to take shape in response to Trump’s divisiveness. It was attractive to many Democrats as a symbol of what they felt the campaign was about but it ensured the battle was fought on Trump’s terms.

Broken polls

Amid the recriminations, special attention is likely to be reserved for the pollsters, who showed Clinton clinging to a comfortable three- or four-point lead in national opinion polls going into the election. Granted, some, such as Nate Silver’s 538 website, flagged up the risk of an upset in key swing states, but even he had downgraded expectations of a Trump win to less than 30% on the eve of polling.

Image result for Why Hillary Clinton lost?

The failure partly reflects a broken industry. Reaching a vast audience no longer using landlines, or even mobile voice calls much, with a 20th-century modeling of statistical sampling has produced dangerously misleading results in elections around the world of late.

But the US fortune tellers were particularly confused by the scrambled demographics of the 2016 election. Trump in many ways ran to Clinton’s left on some economic issues, with a populist appeal to a growing group of unaffiliated independent-minded voters, and yet analysts continued to assume that if registered Democrats were voting early, or telling pollsters they were going to vote, it meant a vote for Clinton.

That all changed in 2016, a ground zero for a political bombshell that will mean the US electoral map never looks the same again.

6 thoughts on “Why Hillary Clinton lost the election

  1. For the next few months I believe there will be a lot of brouhaha and hullabaloo hindsight analysis about how/why Hillary lost or how/why Trump won. I did not vote for either one of them. I was a Bernie Sanders man. I even gave up my membership of 44 years as a Republican so that I could vote for Bernie against Hillary as an Independent. As far as I am concerned, Hillary should be sent to jail and Trump be sent to a mental asylum.

    The election is over. Like it or not, Trump won, fair and square. He should be given a chance to see what he can do for the country. I do anticipate tough time is coming for the next four years. I do worry how the working class people, non-white or white, going to tough out these four years. But I am not worried that something catastrophic is going to happen to America.

    From hindsight, every one is an expert in why Hillary Clinton lost the election. I say Hillary Clinton lost because she is Hillary Clinton, an arrogant elitist who was so detached from the working class and was unable to connect with the working class in traditionally Democratic rust belt with economic angst. That included working class women, who minimized the gender gap (the so-called “Waitress Moms”). They were more worried about their pocketbooks than about what Donald Trump said to an entertainment television host a decade ago, or that the Russian is coming. The result was that states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania which had not voted Republican since 1980 voted against her.

    There is so much talk about Obamacare being Obama legacy. The truth is Obamacare is in a humongous mess. On October 24, two weeks before the election, the federal government informed Americans all over the country that they would be socked with double-digit Obamacare premium increases. Negative news headlines trumpeted the increases in various battleground states while the media were talking about other things (like FBI James Comey, Clinton’s emails and Trump’s groping), things that didn’t directly affect people’s own lives.

    Average increases in Obamacare premium in battleground states: Pennsylvania-13.5%,Ohio-13.12% Nevada-11.74%, Maine-21.24%, Minnesota-59%, Wisconsin-16%, Michigan-16.7%, Florida-17.4%…. This is what average Americans really, really care for. Clinton was unable to detect this for she was so far detached from the Average Joe and Jane, or she simply didn’t care.

    Clinton was as flawed a nominee as Trump. The voters didn’t like either one of them, so the personality and character part was a wash. She was the establishment in an anti-establishment year. In an old “Who would you rather have a beer with?” test, no one could imagine having a beer with Clinton. Some people could imagine having a beer with Trump, probably while eating KFC with silver forks and gold plate. The billionaire had managed to become anti-elite. Go figure.

  2. On election night, the Clinton campaign only booked the Javit centre until 2am which seems strange because you would expect them to book a long night for a celebration. It shows they had expected an early win and had enough time to celebrate.

    Hillary, have a long history of political screw-up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.