UDA: Malay Agenda and its Future
December 20, 2011
The Straits Times (06-13-11)
UDA: Malay Agenda and its Future
Malaysia set up Urban Development Authority (UDA) Holdings 40 years ago, giving it large land banks and huge government grants to fulfil its mission: to help Malays buy property in cities.
Today (2011), the state-owned company is not only struggling for survival, saddled as it is with debts of RM900 million (S$370 million), but also faces a firestorm of complaints over its redevelopment of the famous Pudu Jail site in Kuala Lumpur.
To its chairman Nur Jazlan Mohamed, the decline of the UDA’s fortunes is a cautionary tale. It tells of the direction that Malaysia will be heading in if it continues to promote the Malay agenda through the old ways of rampant government spending and political cronyism.
‘But no one dares to talk about this,’ said Datuk Nur Jazlan, an UMNO MP
appointed to the UDA a year ago, in an interview with The Straits Times.
The company was in dire need of reform to become profit-oriented and focus on building Malay capacity, rather than doling out contracts, he said.But Mr Nur Jazlan himself has come under attack over his handling of its biggest project – the RM6 billion redevelopment of the site once occupied by the Pudu Jail, at one time a landmark in Kuala Lumpur’s tourist zone.
As news leaked out that several Chinese state-owned companies were front-runners to win the bid, he has been accused of abandoning the UDA’s Malay agenda. Eleven companies – about half of them Chinese or joint ventures with Chinese companies – have put in bids. The matter is now pending approval by the Finance Ministry.
Several politicians, including independent MP Zahrain Hashim and Penang UMNO Deputy chairman Musa Sheikh Fadzir, have alleged that Malay contractors were sidelined.Wrote Datuk Seri Zahrain in his blog: ‘I’m not accusing anyone, but I only want to protect the original intent of the UDA.’
Mr Nur Jazlan said the UDA had stringent requirements on this project. The winning company will have to fully finance the development, and will not be allowed to use the land as collateral to raise financing.
In return, it will be given part of the development – a hotel, offices and condominium units. But before it builds those, it will have to deliver the UDA’s portion – a 2 million sq ft mall and carpark, as well as a transport hub.
Mr Nur Jazlan said the winning bid will have to meet these requirements, as the Pudu Jail site has to be developed with a profit motive in mind. The government can no longer keep pumping money into the UDA, he said.
National oil and gas company Petronas, which provides 40 per cent of the federal budget, now wants to cap its dividends to the government at 30 per cent of its profits as it needs money for reinvestment, he said. Last year, it paid the government 69 per cent of its gross profits.
‘Who is going to keep paying for the bumiputera agenda?’ he asked. Mr Nur Jazlan said the UDA’s debts began piling up since the government cut off grants in 1996. It now has just RM90 million in the bank, depleting land banks, and still owes RM130 million in premiums for the Pudu Jail site.
He said the company will give priority to Malays to run the businesses in the new development, although it will not subsidise their leases permanently. ‘They have to be successful businesses,’ he added.
This is a better way to create real Malay businesses, than benefiting a handful of powerfully connected people through contracts, he explained. Mr Nur Jazlan added: ‘Nobody wants to say this – it is political suicide – but it’s time for political leaders to speak up on reforming the Malay agenda.’
The questions to ask are basic. I learned that at B-School many years ago. What is your business? What are you in business for? Remember Peter F. Drucker. Of course, business has its responsibility towards society. But it must first take care of its shareholders and enhance shareholder value. If it fails to do that, it becomes a problem to society since it cannot provide jobs, pay taxes and contribute to economic growth.–Din Merican
dinobeano - December 20, 2011 at 9:37 am
Don’t we have enough shopping malls, hotels, office and condominiums in the Pudu BB area? Transportation hub, hello how about Puduraya? UDA have to put on your thinking cap and do better if you are to further the Malay agenda. How many Malay merchants can afford to open a high end boutique stores or branded name stores? You are going to compete with StarHill, Pavillion, KLCC and Lot 10.
Turn the Pudu Jail site into another Central Market lah. Let the malay traders sell arts and crafts, hawker and street food stalls but with an upscale atmosphere.
orang malaya - December 20, 2011 at 9:58 am
How many Malay merchants can afford to open a high end boutique stores or branded name stores? – orang malaya
What happened to the practice of some Malays mostly politicians and bankers of flaunting their wealth by opening up high end boutiques in shopping malls and creating jobs for their mistresses?? Don’t worry about funding these businesses. They are financed from proceeds of corruption.
Mr Bean - December 20, 2011 at 11:12 am
Minta ma’af Bean, perkara semacam ini, saya naik menyampah, buat sakit hati sahaja : Kerana membuka Pekong di-dada kaum Bumiputra sendiri. Jika Arwah YM Tun Razak mendengar telatah kaum Bumiputra, Ruh Arwah akan bangkit dari kubor Nya. Melatah kerana tiada kegigihan dan daya tahan Bangsa yang Lemah, dengan mudah hendak menyerah HartaTanah Pembangunan Bandar : Bukan kah di-situ letak Kekutan nya ia itu pada ” Hartanah “.? ?
Buat apa melatah disebab kan hutang RM990 juta, sebab jika Malay leadership yang lampau telah ‘menga’ut’ black money untuk faedah diri sendiri, Leadership kini kena lah BERTAHAN kan Kekutan Hartanah yang begitu Tinggi Tidak Ternilai harga nya atas kekuatan UDA.
Kalau begitu Lemah dan mudah Menyerah, saya cadang kan, SERAH sahaja lah Langkawi, Projek Iskandar, dan beberapa Hartanah lain yang besar. Sebab, jika di-serah kepada Enterpreneur kaum China, dengan sekelip mata, mereka dapat lupus kan hutang tersebut – bah kan dapat sokongan kewangan dari Singapura, istimewa dari negara China, dan mungkin juga dari kekuatan 9 orang Billionaire Malaysian Chinese tang telah KINI menyipan Asset dan Wang mereka di Luar Negara.
Naik Menyampah…..SERAH sahaja lah….dapat kesenangan serta-merta. kekuatan kaum Bumiputra MENJUNAM dan menekan anak-cucu sendiri !
Abnizar - December 20, 2011 at 12:05 pm
PS.
I presume everybody knows this, kaum Bumi yang cerdik-pandai :
Since the Brits left, the cost to transform Kaum Bumiputra from Peasantry into a commercially viable people to do business and merely to understand the business of living, the costs have been very, very high indeed…..Tak tahu lah….menyampah…..jika menyerah….
Abnizar - December 20, 2011 at 12:22 pm
It is all about the culture of entitlement.
In the Silicon Valley there is no shortage of Black entrepreneurs in the IT business. But there is none of the success stories that we get to hear like in the case of the other minority groups. Why? It is because of the culture of entitlement. Free market and competition is what makes successful business people.
Mr Bean - December 20, 2011 at 12:30 pm
“…UDA had stringent requirements on this project. The winning company will have to fully finance the development, and will not be allowed to use the land as collateral to raise financing”.
I’ve heard this crap before. Stringent requirements etc but just look at the end result. Tajol Rosli was so hung up on developing a similar “high-end” mall for bumis in Gunong Rapat, Ipoh. Look what has the spot turned into today. The bus terminal, supposedly to be the transport hub of Ipoh, is in such a deplorable state. It looks like a pasar malam from afar.
All these talks about stringency and what not are just craps. The onus is on UDA to make good its claims and at state level, the SEDCs. But after decades of hopes and dreams what have these entities to show other than a long trail of failed projects and endeavors.
Tok Cik - December 20, 2011 at 12:58 pm
UDA was not provide with the fishing rod. They are not taught how to fish but given the fish. This is the case like many, many similar cases that when given the fish, they don’t multiply the fish but ate up the fish and return to ask for more fishes.
These cycles go round and round like the merry go round. It will never end unless one cut the rot and give the fishing rod without bait or they will ask for more bait. Just the fishing rod. To survive they will know how to operate the rod. No instruction is needed. It is all in the human instinct to survive.
vic - December 20, 2011 at 1:27 pm
Go visit the Tanjong Tokong flats in Penang , the so called ‘improvement for Malays’ to live in is depressing! This is what its all about UDA which actually is ‘making money’ for the ‘scumbags’ of UNMO-BN !
___________
The Tanjong Tokong area is in a mess because of Koh Tsu Koon of Gerakan. We had no problems when Tun Lim Chong Eu was the Chief Minister. My good friends, Dato Chet Singh and Dato Ahmad Khairummuzamil worked for the late Tun. UDA at the time was a stautory body with the Late Dato Yaccob Hitam as its Chairman who I respected very much. We cannot attribute this Tanjong Tokong mess directly to UMNO. Tsu Koon was incompetent, and a big talker and kaki ampu. No wonder, he lost Penang for UMNO-BN. As far as I know, his name today stinks in that state.–Din Merican
Mohamad - December 20, 2011 at 2:38 pm
As far as I know, his name today stinks in that state.–Din Merican
Go to any kueh tiow seller in Penang and ask for “Kuah Tiow Tsu Koon”.
You will get the kueh tiow without fish balls.
Sam01 - December 20, 2011 at 3:01 pm
I foresee another white elephant in the making.
CYC - December 20, 2011 at 4:28 pm
My Penang friend recommended his favorite stall near Bayan Lepas. I ordered Bo-hood char kueh teow (pun intended)..the stall owner immediately understood what I wanted. Mind you…this Bo-hood fella is really hated in Penang being the bodek-ampu of Umno.
Rakyat Malaysia - December 20, 2011 at 4:32 pm
UDA, the fundamental principle of business is that if you control the present you countrol the past. And if you control the past you control the future.
Anonymous - December 20, 2011 at 4:47 pm
And as in the last 54 years, there is nothing for me… not even bursary or loan leave alone a scholarship. And I was the top of class in Form 6, in UM and later in my MBA!
Greenbug - December 20, 2011 at 9:26 pm
Why should I then give back to society when society dumped me?
Greenbug - December 20, 2011 at 9:27 pm