US-Israel Relations: Who’s the Elephant, Who’s the Ant?
March 5, 2012
www.haaretz.com
US-Israel Relations: Who’s the Elephant, Who’s the Ant?
It’s just a matter of time before U.S. tires of Israel.Israel doesn’t know when to stop, and it could pay dearly as a result.
An elephant and an ant will meet in Washington on Monday (March 5) for a critical summit. But wait, who here is the elephant and who the ant? Who is the superpower and who the patronage state?
A new chapter is being written in the history of nations. Never before has a small country dictated to a superpower; never before has the chirp of the cricket sounded like a roar; never has the elephant resembled the ant – and vice versa. No Roman province dared tell Julius Caesar what to do, no tribe ever dreamed of forcing Genghis Khan to act in accordance with its own tribal interests. Only Israel does this. On Monday, when Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu meet at the White House, it will be hard to tell which one is the real leader of the world.
For the past few years the Israeli cricket has been chirping “Iran,” and the world responds with a
muffled echo. It isn’t that Iran is only an Israeli problem, but North Korea could endanger Japan just as much as Iran endangers Israel – and the world has not come running to Japan’s side. Netanyahu’s Israel has dictated the global agenda as no small state has ever done before, just as its international standing is at its nadir and its dependence on the United States at a zenith.
To the miracles of the rebirth of the Hebrew language after two millennia, the establishment of a thriving country of immigrants in the Land of Israel in such a short span of time and the invention of the kibbutz, we must now add another, much more deserving of a place on the list of the seven wonders of the world than the statue of Christ the Redeemer in Rio de Janeiro, than the Roman Colosseum or the Great Wall of China: Israel’s wondrous power in the face of the United States. There is no rational explanation.
Israel features in the American presidential campaign as no other foreign country does, with the candidates vying for the sobriquet of “biggest Israel-lover” to the point where it often seems to be the main issue. Rich Jews like Sheldon Adelson donate enormous war chests to candidates for the sole purpose of buying their support for Israel, while the president of the United States, who won with a message of change, was forced to fold up, at lightning speed, the flag of planting peace in the Middle East simply because Israel said “No.” If last week a British member of the House of Lords was forced to resign from Parliament after daring to criticize Israel, in the United States she would never have even considered making her views known.
Size doesn’t matter
Israel is teaching the world a lesson in international relations: Size doesn’t matter. When it comes to foreign policy Europe toes the U.S. line much more than tiny Israel does. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also taught the world that it’s possible to tell the American president “No,” bluntly and explicitly, and not only remain alive but even to gain in strength. So Obama begged for an extension of the settlement construction freeze – so what? Netanyahu will take care of it: He took the issue off the agenda.
When he goes to the White House on Monday (March 5) he will make a new demand: Either you or we (attack Iran ), putting the leader of the free world in a tight spot. Obama does not want to ensnare his country in another war or in an energy crisis, but when Netanyahu hath demanded, who will not fear?
This would appear to be a good thing, a reason to marvel at the prime minister. A cat may look at a king, but it doesn’t always end well. One day, perhaps, even in brainwashed America the questions may begin: another war? Is it right to put more American soldiers in harm’s way for an interest that is more Israeli than it is American? And perhaps we should also make demands from the small protege?
For now, Obama may be unable to prohibit Israel from a military adventure in Iran without offering serious quid pro quo. After all, we are talking about the Prime Minister of Israel. But one day the rope could snap and the whole thing could blow up in the face of power-drunk Israel: Israel doesn’t know when to stop, and it could pay dearly as a result.
*Gideon Levy is a Haaretz columnist and a member of the newspaper’s editorial board.

Who’s the ant, especially one without any privity?
Why of course, busybody Maha Firaun who can’t agree to minimum wages in M’sia, but wants to give others back their “homeland.”
donplaypuks - March 5, 2012 at 8:40 pm
Don,
Pre-emptive attack on Iran by Israel at a time when Syria is in a state of civil war, could throw the Middle East in a turmoil of unimaginable proportions. It is a doomsday scenario. Iran is not be taken for granted because their military is already on the alert.–Din Merican
dinobeano - March 5, 2012 at 9:11 pm
Not if it is a surgical strike aimed only at certain nuclear facilities. They have done that before perhaps not on Iran. Rattling their saber is an Arab trait. But with Israel, they have their backs to the sea (pun intended).
_________
I can’t believe that you have become a warmonger.Nothing is surgical about a nuclear strike. There is collateral damage and serious nuclear fallout. Diplomacy is still the best option.–Din Merican
scarlet.pimpernel - March 5, 2012 at 9:18 pm
Size doesn’t matter? It matters to some. Ask Kathy.
scarlet.pimpernel - March 5, 2012 at 9:23 pm
I can’t believe that you have become a warmonger.Nothing is surgical about a nuclear strike — Din Merican
Who says anything about a nuclear strike? It is a strike at nuclear facilities. A preemptive surgical strike is aimed at minimizing collateral damage, not to forget the political fallout which is bound to follow. In this case the question doesn’t appear to be ‘if’ but ‘when’ in the event Ahmedinejad fails to come to the negotiating table with his terms.
The Iranian people will have to work for a regime change. Economic sanctions only serve to strengthen the hold their government has over them.
_______________
That is military talk. Make peace not war. Why can’t Iran use nuclear power for peaceful purposes the way France, for example, is allowed to do. Israel in the Middle East is the exception with a nuclear arsenal of its own. Double standards, Mr. Pimp…-Din Merican
scarlet.pimpernel - March 5, 2012 at 9:48 pm
I was just kidding. Netanyahu is meeting Obama today to ask for support for a pre-emptive strilke on Iran, which would be a great crime.
It would not have escaped many that Israel is poised to strike a few months before elections are due in USA, thus tying Obama’s hands – he wouldn’t dare anger the Jewish lobby and funders by saying no or agreeing to provide “support.”
What a shame!
Dpp
we are all of 1 Race, the Human Race
donplaypuks - March 5, 2012 at 10:25 pm
Israel has the Davidic warrior complex and the will of the Cohen gene (more properly called the Cohen Modal Haplotype), i.e the Y-Chromosome Aaron (the Priest). So pray tell, why can’t they bully the Bully?
But no worries about the present friction with Iran. The Persian King Darius the Great, was often described as their savior allowed the return of the Jews and funded the rebuilding the second Temple. There won’t be a shooting war. Assassinations perhaps. And Ahmadinejad will be history. All this saber-rattling just goes to show what Godly evolution can do.
The Iranians are pussies compared to them. Always had been since they were whupped by the Greeks. The Great Satan has actually been incubating in their midst all this millenia.
C.L. Familiaris - March 5, 2012 at 10:25 pm
Dato, thanks for this post. It shows two things. First it shows that not all Israelis are hell bent on destroying Iran. There are also Israelis who despair the way their government has been hijacked by the right wing. Second it shows that the Israeli lobby’s iron hold on public opinion is loosening.
You are right-striking Iran is the perfect way to start the fourth world war. Why the fourth? Because the third world war is the long list of wars that have been going on since the first Gulf War.
Observer - March 5, 2012 at 11:02 pm
Obama says (to Netanyahu) “We have your back covered”
Netanyahu responds, “Israel is a sovereign state”.
Therein lies the fundamental difference between the U.S. and Israel. So before you guys go beserk with your conspiracy theories, let it sink in for a minute.
Mr Bean - March 6, 2012 at 4:56 am
Good one CLF , why cant they bully the bully? hehe.
Now we see the display of true colours coming out. The agenda of a few over the many as if we dont exist adn dont matter. Well, we dont do we?
Kathy - March 6, 2012 at 10:14 am
Why can’t Iran use nuclear power for peaceful purposes the way France, for example, is allowed to do. — Din Merican
Because France did not threaten to annihilate Israel from the world map?
scarlet.pimpernel - March 6, 2012 at 11:48 am
Israel will strike Iran pre-emptively at selected targets with bunker busting bombs, only telling the U.S. on the eleventh hour. The timing for it will be before the end of Spring.
scarlet.pimpernel - March 6, 2012 at 11:52 am
scarlet.pimpernel - March 6, 2012 at 11:54 am
scarlet.pimpernel - March 6, 2012 at 11:56 am
Are you talking about Ahmadinejad scarlet?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/did-ahmadinejad-really-say-israel-should-be-wiped-off-the-map/2011/10/04/gIQABJIKML_blog.html
I never thought you are a warhawk. So you can just go and bomb nuclear facility with no disastrous effects? Why don’t you just bomb using nuclear bombs at that? If Israel can attack Iran to protect themselves than Iran too should be able to do the same. Using Israel’s logic, if Indonesia says that they want to see the destruction of Malaysia, does it mean we can go and have a unilateral attack on that country? Mr. Pimpernel here thinks it’s okay.
Maybe Israel will engineer their own downfall. I wouldn’t care but I do care if America joins the attack. My tax money should be used for something else.
didi - March 6, 2012 at 6:06 pm
Let us separate the Iranian people from their government. This regime does not speak for them. The oppression of its own people is only equalled by that of Syria. There are now calls for the U.S> to lead an airstrikes on Syria to free its people who are being murdered on a daily basis. Some 1700 people have been murdered – old men, women and children. And this is between Muslims and Muslims. Have you already forgotten the woman who was murdered right before our eyes several years ago in Iran and so soon? A case of selective memory? Unable to see the wood from the trees?
The evidence is there that the Iranian governemnt under this brutal dictator Ahmedinejad is developing nuclear weapons and is now within a few years away from getting it. Medical isotopes? Gimme a break! It is not about Israel. It is about freeing the Iranian people from the violent oppression by its own government.
In any war there will be collateral damage. The issue here it is the collateral damage worth the price. Or should we wait until this Iranian government which has no legitimacy to rule, which murders its own people unleash a nuclear war. Then only we sit down and talk about collateral damage?
scarlet.pimpernel - March 6, 2012 at 6:42 pm
Scarlet,
You think Ahmadinejad holds the ultimate power? Can’t believe you are parroting media outlet like CNN. Even Rick Steves, the guy who does the travel show, knows Ahmadinejad doesn’t hold that much power.
If you think war is good, then I’m pretty sure you are happy with Iraq. It’s a paradise now isn’t it? Perhaps you should consider moving there. Collateral damage? Who cares, right? After all what are human lives? My parents’ Iraqi friends lost everything in the war. Any guesses if they think their lives are improving now as compared to under Saddam? A family lost a father during the invasion, a son lost a limb. It might not be so much for you Mr Scarlet but to these people war is a disaster.
Freeing the Iranian people from violent oppression of their government? Let them fight for themselves. Like Israel or America cares about the Iranian people.
didi - March 6, 2012 at 7:11 pm
Read:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/06/opinion/iran-israel-and-the-united-states.html?_r=1&ref=opinion
dinobeano - March 6, 2012 at 9:51 pm
Yes. give diplomacy a chance. But Israel is impatient since no Israeli Prime Minister can survive if it is soft on Palestine issue and Iran.–Din Merican
dinobeano - March 6, 2012 at 9:55 pm
“Freeing the Iranian people from violent oppression of their government? Let them fight for themselves.” – -didi
And so the world should only look on as innocent civilians, women and children are murdered in the streets of Syria so a regime could continue to rule the countryy? It is OK with you that Muslim Bosnians were systematically murdered by Christian Croats on a scale that could only be described as genocide and ethnic cleansing. Don’t let your hatred for America cloud your judgment.
Nobody says war is good. What is war if not a continuation of diplomacy by other means?
scarlet.pimpernel - March 7, 2012 at 11:06 am
Like Israel or America cares about the Iranian people.– didi
And you care?? Gimme a break!
scarlet.pimpernel - March 7, 2012 at 11:09 am
Yeah, I care about people getting killed. I’ve worked with war refugees and I’m glad my marine friends who have been to Iraq and Afghanistan are against a new war too. If you like the war so much, scarlet, why don’t you enlist in the IDF? I’m pretty sure they are looking for fresh meat.
didi - March 7, 2012 at 2:00 pm
Hi didi,
Greetings from Black Gold. You must get into BBlum6@aol.com. You will love it there!
Black Gold - March 7, 2012 at 3:32 pm