A Review of the ASEAN Summit in Phnom Penh

April 5, 2012

The Diplomat–ASEAN

A Review of the ASEAN Summit in Phnom Penh

by Luke Hunt

Leaders of the 10-nation ASEAN bloc have laid the final groundwork for the establishment of an integrated economic community by 2015, but rifts have emerged over how to handle Chinese hegemony following the 20th annual summit of the group.

As the summit was wrapped up, key documents were approved that covered workers’ rights, drug initiatives and the overarching declaration of “One Community One Destiny” designed to pave a way for a cherished economic community encompassing about 500 million people.

Members also formally called on Western countries to lift sanctions against Burma following last weekend’s by-elections that resulted in pro-democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi and her National League for Democracy (NLD) winning the vast majority of the 45 seats on offer.

However, China’s growing assertiveness and its disputes over the Spratly and Paracel islands in the South China Sea, particularly with Vietnam and the Philippines, cast a shadow over the meeting, which had clearly angered Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen.

Hun Sen, speaking at a post-summit press conference, was upset with suggestions that Cambodia was acting as China’s unofficial proxy in a bloc that’s often at political loggerheads with Beijing. He then made a shrill attack on analysts and commentators who question the relationship between Phnom Penh and Beijing or suggest that a conflict between China and members of ASEAN over the Spratly’s is possible, labeling them as crazy, lazy and stupid.

He referred to one analyst as a “bald headed doctor” who wrote badly and “should learn more about the processes of ASEAN” as he was “silly,” “wrong thinking” and “bad thinking.”

It was anything but the statesman-like performance expected of the chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).He also warned journalists, including an international press corps of more than 100, to tell the truth.

“What I hate and am fed-up with is talk about Cambodia working for China and must be under some kind of influence. That is completely wrong,” he said. “We are a country full of dignity. We do not practice opportunistic politics.”

In saying this, he painted a gushing picture of China as a no-strings-attached and benign benefactor. He then made an extraordinary claim, saying that Beijing had even come to the rescue of Southeast Asian countries during the 1997-98 financial crisis. China, in most commentators’ views, did nothing of the sort.

He also launched into a tirade on Cambodia’s opposition political parties and chastised one international official who had wanted Cambodia to privatize its customs in return for aid.

“The Chinese friend never defines that I do this or that,” he said. “We will continue our efforts to be better and better in our relationship with China.”

China has invested almost $9 billion in Cambodia over recent years through direct aid, soft loans and other forms of financial assistance. Beijing has also taken out long-term leases on islands that are being developed for military purposes off Cambodia’s southern coast. Hun Sen said he hoped to double Cambodia’s trade with China to $5 billion by 2017.

However, it was a state visit by Chinese PresidentHu Jintao just days before this summit began that initially raised eyebrows among observers. As a tribute, Phnom Penh was and still is festooned with Chinese flags and banners. And, in a park outside the Royal Palace – on perhaps the most expensive piece of real estate in the county – giant pictures have been hung on a billboard that leaves little doubt about Cambodia’s close friendship with China.

In the center sits King Norodom Sihamoni, either side of him are Hu and his wife Liu Yongqing. They are flanked by the King’s parents Sihanouk and Monique. The dedication struck some delegates and observers as somewhat unusual given Cambodia’s independent role as chair of ASEAN for 2012.

“Cambodia cannot be bought,” Hun Sen insisted. During his official visit, Hu told his Cambodian counterparts that as ASEAN hosts they should not be in a hurry to finalize the Document on the Code of Conduct (DOC).

The DOC is supposed to be a structured means of dialogue engagement among ASEAN members to avoid any conflict or deal with any confrontation before it escalates into something much worse in the South China Sea. But it hasn’t been completed, and Beijing has made it known that it wants territorial disputes involving the Spratly’s dealt with on a bilateral basis and not at a regional level.

Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan also have varying claims.The Philippines managed to up the ante during the summit by urging a united front within ASEAN for handling China, and its President Benigno Aquino, told ASEAN members that the DOC must remain an internal, central ASEAN document.

His delegation then said there had been a “big disagreement” during one session, when ASEAN Secretary General Surin Pitsuwan said China might be invited to take part in the drafting of the code.

One delegate said it would be difficult for ASEAN to find a consensus on any Chinese involvement.

“What we are objecting to is we don‘t want China to be invited in terms of the drafting and the decision making,”he said, citing Cambodia as one country that was pushing China’s involvement in the writing of the document.

ASEAN at present consists of Brunei, Burma, Cambodia, Laos, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Timor-Leste has been widely touted as the next member while Papua New Guinea has also indicated it would like to join the bloc.

One observer quipped after the conference: “There’s no doubt now that China would also like to join ASEAN, but they’re not welcome by many of us.”Many here have suggested that with Cambodia as host, however, that may not matter.

7 thoughts on “A Review of the ASEAN Summit in Phnom Penh

  1. Hun Sen is right about journalists, especially some of the foreign ones. That is why gatherings in Asia should keep most of the foreign media at arm’s length.

    In international affairs, the media is part of the problem.

  2. This atrocious performance deserves an “F” though the Phnom Penh summit would get a “B”. The South China Sea is an extremely sensitive issue. Though it is discussed at ASEAN it is essentially a matter for the claimant states. It is a matter of high politics. Therefore when commenting, non claimant states, the ASEAN Chair and Secretary General must tread this issue VERY VERY carefully and avoid giving ANY impression of partiality. For Cambodia, the next Summit will be MORE challenging as the external partners will be there and the pressure will mount. Still there is no excuse for such an uncivil outburst.
    The Western media deserves this kind of treatment. The South China Sea dispute has consequences beyond the claimants and ASEAN. It could be a flashpoint between the US and China if not handled properly.–Din Merican

  3. You are right, Isa.

    Hun Sen is a nationalist and any suggestion that Cambodia is a proxy or an appendage of China by the media is unnecessarily provocative. He is shrewd enough to avoid handling the South China Sea issue. So I don’t expect much progress on the DOC (Document on the Code of Conduct) under Cambodia’s chairmanship of ASEAN. The problem is too complicated. But it can be expected to play host to discussions between ASEAN claimants (Brunei, Malaysia, Philippines and Vietnam) and China, if required.

    China- Cambodia’s relations is a long standing one. The Chinese also have a strong business presence in the country. The EU especially France except for providing some budget support through the Club of Paris is focusing on human rights and democracy and provides funding for NGOs and the political opposition. US business presence is minimal since Vietnam is their priority area. Remember, Vietnam was the only country to have defeated the PRC military during the Vietnam War.

  4. Cambodia is PRC’s satellite, whatever you guys want to make of it. Beggar’s can’t be choosers.

    The DOC will be lame while chairmanship (for whatever good that’ll do) remains in Phnom Penh. That’s why ASEAN is irrelevant, except for talk-kok sessions. If you can’t respect guests and media, however critical, then not only are you an unfit host, but a downright rude, arrogant hick.

  5. Satellite or not is irrelevant here, nor is a CRITICAL media. What IS the main point is a FAIR media and this most of the modern journalists are definitely not. Hardly surprising, as they mostly represent owners who control vast media monopolies and have their own agendas to push, and have no time for political, cultural or historical realities in other countries into which they more often than not, parachute down, send their “truth” reports and then parachute down into another part of the globe to continue their mission.

    The time is long overdue for this type of selective journalism to be thrown out. It is no surprise that there is now a rise in small but relatively independent media centres all over who try to give “the other side” of events.

  6. ASEAN only visible development every Summit the Welcome Board with the photos of the ten Heads of Governent gets better and better and more elaborate. Well at least there is some vertical movernment.

  7. What is Truth, Isa? Define it as you see it.
    Independence and nationalism? Wherefrom? There is no such thing as neutrality, as yours and my own opinions show. What we should be talking about is Hypocrisy – the bane of existence.

    PRC eschews a united ASEAN and insists on bilateralism when it comes to the S. China Seas – which enables them to intimidate, cajole and bribe individual members. The DOC requires much more work, but unless ASEAN can come up with a working model, this SNAFU will drag on indefinitely and the US becomes more entangled in the process.

    What is obvious is that Hun Sen is a terrible host, lacks a shred of diplomatic panache and has zero tolerance to perceptions which counter his molly-coddling to PRC. Even our very own Octo was never this ‘recalcitrant’. Was Mr. Hu’s state visit days before the Summit and an offer of U$D9 billion in investments, an accident of Nature or an act of Sacrificial Love? I think not.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.