Haris Ibrahim: What’s Happening Minister Zaid Ibrahim?


If Wong Chun Wai (WCW)’s ‘Race against time for reforms’ in his On The Beat column on July 13 didn’t touch on one matter of such great significance to this nation, one could just laugh it off as a case of WCW having difficulty shaking of an old habit of spin-doctoring on orders from up above.

That matter of great importance is the reforms to the judiciary.

Speaking of the recently announced two-year transition period before Pak Lah hands over UMNO to Najib, WCW writes :

‘…those who expect Abdullah to be an ineffective PM would be wrong. He has told his supporters and friends that he would devote his next two years to reforms, which he has committed to the rakyat…From reforms in the judiciary to fighting corruption, he would be fighting against time to make all the positive changes – and in the process make it easier for Najib when he takes over…The setting up of an independent inquiry into the VK Lingam video clip issue hurt Abdullah in the general election. The incident took place during the administration of his predecessor but despite the pressure from some quarters, Abdullah went ahead with the setting up of the panel.

I do not share WCW’s confidence.

On April 18, in his ‘Delivering justice, renewing trust’ speech, Pak Lah conceded :

‘…No nation can call itself fair and just without an efficient and trusted judiciary. By “trusted”, I mean a judiciary that delivers justice and is seen to deliver justice…the fact is, we can no longer leave such an important institution to hope and chance. The system must have built-in safeguards to prevent potential abuse and it must have a process that will convincingly identify the best legal minds in the country to join the judiciary…Therefore, the Government proposes a change to make the process of nominating, appointing and promoting judges more transparent and representative…The process to bring about this change will begin now and I assure all of you here today that consultation on the workings and the structure of the Commission will involve primary stakeholders. All will have a chance to provide their input to the Government.

The process would begin ‘now’, he said, and consultations would involve ‘primary stakeholders’?

Who are these ‘primary stakeholders’? It would seem, only UMNO.

On June 19, 2 months after Pak Lah’s grand speech, Malaysianinsider reported that UMNO ministers were not in favour of Zaid Ibrahim’s proposal for the setting up of the Judicial Commission for the appointment and promotion of judges.

What did Zaid propose that these ‘primary stakeholders’ found so unacceptable?

Quoting from that Malaysianinsider report, ‘Under the plan put forward, the commission would consist of 13 members. After deliberations, they would offer the PM a list of candidates for appointment to the Bench. This is a marked change from the current system where the list of candidates is drawn up by the chief justice’.

The following concerns of those stakeholders can be culled from the Malaysianinsider report.

  1. Not agreeable with the presence of former judges and lawyers on the proposed commission.
  2. PM’s power of appointment of judges will be usurped.
  3. Loss of Malay control over the judiciary.
  4. Top judicial post may go to a non-Malay.

Note that there have not been any reports of non-UMNO politicians objecting to Zaid’s proposals.

Are the concerns of these UMNO stakeholders for real or a mere smokescreen?

On May 7, YB Lim Kit Siang posed the following challenge to Pak Lah in his blog :

‘In the last Parliament, I had questioned the fast-track elevation of Tan Sri Zaki Tun Azmi in the judiciary, with his unprecedented triple jump to become Federal Court judge last September without ever being a High Court or Court of Appeal judge, then quadruple jump in three months as Court of Appeal President, and whether this is to be followed by his quintuple jump in a matter of a year to become the next Chief Justice when Datuk Abdul Hamid Mohamed steps down from the topmost judicial post in October?

Is the Prime Minister prepared to make a public commitment that the appointment of the next Chief Justice will be first referred to the Judicial Appointments Commission which he has agreed to set up?’

Current Chief Justice Abdul Hamid Mohamed is due to retire in September this year.

Who’s in line for the job?

Without the 13-man commission, Pak Lah calls the shots.

September, last year, Zaki was handpicked by Pak Lah to first leapfrog into the Federal Court and then slither into the seat of the President of the Court of Appeal.

Pak Lah may have had good reason to once again overlook Zaki’s colourful antecedents, but would a 13-man commission , in looking to fill that vacancy come September, be less charitable and look to some other candidate whose resume does not include transacting an illegal marriage by a Thai qadhi operating out of jurisdiction in a textile shop in Perlis to a woman almost half his age, then setting the marriage certificate ablaze in the hope that the first wife would not stumble upon this surreptitious union, only to later rely on the fact of this illegality to annul that marriage? If you’re in the dark on this, you may want to read about it HERE and HERE.

Or would such a commission have to sadly report back that there are no more good men left in the judiciary?

And speaking of good men, were there none in cabinet who could rise to the occasion when Zaid’s proposals were shot down by the UMNO stakeholders?

HARIS IBRAHIM

10 thoughts on “Haris Ibrahim: What’s Happening Minister Zaid Ibrahim?

  1. The then Parliamentary leader of the Opposition has rightly added his concern to the triple jump and what it could mean to the rest of us. I would go one step further to say I’m appalled by his attire. Making a triple jump in your underwear is not exactly the image we want for the country’s candidate for Sportsman of the Year.

    A candidate for the highest judicial post in the country must be free from scandals both in his public and his private life. He must come clean as a whistle! If he cannot then maybe he should keep on whistling and not adjudicating. Interpreting the law according to the intent of Parliament is never easy for a man who sees skirt chasing as a legitimate distraction from his onerous duties as Chief Justice.

  2. Waaah, for a second or two, I was trying to visualize what could have been so wrong about a CJ attire!

    Right, so that’s the “superman” in triple jump adults were refering to, eh? 😀

  3. “Abdul Hamid remarked “Water finds its own level”…. Chief Justice Tun Abdul Hamid Mohamad
    http://web8.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_lite.php?id=342255

    The constitution he emphasized had been amended many times. The odd thing is it has always been amended by JUST one same government.

    Which begs a more scientific or pure magic basis for scrutiny.

    In science you can levitate things. They’ve done it. They’ve even levitated water drops. [Please google “Levitation”] But you work on open scientific rules.

    In politics, that Blaine Mundo fellow could rise or make us rise to any level, as high as our ego!

    So, the Malaysian constitution is “levitable”—up or down. Or you can just pull the plug off and bring the water level down. Actually, water is awsomely shapeable. You name the container, pour water into the mould, dump it into a big freezer. You take the mould apart, you have a splitting image of yourself! Wallah!!!:)

  4. If you ask me, our Federal Constitution 1957 as drafted is not meant to withstand the test of time. The Constitution as drafted contain provisions which are time related and in contradiction with each other.

    It is like an interim document. A document so drafted should not and cannot qualify as any country’s constitution simply because of the need to have it amended through time. Our Federal Constitution 1957 has been amended no less than 500 times – compared to the U.S. Constitution which has been amended only 27 times since it was written some 200 plus years ago, the first in 1791 and the last in 1992.

  5. The sanctity of a document like the country’s Constitution is violated each time it has to be amended.

    Imagine if she were a damsel in distress! She has been violated more than 500 times and each time she knew the identity of her assailant and was unable to do anything to stop.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.