Regressive Polls Reaction


May 31, 2013

Regressive Polls Reaction

by P. Gunasegaram, Founder Editor, KiniBiz

http://www.malaysiakini.com

“UMNO needs to free itself from those who will destroy it to protect their own narrow interests by race baiting.” –Gunasegaram

QUESTION TIME: The reactions to the elections by Barisan Nasional and UMNOUMNO in particular and related organisations is nothing short of shocking. It reflects an alarming and regressive move towards hardline stances which are blatantly racist and with complete disregard to what the election results themselves indicate the electorate wants.

Considering that the majority of voters were against BN and by implication UMNO, the stance towards needless toughness and the callous appeal to base racial hatred will only alienate the BN from the public who have clearly indicated they want change for the better and which have by and large rejected race itself as an issue.

apa_lagi_cina_mahuIt reflects a belligerent, biased, boorish and childish response to election results by influential quarters, including ministers, a former prominent judge, Utusan Malaysia editors and others who have successfully drowned out a few reasonable voices within UMNO and hijacked the so-called reconciliation process post-elections.

Persisting with these actions has not only put paid to the reconciliation process but unnecessarily raised tensions among all people. This may have been the intention of those who raised these issues in such a manner in the hope of keeping themselves and their ilk in power by perpetuating fear.

But in the end, those who play with fire are likely to burn themselves. Malaysians are already aware that the race card is repeatedly played to trump all manner of ills facing Malaysia, and especially UMNO and BN patronage, corruption and cronyism which lead to a plethora of social ills.

If UMNO goes on along this line and if the government machinery, including the police, continue to selectively prosecute only those opposed to them, they can expect a severe backlash from the electorate five or less years down the line.

If anyone was taken in by the promises of moderation, change, and concernNajib A Razak for the electorate that were a constant refrain of Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak’s pre-election campaigning, they would now think more than twice before voting BN.

Ironically it was Najib himself who set the ball rolling on election night, or rather early morning the next day, when he blamed the Chinese tsunami for the downturn in BN’s fortunes.

While more Chinese may have voted Opposition, it was more than abundantly clear that all urban voters turned away from Barisan, while voters in significant rural Malay areas such as Terengganu and Pahang as well as the Malay heartland areas in Selangor turned towards Pakatan Rakyat.

Even DAP’s Lim Kit Siang could not have won in Gelang Patah against former Johor Chief Minister Abdul Ghani Othman with such a large majority without Malay support.

That BN’s fortunes turned down only because of the Chinese swing is a blatant lie which has been perpetrated over and and over again by the usual string of suspects. There was a broad swing against BN and UMNO in many areas. Najib never retracted or clarified his position over the Chinese tsunami statement.

Closet and not-so-closeted radicals come out

mohd-noor-abdullahEncouraged by this, the closet and not-so-closeted radicals came out, and unfortunately included a former top judge. Malaysikini reported that former Court of Appeal Judge Mohd Noor Abdullah (left) warned that the Chinese Malaysians must be prepared for a backlash from the Malay community for their “betrayal” in the recently concluded 13th general election.

“The Chinese betrayal towards the Malay’s hand of friendship – that is true. Because they plotted to seize political power even though they already have economic power,” he said to raucous applause at a forum in Kuala Lumpur.

How can voting for one party or the other be termed “betrayal”? In this case the Chinese voted for PAS and PKR which are also Malay-based parties. Must the Chinese always vote for BN-based Malay parties; UMNO in other words? And how could a community which forms just 28 percent of the electorate seize power without Malay participation and concurrence?

That a former Court of Appeal judge should make such racist comments and propagate lies in the process, aimed at inciting and inflaming the emotions of the majority community, is unbelievable. Most Malays, however, are not likely to buy such arguments.

And that newspaper, Utusan Malaysia, which publicly proclaims itself as the defender of Malay rights, published an incendiary, provocative article titled ‘Apa lagi Cina mahu?’ as if the Chinese were solely responsible for BN’s poorer fortunes in the election. Even if they were – and they were not the only reason – so what? Is it not up to BN to ask itself why it alienated the Chinese community so much?

Didn’t the Indian community, a previous strong supporter, reject BN in 2008 because it felt that the government did not do enough for the Indian community and could not even prevent the very violent deaths of Indians in police detention?

In fact days after the election, yet another Indian was violently killed in a police lock-up. The suspects – Policemen – have merely been transferred to desk duties, instead of being subjected to intensive questioning after being detained which is the normal procedure for murder.

Utusan Malaysia went on to write an incredibly racist series of articles on the election. When AirAsia X’s CEO Azran Osman Rani twittered his private objections, the newspaper launched a tirade against him and the airline.

New IGPThe authorities remained silent. The new Inspector-General of Police, Khalid Abu Bakar, cautioned all parties not to make seditious statements in the wake of the general election, but ignored Utusan Malaysia’s reports.

Somewhere along the way, the new Home Minister, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, callously called on those who were unhappy with election procedures to migrate and when police arrested speakers who had spoken earlier at a forum on May 13 against racism, disavowed any responsibility.

If these don’t represent a firm return to the bad old days, accompanied with total silence on these issues by Najib, what else is? But if UMNO thinks that this is what will save them, they are sadly, badly mistaken.

If they carry on this way they will find out for themselves that they will lose the next election – phantom voters or no phantom voters. UMNO needs to free itself from those who will destroy it to protect their own narrow interests by race baiting.

Transparency Minister is not quite transparent


May 18, 2013

Transparency Minister is not quite transparent

COMMENT: Dato’ Paul Low started on the wrong foot by giving interviews to Malaysiakini and The Malaysian Insider before even assuming his ministerial duties. From these interviews, we know that we cannot expect much from him in terms of fighting corruption and abuse of power. This is because he faces insurmountable institutional obstacles designed to protect entrenched vested interests.I am sure he knows what he would be up against in advance.

He also claims to be an expert on good governance, transparency and corruption but those who know him including his colleagues in Transparency International-Malaysia (TI-M) may have a different view of him as a Minister.

I know him to be a very pleasant, soft spoken, competent and successful business person and acknowledge his considerable contributions to the work of the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers and TI-M, but after watching to his 25 minute Kini TV interview, I felt that he should not have accepted to the PM’s invitation to join the Cabinet.

Dato Low would, in my view, be more effective as President, Transparency International–Malaysia and civil society advocate against corruption and abuse of power. In his ministerial role he said he will have to depend on the Prime Minister’s stature to get the job done. That is an open admission that he will be not able to operate effectively. If so, why did he accept to the invitation to be in the Cabinet?–Din Merican

________________________

http://www.malaysiakini.com

May 18, 2013

Transparency Minister fails the first test

MP Tony Puh SPEAKS :In all honesty, I did not have high hopes for the appointment of Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) chairperson Paul Low as a new cabinet minister in the Prime Minister’s Department in bringing about significant increase in transparency and reduction in corruption by the Barisan Nasional (BN) government.

Paul Low 2

However, I had hoped that I would be proven wrong.I had hoped to see a newly appointed “transparency minister”, who even if he were to fail in ending corruption, cronyism and abuse of power in the BN government, would go down fighting for the cause while on the job.

However, his interviews with the media yesterday, with The Malaysian Insider and Malaysiakini have left me utterly and completely disappointed.

He said that his job was only to make proposals on changes to government systems, procedures and processes to reduce opportunities for corruption, as well as to strengthen integrity and good governance practices.

Responding to calls for a crackdown on corruption, however, he said has no power on the matter and does not control any government agencies and “will help influence public policies where necessary to reduce corruption, including taking suggestions from MACC.”

He has also told the Singapore Straits Times “I am changing a culture and that cannot be done overnight.” Paul Low must realise that he is being appointed as a full Minister, and not some paid consultant to the government.

Bare your teeth, Minister urged

If he as a Minister, has no powers or is not willing to put his foot down to fight corruption and abuse of power, then who will? Have our cabinet appointments been reduced to pretty flower vases offering just “proposals… procedures and processes”?

As transparency Minister that Malaysians are going to look up to, Paul Low must stand up against corruption, cronyism and abuse of power and not succumb to the political shackles of his office.

Paul Low cannot just tell Malaysians that MACC has the power to investigate Taib Mahmud for alleged corruption even if the latter refuses his cooperation. Malaysians already know that.

What Malaysians want to see is for our new transparency minister to show his teeth and tell the prime minister in no uncertain terms that the government cannot have a chief minister so tainted by corruption and countless abuse of power.

Singing same old song

NONEMalaysians want Paul Low to openly ask why the MACC has failed to investigate Taib Mahmud (right)  who has accumulated excessive amounts of wealth reputed to be in the region of RM45 billion, as estimated by the Bruno Manser Fund.

What hurts the most is for the President of Transparency International to openly defend the refusal by BN ministers to disclose their personal wealth using the same tired and unacceptable excuses sung by these same ministers to date.

Paul Low said that “if you tell the public your kid is worth RM20 million, you put your children at security risk, it’s not fair” and hence “it was sufficient for ministers to declare their assets to the Prime Minister.”

Firstly, if even the children of ministers are not safe under the close protection of the Royal Malaysian Police, what chance does the ordinary Malaysians have in avoiding crime?  Secondly, and more importantly, aren’t the integrity and honesty of cabinet members paramount to ensuring a corrupt-free nation?

And if the child of the minister is indeed worth RM20 million, don’t Malaysians have a right to ask where the money come from given that a minister’s pay will never generate that amount of wealth?

Not BN bag carrier, please

What’s more, if the Pakatan Rakyat state executive councillors of Penang and Selangor can publicly disclose their assets, why can’t the BN Ministers do the same, unless they have something dirty to hide?

Paul Low’s appointment to the cabinet was perhaps the only “bright spark” in the “same old” list.However the spark is being quickly doused before the fire has had a chance to flare up. He  needs to be the champion for fighting corruption and cronyism in the cabinet, and not become the bag carrier and make-up artist for Najib and his merry men.


TONY PUA is Media DAP national publicity secretary and Petaling Jaya Utara MP.

A Constitutional Farce and an Inauspicious Start for Premier Najib


May 18, 2013

COMMENT: When do you things in a hurry, you are bound to overlook procedures and ignore past practices. But this “oversight” is more serious than that. The appointments of Wahid and Paul Low as Ministers and Loga and Ahmad Bashah as Deputy Ministers are in violation of Article 43 (1) (b) and Article 43A(1) of the Federal Constitution. Unless they are formally sworn in as Senators, they cannot take up their ministerial posts.

One would have thought that the Attorney-General would have been consulted before these appointments were made. Of course, our public officials think that this “glitch” is a technical issue that can be easily rectified by swearing them in as members of Dewan Negara. In truth, a violation is a violation.

ALI HAMSAWhat an inauspicious start for the Prime Minister. Perhaps, the Chief Secretary to the Government, Dr Ali Hamsa, should take rap for failing to ensure that all ministerial appointments as in this instance comply with the provisions of our constitution. His job is to ensure that our Prime Minister is  NOT put in a very awkward position.

Dr Ali should know that Government is serious business. Maybe, Caesar’s wife can teach him a thing or two about good housekeeping. Always do the right thing. –Din Merican

A Constitutional Farce and  an Inauspicious Start for Premier Najib

by Lim Kit Siang

What a constitutional farce – Paul Low and Abdul Wahid Omarwaythamoorthy not legally Ministers and Waytha, Loga and Ahmad Bashah not legally Deputy Ministers as they have not been sworn in as Senators

It is neither a good omen nor a good start for Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s post-13GE Cabinet.

Already Najib’s new Cabinet labours under a cloud of legitimacy for the simple reason that Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s Prime Ministership is under a cloud of legitimacy – not only because Najib and Barisan Nasional got 47% popular vote as compared to Anwar Ibrahim and Pakatan Rakyat’s 51% popular vote, but also because the 13GE was the most unfair and dirtiest general elections in the nation’s history.

If the 13th GE had been clean, free and fair, with a level playing field for both coalitions, Anwar and PR would not only have an increased popular vote over 60 per cent or even exceeding 65 per cent, but would also have won a majority of the 222 parliamentary seats in the country.

There are 10 Ministers in the Prime Minister’s Department, the PM, DPM and eight Ministers in the Prime Minister’s Department, more than the four Ministers in the Prime Minister’s Department in the last Cabinet.

There are 10 Ministers in the Prime Minister’s Department, the PM, DPM and eight Ministers in the Prime Minister’s Department, more than the four Ministers in the Prime Minister’s Department in the last Cabinet.

Now, Najib’s post-13GE Cabinet has also become a farce and even a joke as it has two illegal Ministers and three illegal Deputy Ministers although they have gone through an unlawful oath-taking ceremony before the Yang di Pertuan Agong on May 17, 2013.

Paul-LowIt is sad and shocking that the Prime Minister’s Department and the various government departments involved have become so careless, negligent and remiss that the fullest compliance with the proper laws, regulations, proprieties and protocols have been ignored or even violated – which should never have happened in a 56-year-old parliamentary democracy under six Prime Ministers.

Even the Transparency International-Malaysia Election Integrity Pledge signed by the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak on February 20 to comply and observe four principles of good governance had been disregarded, the four principles being:

  • Truth, integrity, ethical conduct and accountability, including not accepting or giving bribes or being involved in corrupt practices in any way;

  • Upholding and giving priority to the interests of the rakyat as a whole;

  • Good governance and transparency; and

  • Compliance with all the applicable laws and regulations of Malaysia.

It cannot be more ironical that Paul Low, President of TI-M who witnessed Najib’s signing of the Election Integrity Pledge is himself party to the violation of the Pledge on his appointment as Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department.

Yesterday, after the swearing-in ceremony for Ministers and Deputy Ministers before the Yang di Pertuan Agong Tuanku Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah at Istana Negara, Najib convened a two-hour Cabinet session at the Cabinet Room in Putrajaya.

However, a dark cloud hanged over both proceedings – as up to the present moment, Datuk Paul Low and Datuk Seri Abdul Wahid Omar (both Prime Minister’s Department) are not legally Ministers and Waytha Moorthy (PM’s Office), Dr. J. Loga Bala Mohan (Federal Territories) and Datuk Ahmad Bashah Md Hanipah (Domestic Trade, Co-operatives and Consumerism) are not legally Deputy Ministers as they have not been sworn in as Senators.

Was the two-hour first Cabinet meeting yesterday tainted by illegality because of the attendance of two illegal Ministers, Paul Low and Abdul Wahid.

Today, Paul Low is already giving interviews as Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, which he is not entitled to, as his Ministerial appointment can only take effect when he is sworn in as Senator – which is very clear from Article 43 (1) (b) in the case of Ministers and Article 43A(1) in the case of Deputy Ministers.

I am given to understand that up to now, there has been no swearing in of the five for them to take up the two Ministerial and three Deputy Ministerial appointments.

We have illegal voters....and now we have illegal Ministers

We have illegal voters….and now we have illegal Ministers

Is there going to be a “rushed” midnight swearing-in of the five as Senators? Najib should explain how such a glaring breach of the Constitution and the law as well as causing embarrassment to the Yang di Pertuan Agong in producing such a farce of Cabinet-making could happen.

UMNO is strong, only Barisan Nasional is weak


May  17, 2013

UMNO is strong, only Barisan Nasional is weak

by http://www.themalaysianinsider.com(05-14-13)

The results of the recent general election show that UMNO is as strong as ever despite Barisan Nasional losing the popular vote, according to a Straits Times report today.

Prof James ChinWriting in the Singapore daily, James Chin (left), a Senior Visiting Research Fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), argued that many Malaysians are misreading the situation and think that UMNO is weak.

He said UMNO today is as strong as it was in 1971, adding that it is BN that is dying, not UMNO.

“The Malay heartland, all in rural areas, backed UMNO and that is why it increased its number of parliamentary seats and why there is an UMNO-alone government in Kuala Lumpur today,” he wrote. In his article, he gave a rundown of the evolution of UMNO from its formation in 1946 under various leaders including Datuk Onn Jaafar, Tun Abdul Razak and Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, and how the party has changed over the years.

Chin wrote that the flaw in Dr Mahathir’s Malay state building was the scourge of money politics. “With so much money flowing out of the government into selected UMNO elite, the competition became so intense that the only way to get support was to ‘buy’ support.”

He said money politics in UMNO was tolerated because it did not contradict Malay or Islamic dominance of the system. As long as the money did not threaten UMNO or Ketuanan Melayu, it was seen as a necessary evil for the functioning of UMNO.

UMNO

Chin also wrote that despite losing the two-thirds parliamentary majority in the 2008 general election, UMNO failed to tackle the corruption issue or move to the middle ground. It cared only about control over Malay minds and control of the federal government.

He argued that reforms undertaken after 2009 were mainly cosmetic and in the economic arena; real political reforms did not take place and that is why the urban polity rejected UMNO this year.

“For example, on the issue of Ketuanan Melayu, rather than deal with it, the party simply ‘subcontracted’ the work to PERKASA, a Malay right-wing organisation established after 2008.”

Ib Ali and Zul

He said the urban public did not buy the argument that UMNO had reformed when PERKASA’s President and Deputy President became BN candidates this year. It became clear that UMNO would not change its political leanings.

Chin said it has become increasingly clear in the past two decades that UMNO is now BN and BN is UMNO. UMNO accounts for just less than half of Cabinet ministers. In Parliament, the overwhelming bloc within BN is always UMNO. In 2008, UMNO won 79 seats out of BN’s 140. This year, UMNO won 88 out of BN’s 133 seats. In percentage terms, this translates to 56 per cent and 66 per cent respectively.

“Today after 56 years of independence, UMNO still controls the rural Malay mind. Yes, it is true UMNO has lost control over large sections of the Malay community in urban areas. Under Malaysia’s electoral system, it is the rural seats that decide the federal government, not urban seats. Urban seats account for less than a quarter of Malaysia’s 222 parliamentary seats while about 150 seats are Malay/Bumiputera-majority seats,” he wrote.

Chin argued that UMNO is unlikely to reform in time for the 14th GE, and does not need to. “As long as the first-past-the-post system continues to allot disproportionate weight to rural voters, all UMNO has to do is to keep the fire of Ketuanan Melayu and Ketuanan Islam burning brightly in rural Malaysia,” he said.

Prime Minister Najib’s Cabinet, 2013


May 15, 2013

Prime Minister Najib’s Cabinet, 2013

One can be relieved that despite controversies surrounding UMNO-Barisan Nasional victory in GE-13, Prime Minister Najib has finally a Cabinet of his own. He can now proceed to honour his election pledges and continue his transformation agenda. He has taken more than a week to announce his Ministers, Deputy Ministers and Political Secretaries. The delay was due to efforts to persuade MCA and Gerakan to join his Cabinet.

His Cabinet line up is (see below):-

The Najib Cabinet, 2013

Malaysiakini reports (May 15, 2013):

Quote: Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak unveiled his “transformation cabinet” this evening, which included a P Waythamoorthy (below) of Hindraf as a Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department.

hindraf 5th anniversary 251112 waythamoorthy waytha moorthyIt also included UMNO Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin who was overlooked in the last cabinet – he is tapped as sports and youth minister.

No one from MCA and Gerakan has been included in the new cabinet. However, Najib said that the door is still open to MCA participation if the party amends its decision not to participate in the cabinet.

Another surprise was the appointment of Transparency International-Malaysia President Paul Low (below) as Minister in Prime Minister’s Department.

Maybank Berhad Chief Executive Officer Abdul Wahid Omar was roped in as a Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, and most probably will be in charge of Economic Planning Unit.

However, Najib did not name the responsibilities of the six Ministers in his department, an increase of one compared to his previous cabinet.

The Transport Ministry is understood to be the Ministry allocated for MCA, which will be helmed by Hishammuddin Hussein. NONEAnother new face in the cabinet is Abdul Rahman Dahlan, who has been named local government and housing Minister.

This cabinet also sees a merger between the education and higher education ministries.

Najib unveiled his cabinet at his office at 5pm. The announcement, Najib’s first official action as head of government following the May 5 general election, was telecast live by local TV channels.

Najib had earlier submitted the cabinet list to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and said his Majesty had given his approval to his cabinet list.

“I believe this is a balanced cabinet. It’s a balance between the experienced, technocrats and young leaders,” he said. As for MCA’s resolution not to take up government positions, Najib said that MCA has to amend its resolution before it can participate in the cabinet.

“If they re-consider later, we have a ministry post ready for them,” he said, referring to the Transport Ministry.

Najib’s new cabinet is heavily dominated by UMNO with 20 ministers, while PBB (Sarawak) has 4, MIC, 2, PRS (Sarawak), PBRS, PBS and UPKO (Sabah), 1. Three ministers, all of whom are in the PM’s Department, have no party affiliation. Unquote.

Tunku Abdul Aziz– Ethics Advisor to the Cabinet

I personally had expected that Tunku Abdul Aziz (right) would be a Minister in the Tunku AzizPrime Minister’s Office. He is well qualified to join the transformation team given his wide experience on issues of governance, ethics and corruption. He was the man who started Transparency International-Malaysian Chapter.

Tunku Aziz was also Ethics Advisor to Secretary-General Kofi Annan at the United Nations. It is unfortunate that Tunku Aziz is not chosen.He would be well suited to be in charge of Ethics Office in the Prime Minister’s Department.

However, we can take comfort that Dato Paul Low of Transparency International-Malaysia Chapter and formerly with the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers has joined the Cabinet as Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department. Let us hope Dato Low will be able to help Dato Seri Idris Jala in fighting corruption and abuse of power in public administration.

Tengku Razaleigh for National Reconciliation

Ku LiNajib should have tapped the expertise of Gua Musang’s Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah. The Kelantan Prince would be ideal to promote national unity and bring about national reconciliation after a very hot contested and divisive election. He has access to key personalities in the political Opposition and can serve as the link between Government and the Opposition.

Obviously, the Prime Minister has other ideas. Perhaps both Khairy Jamaluddin at the Sports Ministry and Shabery Cheek at Communications and Multimedia can probably play that role through sports and multimedia communication.  This would mean that both Khairy and Shabery would have to complement each other.

Overall, I think that the Prime Minister has been able to make the best use of talent available to him. I wish him and his Cabinet all the best. Remember Accountability first and now. –Din Merican

______________________________

The new cabinet, by party and in numbers

8:39PM May 15, 2013www.malaysiakini.com

Non-BN Ministers and Deputy Ministers:
Idris Jala (Sarawakian, no party affiliation, retained)
Paul Low (Transparency International-Malaysia president, new)
Abdul Wahid Omar (Maybank chief executive officer, new)
P Waythamoorthy (disputed Hindraf chief, deputy minister)

Ministers in previous cabinet dropped:
(Excluding MCA and candidates who lost or did not contest GE13)
Shaziman Abu Mansor
Noh Omar
Koh Tsu Koon, Minister in PM’s Department

Gender composition:
Two women ministers out of 35 ministerial posts and four women Deputy ministers out of 26 Deputy ministerial posts. In total, six women out of 61 posts. In the last cabinet announced in June 2010, there were also two women ministers and three deputy ministers.

East Malaysia and Peninsula composition:
Ministers:
East Malaysia: 13 (Sarawak 8, Sabah 5) – (6 in last cabinet, Sabah 4; Sarawak 2)
Peninsula: 22 – (25 in last cabinet)
Total: 35 – (31 in last cabinet)

Deputy Ministers:
East Malaysia: 8 (Sabah 4; Sarawak 4)
Peninsula: 18
Total: 26

The highest number of Ministers from Sabah and Sarawak:
1) Joseph Kurup (Sabah/PBRS) – Prime Minister’s Department
2) Joseph Entulu (Sarawak/PRS) – Prime Minister’s Department
3) Nancy Shukry (Sarawak/PBB) – Prime Minister’s Department
4) Idris Jala (Sarawak/Senator) – Prime Minister’s Department
5) Anifah Aman (Sabah/Umno) – Foreign Affairs
6) Fadilah Yusof (Sarawak/PBB) – Works
7) Richard Riot (Sarawak/SUPP) – Human Resources
8) Ewon Ebin (Sabah/Upko) – Science, Technology and Innovation
9) Maximus Ongkili (Sarawak/PBS) – Energy, Green Technology and Water
10) Douglas Uggah (Sarawak/PBB) – Plantation Industries and Commodities
11)Rohani Karim (Sarawak/PBB) – Women, Family and Community Development
12) Shafie Apdal (Sabah/Umno) – Rural and Regional Development
13) Abdul Rahman Dahlan (Sabah/Umno) – Housing and Urban Well-being

Party breakdown of Ministers:
UMNO: 21 (same as last cabinet)
PBB: 4 (1)
MIC: 2 (2)
PBS : 1 (1)
PBRS: 1 (0)
PRS: 1 (0)
Upko: 1 (1)
SUPP: 1 (1)
Non-BN: 4 (1)
Total: 35 (31)

Party breakdown of Deputy Ministers:
Umno: 17
MIC: 2
PBB: 3
PRS: 1
Hindraf (NGO): 1
PBS: 1
PPP: 1
Total: 26

Chinese and Indian representatives:
Chinese: 2 (1 Minister and 1 Deputy Minister; down from 6 ministers and 10 Deputy Ministers in last cabinet)
Indian: 6 (2 Ministers and 4 Deputy Ministers; the same as in the previous cabinet)

Malaysiakini on Election Night


Dear Readers,

On election night, Malaysiakini will be bombarded with traffic. There may also be some funny matters going on between the user and Malaysiakini. Below is a full list of sites that will be carrying the live results. Please keep this email handy and share this email with friends who will be following the live results. Note some of the channels have https in them, these are secure channels.

http://www.malaysiakini.com
https://www.malaysiakini.com
http://m.malaysiakini.com
http://www.mkini.co

https://www.facebook.com/MalaysiaKini
https://twitter.com/malaysiakini
https://twitter.com/Yahoo_MY

http://www.kinitv.com
http://www.youtube.com/kinitv
https://www.facebook.com/kinitv
http://www.youtube.com/malaysiakini

http://live.undi.info
https://ge13.s3.amazonaws.com
http://bit.ly/ge13result

Thanks very much,

Premesh
CEO Malaysiakini

Tracking network interference around political content in Malaysia


May 4, 2013

Tracking Network Interference around political content in Malaysia

In the last week in April, users on select ISPs found they could not access certain websites critical of the ruling government. These ISPs include (but are not limited to) Unifi, TM, Celcom, Digi, and Maxis; however services offered by Time and YTL did not appear to be affected.

At the time, staff at one of the country’s most popular independent news sites, Malaysiakini, complained to the country’s media regulatory body, the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), and interference ceased. But days later, users were experiencing new difficulties accessing select content, again on the same five ISPs: Unifi, TM, Celcom, Digi, and Maxis.

Unlike before, the second time around, filtering was far more specific. Initially entire domains (and therefore whole websites) were being blocked. This time around, the filtering seemed to target specific content, such as YouTube videos with political content that could be deemed embarrassing to the ruling government.

And instead of blocking content outright, the block was implemented in the traffic stream coming back from the content provider, such as YouTube. Users were able to open a connection to YouTube, but were not receiving any data back. Their connection would ‘hang,’ or fail to complete bidirectionally, in a manner that resembled a problem on the sending server side (YouTube), rather than outright blocking.

Evidence of Network Interference

Working with local partners, Access was able to determine that unencrypted communications seeking political content on those five ISPs, whether directly with YouTube, or via proxies to YouTube experienced this failure in the return data stream, including when a proxy was configured to use non-standard transmission ports, indicating that the interference was being triggered via either deep packet inspection (DPI) or on the HTTP path in the request to the server, rather than more ‘standard’ IP address and port blocking.

When Access’s partners attempted to use an encrypted tunnel out of Malaysia, YouTube returned data downstream per usual, further indicating the use of either DPI or HTTP path based interference, as neither the HTTP path nor packet content is available to the ISP when users transmit requests via an SSH encrypted tunnel.

Packet capture testing demonstrated that requests using proxies always dropped return packets between the proxy server and the end user, indicating that the interference was happening in the ‘near’ network, i.e., their local ISP, rather than in the ‘far’ network, near the YouTube server request.

Further experiments that appended some junk bytes to the URL path of a YouTube request resulted in the video being available via normal downstream provision, suggesting a transparent proxy or DPI device at the ISP level dropping return packets directed to the user, based on the trigger mechanism of HTTP Path.

Further testing also indicated that when the HTTP request was sent fragmented from the user, it defeated the interference mechanism, and the YouTube video was again streamed back as per normal to the user. This behavior points to the likely use of DPI or proxy devices at the ISP level, with custom (if poorly) written rules to first trigger off the HTTP path portion of the URL, and subsequently drop packets on the server to user return path.

There is evidence of content at both YouTube (e.g. hHTz22bTBRw and uVWxB4AWOxc) and specific pages on Facebook (e.g. /DAPMalaysia) being affected. Facebook content is available to users using encrypted channels, but unavailable using plaintext HTTP–which is consistent with other evidence of interference.

It is worth noting that as of yesterday, May 1st, the CitizenLab at University of Toronto’s Munk School released its latest report, For Their Eyes Only: The Commercialization of Digital Spying, which identified the presence of a sample of FinSpy, the surveillance software manufactured by UK-based Gamma Group, that “appears to be specifically targeting Malay language speakers, masquerading as a document discussing Malaysia’s upcoming 2013 General Elections.” This Malay-language sample presents “as Mozilla Firefox in both file properties and in manifest;” Mozilla, long an advocate for user rights, this week announced its intention to sue Gamma for “offensive” trademark violation.

This is not the only form of ‘network interference’ occurring in Malaysia in the lead-up to the elections this weekend. There is evidence of jamming of radio stations critical of the government, as well as Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks and hacking attempts against independent media, blogs, and opposition party websites, and efforts to compromise social media accounts publishing content favorable to the political opposition.

Malaysia’s legally mandated Open Internet

Despite the interference currently in evidence on Malaysia’s networks, the country has a legal mandate to defend a free and open internet, as per the Malaysian Communication and Multimedia Act of 1998. This mandate is overseen by the MCMC, an independent regulator tasked with oversight of mobile and internet providers.

Malaysiakini, the independent news site, filed another request with the MCMC, asking the agency to station it’s people at local ISPs to ensure uninterrupted access on Sunday’s polling day. The publication’s CEO and co-founder, Pramesh Chandran, emphasized the need for free and unfettered communications as a fundamental need in democratic practice, and expressed concern that if networks were to be restricted, the inability for citizens to access information about the electoral outcomes could be dangerously destabilizing.

Meanwhile, Human Rights Watch has issued a statement condemning pre-election violence, as well as the online attacks. Access will continue to run network analysis and report on the data over the coming days.

To help keep the internet open in Malaysia, click here.

Aasil AhmadDisclosure: Access Fellow Aasil Ahmed (left) has worked on Human Rights and Democracy programs in Malaysia, including with Opposition candidate Anwar Ibrahim.

Georgetown University graduate Aasil was also the young man who got me started on blogging in 2007 when we both were part of the team in Anwar Ibrahim’s Office. He showed me how I could be an effective human rights, justice and democracy advocate via my own blog. He now resides in Washington DC.  I hope I have done justice to him and others around the world who are passionate about, and are putting their careers and lives on the line for, these great causes by having my own blog http://www.dinmerican.wordpress.com 

Who is more likely to be America’s ally


May 2, 2013

Who is more likely to be America’s ally

by Rusman

Obama and NajibThroughout the political campaigns of the last five years in Malaysia one recurring theme (at least when Anwar Ibrahim is involved) is his supposed “closeness” to America. The BN propaganda machine, and particularly the UMNO propaganda apparatus, spills much ink talking about how Anwar is a CIA agent funded by the American government.

Whatever the case may be, the following analysis appeared yesterday on the pages of the Washington DC based think tank Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The piece is authored by so called long-time Anwar ally Doug Paal and James Bader, who recently served on the National Security Council for President Obama, advising him on Asian issues.

The essay minces no words in praising the Najib administration for the reforms it has achieved during the last four years. Amazingly they praise Najib as a democratic reformer, by referencing that he offers criticisms of Myanmar and North Korea. They somehow credit Najib for running a “clean” government in comparison to that of Mahathir’s.

Malaysia’s strong performance under Najib stands in marked contrast to the ethnic preferences and frequent allegations of corruption and cronyism under Mahathir.

They also applaud Najib’s repeal of the ISA, only to forget to mention that it was replaced with something that still allows for detention without trial, and has left in place other laws which can be used to arrest political dissidents such as the Sedition Act.

Clearly the authors have not been paying attention neither to Najib’s penchant for ultra-malay nationalism nor the dozens of scandals that have mired UMNO in just the last four years.

Relegating the 13th general election to a sideshow, Paal and Bader say that the real contest taking place in Malaysia is between Najib and the hardliners within his own party. To argue that Najib’s administration has been a clean one is to ignore some very plain and simple facts.

Most notably is the way that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission najib_taib2was talked down to and castigated by Sarawak Chief Minister Taib Mahmud in response to the most recent revelations by Global Witness that the Mahmud family colludes to acquire, sell and profit from Native lands in Borneo.

The authors have to bend over backwards to claim that under Najib Malaysia has been a peaceful and pluralistic nation. Racial tensions have probably not been higher than they currently are and Najib’s selection of Zulkifly Noordin as a candidate and his turn-the-other-cheek attitude to right wing ultra nationalist Ibrahim Ali’s candidacy demonstrate the opposite of a pluralistic outlook. Najib’s 1Malaysia slogan as a banner for his administration falls flat whenever it’s juxtaposed with the many things Najib says or doesn’t say when it comes to truly embracing pluralism.

Finally we get to the heart of the matter. The authors remind us that under Najib Malaysia has come into line with US foreign policy vis-a-vis Iran.

Under Najib, Malaysia also has moved to significantly tighten its previously porous export-control system, which had made the country a transit point for shipment and financing of dual-use products going to Iran. Defense cooperation with the United States and others has been normalized, and it has not remained a forum for grandstanding against the West.

Not being a conduit for dual-use technology to Iran is probably a good thing. However, this paragraph reveals why all the previous arguments in favor of Najib can be so thin and flimsy and yet still make their way into an essay of this nature by authors of this stature.

Disingenuously Paal and Bader spend a brief paragraph trying to criticize Anwar Ibrahim as someone who would not be a friend of the United States. Astonishingly they claim that he’s moved to closer alignment with Islamic politics in recent years, presumably referring to the fact that Pakatan Rakyat includes PAS one of it’s members.

Leave it to the American analyst of Muslim politics to totally misunderstandGE-13 the situation. If anything Anwar should be credited with bringing PAS out of its corner and more into the mainstream as a Muslim political party focused on issues of governance and rule of law instead of focusing on the singular issues of Sharia. This is a major accomplishment vis-a-vis Malaysian democracy.

In conclusion it is interesting to note that on the eve of Malaysian elections, the US favorite is in fact the candidate whose party has staked its reputation on criticizing how much in the pocket of America his opponent is. Who is really in the pocket right now?

PRESS RELEASE – Malaysia: Violence, Cyber Attacks Threaten Elections (HRW)


http://www.hrw.org/node/115280

For Immediate Release


Malaysia: Violence, Cyber Attacks Threaten Elections
Party Workers, Activists, and Online News Portals Targeted

(Bangkok, May 2, 2013) – Malaysia’s ruling party and opposition leaders should rein in their supporters to end intimidation and violence that threaten general elections slated for May 5, 2013, Human Rights Watch said today. The Royal Malaysian Police should fully and impartially investigate alleged attacks on party members and supporters on both sides.

Election-related violence targeting events organized by parties in the ruling Barisan Nasional and the opposition Pakatan Rakyat coalitions has escalated as the election has approached, according to police reports. Calls by the two competing coalitions have so far failed to stem the violence. Cyber attacks on online news services have undercut election-related speech.

“Election violence threatens the right of all Malaysians to vote for the party of their choice,” said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “Political leaders should demonstrate their commitment to democratic elections by taking firm action against their members and supporters who are responsible.”

Violent incidents escalated after the start of official election campaigning on April 20, Human Rights Watch said. Prior to that, political harassment was primarily limited to blocking access to meetings, loud noise, stone and egg throwing, and paint smearing on trucks and houses, though some violence has taken place. For example:

 

·         In mid-April in Georgetown, Penang State, five assailants seriously beat two men putting up opposition party flags;

·         On April 23, unidentified people set off an explosive device at a Barisan Nasional rally in northern Penang state that injured a security guard;  

·         On April 25, assailants threw petrol bombs at a Barisan Nasional office outside of Kuala Lumpur, the capital; and

·         On the same day, unknown attackers torched the car of Pakatan Rakyat candidate Xavier Jayakumar’s daughter at her home. 

  

Well-planned attacks on the websites of several Malaysian news services and online newspapers providing coverage of opposition candidates also raise serious freedom of speech concerns prior to the May 5 polls, Human Rights Watch said.

Since April 20, Malaysiakini, a popular online newspaper that is often critical of the government, has experienced technical interference that has prevented users from accessing its website from inside Malaysia. Readers have experienced slow-downs or sudden drops in service when browsing the website, which has been unpredictable and varied in time. It is unclear whether current disruptions are the result of interference by Internet service providers (ISPs) or by some other actor at centralized Internet gateways that connect Malaysia to the global Internet. Malaysiakini has been the target of distributed denial-of-service (DDOS) attacks in the past. On April 28, the newspaper reported that several of its Twitter accounts had been hacked and taken over; the accounts were recovered on April 30.

On April 11, a major DDOS attack brought down three London-based radio web portals – Radio Free Malaysia, Radio Free Sarawak, and Sarawak Report – that have regularly been critical of the Malaysia federal government and the state government of Sarawak. The attack, emanating from computers around the world, generated over 130 million hits on the three websites in the course of three-and-a-half hours, rapidly overwhelming them. All three websites were only able to return to full operation on April 16.

Radio Free Malaysia, which began operations in March 2013, delivers election-related news to Sarawak’s urban population and openly supports Pakatan Rakyat. Radio Free Sarawak and the Sarawak Report, which broadcast primarily to indigenous people in Sarawak’s rural areas, frequently report on government corruption and criticize government policies affecting rural residents. In addition to the DDOS attacks, since the start of the election period Radio Free Sarawak broadcasts in the Iban language over shortwave radio lost clear transmission after jamming with noise transmitted on the same shortwave frequency.

“Ensuring everyone can access information without interference is critical if there is to be a level political playing field in Malaysia,” Robertson said. “The government has a duty to investigate and shut down all cyber attacks, interference with ISPs, and hacking so that freedom of expression and the right to receive information is preserved.”

For more Human Rights Watch reporting on Malaysia, please visit:
http://www.hrw.org/asia/malaysia

Governments should be colour-blind


May 1, 2013

Social Policies

Time to scrap affirmative action

Governments should be colour-blind

Najib Razak: Interview on Al Jazeera


April 28, 2013

Najib Razak meets Veronica Pedrosa on Al Jazeera

Caretaker PM Najib Razak recorded an interview with Al Jazeera a few weeks ago, apparently, and it aired yesterday.

It will probably go down as one more of Najib’s election related blunders to go along with waiting so long to dissolve Parliament and campaign as a Presidential candidate in a Parliamentary election.

Najib_Aljazeera_interview

Few things about the interview. Firstly, Veronica Pedrosa did a great job. Interviewers frequently get intimidated in front of Heads of State or, out of respect, avoid asking the most obvious and difficult questions. Veronica did neither and I respect her for that.

Secondly, Najib’s body language was off for the interview from start to finish. His legs were shaking. He didn’t know what to do with his hands. His face showed, at times a lack of interest, and at other times a real sense of discomfort with the questions.

Thirdly, on content Najib probably scored a low C. At a general sense he did his best to present himself as someone in a position of leadership who has some grasp of the difficult issues facing his country. However, whenever the interviewer asked about specifics Najib gave answers that probably hurt him more than they helped him.

For instance when asked about debating Anwar Ibrahim, Najib said that there are many ways to engage with people in an election and he was focused on other ways. He said a debate “probably won’t happen”. Well, is it a probability or a possibility or impossible? His answer was weak and showed that after 2 years of avoiding facing Anwar head-to-head he still doesn’t have a good answer to the question.

When asked about the Allah issue I think Najib really botched his response. The first part of the answer probably would have been OK a it reflects a sort of flimsy, neither here neither there attitude of let’s just sweep issues under the rug and try to get along. But when Veronica pressed him on the comparison between Malaysia and Lebanon, Najib once again did not have a solid answer and just said in Malaysia we’re different just because and that’s that.

The problem is that Najib may not even believe the position on non-Muslims not using the world Allah in Malaysia is a valid position. He is a Western educated self-proclaimed ‘moderate’ who is hardly a hardliner when it comes to issues of religion. Yet on this one issue he needs to pander shamelessly to the ultra right Malay base. Even PAS has relented on the position and said there is no problem here. So Najib lost big time on this one.

Which brings us to PAS. It is quite “un-statesmenship” like to berate and attack the Islamic Party of Malaysia during an election like Najib did. Basically when asked “What does PAS stand for” Najib poured scorn on PAS as if it was some antique relic party that still used candles and push carts and wrote on papyrus and animal skins.

In actual fact, PAS is a very modern party going through an amazing internal transformation and has come out the other end far more willing and capable to adapt to the time then UMNO has thus far shown any capacity for. My sense is Najib’s distasteful comments about PAS, if they make it to the grassroots, will backfire among middle of the ground Malays who respect the positions that PAS takes but are focused on outcomes for the country.

I suggest you take 20 minutes to watch the interview. It’s telling how the Prime Minister, after four years in office, still lacks the confidence and composure to answer a few difficult questions.

By comparison Anwar Ibrahim gave interviews on  Al Jazeera and CNBC (above) 15 days ago and generally performed much better.–Din Merican

Rosmah’s Gifts and Ethics


April 28, 2013

Rosmah’s Gifts and Ethics

FLOM

Recently Caretaker FLOM, Rosmah Mansor, said that she accepted all the gifts offered to her by foreign dignitaries because it would be rude not to accept them and what was a poor FLOM supposed to do?

“When people give you something, of course it’s not nice to reject it,” Rosmah wrote in a self-titled biography launched yesterday by former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

“And when I’m given the gifts, I wear them. Why would you want to just keep them in a safe when the items were given sincerely, are beautiful and can be used? It’s a waste if they’re just kept in a safety deposit box,” the wife of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak added. (from Malaysian Insider here)

Well clearly there is another way to handle these situations. The Daily Beast is reporting that the Sarkozy’s used to lavish their friends with expensive gifts. The Obama’s received from the Sarkozy’s over $41,000 worth of bags, towels, etc. Hillary Clinton received three Hermes scarves.

How does the United States handle this? It’s simple. Sitting elected officials are not permitted to accept gifts from anyone. There are Ethics Committees in all branches of the US government that regulate what employees of the US government are allowed to receive and not receive. For example here is a snippet form the Senate Ethics Committee website:

No Member, officer, or employee shall knowingly accept a gift except as provided by the Gifts Rule.

A Member, officer, or employee may accept a gift, other than cash or cash equivalent, having a value of less than $50, provided that the source of the gift is not a registered lobbyist, foreign agent, or private entity that retains or employs such individuals.  The cumulative value of gifts that may be accepted from any one source in a calendar year must be less than $100.  Generally, gifts having a value of less than $10 do not count toward the annual limit.  See Senate Rule 35.1(a)

The White House/Executive branch has similar rules outlined in detail here. It’s clear why such rules need to be in place. When you are in the seat of power, small (or large) gifts from foreign and domestic agents can be used as leverage in any sort of negotiation that comprise the integrity of the relationship. The onus should be on the public servant to want to defend his integrity to the fullest degree.

Which takes us back to Rosmah’s absurd statement. It speaks for itself when you’re talking about a party which is propped up by patronage and corruption. Accepting a few Hermes scarves, Rolex watches etc. is practically a non-issue when you think about the billion of dollars squandered away in no-bid contracts, flawed procurements and under the table deals.

The need for greater transparency in these dealings is essential. But fundamentally, people must elect leaders who they believe have a strong ethical compass that would make them think twice about these types of transgressions.

Malaysian Economy: Is the Party Over?


April 26, 2013

Malaysian Economy: Is the Party Over?

By Azeem Ibrahim from the Huffington Post

Dr Azeem IbrahimWith an election in the near future, scheduled for May 5th, Malaysia’s economy is under scrutiny. Is it really as good as the present government says it is in its campaign propaganda? The usual indicators look good — growth is 5 percent this year, inflation is low at around 2.5 percent and unemployment is low and stable at about 3 percent. Malaysia has enjoyed vigorous growth and change in the 50 years since it became independent and it is now the 37th largest economy in the world.

But after more than 50 years of one-party administration, the country is now at a crossroads with the ruling coalition facing formidable opposition. The economy is a major campaign issue as the country has been running considerable budget deficits since 1998, with the government offering subsidies and cash handouts to maintain itself in power. Since 2008 the government’s debt has escalated exponentially and is projected to be RM 779 billion by 2017 — creating a major problem of domestic debt for future governments to face.

Government borrowing, excessive spending on huge infrastructure projects, the flight of capital overseas, and a downturn in gas and palm oil prices are combining to create concern about a potential economic dislocation, prompting warnings from financial analysts in the region.

Malaysia’s rising ratio of household debt to its GDP reached 80.5 last year, as the country’s middle class has taken advantage of easy credit. Now there is the risk of being caught in a credit bubble, similar to the sub-prime crisis in the U.S. in 2008 which forced foreclosures and the collapse of several major financial institutions.

With 30 percent as the acceptable debt service ratio, it is a matter of increasing concern that people are using more than half of their disposable income to pay off household debts. The ratio of household debt to disposable income in Malaysia is 140 percent, one of the highest in the world and above that of the U.S. at 123 percent and Thailand at 52 percent. Unless there is a rise in productivity and household incomes for Malaysia’s five million working population, this trend is not sustainable.

Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak’s policies of short term gains andNajib latest generous corporate welfare to maintain popular support contrast with the long term vision of the Pakatan coalition led by Anwar Ibrahim. Noting that “Malaysia’s fiscal space has shrunk considerably since the 2008 global financial crisis”, policies need to be put in place to spare the people the austerity measures being adopted by several of the troubled Eurozone countries.

The need is to curb household debt, to broaden the tax base, repeal subsides gradually, trim certain expenditures and generally bring the fiscal house in order without creating the pain of a sudden adjustment. Instead of raising the debt ceiling again and again, Malaysia needs to grow government revenue and rein in sovereign debt, as Malaysia’s debt to revenue ratio is approaching that of Italy’s.

In all the government’s campaign promises there is nothing to address the growing problem of blatant corruption in high places and the widening income disparities since taxes were lowered for the wealthy. Malaysian taxes are the second lowest in South East Asia, with Singapore lowest with personal income tax capped at 20 percent. Singapore has since instituted a tax on services and consumption, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) at 7 percent, a move currently under discussion in Malaysia.

To ensure that growth is sustained, Malaysia needs to implement numerous reforms which have already been outlined in the Government’s New Economic Model. Unfortunately, many of these proposals remain simply paper promises and Malaysia can no longer afford business as usual. Criticisms are common about the lack of transparency of government statistics which are skewed in favor of the incumbent regime. A retired Malaysian international banker recently described official government reports as “Alice in Wonderland statistics.”

Anwar with Hadi and Kit SiangThis would change with a victory for Pakatan Rakyat. Anwar Ibrahim’s vision of good governance, based on fairness and justice and free of race considerations is reinforced by World Bank studies that compare Malaysia with more successful countries such as China, Indonesia and Vietnam. The latest IMF report card on Malaysia indicates the need for fiscal and structural reforms and an ambitious consolidation plan, with tax reform and expenditure rationalization.

Malaysians want an end to stagnant wages and earning levels and an end to the Malaysia being caught in the Middle Income Trap with little hope of higher productivity and wages. Malaysia’s dream of joining the league of high income developed nations as envisaged in its Vision 2020 will not happen on its current course.

Anwar Ibrahim will bring about the necessary changes based on the needs of the people of Malaysia, not be deferring to the bankers, corporations or profiteering capitalists. He understands that is time for more egalitarian policies to put an end to the stifling of initiative and competition through the old affirmative action policies favoring Malays. Preferential treatment for ethnic Malays and some indigenous groups, collectively known as Bumiputra, have led to inequalities in awarding government jobs and contracts and also the provision of education and cheaper housing.

It is also time to end the practice of using low-cost foreign labor for assembly work and to invest instead in a research and development base for new industries. This would help reverse the much-discussed phenomenon of the migration of talent out of Malaysia, and would turn the brain drain into an economic gain. Productivity and inclusiveness lie at the heart of Malaysia’s transformation programs and according to the latest Malaysia Economic Monitor Report, this is an historical opportunity for change.

It remains to be seen whether Anwar Ibrahim’s message will reverberate sufficiently among the voters next month, to bring about a change in direction and a change in leadership for Malaysia, bringing with it the opportunity for the country and its people to realize their full democratic potential.

Dr. Azeem Ibrahim is the Executive Chairman of the Scotland Institute and a Fellow at the Institute of Social Policy and Understanding

NPC Newsmaker Program: Turning Point in Malaysia: Will the Ruling Coalition Finally Lose Power?


From National Press Club

WASHINGTON, April 23, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — On May 5, Malaysians will vote in their 13(th) general election since gaining independence in 1957 — and for the first time, the outcome of the election is in doubt. Disenchantment with the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition, the growing influence of online media and an explosion in the number of young voters (20 percent of the electorate is under 30 and eligible to vote for the first time) could propel the opposition Pakatan Rakyat (PR) coalition to victory.

At a National Press Club Newsmaker news conference on Wednesday, April 24, John Mallott, the former U.S. Ambassador to Malaysia and one of the foremost experts on Malaysian politics, will analyze the forces at play that could make this election an historic turning point for a significant U.S. trading partner and military ally.

While the opposition currently enjoys a slight lead in national polls and a dominant position in online media, the ruling coalition controls the mainstream media and has prevailed in all 12 previous elections. Concerns about electoral fraud are high — international observer delegations have routinely criticized Malaysia’s Election Commission for its handling of previous elections.

The ruling coalition has been plagued by a series of high-profile corruption cases and widespread criticism for poor handling of race relations, including requiring non-Muslims to abide by strict statutes of Muslim law. The opposition coalition controls five of Malaysia’s 14 states and territories and has established a record of building surplus budgets, attracting foreign investment, improving social services and promoting equal citizenship rights for all ethnic groups. But it has also been hampered by internal conflicts over application of Islamic law.

Some observers maintain that a change in government would be destabilizing for Malaysia, while others contend it’s crucial for bringing about the reforms necessary for Malaysia to function effectively as a pluralistic society in a globalized world.

This National Press Club Newsmaker news conference will take place on Wednesday, April 24 at 2 p.m. in the club’s Zenger Room on the 13(th) Floor of the National Press Building, 529 14(th) St., NW, Washington, D.C. 20045.

SOURCE National Press Club

Malaysiakini: Great at recording video, bad at journalism


I just spent almost 12 minutes listening to what I thought would be a hard hitting interview by Malaysiakini with UMNO Youth Chief Khairy Jamaluddin.

With the release and viral spread of the Global Witness expose of Taib Mahmud’s crony capitalism I thought Malaysian independent journalists might be somewhat red-faced for being unable to uncover similar scandals, which seem to lurk around pretty much any corner.

Instead our exceptionally generous host gave Khairy fifteen minutes to deliver a rather stale and staid political stump speech with virtually no challenges or contestations. The toughest Malaysiakini got was to kindly ask Khairy to briefly elaborate on all the wonderful things BN has done since 2008.

Malaysiakini – I pay every month a subscription fee to access your content. Please don’t waste my time with this soft journalism. On the other hand, if putting your least intimidating and qualified interviewer/correspondent on air with Khairy is merely a reflection of how irrelevant Khairy is, then I might forgive you.–Din Merican

GE-13:Anwar Ibrahim pushes ahead with his Reform Agenda


March 20, 2013

Anwar Ibrahim pushes ahead with his Reform Agenda

by Terence Netto (03-19-13)@ http://www.malaysiakini.com

Pakatan Rakyat chief campaigner Anwar Ibrahim said that good leadership would smother threats posed by ‘Little Napoleons’ in the civil service who may not like the egalitarian thrust of the Opposition coalition’s manifesto.

The PKR adviser was speaking yesterday at a dialogue session organised by his party’s Johor Baru division for representatives and activists from Indian-led NGOs in the state.

NONESome 200 people attended the session which was held in the early evening after which the Pakatan supremo hurried off to Skudai to speak at a huge rally to mark fellow coalition member DAP’s 47th anniversary celebrations.

At the dialogue session, Anwar sought to placate Indian fears of continued marginalisation, a situation participants at the dialogue session felt would persist because ‘Little Napoleons’ in a Malay-dominated bureaucracy could baulk alleviative measures mandated by a Pakatan federal government.

Anwar was asked to respond to the observation that in Malaysia “a Malay problem is a national problem, a Chinese problem is a racial problem, and an Indian problem is no problem.”

Anwar said that it would be “a question of leadership” when and if the implementation of Pakatan policies is resisted by ‘Little Napoleons’ in the civil service.

“When I was Finance Minister, I was asked why a non-Malay (Clifford Herbert) was appointed as the ministry’s Secretary-General,” cited Anwar, as an example of what he meant when he said good leadership focused on national priorities can overcome sectarian considerations.

Anwar, who was Finance Minister for eight years (1990-98), fended off pressure from Malay higher-ups in the civil service unhappy at Herbert’s appointment by citing the man’s “good macroeconomic view” and “sound grasp of fundamentals” of the Malaysian economy as the appointee’s merits.

“I’m sure people in the civil service will respond to good leadership that is focused on national priorities,” said Anwar.

Stateless Indians

Once again Pakatan’s putative PM-designate reiterated what he has said several times in the recent past – that within 100 days of the coalition’s federal empowerment, the problem of stateless residents would be resolved.

Indians constitute a disproportionately large percentage of stateless residents, conjectured to be 350,000 out of a probable half million, others being Chinese, and Dayaks and Kadazan in remote parts of Sarawak and Sabah.

“I’m not proposing to grant citizenship to someone who only came here from Chennai yesterday,” quipped Anwar.

“I am proposing to give it to people I know such as a case in Batang Kali who was born in 1943 and till today has not got an identity card. These are fundamental guarantees in the constitution and after half a century if cases like these persist, it is a crying shame,” said the PKR adviser to resounding applause.

Anwar said no leader should without censure question the fundamental right to citizenship of Malaysians qualified for the privilege.

Bersih co-chairperson - Ambiga SreenevasanThis was said in apparent deprecation of attempts to question the fitness for Malaysian citizenship of such government critics as Ambiga Sreenevasan (left), co-chair of electoral reform advocacy group Bersih.

On the question of entry qualifications to universities, Anwar said these would be based on merit to promote and sustain “quality education.”

“We will give intensive additional courses to students who are poor and have fallen short of the qualifying mark so that they can then qualify,” he said.

“To sustain quality tertiary education, we must insist on merit-based entry qualifications,” he stressed.

“This is like our policy towards the different language streams in primary education. We will aid all such schools but we will insist that in every language stream, be it Mandarin, Tamil or Arabic, pupils must be proficient in Malay and at the secondary level, there must acquire proficiency in English,” he said.

The dialogue session lasted an hour and a half at the end of which Anwar was given a resounding ovation and was mobbed as he made his way to the lifts in the hotel where it was held.

Other Paid Malaysia Bloggers Never Registered With U.S. Authorities


The best line in this article, other than the noose slowing tightening on APCO is this:

“Have you ever had a head of state make you breakfast? I found myself in that unusual position on Sunday morning, when Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi made me his unique Malay porridge.”

Other Paid Malaysia Bloggers Never Registered With U.S. Authorities

Conservative blogger Joshua Trevino’s registration as a foreign agent raises questions about his colleagues.

Rosie Gray

BuzzFeed Staff

Two of the main players in the campaign funded by the Malaysian governmentthat placed undisclosed propaganda in the American press did not file with the Department of Justice under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), an omission that lawyers say could place them in legal jeopardy.

David All, a Republican online operative whose David All Group originally contacted conservative writer Joshua Trevino, Trevino said, to conduct a PR operation on behalf of the Malaysian government, is not listed in the records. Nor is Jerome Armstrong, a pioneering liberal blogger whose MyDD was for a time a key site, and who took a leading role alongside Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas in Matt Bai’s 2007 book on how bloggers and billionares were remaking the Democratic Party, who Trevino says was engaged by All at the same time as him to run the website MalaysiaMatters.com as part of a paid media push that backed the country’s ruling party and attacked its critics.

A defunct “about” page for Malaysia Matters listed Armstrong among the founders: “Those working on this project include David All, Jerome Armstrong and Joshua Treviño,” the page said.

Trevino, who last week belatedly filed his own foreign agent registration, told BuzzFeed on Sunday that Armstrong was hired to be his liberal counterpart on MalysiaMatters.

“David All also brought in Jerome,” Trevino said. “I stopped working with him when I stopped working with APCO. He did not transition over to FBC [Media].” APCO Worldwide was in charge of the contract with Malaysia and ultimately David All and the writers, and continued working on Malaysia projects after Trevino’s editorial pursuits transitioned under the aegis of FBC Media.

Armstrong did not reply to repeated requests for comment. In 2011, he told BuzzFeed editor (then at Politico) Ben Smith in an email:

I worked on it and blogged about it back then, iirc [if I recall correctly], it was mid 2008, and it was with the former PM, not Najib. Mine was just a temp contract, did a trip over there as a precursor for having other bloggers there; and then they had a shakeup, it never materialized, and I moved on. I didn’t work for Trevino on it (he was there before and much longer after my brief stint), but through David All and …. (I can’t remember the DC PR group, but there was a big press dust-up about it in 09 iirc).

Malaysia has a really strong blogosphere, and I subsequently got involved on my own with continued conversations with some of the activists and political groups there, but is not a country with a free press. That all changed with the internet by the middle of the decade, and there as a brief moment when it was feared that things would go the way of Singapore. In 2008, bloggers were being thrown into jail, and Badawi was hearing from many that he should outlaw blogs/online political speech. So, when I was there talking with him, it was about praising his initiative, and telling him that would be a very good legacy for him to have initiated…. and showed him how Malaysia Matters worked, and tried to get across to him that it could be used by any political party; that he should be meeting with antagonistic bloggers and try to win them over. Badawi seemed to get it, but his communications director listened in, and by the ‘online outreach’ results of the next special election, and his subsequent blogger outreach, it definitely turned out that way.

Asked to comment further, Armstrong said ” I don’t recall the contract, and ours usually have a non-disclosure type of clause in there.”

The David All Group was partly owned by APCO before he closed it in October 2012, he told BuzzFeed.

All’s status as someone working on behalf of the client would normally have been registered with FARA either as a short form registrant or listed on APCO’s filings regarding the Malaysian contract.

“It’s so long ago,” All said when reached by phone on Monday. “The David All Group was owned in part by APCO Worldwide and [Malaysia] was their client, so I just worked with APCO.”

“I’m sort of gathering more information and looking into this a little bit more,” All said. “My goal is not to hide anything. It was not a covert operation.”

All corroborated Trevino’s account of being engaged on the project at the same time as Armstrong, though Armstrong’s involvement ended earlier than Trevino’s.

Armstrong and Trevino were in Malaysia at the same time, according to Flickr photos. They met with the Prime Minister.

The photos above picture Armstrong and Trevino in Malaysia and were posted to Armstrong’s Flickr feed, picturing a trip to Malaysia in June 2008. The Prime Minister at that time, Abdullah Badawi, made his guests porridge, according to an email from Trevino passed along to BuzzFeed by a source that describes the incident and links to a now-broken MalaysiaMatters post: “Have you ever had a head of state make you breakfast? I found myself in that unusual position on Sunday morning, when Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi made me his unique Malay porridge.”

Cached versions of posts Armstrong wrote about Malaysia are still available online (see herehere, and here).

According to the FARA website, federal law requires that agents “register within ten days of agreeing to become an agent and before performing any activities for the foreign principal.”

The act specifies that “failure to register, keep accounts, mark informational materials, provide a congressional committee with a copy of the agent’s most recent registration, and agreeing to a contingent fee based on the success of political activity are violations of the Act.”

“If he’s employed by his own company he should have filed as an agent,” Joseph E. Sandler, a lawyer and FARA expert, said of All. “If he’s not an employee, if he’s a consultant, he should do his own FARA filing.”

APCO, he said, “should have shown their payments to him on their FARA filings.”

“And secondly he should have registered himself as an agent for him because he’s indirectly working for a foreign principal,” Sandler said. As for Armstrong, “if he knew they were acting indirectly on behalf of the Malaysian government, and knew that’s where the money’s coming from, he should have registered.”

Another lawyer who specializes in FARA law and who wished to speak on background said “It sounds like they’re at least close to the line.”

“Generally, you have a registration for the agent itself and for the persons who are directly providing a service for the foreign principal,” the lawyer said. “If you are writing informational materials at the direction or control of a foreign principal,” he said, registration is required.

Adam Williams, spokesman for APCO Worldwide, said the firm, which appears to have orchestrated the propaganda campaign, could not immediately commment.

“We’re looking into it so we make sure that we have all the facts straight. We want to make sure that we’re 100% honest and accurate.”

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,603 other followers