Why Anwar Ibrahim: A Point of View


October 2, 2012

Why Anwar Ibrahim: A Point of View

by  John Lee M K@http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has already made history by being the first Malay politician to ever actually win more political support through an explicitly non-racial platform.

It is practically impossible to underestimate how Anwar bucked the trend; he has completely turned our understanding of politics in this country on its head.

History has already made it crystal-clear; Malay politicians who try to unite the country by appealing to a common sense of Malaysian-ness inevitably wind up heading into political oblivion. Dato Onn Ja’afar’s political career went up in flames the moment he founded the first multiracial political party in the country, in spite of it having every conceivable advantage – it was literally the incumbent party of the time because of Onn’s towering status in Malayan politics. And it, of course, foundered completely.

Since then nobody has even tried to unite the Malays as Malaysians. Unite the Malays as Malays, of course; Syed Jaafar Albar famously proclaimed in the 1960s that he was a Malay first and a Malaysian second. Syed Hussein Alatas made an admirable attempt to change Malaysian politics through Gerakan, and we all know how that turned out. Literally every Malay leader who has tried to be Malaysian first ever since has risked being branded as a sell-out, a puppet of the non-Malays and a stooge of Lee Kuan Yew.

The one exception was Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who experienced some brief success with his Bangsa Malaysia idea. This only makes sense, considering Dr Mahathir’s iron-fisted handling of anyone who dared to oppose him; it is thus a pity that he never took this policy beyond mere words.

The moment Dr Mahathir handed over the reins to his successor, Malay politicians were up in arms criticising Bangsa Malaysia as a ‘nebulous’ and untenable concept for daring to acknowledge that the non-Malays have a place in this country too.

Brave enough to dump Ketuanan Melayu

So here we are today: 55 years after independence, the easiest way to tar a Malay politician next to calling him a Jew-lover is to accuse him of saying this country belongs to the Chinese and Indians too. That is simply how Malaysian politics works; to win the support of the Malays, you need to denounce the non-Malays as foreign squatters, who are only here as a matter of privilege rather than right, a privilege revocable at any time.

And what a coincidence it is – that is exactly how the Malaysian government works too. If you’re not an Indonesian who can be counted as a Malay, your application for permanent residency or citizenship can never hope to see the light of day. If you’re not a Malay, you can expect to hear your fair share of racist remarks in a public national school – and not from students, mind you, but teachers.

As a student you can expect a syllabus which teaches you about the meaning of Ketuanan Melayu rather than Bangsa Malaysia. As an employee you can expect a civil service where you’re not welcome unless they need you to fulfil their minuscule quota of non-Malay recruits.

As an entrepreneur you can expect a government – and many government-linked companies – which will not give you any business unless you are a Malay. Half a century after independence, and that’s what 40% of this country has to look forward to.

And since this is how the government works, up-and-coming politicians and political activists realise this is how politics works too. That is why even though you will never hear the typical Malaysian voicing such sentiments, political activists will readily denounce the non-Malays as foreign squatters here at the behest of a social contract which gives them the privilege, not right, to stay and live here.

Since this is how politics and government have worked since time immemorial, we owe Anwar an incredible debt for nearly single-handedly turning all this – everything – completely on its head.

For the past half century, to be a good Malay leader, you have either had to publicly proclaim your support for Ketuanan Melayu – and not the mild ketuanan as in strong leadership, but ketuanan as in ‘blood will run in the streets if our demands are not met’ – or you have had to simply avoid commenting on the issue and just hope you can be all things to all people.

Anwar ran on a platform, not of vague meaningless nice-sounding platitudes, but a platform explicitly against everything Ketuanan Melayu stands for.

Ketuanan Rakyat, not Ketuanan Melayu

This is a man, mind you, who celebrated the end of his ban on active politics by damning Ketuanan Melayu and consigning it to the dust heap of history. This is a man who has publicly and repeatedly proclaimed that his commitment is to the sovereignty of the people – Ketuanan Rakyat – rather than the dominance of the Malays.

This is a man who has never wavered from his stand that the philosophy of government assistance based on racial origin, rather than economic status, is fundamentally and morally wrong. This is a man who has repeatedly, wherever he goes, whoever he speaks to, driven home the same point, again and again: ‘Anak Melayu, anak saya. Anak Cina, anak saya. Anak India, anak saya.’

And this is a man who has had everything in the traditional playbook of Malaysian politics thrown at him. He’s been labelled a heretic, a sodomite, a liar, a hypocrite, a traitor willing to sell the Malays and Malaysians out at a moment’s notice. The ruling coalition has done everything in their power to make it known far and wide that this is a man committed to non-racialism; committed to a Malaysia where everyone belongs.

Regardless of whether you think he deserves it, or if he was just lucky, credit is due to Anwar: where so many brave Malay leaders have fallen and failed, he has won an incredible victory. Onn Ja’afar was vilified simply for opening up his political party to Malayans of all creeds and colours; Anwar has gone above and beyond, explicitly declaring that this is a country for all Malaysians, whoever they might be. And he has won a resounding victory.

Broke new frontiers

It would be one thing if he scraped through with a majority of less than 5,000 votes in the recent by-election, but the fact is, it was not even close – not with a landslide majority of 15,000, larger even than the majority his wife won before he explicitly condemned Ketuanan Melayu. Anwar has succeeded where everyone else has failed; he has carved out a broad base of political support, not on a platform of rights or privileges for one community, but a platform of justice, freedom and equality of opportunity for all communities.

Criticise Anwar all you like for his inconsistent and wishy-washy stands on other issues. Criticise his coalition for its internal dissension and strange hypocrisy all you want. You can even say you have no intention of trusting a man who might just stab you in the back the moment he gains power.

The fact of the matter is, you do not have a choice between Anwar and your ideal, committed, consistent, sincere Malaysian leader. Your choice, in the here and now, is between Anwar and a regime built on racism, built on stoking the flames of mistrust and hatred. This regime of hatred has delivered its promise of Ketuanan Melayu; why should we expect things to be any worse under a regime promising Ketuanan Rakyat?

At the worst, it’s the same old garbage under a different government; at best, we might finally have a government and a political system which works for all Malaysians rather than whoever yells the loudest and threatens the most blood.

Making the Malaysian dream a reality

As far as taking power is concerned, this is still a long shot. Anwar may yet turn out to be a flop on delivering if he ever gets the chance to govern. But the simple and stark reality is, as far as we who live in the present are concerned, he is our best and only chance to put a stop to this insanity.

Anwar is not the perfect vessel for uniting the country, but there is a reason he scares the powers that be: he is the first real chance we have ever had to unite the country against the demons of racialism and parochialism. And for now, he is our only chance. He is the only one who can cross ethnic barriers to proclaim a commitment to a Malaysia where Malaysians, not Malays, are sovereign, and actually win more support than before.

I am no huge fan of Anwar, but I recognise what he has done, and how far he has come. I support him, not because I like him as a person, but because I believe in the cause he champions, and because I believe that if there is any person in this country who can make that dream a reality, it is Anwar Ibrahim.

About these ads

34 thoughts on “Why Anwar Ibrahim: A Point of View

  1. Strong message eloquently stated, John/ But I wish you your petty ego didn’t have to insert itself at the end by proclaiming that you endorse Anwar’s premiership even though you are not a huge fan of his. I wonder if you have actually spent any time at close quarters to the man; if not, why must you dislike the man? Has he offended you in any way? It annoys me when people – in the interest of protecting their own reputations as political pundits – try to hedge their bets on Anwar by labeling him the “only viable option at this juncture.” I can’t claim to have any personal knowledge of Anwar Ibrahim – but from observing him carefully over the last 14 years, my admiration for him only keeps growing, considering his resilience, his stamina, and his heroic resolve to see this final war between light and dark through to its inevitable conclusion. Even if, by some fatal misfortune, BN remains the federal government after GE13. Anwar Ibrahim has already, in my books, achieved the status of a national hero in the tradition of freedom fighters like Abraham Lincoln, Jose Rizal, Emiliano Zapata, Salvador Allende, Nelson Mandela, Vaçlav Havel, and Aung San Suu Kyi.

  2. Methinks the last paragraph is superfluous and goes against the grain of the essay.
    So i’ll give a C+ if i were to grade it for a college term paper. Sorry..

    I have no doubt of Anwar’s capabilities, initiative, drive and goodwill, but i have misgivings about his hangers on. Should the Opposition happen to take over Putrajaya, i suggest they turn it into a huge theme park.

  3. They can throw everything they got to this man but history has shown Mandela survived 27 years in Robben Island and quite recently, The Lady Suu Kyi has been honored in US Congress;
    DSAI is a Remarkable Leader in Malaysian history. Do yourself proud, Malaysians. Put him where he rightly belongs….Putrajaya.

  4. The writer, despite his protestations, comes across as quite a fan of Anwar. But he makes a good point on Anwar’s admirable stand on Ketuanan Rakyat and Anwar offering the best alternative to a racist, corrupted government.

  5. Anwar has paid his dues for being a controversial figure by imbibing new and fresh ideas to home although these values are universal and hardly new to the world at large to begin with. But politics in Malaysia has become a closed shop business since the last 30 years beginning with the rule of benign dictator. He is the only active politician who came back after serving sometime in jail and earlier detained under the ISA whereas several others were ex-residents of Kamunting only.

    The UMNO/BN writ were so pervasive that many believed of his political demise only for him to come back within inches of claiming power. Imagine the fear of his political nemesis as seen by their extreme absurdities.

    Controversy will always be with Anwar the politician, but the man should be given a chance to prove his salt.

  6. Hope you (Mr.John) are right…..regarding this Ketuanan Rakyat….at least we the minority will feel secure in this Malaysia as our right and are not privileged….

  7. Antares,

    I agree with your views. Here is a remarkable man who had to put up with a lot in his quest to lead our country. It is a great help to him to have Wan Azizah, Nurul Izzah and his family backing him 100+ per cent. They are a source of his moral and emotional strength and resilience.

    In my opinion he is a political icon in the same league of great Southeast Asian Leaders before him. Will he be given a chance? It depends on voters. The Barisan Nasional knows that; their ability to continue to govern depends us as voters. It has gone out its way to buy votes as per 2013 Budget.

    I know Anwar reasonably well, and was able to observe how he operates at close range. He is a charismatic leader, and an interesting person. He is an intellectual and a strategic thinker who is difficult to match by the “other side”. His ideas and proposals on the development of a humane economy and good governance make a lot of sense to my friends like you, associates and I.–Din Merican

  8. Antares,
    Wait till you read ktemoc’s commentary on anwar Ibrahim. To kaytee, anwar is unfit to run the country.

    Clf,
    Anwar wanna have mano o mano with najib. Love to see your mano o mano with ktemoc lei

    Hang Kebun,
    As much as I appreciate anwar as a leader, anwar is no Mandela lei

    Din,
    Still some of his actions in the 80s are pretty controversial. If only he got the courage of lee kuan yew

    Guys & gals,
    As compared to anwar, I rather admire karpal Singh. Unfortunately, he’s a punjabi. In malaysia, non Malays impossible to become pm. Even wanna be chief minister of malacca also difficult. Just look at how tunku reneged on the promises to have tan cheng shwee as chief minister when a melayu was appointed as governor.
    Sorry if me sound wee bit racist, of all the governors non of them are non Malays, non Muslims. Shall we have a quota just like what Lebanon did before the civil war? President shall be Christian. Pm shall be Sunni Muslim & speaker shall be shite

  9. looes, sometimes i think that your neural pathways need to be rearranged and rewired. The domains of your thoughts are what is sometimes referred to as ‘monomaniac’.
    I think as a self-professed Christian, you should read F.Dostoevsky’s ‘Crime and Punishment’, besides the blogs you so fondly reminiscence about. It might take you quite sometime to digest it, but it will be worth your while. I know Anwar has read it and understood it – in his own context. LKY otoh, doesn’t think much of it – except the bits on Marantha. If God gave you a brain, you have to discern – for that is the your purpose – not what dogs tell you.

    Have you been to Lebanon and smelled the burnt cedars?

  10. I think that JL just stated that he has his own opinion as an individual, but endorse Anwar compare to Najib, if he has to choose for the benefit of society.

  11. So darn simple answer to that question …

    … if not Anwar Ibrahim, would you prefer Najib Razak, Muhiyiddin Yasin, Ibrahim Ali (my name sake) or Azmin Ali?

    For me, if its not Anwar, I’d rather have the kerbau grazing down the road from my house to be the PM rather than these other comedians.

  12. after reading the essay from JLMK last night I wondered what all the comments would be like today. I’m not surprised that the pro-regime cybertroopers couldn’t find their guns to shoot. or are they still contemplating what to write?
    the author, as a journalist is just trying to keep his neutrality, who knows what happens next, the last para is the backdoor he built in on purpose.

    the article is a good description of Anwar and his Kampf against the malaysian partisan politics, the lopsided institutions and the mostly corrupted politicians.
    Anwars comeback was heralded by the majority, even the moderate pro-government voters, as the long hoped for change in the political landscape. especially the ‘others’ were ecstatic that finally time has come for them to be accepted as fellow malaysians by the administration and the ‘Ketuanans’.

    give DSAI a chance, he can’t do more damage than that already done by umno-bn to Malaysia. there is no such thing as benign dictatorship. a country ruled by one party and one group of politicians for 55 years cannot be called a democracy.

    Dostoyevsky’s ‘Crime and Punishment’ – a short description I foung in Amazon:

    ”Crime and Punishment focuses on the mental anguish and moral dilemmas of Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov, an impoverished man who formulates and executes a plan to kill an unscrupulous pawnbroker seemingly for her money, thereby solving his financial problems and at the same time, ridding the world of an evil parasite. Raskolnikov also strives to be an extraordinary being, believing that murder is permissible in pursuit of a higher purpose.”- Amazon.com

    CLF- is it what I’m thinking, the higher purpose – to become the PM of malaysia and also the $500mio fringe benefit from Scorpene?

  13. What a pity to Malaysia and Malaysians if Anwar were to stick to his word that he would resign & give up politics if PR loses this coming GE13. It appears that the longer the GE is delayed the more the chances for BN to win. Hope Anwar will not end up as Dato’ Onn Jaafar.

  14. Yes reeper, Dostoevsky looked into the abyss – yet found redemption there.
    One has to suffer the fires of purgatory (i’m speaking metaphorically here) from the decisions we make, even if deemed immoral and destructive, in order that we truly Live to our fullest potential. Consequences of the Fall must be embraced yet understood, without devolving into utilitarian tendencies, the scapegoat mechanism or finger pointing. This what Anwar is trying to do and has so far succeeded. His detractors, who have not suffered one whit, insist that he’s unrepentant or remains the changeling. We have blogs filled with innuendos and lame-brained conspiracy theories to that effect.

    I say: “Behold, the Man!” Nothing more.

    The Leader of Men, must necessarily cast aside all his compassion and apprehension – leaving only Love as his final frontier. The charismatic protagonist in the novella finally understood that to kill is to be killed and that the only solace for that is the unconditional love of another.

    There is no room for passionless wavering – as displayed by our peerless goons. Their decisions are based on reactionary fear, shame and false pride. Ambitions to greed result in temporary populist policies that stagnate. Love of your fellowman sometimes require tough unpopular dictum, since many know not. Charisma is found in people of passion and who exhibit resoluteness – not people who talk about other people – that’s gossip, nor Santa Clauses bearing tid-bits. Is that too ‘heavy’?

  15. thanks CLF for the heavy stuff. yes, it is beyond debate that our peerless goons are passionless in everything else except in the greed for power and money.
    you have to go hungry before you know what hunger is and you have to have suffered extreme oppression to know what abuse of power means.
    Anwar has been to hell and back and it had made a ‘man’ out of him.

    don’t expect charisma from jibs. how can he have passion and exhibit resoluteness while having a wifey like Rosie.

  16. Most Malays who make the majority voters have lost interest in Anwar’s
    rhetoric outburst…They see him more as a traitor who betrayed the race, whom they have high hopes in his early years in the government…Unfortunately due to lust, greed and power this man will do anything to achieve his ambition to be PM..at the expense of his own people, race and religion.

  17. From what i heard, FLOM is trying hard to mend her ways. Wish her luck. But crocodile tears are deceptive – although her’s i think, are turtle tears – scanty, bitter and hyper-saline. But she has regrets after the ‘sting’ of her Kazakh SIL. An epiphany of sorts. She’s highly intelligent, but in the wrong way. Humility, confession and submission will do her good, but she’ll still be wearing the trousers. Her handlers aren’t exactly salt of the earth ladies.

    Basically, no one is beyond redemption – but everyone must pay their bills – accrued and present.

  18. Jason tay, are you perchance from MCA? Or rather UMNO?
    Sleeping under the mosquito net? Dengue outbreak, you know..

  19. Let us pray for him to be given by Allah the light to be the true leader we expect of him…he might not be the best but let us help him create bangsa malaysia…..

  20. ‘The probability that we may fail in the struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just.’
    Abraham Lincoln

    And like Anwar says; “Lawan tetap Lawan”

  21. Someone has attributed to Anwar the phrase “Lawan tetap Lawan” which can mean it does not matter what happens to Malaysia or its citizens and their general interests in the long run as long as the Opposition keeps on opposing no matter what. This attitude, if adopted by any sides of the political divide, is not good for any Malaysians. The ends should not justify all means.

  22. Another phrase attributed to Anwar is “Ada saya kisah!!”…Another clear indication to this man willingness to sacrifice everything, and ‘go for broke’ even at his own people, race and religion interest, for the sake of his narrow faith and stupid vengeance of the worst kind…

  23. eshmael,

    How do you expect people with Anwar character to be bestowed by God guiding light??…If he’s really sincere, then go to Mecca, pray for forgiveness in front of Ka’abah, and seek His blessing and pray too for the overall peace and security of this country…!! Will he be bold enough to accomplish that??..like what Jibb did last year.

  24. hussin dear, the cause is to rehabilitate malaysian politics and thereby kick out corrupt leaders. is that not good for the country? do you endorse corruption and misuse of power? then it is no surprise that you don’t understand Lincolns statement.

  25. Forgive me for my denseness and sheer ignorance, but how does it help for one to go before the Ka’aba and pray for guidance and forgiveness of Sins? Is that the place of the Sakinah? Is not God everywhere, yet nowhere?

    The Jews did that for centuries before their Temple in Jerusalem prior 70CE before it’s destruction by the Romans. They now have a different concept of the Shekinah. As do the Christians. The Sakinah (سكينة‎) is also mentioned 6 times in the Quran, but is used in without reference to the Ka’aba.

  26. Well CLF your point’s taken. Anyway why do you think God commands Moslem to visit Mecca and perform the Hajj once in a lifetime?…That’s my point.( If Anwar is sincere enough he should perform the Hajj ). Pilgrimage is a communal yet very personal event, climaxing in moments of collective contemplation, inducing a heightened awareness of fellowship, and yet always surrounded itself with a sense of quiet transcendence.

    The goal, if indeed there’s one, is the journey itself which becomes a sort of preparatory purification, readying the pilgrims to experience another dimension of their being. Pilgrimage corresponds to a deep spiritual hunger presence in all of us, offering the possibilities of transcendence to those who might not have the opportunity to experience it.

    ———–
    Hisham,

    Of course, Anwar won’t get the publicity they way PM Najib did when he performs his hajj. Do you expect Bernama, RTM or TV3 to televise his events? It is also none of my business to indulge in his personal issues and issues such as this (If Anwar is sincere enough he should perform the Hajj) !! Who am I to question his relationship with God? To my knowledge, Anwar has performed the Haj, at least Ummrah–Din Merican

  27. Dato I think you got the wrong Hisham here.
    Anyway you only need to do Haj one time, so how many times you commit sins and go to Haj to redeem yourself, doesn’t count.
    God is as close to you as your jugular vein. God does not live in the Kaabah. You talk to God each time you say your prayer. That’s why we have to recite Surah AlFatihah with each prayer. Why? Because we are having a conversation with God.

  28. UMNO-BN abuses the term “social contract” in its rationalisation of
    Malaysia’s system of semi-apartheid.

    Check out what the concept “social contract” actually means in classical political thought (John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau)..

  29. as a malaysian of india origin I never thought myself a Indian but a malaysian so I hope there will be change.

  30. OrangMalaya, may I suggest that you study more about the 5 pillars of Islam…??!!
    ____________
    Orang Malaya, I think you learn from Imam Hisham who claims to be wise in matters Islam.–Din Merican

  31. 5 pillars of Islam
    The Shahadah, there is only one God and Muhammad is his messenger
    Pray 5 times a day
    Fast during Ramadhan
    Do your Haj (at least once in your lifetime)
    Pay your zakat
    Anything I’ve missed Ustaz Hisham?
    Oh yes, please tell me why Muslim recite the Surah Al Fatiha for every rakaat during prayers? Why that surah and not any other?
    What is the meaning of the Surah Al Fatihah?
    Give me and the rest here an education Ustaz.

  32. Dato’ Din, I don’t need that title, but rather remain an obedient Muslim as much as I could, despite the worldly temptations we had to endure… and pray to God to guide us and our families on his righteous path…Amin.

  33. If Anwar is sincere enough he should perform the Hajj – Hisham
    How do you know that Anwar had never done the Haj? Haj and Umrah have become a cop out for the BN politicos once they have been exposed. They rush to do Umrah and the news is splattered all over the media. Is there a difference in repentance and atonement if done in Mekkah versus done during Solat Taubah and Solat Tasbih? What happens to the poor that can’t afford to fly to Mekkah to do the Haj and Umrah, how do they repent and make amends for their sins? No wonder I read Shahrizat and then Najib rushing off to do the Haj and umrah. It seems money can absolve you of your sin. You can’t bribe God.
    Me I can just afford to repent at home and pray that God accepts my prayers and my do’as.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s