UN AWARD MALAYSIA 2012: Citation for the Malaysian Bar Council


October 25, 2012

UN AWARD MALAYSIA 2012: Citation for the Malaysian Bar Council

Kuala Lumpur, October 24, 2012

Throughout its 66-year existence, the Malaysian Bar has admirably fulfilled its role as guardian of the rule of law, and defender of human rights and the public interest in Malaysia. The Malaysian public has come to look to the Malaysian Bar for guidance on what the law is, what the law should be, and what the law must never be.

As a statutory body set up under the Legal Profession Act 1976, the Malaysian Bar is tasked to “uphold the cause of justice without regard to its own interests or that of its Members, uninfluenced by fear or favour”, and to “protect and assist the public in all matters touching ancillary or incidental to the law”.

The Malaysian Bar has been exemplary in discharging its responsibilities. In particular, the Malaysian Bar has shown unfailing commitment in standing up and unwavering zeal in speaking out against abuse of power by those in authority.

The Malaysian Bar’s history has been marked by opposition to legislation that is draconian and against the interests of justice. In the 1970s it stood against the Essential (Security Cases) Regulations, 1975, that amended the law for the trial of offences against national security, which included changes in the basic rules of evidence and removal of a judge’s discretion in sentencing.

In the early 1980s a contingent of lawyers marched to Parliament House to oppose amendments to the Societies Act, which infringed on the freedom of association and curtailed the self-regulation of registered societies. 42 lawyers were subsequently charged in court for taking part in an unlawful assembly, found guilty, admonished and discharged.

In the late 1980s the Malaysian Bar protested the Executive’s assault on the independence of the judiciary, which led to the suspension of the Lord President and five judges of the Supreme Court, and which culminated in the dismissal of the Lord President and two judges of the Supreme Court.

Throughout the 1990s and 2000s, the Bar continued to consistently advocate for the independence of the Judiciary, and has persisted in calling for the assertions of judicial misconduct to be investigated, even to the extent of calling for a royal commission of inquiry, to which the government agreed.

One aspect of the Malaysian Bar’s work that sets it distinctively apart from many other law associations is its robust defence of democracy and human rights — particularly civil and political rights — and its intolerance of discrimination.

Since 2000 in particular, the Malaysian Bar has been vocal in promoting the right to freedom of belief, and mutual respect and acceptance of all faiths. The Malaysian Bar has actively engaged with the authorities on proposed amendments to relevant legislation, and provided its views on conflicts of laws issues that face families caught between the separate jurisdictions of civil and Syariah laws. In addition, it has repeatedly called for the open and constructive exchange of views as a means of fostering national unity.

In more recent years the Malaysian Bar has championed the rights of the Orang Asli community, persons with disabilities, and the freedoms of assembly and association. The landmark native title case of Sagong Tasi, which recognised the proprietary interest of the Orang Asli in their ancestral lands, was undertaken completely on a pro bono basis by a team of lawyers from the Malaysian Bar.

The “Walk for Justice” in 2007 and “Walk for Freedom” in 2011 were bold moves to highlight travesties of the administration of justice and rule of law, and to oppose unjust laws. Undeterred by threats, and allegations of political bias, the Malaysian Bar has continuously and unhesitatingly taken a stand in favour of human rights, fundamental freedoms and civil liberties, greater constitutionalism, access to justice, and an independent Bench and Bar.

Through the holding of watching briefs, the Malaysian Bar signals its concern on particular issues, suchas conversion of children; gender discrimination; deaths in custody; the constitutionality of requiring a Police permit for a gathering; sedition; and excessive use of force by law enforcement personnel. The Malaysian Bar has also often been called upon to provide monitors to observe public assemblies organised by other groups.

The Malaysian Bar’s presence at these trials, inquests, inquiries and public assemblies reminds those responsible for the administration of justice in this country that the Bar will not sit idly by where matters of public or national interest are concerned.

Since March 2009, the Malaysian Bar’s ground-breaking MyConstitution Campaign has undertaken a plethora of innovative activities and events throughout the country, in its mission to promote constitutional awareness and constitutionalism amongst Malaysians.

The launch of the National Legal Aid Foundation (Yayasan Bantuan Guaman Kebangsaan) on February 25, 2011 was a significant milestone in the history of the Malaysian Bar’s involvement in ensuring access to justice through the provision of legal aid. The Malaysian Bar is one of the few law associations that run a fairly widespread legal aid scheme funded solely by a levy imposed on all its Members.

Despite the scheme’s existence since 1982, however, many arrested individuals are still unrepresented,as the scheme does not have adequate resources. For many years,the Malaysian Bar had lobbied for the establishment of a comprehensive legal aid scheme, and the establishment of the Foundation – which is a collaborative effort with the Government – a momentous step forward in plugging this gap.

The UN in Malaysia has no doubt that the Malaysian Bar will continue to uphold its democratic values and norms and its tradition, and indeed its duty, of speaking up against injustice, and unjust laws and practices.

_________________

Acceptance Speech of President, Malaysian Bar Council. Lim Chee Wee at the United Nations Malaysia Organisation of the Year Award 2012 Presentation Ceremony, Renaissance Hotel, Kuala Lumpur (24 Oct 2012)


It is a privilege for me to accept this United Nations Award on behalf of the Malaysian Bar’s almost 14,800 Members, 25 past Presidents, and its past and present Bar Council members.

The Malaysian Bar is both honoured and humbled by this award, which recognises the outstanding contributions of organisations in Malaysia in the areas of human rights, social justice and equality. We, the Bar, thank the United Nations for this privilege.

This United Nations Award is undoubtedly the most prestigious award ever received by the Malaysian Bar.

The Malaysian Bar is being recognised for the work it has carried out in fulfilment of its principal statutory purpose, namely, “to uphold the cause of justice without regard to its own interests or that of its members, uninfluenced by fear or favour”.  The Bar has also undertaken many initiatives in order to “protect and assist the public in all matters touching ancillary or incidental to the law”, another statutorily-mandated function.

In its sixty-six years of existence, the Malaysian Bar has consistently and unhesitatingly stood up for rights and freedoms, and for justice.  The Bar has, for example:

  • condemned the existence, and use, of oppressive and unjust laws such as the Internal Security Act 1960 and other security laws;
  •  publicly advocated for the preservation of the independence of the Judiciary, particularly during the 1988 judicial crisis, and the video clip scandal involving VK Lingam and Ahmad Fairuz;
  • publicly advocated for the protection and promotion of our constitutional fundamental liberties and that Malaysia is a secular state; and
  • provided legal representation to uphold the human rights of marginalised and vulnerable individuals and groups, including the Orang Asli and Orang Asal, and other minorities.

Over the years the Malaysian Bar’s work has earned it not only bouquets, but also brickbats in equal measure.  Public rebuke and protests against the Malaysian Bar, and warnings of physical violence — even death threats — against its leaders have not, and will not, dissuade the Malaysian Bar from fulfilling its purpose, and acting true to its values and responsibilities.

The Malaysian Bar has come a long way in its relationship with the Executive and the Judiciary in the last twenty-five years.  Whilst the passage of time has not seen any change to the values and causes that the Malaysian Bar champions, it has witnessed dramatic improvements in the Bar’s relationship with these two pillars of democracy.

It would have been unimaginable, twenty-five years ago, for the then-Prime Minister of Malaysia to have publicly acknowledged that, “The Malaysian Bar is an important partner in the rule of law and the administration of justice.  When it speaks, we listen.”

Yet, almost a month ago, our Prime Minister, Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak uttered these words at the Malaysian Bar’s International Malaysia Law Conference 2012. At the same event, the Chief Justice of Malaysia, Tun Arifin Zakaria, described the Bar as “an equal partner in the administration of justice”.

It is the Malaysian Bar’s hope that this collaboration will develop into an effective partnership, characterised by commonality of aspiration and purpose for a Malaysia where the rule of law and human rights are protected and promoted, regardless of class, race, gender, or membership of minority groups.

Recent events suggest that we will continue to face challenges and difficulties in the exercise of our freedoms of speech and assembly, and our right to vote, as well as in the elimination of discrimination against, and promotion of equality for, minorities.

The Malaysian Bar pledges to continue lending its advocacy, both in the public arena and in the courtroom, to defending freedoms and rights, and to realising the nation’s aspirations for an inclusive and functioning democracy.

Lim Chee Wee
President
Malaysian Bar Council

About these ads

11 thoughts on “UN AWARD MALAYSIA 2012: Citation for the Malaysian Bar Council

  1. Congratulations to President Lim Chee Wee and members of the Malaysian Bar Council for this UN Award. I celebrate your achievements, and admire your courage to stand on the side of the Rule of Law and Justice. Keep up the good work for Malaysia. Bon Courage.–Din Merican

  2. How could the Bar Council accept the award with a straight face when it could not disbar V.K. Lingam for his role in perverting the course of justice?

  3. Genuine award. Congratulations!

    Not obtained through the machinations of
    public relations firms hired to promote one’s public image.

  4. No matter what others may say, the Malaysian Bar Council fully deserves this prestigious award. Congratulations.

    The Bar Council is also sincere in its recognition of the improving relationship between it and the Judiciary & Executive. Najib is also positively adopting a cooperative approach towards the Bar Council and this is good for Malaysia as the PM listens to what the Bar Council says.

    Whenever the Bar Council correctly and constructively criticises the government (the Executive) some may perceive those criticisms as “an opposition” – this perception needs to be corrected. In this respect the Bar Council has to be forever vigilant not to allow its campaign to be, or seen to be, hijacked in any way by the Oppositon political parties which are ever ready to get their “foot” in the door even without any invitation.

    Despite the above the Bar Council does have its own flaws such as the mentioned failure to disbar its errant member. No one is perfect.

  5. Congratulations to the Bar Council for standing upright in support of justice and fairness against a government that often uses illegal and unfair means to subjugate its citizens.
    what happened to proposed idea of a parallel Bar Council with lawyers supportive of the ruling coalition??
    the opposition parties and umno-bn are well advised to support civil society movements which is actually fighting for the good of the people and also the obligation of the political parties to the society.
    leave your political allegiance, religious and racial preferences at home.
    hussin: you are a budding spinner, all political parties including your darling umno-bn was invited to join the Bersih rally.

  6. Hussin must be his dreaming self again. It is time he has both feet on the ground.

    The failure to purge the honorable profession of members seen to be flouting its own rules is symptomatic of a wider problem that continues to make a mockery of its struggle to give meaning to the rule of law.

    Here is a profession which grew from some 600 members in the ’60s to multiples of 3,000 members today in the short space of a few decades and whose members for the most part depend on the government directly or indirectly for their livelihood, to put food on the table for their famiies, it is wishful thinking to think that they could be more than anything else but a group of self serving individuals who would prostitute their profession and betray the principles of their profession, sell their grandmothers and throw others under the bus when push comes to shove.

    Having said that there have been a committed and dedicated handful fiercely loyal to their profession who are working to bring back honor to their profession that have alluded it over the years. But even they are powerless to bring change where change is most needed.

  7. Congratulation Malaysian Bar. Keep up the pressure.

    May I take this opportunity to wish Dato’ and everyone Selamat Hari Raya Aidil Adha.

  8. The first three Prime Ministers had been lawyers all trained abroad. All were involved in the country’s struggle for independence. Then came a wannabe lawyer who missed the boat in the struggle for independence, all but sidelined by his peers, who harbored ambitions of being a lawyer himself but was reduced to dispensing antibiotices and vitamin to the kampong folks for $2 for his services including any antibiotics.

    This Old Goat later got to be Prime Minister, had only disdain for the legal profession and single handedly brought the legal profession to its knees, to a position second only to the oldest profession in the world.

    No accolades showered on this once honorable profession can hide the disgrace it has brought upon itself..

  9. I saw you hussin at the Bersih rally.
    hussin, hassan and Co. your naiveness is so glaring that it has to be a put on.

    the Ole Goat took his revenge and at what cost?
    ‘all the kings horses and all the kings men
    could not put Humpty Dumpty together again’

  10. Toad! This award is entirely inappropriate. How could UN award the Bar Council when Teo Beng Hock and Altantuya died without legal redress? When socio-economic apartheid continues uncontrolled? When forced military conscriptions are unaddressed? Where the country is being bled by term limitless nepotists and Orang Asli land is stolen ALL THE TIME? Does the UN know that Malaysia lacks :

    1) Freedom from Apartheid/Fascism (Article 1 Human Rights Charter)
    2) Freedom from Religious-Persecution/Religious-Supremacy. (Article 18 Human Rights Charter)
    3) Equality for all ethnicities and faiths in all aspects of policy, Law and Constitution. (Surah An Nisa 4:75)

    ;and that the Bar Council (which I visited in person but were all unwilling to address APARTHEID of BUMIPUTRA) is asleep on the job regards even Article 1 of the Human Rights Charter which is equality that Malaysians do not have, Article 18 of the Human Rights Charter which us freedom of choice in religion which Malaysia ALSO does not have? Bar Council are panders and colluders to Malaysian insouciance and opacity, hiding behind a legal junta of undemocratically installed judge that collude with MPs to hide all sorts of Human Rights abuses?

    Did Bar Council bribe the UN for this award? The people don’t need a legal education to understand all the above facts. I am shocked at the UN! What is wrong with the UN?

    The skewed comments makes the Bar Council and UN into farces. @Mr.Bean is making sense here and so am I by any measure of severity of cases mentioned. Whats this ra-ra b.s..? That alternate Bar Council needs to be set up, and I don;t mean the pro-Apartheid one!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s