Anwar will pursue an academic career if he does not get Putrajaya


August 19, 2012

http://www.malaysiakini.com (08-18-12)

Anwar will pursue an academic career if he does not get Putrajaya

Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim has reiterated his plan to end 30-year political career if he fails to unseat Prime Minister Najib Razak at the next election.

“I will try my best. I am confident we will win. But if not, I will step down,” Anwar said last night when taking part in a Google Hangout that was streamed live on YouTube.

Anwar, who has taught at Oxford and Washington’s Georgetown University, said he would return to academic life if he lost.

“If we don’t get the mandate, then we should give space for the second-liners in leadership,” he said during the one-hour question-and-answer event which has previously featured US President Barack Obama.

Last month, Anwar told the London-based Financial Times that he may quit if Pakatan tanks at the polls.

Anwar was once Deputy Prime Minister in the BN government that has ruled Malaysia since independence 55 years ago, but has campaigned against it since his shock ouster in 1998.

Najib must call GE by June next year

Najib must call national elections by June next year and many observers expect a tight contest after the ruling coalition suffered its worst showing ever at the last polls in 2008.

Anwar has been in and out of court on various charges he says are political ploys to tarnish his image and stifle his opposition coalition. He was charged in May with participating in an illegal rally which saw tens of thousands take to the streets to call for reforms to the electoral system, which they say is biased towards BN.

In January he was acquitted of having sex with a male former aide at the end of a lengthy trial.

Previously, Anwar was imprisoned for corruption and sodomy after he fell out with the then prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad in 1998. He released from jail in 2004 after the sodomy conviction was overturned.

- AFP

______________________

Kuala Lumpur

August 19, 2012

Comment: Does it matter if Anwar Ibrahim does not become the Prime Minister? As far as I am concerned, being Prime Minister is Anwar’s political ambition. And that is it. The rest is up to us as voters to decide in GE-13 whether he deserves a crack at the top job.

Failure to take over Putrajaya, tragic as it may be, is not the end of the world for him. He will still be remembered as the man who transformed politics in our country. Anwar Ibrahim is already a Malaysian political icon, whose ideas are contained in his book,The Asian Renaissance which he wrote in 1996 when he was Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance. These ideas defined Anwar as a politician and a public intellectual.

I wrote about the book, The Asian Renaissance and posted it on my blog on December 15, 2007.  Let us revisit it so that we may recognise him by his vision, ideas and political beliefs. Like the rest of us, but more intense for him, Anwar wants a truly democratic and just Malaysia. He himself has been consistent and persistent on governance, freedom and justice. By the way, my views on Anwar Ibrahim as a public intellectual have not changed.Din Merican

Asian Renaissance Ideas and Its Relevance

by Din Merican, December 15, 2007

To know a politician, listen to what he says. To know a leader, read what he writes and observe what he does. A leader leads, it is that simple. To know a man, listen to his soul and the rumblings of his heart. That is more complex.

 Anwar Ibrahim, whose name is inextricably linked to Asian Renaissance, is indeed a complex man, a humanist, politician, and a leader.

We know him by his many roles in Malaysia and abroad. Abroad, he is respected as one of the most outstanding leaders from our region. He is a challenge to his political opponents and critics.

In his own country, he is also our prisoner of conscience for having stood up for his ideals and principles. He paid a heavy price for it. He spent six years in solitary confinement in Sungei Buloh Prison. He was released in 2004 and is now the de facto leader of Parti KeADILan Rakyat (Peoples’ Justice Party).

In a speech in Istanbul, Turkey (April, 2006), Anwar Ibrahim said:

“At this pivotal moment in history, when East and West are growing increasingly alienated from one another over issues of freedom and justice, I am reminded of our upbringing in multicultural and multi-ethnic Malaysia. It was this upbringing that infused the Malaysian psyche with what Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen has described as ‘a plurality of identities’. Sen, Identity and Violence (New York: W.W. Norton, 2006).

By nature we Malaysians are inquisitive people, interested in other faiths and cultures. We studied the Koran and the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad at the same time that we devoured the works of Dante, Shakespeare and T.S. Eliot. For me there has never been any doubt that our world and the West are compatible, and that this spirit of inclusiveness and pluralism will continue to be a source of inspiration in bridging the gaps between cultures and civilizations”.

He goes on to state that:

“…we see fundamental liberties being trampled upon and abused, fuelling discord among nations and civilizations. My own struggle against those who seek to keep humanity shrouded in tyranny led to my incarceration for six years, a time during which I realized with blinding clarity that freedom is the very essence of being which unlocks the full potential of the human spirit”.

Recently in a private conversation (with this writer), Anwar Ibrahim said, “I know what is to be free and what freedom means. It is priceless and must be protected and preserved for all times”.

Asian Renaissance and Anwarian Philosophy

Let us now proceed with some excerpts from The Asian Renaissance (Kuala Lumpur: Times International, 1996) and then we can decide whether his ideas which were first articulated in 1996 still have relevance in the 21st century.

He defines Asian Renaissance as

“…. the revival of the arts and the sciences under the influence of classical models based on strong moral and religious foundations; a cultural resurgence dominated by a re-flowering of art and literature, architecture and music and advancements in science and technology.” (p.18)

Our renaissance, he states, is different from that Europe in that it has its foundations in Islam, Confucianism, Buddhism, Hinduism and Christianity, among others. Ours is of renewed Age of Faith, which the West has abandoned in favour of Cartesian dichotomy (the clear separation of body and mind). So Anwar says:

“…Asia, despite centuries of change and transformation, retains its essential religious character. The Asian Man at heart is persona religiosus.” (p. 18-19)

His conception of renaissance of Asia is, and I quote: “…growth, development and flowering of Asian societies based on a certain vision of perfection; societies imbued with truth and the love of learning, justice and compassion, mutual respect and forbearance, and freedom with responsibility. Faith and religious practice is not confined to the individual, it permeates the life of the community.” (p.19).

Anwar Ibrahim draws his inspiration from great Asians of a bygone era, men like Chuang Tze, Ibn Arabi, Muhammad Iqbal, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan who is the author of An Idealist View of Life, Jose Rizal, Rabindranath Tagore, Jamaluddin Al-Afghani, Nishida Kitaro, and others to reaffirm his basic belief that “Nations can actually grow and prosper by accepting the fact of cultural diversity, strengthening themselves by learning about their differences as well as by reinforcing the values they share in common”.. (p.24).

Asian Renaissance is thus holistic, inclusive and all-embracing. It is about accepting our cultural diversity and celebrating the dignity of difference, cultural re-awakening, economic empowerment, and good governance.

Asia must renew its commitment to universal values of justice for all, virtue and compassion. Our task is by no means easy, but there is hope yet if we prepared to deal with these with creativity, imagination and courage.

How does Anwar Ibrahim translate his philosophy and vision into a system of governance?

Governing Human Affairs

In the process of reconstituting itself, Asia must first secure its social and political order. This order must be founded on the idea of the dignity of man. Uppermost in his mind is his acceptance of democracy, despite its imperfections, as still the best way, but democratisation must also involve the creation and preservation of social order.

He says,

“In a truly democratic regime, such an order is to be achieved through the exercise of authority with accountability…Democracy should not be an end onto itself, but merely the means by which we can ensure humane governance: the restoring of the dignity of the human person and the satisfying of the hunger for justice.

There can be no dignity in poverty, sickness, deprivation, illiteracy and ignorance. Nor can there be dignity when women continue to be denied equal status, opportunities and remuneration. There can be no justice when the individual is oppressed and fundamental rights are denied him…Our ultimate goal must be nothing less than the establishment of a just and equitable society” (p.50).

Cynics will say that democracy is not possible in our part of the world. Asians lack sophistication. They are traditionalists, and respond only to authoritarian leaders. It is true that regular elections are held regularly but elections do not make for a truly functioning democracy. We need a free and independent media, an active and caring civil society, and other instruments of governance such an independent and impartial Judiciary which upholds the Rule of Law, and incorruptible civil service.

Look at Malaysia, the media is far from free and civil society is just emerging. Even our elections are rigged and fraudulent. The political elite is said to be corrupt, and in recent years, corruption is on the rise. The Judiciary’s impartiality and integrity have been called to question as result of the Lingam video clip. Public administration is punching below its weight to the point of being completely dysfunctional.

Anwar’s response is that we must change and improve, get better and be more competitive. In response to cynicism, he is fond of quoting Dr. Sun Yat-sen who reportedly said,

“Alas! This is like telling a child that he cannot go to school because he is illiterate”. We must seek answers. In his view, the answer lies “in treading the middle path between anarchy and absolutism.” (p.53).

Humane Economy

I find the Anwarian conception of a humane economy most intriguing. It is based on a “philosophy of development which is holistic, guided by ethical and social concerns and founded upon the principles of justice and virtue” (p.85). It offers hope for the region and Malaysia. For far too long, we have ignored the consequences of seeking material wealth to the exclusion of other social and cultural considerations.

He says that: “In a humane economy….there is optimum utilization of scarce resources, discipline in fiscal management, promotion of a clear social agenda, and a profound respect for the environment. The prudent use of resources entails the protection and conservation of the environment for the benefit of future generations.”

The Malaysian Economic Agenda

With the 12th national elections looming, Anwar Ibrahim has crafted his Economic Agenda for Malaysia. This agenda incorporates ideas that relate to his conceptualization of the humane economy. His plan includes strategies for achieving strong and sustainable rates of economic growth through productivity gains and enhancement of national competitiveness. It includes the creation of a conducive business environment for domestic and foreign investment, and promoting good governance.

Programmes for public investment in quality education and human resources, healthcare, and social security including minimum wage are critical to achieving the goal of justice for all. Poverty eradicating schemes will be founded on needs, not race or class. The emphasis is on economic growth with distributive justice based on an expanding economic cake.

The Anwarian economic agenda forms part of his overall philosophy of human development which seeks to balance the material with the spiritual development, a potent blend of market economics and benign state interventionism. We need efficiency and we also need compassion for those among us who are less endowed or less fortunate.

Conclusion

An Asian reawakening awaits us. We need to rise above the clouds of despair to see a new dawn which men of intellect of Asia in the last century had envisioned.

Tagore is right when he said that:

The night has ended.
Put out the light of the lamp of thine own narrow corner smudged
with smoke.
The great morning which is for all appears in the East.
Let its light reveal us to each other who walk on the same path
of pilgrimage.

That is my wish for Malaysia. Let us take the pilgrimage in search of a humane economy where we can rediscover our dignity from the ravages of corruption, incompetence and mismanagement of our scarce resources. Let us earn our pride of place in the community of nations of Asia.

About these ads

26 thoughts on “Anwar will pursue an academic career if he does not get Putrajaya

  1. Din,
    I am sure many including rpk & ktemoc would be jumping with joy if anwar does not become pm. To them, anwar epitomises old wine in new bottle. However, some of them especially ktemoc view with concern what’s next after anwar. What if azmin becomes the next in line? Would Malaysia be back dark ages?
    To me, if pakatan can’t make it, I am sure bn would rule for at least 50 years. There are plenty of precedents. See when ppp join bn, it took almost 40 years to see an alternative government running the state. Even then the mayor of Ipoh is still a civil servant
    Gone were the glorious where competent men such as seenivasagam bros running the town

  2. Here’s the deal, ladies.

    What has Anwar wanting the top job in Putrajaya got anything to do with the general elections?? We want a change in government. Unfortunately the tradition has always been whoever is the leader of the political party that wins the elections and the mandate to govern becomes the Prime Minister. You can change that tradition. There is no law that prevents you from doing it. You can put the next senior person and make him PM – and set a new tradition for the party to follow. United Kingdom is a good case to follow.

    Alternatively, we can turn the system on its head and do away with the parliamentary system of government and put in its place place a republican system like that of the United States and have separate elections for the President – although something tells me that is never going to happy.

    Personally I want Karpal Singh to be Prime Minister – and me his deputy. Together we can make it happen.

  3. “Anwar, who has taught at Oxford and Washington’s Georgetown University, said he would return to academic life if he lost.”

    In preparation for the inevitable I’m now in the midst of relocating myself to D.C. where I’ll open a watering hole with Semper Fi for visiting JAWI officials.

  4. I wish Terrence Netto could write like our Dato. But the former has to be in love with himself and the sound of his voice. Sheeesh!

  5. Hey ladies ! There is a new video clip in real time of the bloghost and his lovely co-host on the other thread. Go watch.

  6. The truth of Anwar as a spent force, rides with onslaught of treacherous murky troubled stormy waters on his quest to putrajaya, has now even look blurry by each moment of his failure to captivate the majority malay towards his idealism and struggles.

  7. Whether or not Anwar makes it as the PM or not, we as Malaysians must ensure we put in place a responsible government answerable fully to the parliament and people, preferable a two-party system with check and balance! Rebuild the institutions like Judiciary and the Police destroyed by the Kerala-man and rebuild this country… Anwar is temporary, Malaysia is permanent, let us not forget that!

  8. Reblogged this on The right of reply and commented:

    At least Din got the principle right on judging a politician. Talk is cheap to them and we must judge by their actions. But unfortunately for Anwar the 98 economic debacle either shows he put his interest above the nation and rakyat or plain dumb. He aggravated the economic contraction and hardship when he could have gone for an anti cyclical deficit spending to spur the economy.

    Mahathir was fiercely brilliant then and found to this day to be correct. I was a total follower of Anwar and prof jomo til the crisis. The crisis was good for revealing us the devil and incompetence in Anwar. Since Din is late in reading the Asian renaissance, he should ask who was the shadow writer for the book.
    ________________
    There are no shadow writers, only good advisors and editors for his classic Asian Renaissance. I know all of them personally. Read the book way back in 1996. This article was written after I lectured on the book at the Asian Renaissance course in Kota Kinabalu a week earlier.

    Was Mahathir brilliant or lucky? You say he was brilliant on selective capital controls in 1998. Others think he was lucky. South Korea took a different approach. The state sponsored chaebols were forced to bite the bullet and restructure and look where these Korea Inc. companies are today; they have become world beaters. Mahathir opted to bail out UMNO controlled companies and cronies, including Mirzan’s shipping company using Petronas money. So, we lost the opportunity to make the change, that is, by putting an end to Mahathirism and Malaysia’s ersatz capitalism.–Din Merican

  9. Not Azmin please thereafter! One day after Anwar. Azmin could be the reason for the break up in PKR > watch my word! He hasn’t the right qualities of a leader. He is going to be the destroyer of the opposition when Anwar has left. It’s going to be pathetic.

  10. I would prefer Nurul Izzah as our new PM should PR wins 13GE. Its time Malaysia get some fresh blood rather than old and recycled ones.

  11. Azmin is Anwar’s prodigy but he is alien to PKR culture. If he becomes PKR President, he would rejoin UMNO and bring his faction along. He is just another Nasharuddin of PAS, both being advocates of Malay Unity.

    GVS, you could be right. I think the break up of PKR after Anwar’s departure could be the end of Pakatan Rakyat, unless DAP-PAS can come together. Right now I am not sure if PAS will not go UMNO. Pakatan Rakyat is, therefore, a fragile political arrangement. GE-13 will decide whether it can be the alternative government.

  12. For the sake of the commentators especially CLF…….Here goes

    Happy debating…..see some sparks here…..As usual, Ellese can do his best in condemning anwar, pakatan & tell us only BN is the best alternative

    Leadership dilemma of Pakatan Rakyat
    Is Pakatan Rakyat so bereft of suitable leaders to lead the coalition that it must rely solely on Anwar Ibrahim?

    Even to many of his ‘supporters’, Anwar Ibrahim is acknowledged to be (grudgingly) NOT the correct person to become PM in the event Pakatan wins majority rule, yet they persist, rationalizing (in Malaysia-Today’s publishing of my post The elephant in ABU) with so-called Chinese saying such as

    ‘… ride a donkey while you seek a horse’, … [meaning] … that if you do not have a horse (the ideal choice) but only a donkey and a pig to choose from then you should make use of the donkey. And they say RIDE that donkey while you seek that ideal horse, not let that donkey ride you …’

    Ironically, the last phrase is so true and wise, namely, I and many others have no wish to let the donkey ride us wakakaka.

    Amd our reason is best explained by another visitor to M2D wrote what many of us believe:

    The trouble with riding a donkey while seeking for the horse in this instance … is that we KNOW that the donkey we are sitting on is the same as the current devil donkey we want so desperately to get rid of !

    The donkey we thought we could make use of will NOT allow you to discard him once he reaches the throne … he will put in place all the screws tighening such that you will be shouting helplessly, like how you are shouting in vain NOW under the current goon.

    This donkey will turn into a tiger to eat you up.

    So we don’t want Anwar Ibrahim, the elephant who is a donkey who is a tiger – basically a chimera.

    But if you ask those anwaristas for a substitute to Anwar Ibrahim (assuming hypothetically he is imprisoned followung successful appeal by the AG), guess who they will pick?

    Yes, you guess it, either Wan Azizah or Nurul Izzah (or if another of Anwar’s daughters were to participate in politics, then her!). Because in their view, ultimately the leader must be Anwar or at least a clone (family member) of Anwar, so go ahead and convince me if that mentality does not reek of cultism.

    Let’s forget about Wan Azizah because in truth she has been an unwilling politician, only getting involved directly because she had wanted her husband freed from incarceration (in the Sodomy I era). Now that that’s done with, she is quite happy to fade off into the background. But she has been compelled into becoming President of PKR because Anwar Ibrahim is avoiding the direct responsibility of the job (though clinging on to de facto power), and because Azmin Ali may not yet be publicly acceptable as the PKR No 1, though may be assumed to be the de facto head. Besides, Wan Azizah showed she was incapable of good firm and fair leadership in the last PKR party polls.

    That leaves us with Nurul Izzah.

    Please tell me, other than she is Anwar’s daughter and thus the so-named Princess Reformasi, what qualities or outstanding achievement of hers have qualified her (as the proposed alternative to her father Anwar Ibrahim) to be federal Opposition Leader and Pakatan’s PM-in-waiting?

    Still thinking of a reason? Wakakaka. Again, isn’t it pure cultism, or what I term Kim Jong-Nurul, where I wrote:

    Many have been the times I read/heard of the preposterous proposals for Nurul to be nominated as the PM of a Pakatan-ruled Malaysia, in the event of the non availability of her father. Those proposals have been so unrealistically moronic, leaving me flabbergasted by the puerile mentality of those blind-as-bats idol-worshippers. Then I could only think of poor hard working, politically far superior Fuziah Salleh, who only lacks the (questionable) pedigree to be considered!

    So I ask again the opening sentence-query of this post: Is Pakatan Rakyat so bereft of suitable leaders to lead the coalition that it must rely solely on Anwar Ibrahim?

    Let’s be frank and start off by acknowledging (whether we accept it or not) that the leader and potential PM-in-waiting has to be a Malay, full stop. Even if we claim to be personally NOT racist, be truthful in recognizing that we are a very race-conscious society, so race is still the No 1 consideration when selecting a PM …

    … which simplifies this discussion by removing from considerations people like Karpal Singh, Lim Kit Siang, Lim Guan Eng and wakakaka, Tian Chua etc.

    One could of course argue in special favour of Lim GE by reminding everyone that when a Malacca underage Malay girl was raped (statutorily), who stood up for her rights and demanded justice for the abuse against her? Who was sent to prison for her cause while her rapist not only escaped totally unscathed but was subsequently even honoured with a Tan Sri award?

    Any UMNO or PAS person?

    Forget about UMNO, also bearing in mind this was at a time (1994-5) when Anwar Ibrahim, the so-called reformasi man, was already DPM.

    As for PAS, its members may be bloody good at protesting against Valentine Day or shows by Beyoncé but when it came to crimes like statutory rape (or incest), they were as silent as sand mites in the still of any Arabian desert night.

    Read The Trial of Lim Guan Eng to know more about Lim’s sacrifice for a Malay girl. Also recall the following letter published in the December 1998 issue of ALIRAN MONTHLY:

    Dear Guan Eng,

    As you languish in prison, I have had plenty of time to reflect on you and your idealism.

    Rightly or wrongly, the Democratic Action Party has long tried to have a ‘MALAYSIAN’ character when the vast majority in the country still perceive it to be essentially a political party for the ethnic Chinese.

    I realise that recently people like you have tried hard to attract Malaysians, especially Malays, to make the DAP truly Malaysian, but not too successfully, in my view.

    Then came an explosive event – the Rahim Thamby Chik case – which made a lot of Malays sit up and change their perceptions of the DAP.

    That case rocked MALAY society to its very foundation.

    Your conduct and role in pursuit of truth in that scandal earned my deepest admiration. The series of events following that scandal, culminating in the judicial proceedings against you, have turned out to be a classic example of how a verdict in a ‘court of law’ has become subordinate to the ‘court of public opinion’.

    Ask any MALAY mother anywhere. Few would agree that the famous grandmother in that scandal should have been abandoned by UMNO, and the under-aged girl should have been so blatantly violated and her family silenced.

    By your words and deeds, you challenged the government, police, media, and the judiciary, and exposed yourself to certain incarceration and vindictive punishment by Dr. Mahathir and the political elite.

    I have always believed that God works in mysterious ways. Inexplicably, He chose you to put the DAP into sharp focus. He chose you to force Malaysians to look at themselves and reflect on the abuse of basic values in our society.

    To that extent, God in His wisdom made the DAP no longer just a Chinese political party, but, overnight, into a truly Malaysian one which fights for the deprived.

    I am a MALAY with a family of my own.

    I shall remember you as a CHINESE father who fought for the rights of a MALAY grand-mother and her sexually abused grand-daughter.

    I know that when you decided to take on the case, you knew the price for your action would be heavy for you and your family, personally and politically.

    Today, you are still paying the price.

    You languish alone in prison. Ironically, as in Nelson Mandela’s case, the longer they lock you up, the greater will be your stature, the more powerful the focus on the issues you fought for.

    I also know that, all through this, you can look into the eyes of your wife, children and parents,and say, with deserved pride and honour, that “Guan Eng has not prostituted his dignity, decency and self-respect in the face of oppression and tyranny”.

    You have truly given new meaning to the maxim, ‘Politics With Honour’.

    More importantly, you have made me look in the mirror and ask, ‘Who Am I?

    What have I done to speak out against the evil forces which confronted two Malay kampong women? Why have I remained silent? Have I lost my decency and self-respect?’

    In all honesty, I cannot say I have the guts to look into the eyes of my family members and say I have done them proud. I have kept silent.

    I owe it to you, Guan Eng, for opening my eyes and stirring my conscience.

    Our inaction and apathy have allowed oppression, tyranny and injustice to continue. We have to search our hearts and souls to find ways to make up for our negligence and ineptitude.

    To you, Guan Eng, I offer prayers from my family.

    May the blessings of the Almighty continue to give you strength, courage and tenacity to do what is right and just for all Malaysians.

    Yours Sincerely,

    Narmi Saila
    Petaling Jaya, Selangor

    At least Marina Mahathir wrote: There are injustices in the law which are mind-boggling … The lesson is clear – choose your rapist carefully … As a woman, especially a Muslim woman, I am angry, disgusted and ashamed … As a mother, I now have real fears for my daughter. What protection can we hope for our daughters if, in the interests of politics, a minor can so easily be sacrificed?

    Most of us are still waiting for Dr Mahathir to apologize to Lim GE for the unmitigated injustice of Lim’s imprisonment!

    But nonetheless, notwithstanding Narmi Saila’s heartfelt statement that [she] have always believed that God works in mysterious ways. Inexplicably, He chose you to put the DAP into sharp focus. He chose you to force Malaysians to look at themselves and reflect on the abuse of basic values in our society.

    To that extent, God in His wisdom made the DAP no longer just a Chinese political party, but, overnight, into a truly Malaysian one which fights for the deprived …

    … it took DAP another 15 years before the party could make a beachhead in the heartland but the fact remains that it’s only a beachhead – see UMNO fears DAP beachhead – so effectively we are still a long way from most Malays seeing DAP as a truly Malaysian political party for all Malaysians, and accepting a Chinese PM like Lim GE as PM, no matter that he did more than any Malay politician (including Anwar Ibrahim) for an abused underage Malacca Malay girl and her grandmother.

    So, where does that leave us? Nurul again? Wakakaka.

    Actually there are talented and competent Malays in both PAS and … gasp … PKR wakakaka, but whether they have the leadership persona is another question.

    However, I dare say there are many such capable leaders with PM-persona in PAS though alas, they suffer from one (self-induced) major disabling handicap – their persistent obsession to ‘prohibit and punish’ the twaddly trifle and trivia, as witnessed in their anti Valentine Day, anti Western style (musical) shows, anti Inul Daratista shows, ‘anti inconsequential this’ and ‘anti inconsequential that’ attitude, which practically render PAS politicians unsuitable for the Premiership and important ministerial functions in Malaysian politics.

    And then there is that wretched issue of PAS wanting to implement hudud into our legal system.

    But this is not to say the more tolerant PAS leaders like Mat Sabu or (regrettably junior in PAS hierarchy) Nizar Jamualuddin cannot be, but they themselves are constrained by their party policies (just described above). Yes, you can thus blame PAS for pushing us unwillingly into Anwar Ibrahim’s arms.

    So, back to square one, is Pakatan Rakyat so bereft of suitable leaders to lead the coalition that it must rely solely on Anwar Ibrahim?

    Not if (a) PAS recognizes that Malaysia is a multi-religious multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society and is prepared to discard the idea of introducing hudud as well as revise their party policies and ideology to accept the reality of the wonderful plurality of Malaysia and her Malaysians, or …

    … (b) Ku Li joins Pakatan wakakaka.
    _____________
    Can anyone tell me who is this UMNO-Melaka political big wig rapist! Let me give two hints: 1) He is the Chairman of RISDA and 2) He is the Head of the Datuk T gang which produced the Anwar Ibrahim sex video.–Din Merican

  13. looes74,
    after an arduous reading of your extended comment, I understood what you are driving at. we need changes but we should refrain from putting everything on its head in one go. one step at a time and give the people time to accept it.
    in malaysia we have a lot of Acts that could get us into trouble for saying certain things. this has resulted in malaysians saying one thing but meaning something else or saying one thing but doing the opposite. split personality. the politicians are no exception.
    for a change why not Nurul, a young mind is adaptable, it can learn by doing and would be of advantage in international matters potraying malaysia as a moderate and modern nation. after all that they did to Anwar it is fit (if Anwar doesn’t make it himself) to give a chance to his daughter whom he has personally groomed for the PM-ship. Nurul is not a nobody as you imply Looes74, you’re mistaken.

    Dato’ I thought everyone knew that particular guy, another Thamby with Chik’ken shit on him?

  14. Yup CLF, Hijacked by clowns like Looes74, unless the bloghost do some overhauling!
    ___________
    Just because his comments are not to your taste. On this, my attitude is very simple. Those who think that I should censor comments which are in my judgement reasonable–and I won’t– are free to do as they please. That applies to CLF as well. –Din Merican

  15. Clf,
    No, don’t be a chicken & cabutted from commenting on this. There are certain things worth debating. For the sake of good sport, let’s fight it out. Prove us that you are not blind & idol worshipper as described. Hahaha!

    Bean suk,
    Kindly tell this joker, Lky about freedom of speech. Anyway, you are least honest & pretty coward when comes to commenting.

    Reeper,
    What I am saying Is that there is nothing wrong in accessing & scrutinising pr & it’s politicians. On their actions & their speeches. Though I may not fully my sparing partner, kaytee, in which I felt that there should be a sparing match between clf & him, Certain it’s worth to have serious thought on this. During ww2, the Americans & the British were anticipating what world would be like after nazi & Japan were defeated. How to deal with might of soviet union. In this case, likewise.

    Din,
    Everybody knows that clown. Some say if you put a skirt around that pole. That pole won’t be saved to be ahem ahem

  16. Lets hope Anwar’s decision of leaving politics if PR doesnt win in the coming GE will pull in more votes rather than jeopardising its hopes of winning.
    There are 2 ways of measuring that decision..some will be adamant and sure of PR winning, but there are some who also may be undecided who to vote,and the latter may be casualty to PR..becos they may imply that Anwar seemed not confident of winning by announcing that decision.
    But lets strive to vote BN out and pray that Anwar can eventually get to Putrajaya to form the promised and corruption free government, thus making BN licking its wounds.

  17. Malaysia also needs to get rid of its “first-past-the-post” electoral system
    inherited from the British and change to “proportional representation”.

  18. My response To Gurubachan(see comment above, Aug.20) and all of you who are against Malay unity,

    What’s wrong with MALAY UNITY?

    Malay unity will give STRENGTH to both the Malays (who are, to this day, still economically disadvantaged in HIS OWN land), and even greater strength to the Muslim faith in Malaysia.

    I speak for all those silent majority out there who are too cowardly to speak up against the LOUD minority “Opposition” people which also control scores of alternative and social media (talking of “no freedom of speech in Malaysia”?) and who are generously funded by foreign organisations (part of the New World Order).

    I speak up for all the silent majority of Malaysians who voted BN (BARISAN NASIONAL- AN ALLIANCE OF MANY PARTIES) again in PRU12 in 2008, to lead the country, in peace, prosperity and harmony.

    Anwar talks a lot; undeniably rivetting to listen and seemingly awesome on the surface, but when one goes back and analyse word for word, the “facts” that he made, it’s ALL crap.

    nshinah@yahoo.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s