1MDB Responses raise more Questions


June 4, 2015

1MDB Responses raise more Questions
— What’s Up, Mr. Auditor-General?

by Andrew Ong@www.malaysiakini.com

1MDB’s attempt to account for how its RM42 billion in loans was spent raises more questions than answers, according the company’s top two critics. Of the items listed, noted Petaling Jaya Utara MP Tony Pua and Pandan MP Rafizi Ramli, the most suspicious was the RM4.5 billion used for “cost of finance and working capital”

“To claim that RM4.5 billion was used as financing cost as part of the debt total is disingenuous. It means 1MDB borrowed more money to pay interest on its loans. It means all the assets it acquired don’t earn enough to even pay for the interests incurred,” Pua told Malaysiakini.

According to Rafizi, who is a certified chartered accountant, a financing cost bill of RM4.5 billion would mean that 1MDB’s financing cost was around 10.7 percent – a record of sorts.

Rafizi speculated that the financing cost probably included consultancy, arranger fees and interest. He explained the coupon rate of 1MDB’s bonds are between 4 percent to 6 percent, thus it could be concluded that at a 10.7 percent financing cost, 1MDB could have paid “exorbitant” financing fees and short-term interest. “One would have to wonder what kind of short-term financing and advisory (services) that 1MDB subscribed to because most of its debts are not due yet,” he told Malaysiakini.

Why didn’t they liquidate assets?

Rafizi’s estimate was based on an assumption that for the period of 2009 and 2010, financing for its RM6 billion loan was at 5 percent, or RM300 million per annum. And thus, he said, the balance of the financing cost (RM3.9 billion) would have been paid over the period of 2011 and 2013 for the additional RM36 billion in loans.

Therefore, he added, an average of RM3.9 billion over RM36 billion would roughly translate to 10.7 percent financing cost over the loans taken in this 3-year period.Meanwhile, Pua and Rafizi said 1MDB’s claim that RM15.4 billion was used for Brazen Sky Ltd, 1MDB Global Investment Limited and Aabar Investment PJS also warranted further explanation.

“What is RM6.1 billion for Brazen Sky? Where is the RM5.1 billion invested by 1MDB in Global Investment Limited? And why deposit RM4.1 billion with Aabar Investments PJS?” asked Pua.

Rafizi said the figures were already out in public domain, but what remains unknown is how the money was used and how much cash is left. “What exactly are these assets? If they are cash, why was it not liquidated to pay for the loans, without having to resort to (business mogul) T Ananda Krishnan or the IPIC (International Petroleum Investment Company) injection? It is precisely because 1MDB had failed to account for these details that the question of missing money arose in the first place,” he said.

Foreign exchange loss

On 1MDB’s claim that RM900 million was incurred on foreign exchange cost, Rafizi said this should be read as “foreign exchange loss” which was “deplorable”. “What kind of company allows RM900 million realised in foreign exchange losses? This is purely bad management and incompetence, if not outright dereliction of duty. Which transactions and what assets had caused such losses?” he asked.

Both Rafizi and Pua agreed that 1MDB’s explanation of where the money went did not help the company’s credibility crisis and instead led to more questions regarding its management.

Earlier today, 1MDB issued a statement to  explain how its RM41.8 billion in loans were used, in response to former Premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s claim that RM27 billion could not be traced.

1MDB President and Group Executive Director Arul Kanda Kandasamy said this information was fully disclosed in 1MDB’s audited accounts from 2010 to 2014 and was publicly available. “We trust this clarification would help to clear any confusion on this matter,” said Arul.

7 thoughts on “1MDB Responses raise more Questions

  1. This RM6 billion number just shown being the debts of the IPPs that were underwritten by 1MDB bought over the IPPs at RM12 billion, I think this is something new…. all this while only RM12 billion was mentioned…. suddenly this RM6 billion pops up….

    And why does 1MDB have to underwrite the IPP’s liabilities of RM6 billion? I thought buying companies mean at net value ie all assets less liabilities after due diligence, no?

  2. I wonder how long all those involved in the 1MDB financial scandal
    (politicians as well as management) can keep up with their denials and propaganda.
    You can fool some of our less-educated Malaysians but you can’t fool the
    international financial markets.

  3. I wonder how long all those involved in the 1MDB financial scandal
    (politicians as well as management) can keep up with their denials and propaganda.

    CAN CONTINUE UNTIL THEY RESIGN as is the normal culture in all such cases in past including in developed countries. Who remembers the financial scandals and the professionals and those in power who caused them? None as new scandals have been perpetuated to replace the old ones.

    You can fool some of our less-educated Malaysians but you can’t fool the
    international financial markets.

    THIS DOES NOT APPLY WHEN POLITICIANS IN POWER AND PROFESSIONAL ADVISERS ARE INVOLVED. Remember the past financial disasters were in developed countries and was at international financial markets and THOSE FOOLED WERE HIGHLY LITERATE [Do not confuse literacy with education] with several alphabets after their names including PhD [Permanent Head Damage] holders and MBA [ME BEFORE ALL].

  4. I foresee that a very serious economic crisis will eventually occur
    as a result of the 1PM-cum-1Finance Minister’s continued gross mismanagement of
    Malaysia’s fiscal policy. This will force him out of office. No amount of propaganda and buying support with millions of RM in tax payer money will save him.

    (I hope that I am wrong. But I don’t think Dr M’s relentless barrage will work. It will however undermine the 1PM’s legitimacy and credibility more and more).

  5. Now that they appeared to have laid out their full set of cards, (there’s no turning back for them now), and daring anyone to call their bluff, it is quite legitimate now to demand a forensic investigation without which any comment from Rafizi or Tony Pua, however cogent, would be dismissed as mere speculation and opposition political trickery.

    Also we can now expect the Auditor-General to just confirm all that, (what else would or could the A-G come up without any forensic investigation conducted?), and declare that Deloitte and all auditors before them did give a true and fair view of 1MDB accounts.

    The only hope now is for the PAC to question the people involved for details of each and every transaction, supported by material documents which should not be a problem as these are not matters of national security, and last but not least the crucial regulatory role of Bank Negara.

    And finally to ask for specific rebuttals or confirmations of the matters brought up by Sarawak Report which so far have not been denied or rebutted but silently and suspiciously ignored.

    If we as a nation really want some kind of national economic / political reconciliation, as Najib seems to be asking of his divided Cabinet and the people of Malaysia whose support he so dearly need at this moment to silence Mahathir, then be 110% open in words and more importantly in deed; account for every cent spent which should not be a problem also as 1MDB has banks of accountants and managers working in there, and as I said before crucially explain why, whether true or false, US700m or may be more were transferred into Jho Low’s company account.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.