SARAWAK 2016: Election that is not an Election


May 7, 2016

SARAWAK 2016: Election that is not an Election

By P Ramakrishnan

The Sarawak election does not fit into the democratic mode in any way.It is an election that does not give the Opposition any chance to contest on an equal footing. It is so unfair that it can be easily compared to a boxer being thrown into the ring with his hands tied.

Sarawak covers a huge tract of land that is inaccessible without large resources and facilities – a great handicap for the Opposition. A huge team of party workers is required to spread out and reach remote villages to bring to them a party’s point of view on political matters, so clearly much effort and time is needed.

This makes it doubly hard for Opposition parties when they lack the resources to penetrate these inaccessible areas to bring home the message of change. This is made even harder by the Barisan Nasional, that unfairly puts obstacles in the Opposition’s way in a bid to deny their parties the legitimate right to campaign effectively.

When Opposition politicians are barred from Sarawak without any rhyme or reason whereas BN politicians are allowed free access to campaign, one is left baffled as to how lopsided this election has become. It is atrociously outrageous, to be honest.

We hear accusations that Opposition leaders from the Peninsula would control Sarawak if the Opposition won. We wonder how this would be possible when only Sarawakians are contesting in the elections. No one from the Peninsula is contesting in this election. How then could Opposition leaders from the Peninsula control Sarawak? This is an absurd accusation by people who have lost their thinking faculties.

Going by that same logic, can we then claim that BN leaders from the Peninsula would be controlling Sarawak because these leaders are busily campaigning there as well? That would be stupid.

The Prime Mminister and his entire cabinet (with nothing useful do in Putrajaya) have descended on Sarawak and are spreading out across the state using various convenient transportation facilities at their disposal and promising projects and incentives to woo the voters. This is bribing.

When you prevent Opposition politicians from conducting legitimate political activities during the election period by banning them from the state, you are reducing their campaign personnel and their ability to campaign effectively. Thus the Sarawak Opposition is rendered ineffective and their influence is deliberately diminished so that they cannot do well in the election. This is contrary to the rule of law.

Immigration laws allow Opposition politicians to enter Sarawak “for the sole purpose of engaging in legitimate political activity”. But when this provision is totally ignored, it means even the rule by law is discarded. There is no rule of law; neither is there rule by law. The Sarawak government under Adenan Satem has no moral authority to exercise any legitimate power to prevent the Opposition equal access to the state.

It is a commonly accepted notion that a caretaker chief minister does not have the power to ban Opposition politicians, who have a right to be in Sarawak during this campaign period. He can only attend to the day-to-day affairs and cannot initiate new projects or approve allocations for whatever reason or purpose. However this simple moral obligation has not been observed by the chief minister of Sarawak.

Sarawak voters must never tolerate this blatant abuse of power. If the right of politicians can be denied so blatantly, it only means that the right of ordinary Sarawakians can also be denied any time after the election.

To safeguard your rights, “Never be a spectator to unfairness or stupidity.”

P Ramakrishnan is an Aliran executive committee member.

With a firm belief in freedom of expression and without prejudice, FMT tries its best to share reliable content from third parties. Such articles are strictly the writer’s personal opinion. FMT does not necessarily endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider.

 

7 thoughts on “SARAWAK 2016: Election that is not an Election

  1. go to Courts, if you skin the kangaroo out, and seek a declaration the election is no election by any conventions. Inform the whole world the UMNOMelayu governed Bolehland does not deserve a respectful seat at the UN. Shame the UMNOMelayus where ever you find them. Let then hang their head in shame among humanity and declare these UMNOMelayus are sub-specimen of the human breed.

  2. We can keep barking of all the words of insincerity, unjust, impartiality, bias, selfish and corrupted government and what not but UMNO/Barisan rule at Federal level will not pay any heed. Najib and his bandwagon of fools will just say you can fuck off and they keep ruling as long as they have billions in their kitty.

    It is no way when all the government agencies especially EC, work towards this cowardly and dastardly act to cheat to help the government to remain in power.

    BERSIH with all the noise in the past is now sleeping and the wake up time will be near to GE14. Our comments will not carry any weight though vast majority have been expressing dissatisfaction of the way the elections are being conducted in Malaysia. When the boundaries are drawn in Barisan’s favor, do you have any chance to win the government?

  3. “Sarawak covers a huge tract of land that is inaccessible without large resources and facilities – a great handicap for the Opposition.”

    What a lame excuse.

  4. These UMNO scumbags deserved to be called lowlife. The worst humanity of all mankind. No shame at all.

  5. A lot of factors contributed to what we in Semenanjung felt was a dissapointing Election Result….. All things aside..the infighting for seats by PKR/DAP too gave the BN more votes… The opposition should by now have a sense of responsibility and should’ve set aside their ego and coorperated instead of being divided. Serves them right to lose all those seats!!!

  6. The blocks are one thing but truth is the two biggest problem, no crime, is the Gerry meandering particularly the small size of rural constituencies and the vast amount of money spent and dished out. It’s simply theft – the money spent are stolen and the votes are bought with the stolen money. Some constituencies only have a few thousand voters and wins can be had for a couple of million cash – Peanuts considered the tens of billions Najib, alone has stolen.

    It’s feudal, raw feudalism

  7. Let me put it simply, Azmin is a scumbag political operator. He can only be a bag carrier for real leaders and should be moved aside for real leader. He is an apologist for Hadi’s PAS and at some point UMNO.

    Operators are just that, workers. Not leaders, bag carriers and they extract a big price for themselves for the work they do. If Azmin is a political leader then, Wall Street is a temple full of gods. Even Nurul Izzah is better in the long run then he is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s