The Plight of the Rohingyas ignored by ASEAN and the West


August 6, 2012

COMMENT: In today’s world, we need champions whose reputation and personality, be that positive or negative, to bring a humanitarian crisis to the world’s attention. On Dafur, we had George Clooney and his friends from Hollywood. On Africa, we have Bono and his intellectual sidekick, Jeffrey Sachs. For Somalia, Malaysia’s UMNO Youth’s (Datuk) Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim was their champion and saviour. The fate of the Palestinians, on the other hand, has come under constant scrutiny of NAM and the Muslim World. Even in this case of Palestine, progress has been slow due to  Israel’s hardline policies.

But the fate of the Rohingya, forgotten for 5 decades, may now receive our attention, thanks to the initiative of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. The Saudi King, according to this article,”has invited Muslim leaders to Mecca for an Extraordinary OIC Summit, scheduled for mid-August and the Rohingya issue is expected to feature prominently”. Malaysia should take a firm stand on this matter.

Given political will, this OIC meeting can come up with concrete recommendations on how this silent genocide perpetrated by the military junta in Myanmar for 5 decades can be put to end. We cannot leave this issue to be resolved by ASEAN and states like India, Bangladesh, Thailand and Myanmar.

These stateless people need a place they can call home. To me that home is Myanmar, where they should enjoy equal rights and opportunities. End this state-sponsored genocide of the Rohingyas.

ASEAN is powerless to deal with this issue. ASEAN is all talk, golf and durian eating, preoccupied with the vision thing, while the nations more directly affected by the Rohingya conundrum are afraid to take a stand  for  fear of social and cultural problems associated with the influx of Rohinyas into their respective borders. For them, national self interest overrides humanitarian considerations.

Even the darling of the Western World and champion of freedom, democracy  and justice for the people of Myanmar and Nobel Peace Laureate, Aung San Syu Kyi, who was recently on a speaking tour of European capitals, chose not to mention the plight of the Rohingya in her speeches. Her own political survival, it would seem, is more important than doing the humane and right thing.–Din Merican  

The Plight of the Rohingya ignored by ASEAN and the West

FOR the past five decades, the Rohingya have suffered killings, rape and mass expulsion. Now, in her inaugural speech in Parliament on July 25, Aung San Suu Kyi supported a motion by a ruling-party lawmaker to uphold ethnic minority rights in Myanmar.

Could this lead to reconciliation across the ethnically divided country, including between the government, the Rakhine Buddhists and the Rohingya?

Multi-religious Myanmar has some 60 million people who are predominantly Buddhist. Christians, Muslims, Hindus and others comprise about 12 per cent.

Not all of the five million Muslims in Myanmar are Rohingya (as the Arakan/Rakhine Muslims are often called). The Rohingya have not been considered a fellow ethnic community by successive military regimes.

Rakhine is bounded by the Bay of Bengal in the west and the Chin hills in the northeast. It is separated from the other 15 states by the Arakan mountains. Of its population of 2.2 million, about a million are Rohingya.

The Muslims, especially in Rakhine, were mostly brought into Myanmar as indentured labourers from the Indian subcontinent during British rule, long before the partition of India in 1947.

Rohingya resemble Bengalis and speak a dialect close to the language spoken in certain parts of Bangladesh’s Chittagong region.The animosity between the Rakhine Buddhists and the Rohingya dates back to colonial times.

Arakan was an independent kingdom which was annexed by Burmese forces in 1784. And in 1824, Arakan and other territories were annexed by the British after the Anglo-Burmese war.

When Japanese forces invaded Myanmar, the Rohingya supported the British while the Rakhine Buddhists sided with the Japanese.

Muslims’ settlement in Myanmar dates back many centuries to when Arabs introduced Islam there. Arakan was ruled by Muslims from 1430 to 1784. Muslim rule there ended when the Burmese king Bodawpaya, and later the British, took over in Arakan. Since then, the Rohingya have faced endless persecution: half their population perished in a 1942 massacre.

In 1962 when General Ne Win seized power, the Rohingya were stripped of their rights as citizens, classified as stateless, and subjected to persecution by the state. For the second time, in 1978-79, Rohingya were expelled, with over 300,000 taking refuge in Bangladesh.

The controversial Burma Citizenship Law of 1982 further reduced them to “third class citizens”, classifying them as “foreigners who entered Burma as immigrants during the British colonial period”. In 1991-92 a third and bigger wave of refugees was forced across the border into Bangladesh.

The law specifies three types of citizenship — full, associate and naturalised. According to General Ne Win all communities who settled in Myanmar after 1823 are ineligible for full citizenship. In the absence of any citizenship records, the government decided arbitrarily who is to be considered a pre-1823 settler.

In mid-1983, riots broke out in several towns following intense anti-Muslim campaigns. Muslim living quarters and mosques were destroyed. Hundreds of Muslims fled, this time to shelter across the Thai border.

International organisations, in particular the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), have to date not taken any proactive and sustained efforts to stop the persecution and repression of this ethnic minority.

The Rohingya themselves brought their plight to the notice of the Fifth Islamic Summit in Kuwait in January 1987. However, a memorandum, which was submitted, was not officially acknowledged by the summit.

Discussion within ASEAN a couple of years ago on the issue was nothing more than a perfunctory exercise. It is indeed strange and sad that successive (the majority Burman) Buddhist leaders have sunk to the depths of chauvinism, creating not only socio-economic, but also law and order problems (human trafficking, smuggling and the narcotic trade).

This long-standing problem has lured extremists within and across in Bangladesh to take up the cause, posing a serious threat to the region’s peace and security.

The war between Muslim liberation groups and the Myanmar government has persisted for decades, but unlike most of their counterparts in the Philippines and Thailand, the Myanmar Muslim struggle is hardly noticed.

Rohingya began to organise themselves into various non-governmental organisation fora and guerilla groups to defend their basic rights. Muslim Mujahid was started in 1954 to seek autonomy for Arakan. In 1974 an Arakan Liberation Army was mobilised.

After General Ne Win’s repression increased against the Rohingya, the Kawthoolei Muslim Liberation Front (KMLF) was established, seeking a separate state as its goal. KMLF made an alliance with the Karen National Union. Muslim guerillas also obtained arms, medicine and other supplies through the support of the Karens.

On July 27, the Taliban issued a rare statement threatening an attack on Myanmar to avenge crimes against Rohingya.

President Thein Sein has taken positive steps to end the long-standing armed conflicts with the country’s armed ethnic minorities while remaining evasive about the citizenship status of the Rohingya. To date, Aung San Suu Kyi herself has been largely silent on the Rohingya issue.

It is interesting, too, that Britain and Japan have not come out to put the record straight with regard to what their archives show. And where are the United States and the European Union on this issue?

King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia has invited Muslim leaders to Mecca for an Extraordinary OIC Summit, scheduled for mid-August and the Rohingya issue is expected to feature prominently.

About these ads

5 thoughts on “The Plight of the Rohingyas ignored by ASEAN and the West

  1. I have just come back from Myanmar on a Matrade trip. The situation is mis-reported. There are 138 ethnicities in their country and at least 20 of them are at war with the Union government, Rohingyas being one of the defiants.If we’re going to help the Rohingyas, we must also consider the other 19.
    But better yet, let’s concentrate on helping our Orang Asli progress as citizens of a developed country.
    ______________
    We should help all. We can’t afford to do it alone, we need the world to be with us. United Nations can do something.–Din Merican

  2. The fact that they are Muslims should not take precedence over the fact that they an oppressed minority. Oppressed minorities the world over who suffer the same fate should be given a helping hand.
    ____________
    The Rohingyas are Muslims, but they are human beings first and citizens of Myanmar. They are entitled to their rights and opportunities.They cannot be stateless because the military junta since General Ne Win decided to oppress them. I agree with you that all oppressed people should be given a helping hand.–Din Merican

  3. The Rohingyas plight is indeed tragic. They deserve to be helped. In fact no minority deserves to be treated like this. This time we are putting our hope on ASEAN, the West and OIC. Will they be effective?

    ASEAN states are very much Westphalian in nature to allow even the least interference in internal affairs of another state. It has nothing to do with Islam or anything. ASEAN members are still driven by nationalism rather than regionalism. Community values are always subservient to national interests. It wasn’t too long ago, several readers were even calling for the Philippines to stew in its own juices though the issue is a regional one.

    Furthermore every state has its own skeletons in its closet. The difference is only in the number of skeletons. Hence the famous ASEAN Way has been a convenient way to block frank discussions. So that is why we have not heard of Rohingya in any ASEAN meeting. Lest we forget, we only need to recall the ASEAN paralysis in even getting assistance to Myanmar following Nargis.

    What about the West? It has too much vested interest in the region to upset anyone, least of all, on behalf of a minority group that is perceived as not of strategic interest.

    The OIC? There too we see early signs of paralysis. It seems that Iran will also participate in the Makkah meeting. In a bid to balance the perceived anti-Shiite leaning of the summit, Iran has given notice that it will raise the issue of the Shiite unrest in Bahrain and maybe even the rumored Shiite unrest in eastern Saudi Arabia.

    So the OIC summit would end up with a strong statement condemning Israel.
    _____________
    Observer,

    Since all these institutions are playing power politics, and are ineffective, what hope is there for the Rohingyas or any other oppressed minority groups within nation states. It took a long time for the Aceh issue to be resolved (it required the intervention of Norway). The Southern Thailand and the Mindanao Question have yet to be dealt with properly. Malaysia is involved in both without much success. Both Thailand and Philippines want to keep their troops busy.

    ASEAN itself is not involved when it should.But it couldn’t even deal with the Cambodia-Thailand Temple dispute. I have always maintained that ASEAN is a bloody waste of time and money.It is just a talk shop where instead of tea tarik and mee rebus our leaders are enjoying champagne and fine cuisine.

    As you know, the Palestinian matter remains a difficult problem. In the case of Palestine, both Israel and Palestinian Authority in Ramallah want to prolong this problem as long as they can because both get aid money from the United States. That is what I think. Yassir Arafat, for example, took away substantial amounts of money for his account and that money came from the US and other donors.–Din Merican

  4. The plight of the Rohingyas and other minorities in the region is indeed tragic. But to just deal with this problem as a single issue is to deal with the effects and not the cause. The root cause is that in Many Third World Countries the forms and principles of the parliamentary democratic system is being used to undermine its substance. On the suface when compared to the 70s and 80s, the people in the region enjoy greater freedoms.People may be unafraid to speakout in blogs, people are free to leave their county as and when necessary and almost all the leaders are elected in an open, though sometimes in a flawed, elections. By and large power has been transferred peacefully but once in power it is a winner take all situation.

    For the outside observer civil society and the rule of law or rule by law appears to have matured in the region but so has the sophisticated manner in which politicians and those in the Civil Service operate. They have become urbane and have a clear understanding on how to use the wheels of constitutional power and utilize due process to ensure that they remain in power. We may not know itb but the laws, regulations, reverse due process, may be tthe most effective tools to keep the opposition in its place.

    Now, we even see the claver employment of Foreign Consultants to check the opposition from gaining ground.If that does not work then Sovereign Funds are employed to grease the system with the sole purpose of keeping them in power. The advent of Soverign Funding, all be it under a different name, has emasculated the so called elite print media and made it play the lead role of cheerleader for the powers that may be. The power of the state is used to its fullest extent to get the ‘right’message to the people. And if all that fails then the final weapon of compromise is used to give up some political ground in order to maintain the political groud.

    The Rohinyas problem is only the tip of the iceberg. The countries in the region are now facing greater competition in all fields from the outside and now from within its members. Only strong institutions of governments in individual countries will be able to match that challenge.While regional organisations should rightly highlight issues like the one now under discussion they have a greater duty to pay attention to the wider issues related to the freedoms of the individual, and the adherence to the forms and principles of parliamentary democracy without the latter being allowed to be used by the powers that may be to undrmine its substance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s