The Guardian view on President-elect Donald Trump: a dark day for the world


November 11, 2016

The Guardian view on President-elect Donald Trump: a dark day for the world

Editorial–The Guardian

Image result for Trump is President-Elect

This is a political and cultural cataclysm that few believed would really happen. It’s a bleak day for America, and for the pluralism and diversity the country has come to stand for

The unthinkable is only unthinkable until it happens. Then, like the sack of Rome, it can seem historically inevitable. So it is with the global political earthquake that is the election of Donald Trump as the next president of the United States. If he is true to his campaign pledges, which were many and reckless, Mr Trump’s win will herald America’s most stunning reversal of political and economic orthodoxy since the New Deal in the 1930s, but with the opposite intention and effect. It halts the ailing progressive narrative about modern America and the 21st-century world in its tracks. It signals a seismic rupture in the American-dominated global liberal economic and political order that had seemed to command the 21st century after communism collapsed and China’s economy soared.

In that sense, the Trump triumph has echoes of the increasingly alarming general rightward shift in the politics of other post-industrial western democracies, to which progressives have again produced inadequate responses. The parallel with Britain’s Brexit vote is obvious and real. So, perhaps, is the further boost that the Trump triumph may hand to nationalists in many parts of Europe – Marine Le Pen jumped quickly on that bandwagon. The result will be lamented by liberals across America and beyond. But it will be cheered in Moscow and Damascus, which will feel emboldened. This is not a good week to be a Latvian or a Ukrainian, and another dire one to be a Syrian oppositionist. The result is also a generational challenge to progressive politics to find the radical and credible message that eludes them in so many countries, not just in America.

But this is primarily an American catastrophe that America has brought upon itself. When it came to it, the US was unable to find a credible way of rallying against Mr Trump and what he represents. Hillary Clinton failed that crucial test both in herself and in what she offered; for her this is the end. But she was the symptom, not the cause. Mr Trump was not taken seriously and was widely not expected to beat Mrs Clinton throughout the long, bitter campaign. At each stage, his candidacy was deemed certain to crash and burn. The opinion polls and the vaunted probability calculus rarely trended in his direction; both are now discredited. Only after the FBI director’s intervention, less than two weeks before the election, was it widely imagined that the tables might turn in Mr Trump’s favour. Nevertheless by the eve of poll Mr Trump was again the outsider.

Yet Mr Trump won big in an election where, if the exit polls were right, most people made up their minds long before the James Comey furore. Mr Trump’s victory was total. It was built, more than anything else, on the white vote; irrespective of gender, age or education, white people mostly voted for him. It was the most stunning upset in modern US history; not even a squeaker. He won most of the battleground states into which the Clinton campaign had poured money – Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, North Carolina and Wisconsin – en route to a decisive Republican electoral college total exceeding 300. That majority is centred on the so-called flyover states, which inhabitants of the big Democratic bastions on the coasts often only see from 35,000 feet. But the red tide pushed north too, deep into the rustbelt, and consolidated in the south – although the electoral college system amplified Mr Trump’s victory: Mrs Clinton is set to win the popular vote, as Democrats have in every election bar one since 1988.

Democrats shattered

Image result for Trump is President-Elect

Meanwhile, Republican congressional candidates who had scrabbled to put distance between themselves and their nominee after the ugly TV debates found themselves riding to victory on Mr Trump’s coattails. Republicans held most of their seats in the Senate races, and will be savouring the chance to extend their majority in 2018, when the beneficiaries of the Obama re-election wave of 2012 face the voters. More predictably, the House remained firmly in Republican hands too; Speaker Paul Ryan and his lieutenants have more to fear from their own party grassroots and from a perhaps vengeful new man in the White House than they do from the shattered Democrats, for whom this outcome is the sum of all fears.

President Trump is the shock heard round the world. Now that he has won, the instant explanations have already started to flood in: that the mobilisation (or not) of this or that demographic was decisive; that he tapped the angry anti-establishment mood; that he spoke for millions who felt abandoned by the prosperous and progressive; that American nativism was always far stronger than liberals wanted to think; that he was a celebrity candidate for the celebrity-obsessed age; that he rode the tiger of post-truth politics; that making America great again was a cut-through message in a militaristic and imperial nation; that white men (and many white women) had had it with political correctness; that misogyny swung it; that the mainstream media failed to call him out; that it is a verdict on the Barack Obama years; that Mrs Clinton was always the wrong candidate; that there was racist dirty work in the voting system; that it was the Russians who won it for him.

None of these explanations are irrelevant. All of them have something to say. But beware of instant certainties. As with Brexit, in the immediate aftermath of a huge upset, a period of careful evidence-gathering and reflection is in order. This is not to diminish the immense seriousness of what happened on Tuesday. Nor is it to understate the anxieties about what lies ahead as Mr Obama steps back and Mr Trump takes over.

Image result for Washington DC

Donald J. Trump conquers Washington DC and The Republics controls Congress

Four particular fears now stand out. The first is the unleashing of an unbridled conservative agenda in Washington, now that the Republicans control the White House and Capitol Hill together, a rare thing in the past hundred years. In her dignified concession speech Mrs Clinton rightly emphasised the need to defend democratic values; she might have drawn attention to President Obama’s legacy on healthcare and climate change too. Mr Trump and the congressional Republicans have differences; he is more prepared to use the power of government than many of them are. But they have a clear path now towards reshaping the supreme court and dozens of lower-tier judicial benches in their own image. The effect on race, gender and sexual-equality issues is likely to outlast Mr Trump’s period in office. The culture wars will reopen. Abortion rights are threatened.

Racial impact

The second is the impact of this result on race in America more widely. Mr Trump campaigned against migrants and against Muslims, insulted black and Latino Americans, launched ads that some saw as covertly antisemitic, and was cheered to victory by every white racist in the land. His voters – a Brexit echo again – will want him to deliver. Every action he takes in this area threatens to divide and inflame. After a half-century of uneven but undeniable racial progress in America, the consequences of every attempt to turn back the clock could be dire.

The third fear is whether Mr Trump has any economic plan that will deliver for some of the poor communities that gave him their votes so solidly. Mr Trump connected with the anger that many poor and white voters feel. But what can he really do about it? What do most congressional Republicans care about it? He can try to put up all the protectionist walls he likes. That will please his supporters. But it is difficult to see how he can bring old mines, mills and factories back to life. A lot of Americans feel left behind and let down. However, Mr Trump is playing with fire if, in the end, it becomes clear that he has used their anxieties to again advance himself and the urban rich class to which he belongs.

The final and overarching fear, though, is for the world. Mr Trump’s win means uncertainty about America’s future strategy in a world that has long relied on the United States for stability. But Mr Trump’s capacity to destabilise is almost limitless. His military, diplomatic, security, environmental and trade policies all have the capacity to change the world for the worse. Americans have done a very dangerous thing this week. Because of what they have done we all face dark, uncertain and fearful times.

5 thoughts on “The Guardian view on President-elect Donald Trump: a dark day for the world

  1. “Mr Trump’s victory was total. It was built, more than anything else, on the white vote; irrespective of gender, age or education, white people mostly voted for him,” Editorial of Guardian.

    One third of Latino Americans voted for Trump. Trump earned 2 percentage higher than Romney from Latino votes. Also Trump earned 2 percentage higher than Romney from African Americans votes. This is amazing, if you think about it, that Trump can still earn more votes from minorities under avalanche of criticism of being a racist, sexiest, xenophobic, Islamophobic, and anti-sematic, by the leftists, to which the Guardian is the main champion.

    Malaysians who are interested in American politics could have a more well-rounded views if they check out http://www.allsides.com/, which presents views on 3 columns – left, center, and right.

  2. The Guardian view on President-elect Donald Trump: a dark day for the world

    Every change in power brings new winners and losers whether it is in the Government or Corporate Sectors or other Organizations having influence on substantial funds such as Religions-Charities-Sporting Associations-NGOs- etc. The views being currently published most appear to be by those who may be the losers under the Trump Presidency.
    There will be new winners under the Trump Presidency but either they are not giving their views or there views are not being published as most of the media was Pro-Hillary and thus may feel that their credibility as independent news providers and journalists may have been proven to be a farce.

    Remember there will be
    TENS OF THOUSANDS of BENEFICIARIES OF APPOINTMENTS AND OPPORTUNITIES OF REWARDS AND BENEFITS WITH CONTRACTS etc
    FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORTED TRUMP
    and these BENEFICIARIES WILL REPLACE THOSE WHO BENEFITED UNDER DEMOCRATS PRESIDENCY AND WILL NOW BE THE LOSERS.

    FACT AND REALITY F LIFE WORLDWIDE AS SUPPORTERS OF WINNERS ARE REWARDED AND THOSE WHO SUPPORT LOSERS END UP AS LOSERS.

  3. Trump’s victory could be total only when he takes both the popular votes and the electoral college votes. Well, he has not. This of course relates to voting block entities like electoral college. At individual level voting (like in a GE), no candidate ever gets 100% votes. Even in rigged communist countries it is still around 98-99 % plus or minus.

  4. Differing modes of elections have their own pros and cons. USA system does not require majority in popular votes but requires electoral college votes. The UK system which is followed in most countries especially those which were under the British rule go by Constituencies where a smaller number of voters in an individual constituency may have same number of elected representatives as another with larger number of voters. Just compare the number of Members of Parliament for cities such as KL which has 11 MPs and the whole population of several States have more MPs even though their populations and thus voters are small.
    All systems may have been designed for those in power and for vested interests and changes may be made to ‘benefit’ them.
    What does this tell for the ‘independence’ of the relevant Commissions?

  5. Trump’s Presidency could well bring about a new world order and that would be every country would have to look after its own interest with its own resources. UNcle Sam is no longer there to protect the well being of other countries , be it on human rights, or political correctness or from external threats. It will be whats it in for the benefit of USA before a deal can be done. This means each country has to grow its own arrangements . This may not be bad for the world at large.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s