Policy shift helped win more friends globally for Malaysia

March 22, 2013

Policy shift helped win more friends globally for Malaysia

By Dato Dr Ananda Kumaraseri@http://www.nst.com.my

HOW does one explain Malaysia’s distinct shift from one of being avowedly pro-Western and staunchly anti-Communist, that smacked of non-neutrality in the East-West Cold War conflict, to one of being Non-Aligned and equidistant? The significant shift is also somewhat intriguing in the way it emerged.

Konfrontasi IndonesiaThis landmark development in Malaysia’s diplomacy and international relations was an outcome of the rather uncanny impact Indonesian Konfrontasi had on the thinking and attitude of its leaders, in particular that of Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman.

The psyche of Malaysia leaders especially in respect to their overriding goal of safeguarding national sovereignty and in ensuring political self-preservation was shaken to its very core when Indonesia, the enamoured brotherly neighbour, launched its Konfrontasi to destroy Malaysia.

A parallel to this profound trauma is to be found in the horrifying experience Indian leaders underwent when their “Hindi Chini Bai Bai” foreign policy mantra was utterly shattered by China’s military attack in 1962.

When Konfrontasi was first unleashed, the government found itself compelled to rely almost wholly on the Anglo-Malayan Defence Agreement to ensure the country’s security and territorial integrity.

The heightened security concerns resulting from Indonesian military actions also initially prodded a reinforcement of the country’s pro-Western world view and a hardening of its anti-Communist stance on international issues.

This seemed thoroughly justified given the firm belief that Konfrontasi was a grand communist design hatched by Parti Kommunist Indonesia that was acting in concert with a larger Peking-Pyongyang-Hanoi Axis, to ensure a fierce and sweeping geo-political communist domination in the region.

But as the traumatic challenge of Konfrontasi progressed, Malaysia found it necessary to go beyond addressing its immediate defence and military concerns to counter the stiff diplomatic hurdles in the international arena to secure its territorial integrity and sovereignty.

The government found itself hard put to match Indonesia’s diplomatic clout among the international community of nations that the latter had built over the years.

Numerous Malaysian delegations to international conferences found themselves disadvantaged to press the country’s case because of its entrenched pro-Western anti-Communist profile.

To the utter disappointment and frustration of the government, Malaysian representatives were shunned and even shut out in important international forums at practically every turn. A pertinent case in point was Malaysia’s failure to secure admission into the Conference of Non-Aligned Nations in Cairo in 1964.

The bitter experiences underlined the reality to re-orientate the country’s profile if it was to succeed in winning friends globally. An earnest effort was called for to shed Malaysia’s pro-Western anti-Communist image in favour of an equidistant foreign policy in order to shore up its credentials as a non-aligned state.

The Tunku himself acknowledged the need for the shift on grounds of the realities of the contemporary international situation. So by 1966, the new direction of the country’s foreign policy and conduct of its diplomacy and international relations was well on course to win as many friends, particullarly among Afro-Asian and Latin American states.

Initial efforts to give substance to the foreign policy shift that focused on establishing Malaysia’s credential as a non-aligned state was soon widened to include the establishment of diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union and Eastern European socialist states.

This policy shift witnessed a spate of historic exchange of visits and negotiations at senior-officials levels with the communist states.

The first Malaysian delegation to visit Moscow that eventually paved the way for the establishment of diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union at ambassadorial level included a senior Foreign Ministry officer in the person of Mr. Yeo Beng Poh.

The follow-up visits by the Soviet Delegation led to wide ranging discussionsGhazali Shafie with senior officers from the Prime Minister’s Economic Planning Unit, the Ministry of Trade and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs that included Mohammad Ghazali Shafie, Raja Mohar Raja Badiozaman, Tong Yaw Hong, Robless, and G.K. Rama Iyer. The focus of the negotiations was on exploring new avenues to enhance trade and economic collaboration.

But it was all too clear that these initiatives were an integral part of the Tunku’s policy shift aimed at giving real substance and meaning to Malaysia’s credentials as a member of the Organisation of Non-Aligned Nations by shedding its entrenched anti-communist pro-Western foreign policy profile.

Moreover, the government felt it prudent to expand its trade and economic interests globally by exploring new avenues of collaboration with the Soviet Union and Eastern European states.

Among other policy changes, these developments meant the relaxation and subsequent removal of the ban on Malaysians visiting the Soviet Union and Eastern European socialist states.

6 thoughts on “Policy shift helped win more friends globally for Malaysia

  1. ”Among other policy changes, these developments meant the relaxation and subsequent removal of the ban on Malaysians visiting the Soviet Union and Eastern European socialist states.” Dato Ananda!

    Malaysia still bans people going to Israel. why not the same policy?

    This article is nothing special, the facts are well known to us and logical. Malaysia and malaysians will win more friends if the present government also practises the same moderation it preaches on international stage.

    A typical Non Straight Times article full of nothing

  2. These views are one-sided. What we lack are investigative journalism (IJ), one who writes with facts not fearing the oppression of the authority. Investigative journalism will be a tremendous help to our MACC, if MACC takes their cues.
    Anyway with IJ our country would not have been infested with corruptions and abused of power. Malaysia would not have lost and still losing billions in revenue. It will be a good mean of check and balance as the fear of being exposed is most likely.
    Articles in Star, NST and government control media are not worth our time except those posted here. They are full of shit and their only purpose is to serve their master mouth piece. Their views are not levelled and full of political mumbo.
    It’s about time some brave souls to take up this challenge. Most of our journalists are rent seekers and opportunists with no balls or tits to write how they feels but only be used by others.

  3. Reeper,
    Well, one just go to look at how singapore handles their foreign affair abroad since its independent. Of course, some may allude that Singapore closes one eye on the sarawak thingy. But wait a minute, isn’t it kinda norm around the world

  4. When you are at the United Nations all members will say nice things about you policies and your country.And in return you are also expected to say nice things about other countries and their policies. If you really want to hear what others have to say about us go for some of the diplomatic receptions that are held on a regular basis in Kuala Lumpur. Now, you will get a group of foreign diplomats in deep conversation on current issues. When you as a Malaysian and more so if you are from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs join that group there is sudden silence and the conversation shifts skillfully to some social subject.

    In your personal life if the group that is indeep conversation stops talking the moment you arrive then you know for a fact that they are talikg about you.

    In this internet world of today our reporters who make the first report must speak the truth because that is the first report on any situation and all subsequent discussion is based on that report. But is the first report is misleading then all discussion on the report will avoid the substance and focus on the validity of the report.

    Moral of the story if you want to make friends locally and internationally please pay homage to the truth. Only the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth will set you free. So help me God.

  5. upon achieving independence from a colonial power a country throttles down its dependance on its once colonial master. the enemies of the colonial master are no more the enemies of the freed country and it opens its doors to all.
    India got its independence 10 years before us and went the same way by establishing trade and cultural links with all former adversaries of Britain.

    what I wanted to say is, if Pakatan was the ruling party after independence then they would have done the same thing because that is the most logical method.
    so we don’t have to be thankful to umno for this achievement, probably that is what this writer wants to say. we Malaysians could have achieved more if not for the mamak and his side-kicks under umno-baru.

    exactly, thats the way to make friends and also to function as moderators for this region in the future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s