On the Question of “School Choice”


January 1, 2012

http://www.ideas.org.my

On the Question of “School Choice”

By Wan Saiful Wan Jan, for The Edge 1 January 2012

Around this time last year I asked several contacts if they would be interested to partner with us to hold a national conference on ‘school choice’. All of them responded with a question: “What do you mean by school choice?”. Not many people are familiar with the meaning of the phrase.

School choice is a concept that we in Malaysia don’t usually talk about. In broad terms, it is about giving parents ownership and responsibility to choose and manage school education for their children.

The philosophy behind this concept is rather straightforward. We as parents are the ones responsible for the education of our own children. Therefore it is us who must make the decision on which school our child will go to. This is actually one of the most important decisions we have to make because the school environment will produce a big impact on the future of our children.

Not only must we be given the right to decide, we also have the responsibility to decide. How ironic is it that, while we would never allow a stranger to hold our children’s hands to cross the road, we are indifferent when surrendering all powers to strangers in Putrajaya to decide about the eleven years of education that our children will experience.

But, assuming that we do want to be responsible parents, we are actually still powerless. It does not matter how much we love our children. If we live in the wrong area, we have no option but to send to children to a bad school. As a result, children in affluent areas usually get better schools than those in rural ones. The current policy of forcing a postcode lottery is cruel and immoral. By denying parents the right to choose schools, we perpetuate education inequity.

Unless we can afford private school fees, our children are completely at the mercy of the Putrajaya strangers. Perhaps the existence of private schools does provide a level of choice. But apart from some Islamic schools, almost all private schools in Malaysia use differentiation as their business strategy. I have not found any private school that takes the cost-leadership path.

As result, school fees are generally beyond the reach of the average Malaysians. Children from poor families who desperately need better quality schools are automatically excluded.

I have visited India twice to look for a potential solution. Back in February I visited two private schools in the slums of New Delhi. And last month I attended the School Choice National Conference in New Delhi, organised by India’s Centre for Civil Society. Both trips reinforce my belief that private education can be made to work for those at the bottom half of the pyramid.

At the school choice conference, I heard case studies on how low cost private schools have improved access to education for children from poor tribes in north east India as well as for those in slum areas. I also spoke to several operators of low cost private schools, who told me that many poor parents they serve do have access to free government schools. But they are willing to spend quite a big chunk of their monthly income for private school fees because the government schools are not as good.

Of course it would be wrong to blindly assume that all private schools are better than government ones. The point I am trying to make here is that some parents in rural and slum areas of India actually have more choice, and exercise greater responsibility, than the average Malaysian parents. Most of us simply accept whatever school the government says our children must go to. But many poor Indian parents, out of love and care for their own children, actively take things into their own hands. They refuse to be dependent on government.

James Tooley (left), professor of education policy at Newcastle University, was also at the conference. As a world-renowned researcher-practitioner, he combines his work with running a chain of low cost private school in India and Ghana. When I asked him if the low-cost model can be sustainable, he didn’t just affirm the sustainability of the model, but also its profitability.

With all the challenges facing our school system, and the dire need to improve the quality of schools in rural areas, I am curious what is actually preventing Malaysian private school operators from looking at the low-cost model. Why do we not yet have the equivalent of Air Asia and Mydin among our private schools?

And why is the government not looking at the private sector as a potential partner to address education inequality in the school system? The Entry Point Projects in the ETP are focused mainly on creating more premium private schools. What will happen to the poor in rural areas, as well as other financially excluded children such as those who are stateless and refugee? Is there not a business opportunity to provide them with better quality education?

I firmly believe there are rooms in the Malaysian market for low cost, for profit private school model. Several colleagues and I are actively looking into this matter, and we are learning from the experiences of our friends in India and other countries.

More school choice will be created if we can develop a model that charges just 20-30 percent less that today’s average private school fee. At that level, the fee may not be low enough for the poorest in society. But it is only the very first step. Once market competition kicks in, I suspect the potential market size for the low-cost private school model will be significant.

Wan Saiful Wan Jan is chief executive of the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (www.ideas.org.my)

9 thoughts on “On the Question of “School Choice”

  1. What about select entry schools? Ever heard of that?

    Why are the policy makers so lacking in interest,so ignorant, so not bothered about the people? never mind , dont answer that.

  2. Kathy, let me try to answer that. But first welcome to 2012.

    Parents, especially Malay parents have abandoned their duty to their kids and allowed government to take over. Our PTAs are just ineffective. Why must we rely on government for everything we need? We have a responsibility to God to raise our kids to be My parents, especially my mom, sacrificed a lot of money and her time to ensure that I had a good education with the discipline that comes my parental care.

    There is no such thing as a free lunch. Give government a chance, it will educate us its way. Government realise that the best way to control citizenry is to educate the young to be timid and unquestioning. I can say that Malaysian education is doctrinal education. It is deliberate attempt by control freaks to nip critical minds in the bud. What we need is chutzpah.

    In Hebrew, chutzpah is used indignantly, to describe someone who has overstepped the boundaries of accepted behavior. In traditional usage, the word expresses a strong sense of disgust, condemnation and outrage.

    Leo Rosten in The Joys of Yiddish defines chutzpah as “gall, brazen nerve, effrontery, incredible ‘guts,’ presumption plus arrogance such as no other word and no other language can do justice to.” In this sense, chutzpah expresses both strong disapproval and condemnation.

    The cognate of chutzpah in Arabic, ḥaṣāfah (حصافة), does not mean “impudence” or “cheekiness” or anything similar, but rather “sound judgment.”–wikipedia

    –Din Merican

  3. An eye opening piece. True enough Dato’, what the existing educational system produces are timid and passive regurgitating cyborgs devoid of critical thinking. Can’t do better than that to control the masses!

    Currently private education is considered premium certainly beyond the reach of the average Malaysian. I’d support this new alternative if there are available opportunity.

    One question though, will the little Napoleons in Putrajaya willing to cede control which might make some of them redundant? Not that I care much about their antics its just that this kind of issue will certainly hit some nerve somewhere.

  4. dinobeano & ARMS, whilst i truly admire the accuracy of what you say here, i have this little bit to add – mind you, i am no psychologist either.

    my heart bleeds, how the young minds are being ‘destroyed’ daily, by their parents & peers alike, to enforce the full-garb, almost to the point of the Burqah, and for couple of hours on end, being subjected to “stick” held by the Ustaz,, virtually torturing them to regurgitate by mere ‘hafal’ of verses, NOT EVEN UNDERSTOOD BY THESE OLD GOATS WITH BEARDS, staring at them menacingly !

    My point is, they are kids & toddlers…..natural propensity to play around amongst them, in the process of ” growing up “, and they need ” Toys” more than anything else…. to even understand not to ‘pee’ in their pants ! !
    i do feel terribly sad for them, being as it were, a ‘grandfather’ witnessing the daily spectacle around – am i turning ‘nyanyok’ ?

  5. Abnizar – I can tell from first hand experience the quality of our educational system as I’m currently part of the team training them for soft skills. When I wrote the above the madrasah type did not come to mind at all. Now that you’ve mentioned it they too I supposed should be looked into.

    I pained me as well to have to keep quiet when toddlers are sent to all sorts of classes to so call prepare them for the future. There apparently is no guilt at all in robbing them of their childhood.

  6. i feel very distressed, very distressed….ARMS !

    Please, i beg of you all, and you are there, i would even beg the authorities to seriously look into Child Psychology….they need to grow from stage to stage…..please they are kids….they learn faster by interacting within themselves….their own kid-world ( nay,,,they are “angels…”).

    You know something, not until lately when i reached my seventy-five, did i realise that i, mixing with grandchildren, me too i felt the deep ” sweet-innocence” they possess INFECTED me like a small-kid myself. Well, i di not quite understand this belated feeling within me, when their ” infection ” on me made me realise what is TRUE HAPPINESS ? This sweet-Innocence is really a ” Fullness of Heart ” that we we feel extremely overjoyed about !
    What greater happiness we need in old age…..?
    Religious orthodoxy….welcome…..

  7. Abnizar – I share you pain am doing all I can. Perhaps we should be reminded of what the Prophet pbuh said when it comes to raising children. 1st 7 years treat them like menatang minyak penuh, 2nd 7 years embed into them the fundamentals and be strict and the 3rd 7 years treat them like friends.

    This is what I said to my children, I’m always your father first your friend second. You can always disagree with me but decorum must always be maintained. So far so good. Syukur alhamdulillah.

  8. Thank you ARMS….guess i was extra-emotional, b’coz it was all pent-up within me silently for decades….could;nt speak-up due to religious bigotry, thanks to our bloghost for this opportunity.

  9. Abnizar7, I’m also thankful to our bloghost for his kindness in allowing us the space to vent our pent up feelings. At least there’s an outlet where we all can let off steam once a while.

    Let us all do all we can in our own way to leave our loved ones a better Malaysia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s