Reinvigorating Rural Malaysia: New Paradigms Needed


July 2, 2013

MY COMMENT: The rural sector of the Malaysian economy has been for din-merican5over 3 decades treated with benign neglect as the government forged ahead with rapid industrialisation driven by foreign direct investment, particularly from Japan. Agriculture should be the backbone of any economy. Take Japan or the United States. Both these countries have not abandoned this important sector of the economy.There is now a need for Malaysia to have balanced economic development, not rapid growth. It makes economic and political sense.

I, therefore, congratulate Murray Hunter for this article. We cannot alleviate poverty if we continue to treat the rural economy as a step child. Politically, it is also not sustainable since the increasing urban-rural income will lead migration of rural less skilled labour into the cities, thereby creating social problems for the government. As Murray says, “[T]here must be a renewed interest in sustainability on the part of both policymakers and communities, as Malaysia’s sustainability is tied up with rural evolution. New forms of community education are needed outside of the traditional education system to deliver community needed skills. The failure to achieve this will result in continued population depletion as the youth abandon rural areas for the cities”–Din Merican.

Reinvigorating Rural Malaysia: New Paradigms Needed

by Murray Hunter (06-30-13) @http://www.themalaysiainsider.com

rural-in-malaysia2

There has been a remarkable change in the composition of Malaysia’s rural-urban mix. In the 1980s approximately 70 percent was considered rural, where today 72 percent are urbanized and with the change taking place at about 2.4 percent annually.

It is a change that is taking place all over Asia, from China to India to Indonesia and more. Very few countries outside China have even attempted to cope, with the result that the rural-urban divide has grown and with very little being done to directly alleviate problems of poverty and rustication.

Ranau, SabahIn Malaysia, rural sector development has been debated little, even though the primary sector still represents almost 12 percent of GDP and employs more than 11 percent of the population. Many rural issues affect the future in much greater magnitude than the rural contribution to GDP and employment. The sustainability of Malaysia as an eco(n)-system, the country’s cultural basis, and even political destiny are tied up with rural evolution, with the vote in the kampung remaining a potent fiction if nothing else

In the meantime, deterioration continues in what was once one of the world’s most lush environmental green lungs. Forest cover is decreasing on a daily basis. Conservation has lost out to greed and development. Palm oil, rubber plantations and urban expansion are eating into the forests, with very poor land enforcement on the ground. Well-connected businesses get concessions that are extremely financially lucrative, at great environmental cost. Roads and new townships have divided rural habitats, playing havoc with biodiversity.

Rural Malaysia3The precise needs of rural societies are best obtained from inside those communities. A “bottom up” problem identification process would ensure development objectives and implementation scenarios would remain relevant. Community shura (consultation) committees could be set up at the village level to identify and discuss needs, problems, and desired solutions, and advise village heads.

Such a democratic approach to community would provide policymakers with the guidance they need in setting objectives and programs, and assist in minimizing funding leakages during implementation. This measure alone would signal a very strong redistribution of policy decision-making to the communities themselves, empowering communities to have more say in deciding their own future destinies. The shura system should develop new leaders and champions who are willing to lead and help shape a new community sense of wisdom. Policies will never succeed without people to drive them.

Self-sufficiency and a vibrant local trade economy are the keys to future rural communities. However, rural SMEs should be facilitated to enter national and international markets. There are now many compliance procedures such as Good Agricultural Practice (GAP), necessary for agricultural produce to enter international supply chains. These practices need to be introduced within rural communities so products produced are accepted in international markets.

These compliance processes can be locally enhanced to include halal (Islamic compliance) certification, thus widening the compliance process to one inclusive certification, which would greatly enhance the desirability of Malaysian produce, especially within the exponentially growing halal markets worldwide.

Paddy FieldsWhole sectors like rice paddy production need to be reconfigured from the bottom up so they can become competitive. The paddy production process requires the hands of a number of contractors during field preparation, planting, cultivation, harvesting, and processing stages. Paddy production is an uncompetitive sector.

New methods like System of Rice Intensification (SRI) could be adopted, and more popular aromatic varieties of rice cultivated to increase industry viability. The rice monopoly held by the government regulator Bernas could be ended to allow new approaches to rice products and marketing by entrepreneurial individuals. Such an approach could drastically decrease production costs and add value to rice products, redistributing this added value back to farmers.

University and institutional research should change focus towards communities rather than using scare research funds to chase medals at exhibitions that have no research or commercial significance in places like Geneva and Seoul. The technology developed by Malaysian institutions should be simple, applicable to community enterprise, and appropriate to the size of the enterprises operating in rural areas.

This appropriate technology, if effective and viable is itself a source of competitive advantage that would enable rural enterprises to compete in the marketplace.

This is a major challenge to Malaysian researchers to come out from their academic institutions and into the community with solutions that can enrich society. If state awards with titles were recommended for those who developed technology benefiting the community, one would be sure there would be great focus and resources allocated towards solving rural problems by academic researchers.

Locally relevant new crops research programs should be undertaken to identify locally viable new crops, which are developed as close as possible to the communities it is intended to benefit, with the community’s input and cooperation through Participatory Action Research (PAR), rather than centralizing research under a national agenda. New crops research should adopt an ‘farm to folk’ research and development approach, including the development of know how for processing new downstream products.

FowlThis requires support through developing new supply/value chains that will carry new micro-enterprises to new markets, with new products. The Federal Agricultural Marketing Authority (FAMA) has a superb distribution infrastructure that could be used to do this. Primary and processed food products can be supplemented with handicrafts, traditional Malay wedding items, batik, leather goods, pewter, and Malay fashion products to develop a national range of indigenous products that can be marketed through franchised retail outlets.

These products could be the result of a host of new rural activities that are developed at micro-SME level. If Fairtrade shops in Europe and OTOP shops in Thailand are any indication of the viability of this proposition, these shops would be extremely profitable.

The nature of entrepreneurship education also needs reconsideration. Currently universities play a primary role in training entrepreneurs, but current courses tend to be academically full of theory, teaching more about entrepreneurship rather than how people can become entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship is more about creativity than intelligence. Yet universities focus on measuring intelligence through assignment and exam, rather than project formats. Entrepreneurship education should be technically based and taught with a ‘hands on’ approach, rather than the stiff classroom theory approach.

Entrepreneurship education needs to be refocused towards vocational and community education mediums to reach those in rural communities who need assistance through this form of education.

An entrepreneurial community requires finance which the established banks are hesitant to provide, even with the government sponsored credit guarantee program under the Credit Guarantee Corporation (CGC). Rural community savings cooperatives can be developed as savings and micro-lending institutions, owned by the community, run for the community, by the community itself.

These savings cooperatives can operate according to Islamic finance procedures where venture risk is shared by both the entrepreneur and institution, and as supplementary activities, run special education, Haj and Umrah funds for community members.

These measures would create a new community enrichment rather than a ‘KPI’ orientated development paradigm. All of these measures individually exist and operate successfully in other member ASEAN states today.

New crop research is very much needed to ensure communities are able to successfully adapt to a changing environment due to climate change. Over the next few years, some crops may provide better yields, while others will drastically decline in their productive capabilities. In addition food production for increasing urban populations and restoring water quality will become very critical issues.

There must be a renewed interest in sustainability on the part of both policy makers and communities, as Malaysia’s sustainability is tied up with rural evolution. New forms of community education are needed outside of the traditional education system to deliver community needed skills. The failure to achieve this will result in continued population depletion as the youth abandon rural areas for the cities.

For more than five years there has been talk about the need for change. This has usually been expressed in political terms at the cost of looking at the cultural, economic, and spiritual development. Current development paradigms have eroded traditional Malaysian society values to the point where it is just a national memory and a long gone narrative.

These old narratives once housed Malaysia’s sense of unity in being collectively proud as a nation, where the rituals of ‘balik kampong’ (returning home) during festivals, smelling the scent of durian during season, rendang during festivals, fishing in the longkang (irrigation drains), and flying kites over paddy fields. These activities once signified what was most valued by communities.

Logo FAMA Malaysia BestHere lies the opportunity to enrich rural society along the vibrant cultural traditions that the country once thrived upon; building self sufficient and sustaining communities. These communities would be much better immune to economic downturns. Communities based upon indigenous knowledge and skills will develop much greater cultural pride which has become exhausted through Malaysia’s occidental industrial growth paradigm.

This is the fundamental issue at stake for Malaysians to decide whether the same country will spiritually exist in the future, or be gone and replaced with something else. The rural communities are the last custodians of Malaysia’s culture and this is where efforts must be made to preserve the spirit of Malaysia, if it is to survive.

The role of government linked corporations (GLCs) in Malaysia’s corridor development projects has not necessarily taken into account the best interests of the communities they have sought to ‘develop’. The collateral damage of this ‘development’ may be too much to bear. If rural development serves vested interests, it will surely be piece meal, unbalanced and ultimately destructive. Future development must enrich rather than destroy culture with blind materialism produced through current paradigms. This requires a rethink on rural development in Malaysia before what once mattered to Malaysians is destroyed forever.

13 thoughts on “Reinvigorating Rural Malaysia: New Paradigms Needed

  1. Din, thank you for posting this. I have always believed that Malaysia had a great future as an agricultural producing and exporting nation. But Mahathir — who sold bananas during the Japanese occupation — thought that was low class. As you said, America, Japan, France and others continue to earn lots of money because of their agricultural sector.

    Malaysia can, too.

  2. Malott,
    Because while Madhater was good friend of Mugabe, he has never grasped the foresight of Mugabe’s predecessor. Ian Smith. I agree to denounce his policy of minority rule. To a certain extent, exercising totalitarian rule albeit not as bad as Idi Amin. Rhodesia then was known as the bread basket of Africa.
    Come to think of it. Ian should come to Malaysia & send Madhater to Rhodesia or Zimbabwe

  3. Malaysia is blessed with fertile soil and conducive environment for agriculture. We used to rank in the export of rubber, but now has been taken over by our neighbors. However, corruption is one of the major factor that hampered the growth of our agriculture. To name a few: a) Subsidized or free seedlings, fertilliser and farming facilities for the farmers and small holders were hijack; b) more research should be conducted by the government to help increase the production of crops, c) devise some methodology to assist the farmers when there is a failed harvest. Thailand has very successful program on the agriculture sector, and we should learn from them.

  4. The WB has one important measure and that is food sustainability. How long can a country goes without import. How long can an army fight without food. Napoleon Bornapart got hammered by Russian winter. His troops died of starvation. I kept ranting on and off we must be self-sustaining on our staple rice; yet we import because CPO yields more per acre. Economically speaking, he might not be wrong. If he has, then he will point to the MEast for exchanging oil for rice might also be wrong economics of trading commodities? What TDM forgot is MEast had nor arable land like ours so they have no choice. We have and the least is we should be self sustaining on our staple. That was the stand by US and Japan and CHINA and INDIA.

    So off goes hard timber, rubber, padi for CPO. We have not developed our staple unlike Professor Yuan Longping who fed the world with his high yield Rice.

    It was wrong, totally wrong for all of us to compare with Sg. Sg has NO LAND. They received better revenue from Mandai zoo than rice and that is economics of exchange. Penangites kept saying Penang has the making of Spore or even better and Putrajaya stopped it. Quite true really as Penang has everything, deep port, searoute, air route, industry zone, land, labour etc. The days of Pg silicon valley proved it. Penang can be everything Spore want to be and more. Penang has PRAI. Spore has to lease Iskandar from Johore and we were stupid to lease it. Iskandar idea was ported from Prai and Perak inland port. For Iskandar we ceeded our Pg Pagar KTM land.

    In totality we have been stupid thrice. TDM never would ceed KTM land in Tg Pagar. He would have kept developing Northern Corridor. For that TDM has better head than Najib, maybe it’s because he doesn’t GOLF.

  5. Murray Hunter is so very elegantly polite, urbane & down to earth about this field of entrepreneurship that will put professors in the Academia to shame….. no airy-fairy or high flown kind of theoretical treatment about something so mundane as the subject of padi planting, which most people shun about, but given a shade of dignity by indulging in humility.
    Great stuff by the writer on the subject.

  6. Din,

    I agree, we need to do much more for the rural areas. As you know, I have been working on microalgae. The value added for microalgae is about 40 to 50 times the value added for oil palm on a per hectare, per year basis.

    The technology has been developed and we are in commercial production. This is an unusual area where the bottleneck was technology, not the market. The market is far larger than palm oil and its derivatives.

    I am keen to help the small farmers and would be happy if we could promote small scale farming of microalgae. The system and technology are there but how do we get started with small holder farms?

    Kind regards
    Jagjit
    ___________
    Jag, I think you should see the people in MADA (Kedah), RISDA, and FELCRA. –Din Merican

  7. One possibility of our failure is we DIDN’T promote the pride in being an AGRI or AGRO or AQUA business person or technologist or scientist.

    We have got to emphasize our domain and built it strong.

    Old days we have UPM but it stands for putra now as the world Pertanian seems for 3rd world? We need to bring pride into our domain. Many of our people should stop comparing us with Spore which will starve if food is blocked from entry.

    We have ample land esp in EM to rear lots of cattle, sheep and goat. Even WM has ample land for these meat.

    Bring back the pride in Agri business and make it lucrative for young people to get into them i.e. we need to restructure some part of our univ system to incentivize youth into them.

  8. Like concerned citizen says, ” Malaysia is blessed with fertile soil and conducive environment for agriculture “…(I’d like to continue) but Forked Up with stupid,corrupt & arrogant Politicians, whatever that God has blessed Malaysia with, these idiots will rampage n loot it to the ground, we’ve been truly Fork….Oouch!!

  9. Dear bangsamalaya, what Dato Din says to meet those people ,sorry Dato, sounds hollow to me,my company has 3 products that are Malaysian made, tested by the Authorities for eg. TNB, DBKL, JPS etc, they’ve acknowledge it to be superior to what they are using now, but when it comes to giving out the job or using those 3 products themselves, they somehow manage to stay silent, they whispered, they will be stepping on too many toes & it’ll shorten their careers, what a shame.

    Singapore is currently using my products and they are happy, so Singapore must be stupid to use my products, Hiyaaa…how to clear corruption,here’s another one, 51% Khazanah owned UMW Toyota should be help, and Toyota’s Camry should be the car of choice of the MOF/Government, when replacing Proton Perdana’s, but since we are much smarter than Singapore, they decided to help Mamak’s cronies by using Honda( DRB Hicom ), in Terengganu Merc, in Pahang, VW Passat, now where’s the loyalty or the logic in all these.It’s always..Masssuk2, to hell with Khazanah ( which actually belongs to the people ), now you go sleep on it n tell me tomorrow….Oouch!!!, so bangsamalaya, that’s the lesson from me to you, Cronies come first, we are not even in the running, with the best products in the world, they still are greedy enough to reject, a product that’ll help the poor, they say so what, they rather have them producing and earning less so when the time comes for Santa’s Birthday, it’s BRIM’s time all the way, it’s easier to dictate poor,stupid, people, desperate and beholden to you than middle class,smarter people….Oouch!!

  10. Lok1,
    Frankly, why it’s bad to be agriculture based country. Australia & New Zealand are Agri based country. Look at how rich the country. What about Taiwan? Their agro technology is so supposed that their pineapple is the best in the world as compared to Pontian ones. I bet those who developed for Taiwan are Malaysians. Sometimes, we should impose the “final solution” on all BN leaders.

  11. “But Mahathir — who sold bananas during the Japanese occupation — thought that was low class” Interesting quote. Such a mentality can bring dire consequences to a country, meaning less and less produce to feed to people. Just like any other scenes of cultural destruction in Malaysia like the perversion of forests, demolition of historical buildings, decline of traditional music (Irama Malaysia) and arts, bastardization of national language and minority indigenous languages going extinct, book bannings etc. Feels like a Mao-styled Cultural Revolution going on here, but silent, slow and discreet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.