Pakatan Harapan: The Artful Dodger with lots of Hot Air and Misfits

January 11, 2016

Pakatan Harapan: The Artful Dodger with lots of Hot Air and Misfits

by Cmdr (rtd) S. Thayaparan


“The difference between a politician and a statesman is that a politician thinks about the next election while the statesman thinks about the next generation.” – James Freeman Clarke

Sultan Nazrin Shah of Perak was quoted as saying, “Information is no longer limited to sources that have been filtered and controlled by the authorities.” The problem with large-scale media organisations is that information is always controlled, sometimes even by consumers who show very little tolerance for anything that goes against prevailing sentiments. Echo chambers have always told you what you want to hear.

This brings us to Pakatan Harapan. If Pakatan Harapan really thinks that Harapan’s hope is in Sungai Buloh, then we are all in trouble. Terence Netto is right. Pakatan Harapan is the artful dodger.

In his piece, Terence wrote, “The tripartite assembly wheeled out all the broadly supportable democratic principles embedded in the Federal Constitution, with a particular eye for those planks that sustain Malay Muslim primacy, saying that the coalition would ensure their rule will uphold this.”

What exactly has Malay Muslim primacy achieved? The latest evidence are students who, for whatever reasons, do not have enough funds to buy food and a court decision endorsing unilateral conversion of minors as something legally acceptable (sic) under the Federal Constitution.

John Cage said, “I can’t understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I’m frightened of the old ones.” Here in Malaysia, politicians who have power, or seek it, are so afraid that new ideas would impede their efforts that they are content to let the rot continue so long as the old ways, the old ideas, maintain them in power. Meanwhile, the disenfranchised of society regardless, of race but with very little options, plays the part of maintaining this charade we call a democracy.

 Dr.Mahathir again

Of former Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, I wrote, “You see in the reality what Mahathir (photo above) and UMNO have created, drawing attention to the systemic inequalities faced by non-Malay communities, is a racist act. Criticisms directed towards the government or civil departments are considered racist acts because the majorities who comprise those institutions are Malays. It was getting to the absurd level where simply being a non-Malay who didn’t support the government was considered a racial provocation.”

And we are still falling into his trap. These days you find people more than willing to subscribe to the premise that “as Malaysians we are all racists in our own ways” as shorthand to dismiss any constructive objections to racist or racialist ideas.

In this way it legitimises the UMNO-BN ideology as not a moral failing but as a failure of execution. It implies that the only route for a functional Malaysia is a racial one. Hence the usual BN plea of “give us more time” or “the Malays need not worry, because even in a class-based approach, the Malays are the majority” assurances from Pakatan Rakyat.

Racial and religious tensions

The DAP is demonised as being anti-Malay and Islam, while PKR is terrified that it is perceived as being not Malay or Muslim enough. This gives PAS the opportunity to dishonourably (in my opinion) remain relevant by hanging on the coattails of a movement that supposedly offered change but so far has kept to the old UMNO ways.

Squabbling over seats and reaching an “amicable” compromise is hardly an achievement in a country simmering with racial and religious tensions. Furthermore, it is hardly learning from past mistakes when this problem of seat allocations had always been a preoccupation with Pakatan Rakyat, and now Pakatan Harapan.

Johor Amanah Deputy Cief Zulkefly Ahmad said because UMNO has convinced the rural Malays that DAP is anti-Malay and Muslim, Harapan should resort to trickery – fielding candidates under an Amanah or PKR logo – to win a seat. While the big cheese in Amanah and the DAP distanced themselves from the comment, it really points to the political dissonance of opposition politics.

It is all about convincing people that you are not anti this or anti that when we are living in a country that defines its citizens along racial and religious lines. Of course, the Opposition can’t rely on foundation principles because, at the end of the day, race and religion are just as much a preoccupation to them as it is with UMNO-BN.

Dr. Wong Chin Huat of the DAP-linked Penang Institute backs “cultural literacy” as a means to neutralise UMNO propaganda, but this really is not the solution to the problem. Malays, whose scepticism is based on racial or religious grounds, are not going to be convinced because they are spoken to in the same language.

The reality is that beyond the religious component, when politicians and pundits talk about the special positions of the Malays, the gist of it is the so-called affirmative action policies at work here in Malaysia. Again I revisit an earlier article of mine, No Brave New Malaysia:

“Thomas Sowell in his provocative essay ‘Affirmative Action: A World Wide Disaster’ (1989) on his research in countries with such policies either race-based or needs-based lists several ‘patterns’ which have a deleterious effect on any given society. I will list them, from the article, here for convenience.

1. Preferential programmes, even when explicitly and repeatedly defined as “temporary”, have tended not only to persist but also to expand in scope, either embracing more groups or spreading to wider realms for the same groups, or both. Even preferential programmes established with legally mandated cut-off dates in India and Pakistan have continued past those dates by subsequent extensions.

2. Within these groups designated by government as recipients of preferential treatment, the benefits have disproportionately gone to those members already more fortunate.

3. Group polarisation has tended to increase in the wake of preferential treatment programmes, with non-preferred groups reacting adversely in ways ranging from political backlash to mob violence and civil war.

4. Fraudulent claims of belonging to beneficiary groups have been widespread and have taken many forms in various countries.”

I will just throw this out there. The goal of the opposition should be to ensure that people are not reliant on political parties or government policies that appear to favour them. It may take some time to get to that better place, but it is better than going nowhere fast.

S THAYAPARAN is Commander (Rtd) of the Royal Malaysian Navy.

5 thoughts on “Pakatan Harapan: The Artful Dodger with lots of Hot Air and Misfits

  1. In line with the comment by YAB Tun Dr M it may be concluded that


  2. Is Pakatan Harapan dodging and spinning? Of course they are.. Should they be better? Of course they should. BUT are many Malaysian also also pathetic and should be better? Of course also..Even critics are also often pathetic and often should be better..

    If you ask for what should be in govt and politics, there is just too long a list very quickly..The thing is to ask for WHAT MIUST BE. – that is much harder..Frankly, for many Malaysian, especially non-Muslims and non-Malays, you would be a fool if you did not have your own independent game plan to be independent of the govt and politics in this country,.

    : an active effort to improve the employment or educational opportunities of members of minority groups and women.

    DISCRIMINATION is treatment of making a distinction in favour of or against, a person based on the group to which that person belongs to, rather than on individual merit.

    Folks, according to the definitions above, the NEP was not an Affirmative Action plan, it was a discrimination.

  4. Spot on, commander! Time has come for non Bumis to share links on Reid Commission and Cobbald Commission on FB, and publicly ask their MP on their opinions and views on many statements in which the Commissioners have raised concerns on the preferrential rights. If no answer is provided, it is the same as not voting. Might as well as not vote. Else, why bother?
    17% of the nation already hold 50% of the votes. NonBumi’s city dwellers’ vote do not matter, in any case. For those 17%, their livelihood depends fully on ruling elite. The votes from the 17% are really a dime a dozen for the ruling elites. All this is assuming that we still get to vote in the next few years. The most loving thing for the 17% havenot Bumis is for the nonBumis to voice out.

    We Malaysians deserve what we sow. We, penumpang will forver be penumpang if we do not voice out for our own dignity! Powerless love is of no use. Time to buckle belt, and get ready for the worst. Ruling elites, on both aisles, are just taking advantage of all of us, the have-nots, bumis and nonbumis. A lot of the 17% Bumi havenots probably got it worst.

    All of this calculation shows the lack of intention to be honest amongst many of top Harapan leadership. If they cannot be honest before voting, why bother to think they would be honest. For the few who are honest within Harapan, it is time to help them flush out the business as usual, no different from UMNO, kind of leadership.

    NonBumi voters only get to deserve the leadership that we want, when we voice out.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s