Proper Discourse

April 23, 2016

by Lyana Khairuddin

We should take up discourses that allow a richer, more meaningful understanding of religion and cultural sensitivities to allow society to attain a measure of peace within its diversity.

IN my line of work, I do a lot of talking. Apparently, being having a PhD makes one an expert in speaking about particular topics, and one’s opinions are held to a higher regard than most.

Personally, I have always had an issue with the word “lecture” and the way things are taught in traditional, conservative classrooms.I prefer to have conversations on a particular topic, with many questions related to the topic being thrown in for discussion, rather than one-way didactic lectures.

This is the conundrum with being considered an expert; where one would expect an expert in any field to give a lecture, followed by a question-and-answer session with the audience, rather than a discourse. After all, technically, this is what I am paid to do.From my six years of being on this side of the rostrum, however, I still think that having a discussion is the more enriching experience.

I would prefer to learn from my students, as they expect to learn from me. Thus, it saddened me to see the many attendees to a recent lecture by a non-Malaysian ulama in rapt attention and mesmerised by claims of miraculous conversions into Islam.

Try  talking sensibly to this religious functionary

What made me even sadder was the fact that our religious affairs department applauded and wel­­comed the said ulama (with open arms and complete VIP treatment), claiming that he is a beacon of “moderation” much required in a country baffled by extremists in our midst.

As part of the Voices of Moderation campaign ran by this newspaper, I am offended. As a Malaysian born post-independence, I think it is high time we Malaysians take discourses into our own minds and voices.

We do not need an outsider to tell us to be moderates or how “Islamic” we should be. We Malaysians should read the Quran more (and actually understand what we are reading), have discussions moderated by learned persons in the Quran and Islamic history (there are many among us), and have more interfaith dialogues with fellow Malay­sians who practise Christ­ianity, Buddhism, Hindu­ism and other faiths. I would even suggest having discussions with agnostics and atheists.

We should go a step further from “I want to hug an ulama”, as popularised by Syed Azmi, to “I want to accept a fellow human being”.I do not see the relevance of having a public lecture that compares religions and then claim that one is better than another.

I would, however, put my support behind discourses that allow a richer, more meaningful understanding of religion and cultural sensitivities to allow a society to attain a measure of societal peace within its diversity, to live and let live, yet respectful of each other’s believes.

It is a utopia of sorts, yet a dream that was once envisioned for this country of ours. Furthermore, things should move beyond just talking and reaching an understanding.

How many of us have had our fellow Malaysians catering to our needs in order to include us? I’ve had non-Muslim friends catering only halal food to accommodate me. For this to have happened during a Christmas celebration  in Brisbane was an amazing feat, and one that overwhelmed me with gratitude. I only hope to do the same for my Buddhist friends who are strict vegans, and my Hindu friends who do not eat beef, when I have meals with them.

Before we start looking up to an outsider to inform us of whether our version of Islam is great and how our society would become more “moderate” by doing so, I think we should start having conversations with our fellow Malaysians.

How are they affected by the ruling over the use of the word “Allah” in the Herald case from many moons ago? How do they feel about the recent raids conducted by the religious authorities on transgender Malaysians? What do they think about the kerfuffle in Taman Medan last year? Is there still resentment over not being able to display the cross on buildings (to identify a shoplot as a church)?

I think it is past time that we have these conversations and get to know each other better.It does not do for us to only claim to have friends of other faiths and ethni­cities, but we do not talk to them, or even know them.

Perhaps this would also be a step towards not being blindly fooled by “ex-priests” from Germany. After all, our lack of knowledge on the many sects of Christianity is only matched by our lack of knowledge in geography!

I am also an advocate for spreading kindness and compassion through our very actions. There is no need for “comparative religion” if all of us are to understand that every religion teaches us to do good to fellow humans, and be good human beings ourselves.

The discourse should be about how every mosque, temple, and church in Malaysia can be put to better use for the community at large.The discourse should be on interfaith understanding, on finding a common ground against extremist ideas, and on advocating the spirit of voluntarism in our citizens.

Let us reclaim the discourse in Malaysia.

Lyana Khairuddin is an academic with a local public university who runs to keep being optimistic about Malaysia. The views expressed here are entirely her own.

9 thoughts on “Proper Discourse

  1. Quote:- “I am also an advocate for spreading kindness and compassion through our very actions. There is no need for “comparative religion” if all of us are to understand that every religion teaches us to do good to fellow humans, and be good human beings ourselves”

    If that is all there is to religion, then why have religion at all? Can’t we have all that without religion? After all animals, which presumably have no religion, could display kindness and compassion and kill for food or in defense of their own kind, and not for some “ideology”

    The point is the author, by default or design, forgot the crucial Heaven and Hell part and who rightfully or deservedly goes to which place.

    I am sure the author is innately a good, kind, compassionate person, but there is no escaping the fact that religion, however which way you polish and market it, divides and separates human beings rather than unite them.

  2. “..and have more interfaith dialogues with fellow Malay­sians..” Dr Lyana

    Perhaps, a bit quixotic when it comes to the present bunch of Establishment Maggots. But i’ll give her credit for trying. Here’s to Lyana and all of us who wanna see a better Malaysia:

  3. Zakir is a con man and Najib our no. 1 fraudster knows one when he see it. So, the coming together of the two raised no alarm bell of the entire Islamic political- bureaucracy is condemnation of Islam practise in this country and everyone involved

  4. When a religion claims to be the only true path and its followers are highly convinced of its superiority, it is bound to create a divide between the followers and the rest of mankind, and it breeds violence. A true religion of peace is concerned with the total understanding of mankind, teaches its followers not only to understanding their own faith but to respect and understanding the faiths of other people. Generally, Islam has failed to do this. It is not a religion of peace as it claims.

  5. Governments should not interfere in the choice of one’s religion. A government is not god, period! Far too long -governments has used religion to consolidate its position to stay in power.

  6. Essentially, the religion is “hablun min Allah, hablun min an-nas” or “to know and devote oneself to God, and to love and serve humankind”. But the perennial chauvinists and opportunists of course will persistently thrust their pseudo-religious ideas into our fold . . .

  7. There can never be any discourse in Malaysia when the specific religious bigots supported and condones by the government forced their “My religion is the one and only true religion” down every Malaysians throat and insult and run down other religions.

  8. Blessed may you be Lyana Khairuddin. Your effort and subconscious mission of liberating the closed minds of some blissful fellow Muslims misguided by false teachings of a few charlatan ulamaks is laudable.

    I was saddened to see Dr Mahathir being present at one of Zakir Naik’s talks here. His presence may unwittingly convey the impression that he endorses the speaker and his strident views. I would like to give the benefit of doubt to Dr Mahathir. Perhaps he wanted to hear him direct to size up the man.

    Adaption and adjustment to exigencies and modern needs and requirements is inevitable. This also applies to practitioners of all faiths. During the British time, Police Stations in Malaya and Singapore had either a surau or dedicated prayer spaces for Muslims to pray. It is no longer there, at least as far as Singapore is concerned.

    Recently a Naval trainee complained of the lack of halal kitchens on battle ships. Another Malay gentleman responded with, what I thought was, a fitting reply. He said halal food is a strict dietary requirment for Muslims and this can be followed up without much fuss or setting pre-conditions. He also pointed out that at battle fields halal kitchens will simply have no place at all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s