Racism and Corruption in Malaysia: The Ongoing Saga
December 6, 2011
Racism and Corruption in Malaysia: The Ongoing Saga
by Nawawi Mohamad, Malaysia Chronicle
Many of us may have asked: when and why did the racial divisions in Malaysia start and who is to blame? Obviously, the racial divide did not exist in old Malaya, where the different races could live together in harmony in the kampongs (villages) and small towns.
Now, it seems that we are forever at the brink of racial tension or even racial war. In fact, jihad (holy war) has been declared several times by the UMNO-linked PERKASA against the Christians as well as the Chinese.
The starting point
When UMNO was formed, Onn Jaafar who was one of the main founders and who was the then president, had to leave the party because a group of new faces disagreed and fought with him over the political direction to be taken. They insisted their ideas were better than his and this inevitably led to the changes in policies, rules and objectives.
Whereas Onn was more for uniting the Malays from all walks of life, with the Chinese, Indians and other migrants under one organsation, and then jointly struggle for independence, the group of UMNO leaders led by the late Tunku Abdul Rahman was more interested in meeting the qualifying terms set by the British for achieving independence – no matter how onerous.
The idea of a non-communal political party
Onn Jaafar (right) – the grandfather of the current Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein – had indeed
been farsighted and visionary; he felt the need for racial harmony and a non-communal political party was the best way to secure a prosperous future for Malaya. No doubt the British did create the Malayan Union comprising all races with equal rights, and even diluted the powers of the Malay rulers, but the British were not really sincere at all.
The British did not really want Malayans to be united as one, like in Onn’s vision. Neither did the British really want the Malayan Union to succeed. So the Malays were led into rejecting the Malayan Union, paving the way for its dissolution.
Had the British been sincere, they would have backed Onn’s idea. Instead the British supported Tunku when he was elected the new UMNO president after Onn resigned. Onn had to quit after failing to garner the majority support from the delegates on his multiracial vision after his speech in the UMNO General Assembly in Kuala Lumpur in August 1951 backfired. The Malays have never been united since then.
The idea of non-communal political party still lives on
But did Onn Jaafar really have so little support? The answer is no, he had the support of the Malays all over the country and at the grassroots level. In fact when Tunku tried to manage UMNO, he found out that most of the people were not aware that Onn had left the party. The staff manning the UMNO offices were also reluctant to work with Tunku as they still supported Onn. In the end, Tunku had to abandon the old UMNO office bearers and create a new set-up, appointing his own people to manage the party and its activities.
Further proof of the British ill-intent was when they told the Malayan entourage negotiating for independence consisting of UMNO, MCA and MIC that Malaya could not be given independence since the three major races were not united! Onn’s multiracial proposal was the best and it still is and the British also knew that. Yet, they managed to convince the Malayan delegates to agree on an Alliance with UMNO, MCA and MIC the pioneer members.
To their discredit, all three of them fell for it. Presumably this had been outlined by the British for Tunku to implement.
UMNO failed us from the start
Here UMNO has thus failed twice. Firstly, to unite the Malays and consolidate their political power and losing the opportunity to unite the various races under one non-communal party. Secondly, to really lead a more meaningful struggle. Unlike the other true independent struggles seen all over the world, UMNO just “negotiated” for a ‘walkover’ from the British.
UMNO may argue that it was the ingenuity of their leaders that helped Malayans gain independence without bloodshed. This is not true! There was indeed a lot of bloodshed but not amongst the UMNO people. What about the struggle led by other groups and individuals?
Let us also not forget that during this period there were many other groups and individuals struggling and fighting for independence and with the inevitable bloodshed. We were not informed about their struggle as if the Alliance was the only one who struggled. PAS Deputy President Mat Sabu had exposed this one-sided history for us. Besides the Communists, there were many others from all the races.
Nations that experienced, endured and managed to overcome all obstacles leading to the true sense of independence are usually of a different breed. The struggle instills real patriotism and their citizens really value what they have achieved unlike Malaysians too, who need to be lured to fly the Jalur Gemilang almost every time we try to celebrate the National Day.
In the end, the UMNO-BN celebration of the 31st August National Day has become something of a mediocre, wasteful, and meaningless effort, without zeal and substance, without the real feeling of patriotism at all. The annual procession is just for show as the number of people flying the Jalur Gemilang keeps dwindling year after year till the number of road vehicles flying the national flag can even be counted on our fingers. The national day celebrations are only being looked forward to by the Mat Rempits and the like.
UMNO and Malaysia under Tunku Abdul Rahman: Going Nowhere
Malaysia under Tunku was not really independent, it had to depend on the British and they were more than willing to maintain their support, mainly due to economic reasons. The British had invested so much in Malaya in plantations, mining, banking, media and education. Furthermore, Malaya was one of the growing markets for everything English.
After gaining independence, the Tunku was not able to really achieve anything more substantial. He was not even able to defeat the ragtag Communists, and Malaysia was still backward in every sense of the word. The young democracy and new nation was just at its infancy and without any coherent policy, objectives, vision and actions although there were some sort of localized economic activities in the towns, and racial harmony in the kampongs.
With the Communists still active not only in the jungles but also in the urban areas and their ideology spreading in the University of Malaya, real peace and unity as a nation were not attained during his administration. Even Singapore was separated from Malaysia. The economy was not doing well since Malaysia was more on a commodity-based economy, and at the mercy of the British who controlled prices and the trade itself.
At this stage of the nation building, Malaysians had nothing to celebrate or cheer about. There was nothing to hold on to, nor was there a sense of belonging. Not only were the business, finance and money still under the British, the Supreme Court was also in Britain. Nothing substantial belonged to Malaysia. The Malays in particular had nothing except for the small plots of land in the kampongs and the Malay rulers to be proud of. Tunku did not have any real plans for the Malays despite UMNO being so-called the United Malays National Organization.
Racism during Tunku’s period
The Tunku fell into the trap set by the British when the racial based coalition, Alliance was formed. He had not done enough to set any solid foundation for the country and he realized too late how fragile racial harmony was after the 1969 general election. The Gerakan and DAP had celebrated their wins with a victory parade in KL on May 12, 1969. Then UMNO led a counter march the next day, and this is when the racial riot known as the infamous May 13 racial riots erupted. May 13 also led to Abdul Razak Hussein taking over the nation’s leadership.
But was it really a racial riot? Were both the Gerakan and DAP really so insensitive to the political situation that they organized the march and failed to control their members? The Alliance managed to win 77 out of 140 seats in Parliament; UMNO still held power. Furthermore it was very interesting to note that Malay opposition parties saw a sharp increase in votes in the peninsula, rising drastically from about 15% in 1964 to 25% in 1969. UMNO did not have the full support of the Malays and apparently the Malays did not agree fully with UMNO even then!
UMNO under Razak: His inaction led to the next stage of failure
Razak, the father of current Prime Minister Najib Razak, was quite thoughtful and managed to
bring about some changes. He started the process of nation building by introducing the word “pembangunan” which is development. For this, he was eventually bestowed the title of “Bapa Pembangunan”. After the infamous May 13 racial riot, he introduced the New Economic Policy (NEP) which had good and noble intentions although it was miserably abused to the core in later years.
The NEP was meant to restructure society, encompassing education, business opportunities, employment and preferences to eliminate identification of race with economic function anf eradicate poverty amongst Malaysians, irrespective of race.But UMNO leaders took advantage of this policy to fatten their coffers leaving both the Malays and other poor Malaysians behind. We can clearly see and understand the situation now.
Razak also empowered FELDA (which was formed by the British in 1956 for their own reasons) to aggressively embark on opening new land schemes and making Malays do something to upgrade and improve themselves. The FELDA story is still unfolding now.
As the Malays were earning some extra income, Tabung Haji ( the brainchild of Professor Ungku Aziz) was formed to inculcate the habit of savings for the rainy days and to help save enough money to perform the haj. Sad to say, as has been reported, Tabung Haji was not safe from the dirty hands either.
The siphoning of money that we see now, the unscrupulous civil servants and their abuse of power and unchecked corruption also started during Razak’s premiership. He was not able to closely monitor all the things that he had implemented.
One glaring example is the construction of the wooden houses for the FELDA settlers. But instead of houses, the settlers got what were basically just pieces of sawn wood nailed together with some sort of roofing to protect the inhabitants from the elements of nature. Yes, the ‘house’ was just a shed. These houses can still be seen in the FELDA settlements as a testimony to the plundering of the allocations by unscrupulous groups of people.
This was the beginning of the money-making schemes, and those in UMNO saw the doors opening to all the golden opportunities that had never existed for them before. The government officials too found the opportunity and took what they could and as much as they could.
When RISDA was formed to help the rubber smallholders, they were provided with free fertilizers, weed poison and other incentives like the money to keep the rubber plantation clear of all other plants, shrubs and small trees. This was to ensure improved rubber production, easy maintenance, safety and prevent the rubber plantation to be any form of hideouts for vermin, wild animals and the communists.
While they were supposed to be given the items free of charge, the officials still demanded money from the small holders and a substantial amount of the fertilizers and poisons went into the wrong hands and were eventually sold to the hardware shops to be re-sold to others. The money-making schemes were carried out openly to the extent the RISDA emblem on the sacks could be clearly seen. Yet, the authorities did nothing to stop the corruption.
Almost all the projects awarded to the UMNO-putras during this period was executed as Ali Baba schemes leaving the UMNOputras with just 5 percent of the profit which was too little. Since they were not real businessmen, they spent extravagantly within a few months finished all their gains. Thus more projects had to be given out to fulfill their lust. The Ali Baba business trend began here.
It was the same with other government projects and procurements. The instant noodles supplied as army ration were paid by the Ministry of Defense at RM0.65 per packet while the market price was just RM0.25 each.
The Police and the Army were also in a world of their own with free cigarettes, cheap alcohol, partying in their messes. They were oblivious to their surroundings. The police were so callous in their duties that the IGP was shot dead point blank by two assailants on a motorbike when his car halted at a congested road on his way to the office.
The inefficient civil servants were preoccupied with so many tasks in their offices. Hospitals and medical staff were few in numbers, and the school teachers were the most respectable group of people in society then. But unfortunately not anymore now.
The Biro Siasatan Negara (National Bureau of Investigation) was operational but they did nothing. At this stage, the UMNO government ignored all the warning signs of blatant corruption, misuse of funds and pilferage. As such, the next stage of failure was inevitable and more so under Hussein Onn.
First huge scandal under Tun Hussein Onn
Hussein Onn was like Abdullah Badawi and unlike Badawi, he was a reluctant politician. He was not able to fit into Razak’s shoes. Hussein Onn left the country on auto-pilot. Thus, more corruption and wrongdoing spread all over the country including to Sabah and Sarawak which had huge amounts of natural resources especially timber.
Sandakan in Sabah once held the world record of the highest numbers of millionaires (from the greedy rampage and corruption of the timber industry) per square mile. Sabah is now without a virgin forest except at the national reserve. This too will not be spared for long and Sabahans still remain poor today.
The first huge scandal for UMNO which was the RM2.5 billion losses by Bank Bumiputera Malaysia Bhd, which began in 1976 with its wholly owned Bumiputera Malaysia Finance (BMF) lending money to property developer Carrian Group in Hong Kong. The mess unfolded in 1983 kicked off the UMNO plundering tradition on a huge scale.
You see, no one was punished for the crime. UMNO leaders condoned such debacle creating a precedent that when one is a strong UMNO man and with proper connection, one can get away scot-free. The bailout tradition too began from this point on. Since Malaysia was on auto-pilot, the ordinary citizens had to survive on their own.
Mahathir: All forms of failure and a sad lack of vision
This was a very interesting period for UMNO. There were failures galore – all and every form of
failure that could happen did happen. There was systematic failure at all levels of government to understand the magnitude of the situation, from stripping the Malay rulers of their powers, using the full force of the ISA on the opposition, breaking up UMNO, looting the nation’s funds, antagonizing the West, full-scale bailouts of cronies, destroying the integrity of the Police and Judiciary to being a dictator. Obviously, this resulted in resentment throughout the entire society leading to the formation of Pakatan Rakyat.
Mahathir was the one who broke the national piggy bank, blazing the trail to unmitigated government borrowings. He failed to provide enough funds for rainy days. Many of his supporters boasted that he was famous for his vision, but time has proven that Mahathir in fact lacked it. He lacked vision simply because he was not able to see beyond himself.
Mahathir failed to understand the inherent economic cycle and be prepared for eventual downturns. He knew Lee Kuan Yew had special funds to be used under the power of the President. But Mahathir siphoned out the only real funds we had in PETRONAS, thus even the once rich PETRONAS has to borrow money now.
The Police under Mahathir was for most of the time working for him and not much for the rakyat. The police was used to defeat the opposition, harass individuals, put people in jail using the ISA and determining the most suitable time for a general election. Crime was high since the PDRM was preoccupied with UMNO and Mahathir. Lawyers were know to be unscrupulous but it was during his time that the judiciary system was turned into shambles and judges could be openly bought, thus ending the integrity of the entire law and order of the country.
Mahathir also failed to defend the monarchy by stripping the Malay rulers of their powers. The Malays have lost their last bastion of pride and for the rest of the Malaysians the last bastion of justice, as can be seen in the awkward position of the Sultan of Perak being manipulated by UMNO in the Perak power grab of 2009. The Perak Sultan sanctioned UMNO’s coup d’etat, while the Agong only had enough guts to acknowledge BERSIH as legitimate, while the Sultan of Selangor had to play safe in the JAIS -DUMC case with UMNO breathing down his neck.
Mahathir in his endeavour to make Malaysia a developed nation by 2020 failed to safeguard the nation from being plundered by refusing to prevent and take action against corrupt people. This could be because he was himself a cohort in some, if not most of the fiascos. The Tajuddin Ramli-MAS scandal is an example and a living testimony to the failures of the Mahathir-era, while the RM12.5bil PKFZ scandal is still unfolding.
Mahathir also failed to see the inept capability of Badawi and the hopeless Najib who both have no real ability of their own. Nonetheless, one cannot turn back time or erase the systematic failures Mahathir caused. In any case, he was ready to pass the baton to Abdullah Badawi by 2003.
Badawi sleeping away
Badawi was not able to fit in the shoes of Dr. Mahathir. He tried to undo several of questionable projects started by Mahathir. But even this, he fumbled and bungled.
Badawi tried to create some economic corridors, have some fancy slogans like working together with him and Islam Hadhari, which he himself found difficult to explain. Till now, the questions ring: what are the corridors, the slogans and Islam Hadhari really all about?
The economy became stagnant and to spur development Malaysia had to borrow more money. He was able to create some sense of economic activities but just for the elections. Fortunately for him but unfortunately for the rakyat, he had the fourth floor goons headed by his beloved son-in-law, Khairy Jamaludin who made things worse.
Our nation was in jeopardy because it was being managed by a twenty-something de-facto prime minister. Although Khairy was an Oxford graduate, he was not savvy enough to run a country much to the disgust of Mahathir. Both the nation and UMNO are now in disarray. A classic example of a Khairy deal gone awry is the failure of the Shahrizat-linked Gemas NFC debacle.
Badawi did form the MACC but for what? They are just the same people from the Anti Corruption Agency (ACA) in different uniform.
Free for all, grab what you can now under Najib
Najib is long on ideas but short on action, thus has no results to show. Basically, this is due to his ideas being copycats of other systems, such as the Pakatan’s Buku Jingga or economic blueprint.
But first of all since he was not elected to his post and his image was tarnished by the useless and unsinkable Scorpene submarines that also led to the murder of Mongolian national Altantuya Shaaribuu.
Najib engaged APCO and FBC Media for a full scale image makeover, spending at least RM55
million of tax-payers’ money for expensive propaganda to glorify himself, his government and his policies and having it screened on international channels like CNN, CNBC and BBC.
To repair the damage to his image, Najib should have rectified the mistakes and not try to whitewash them and incurring more blunders in the process. There is really no point in putting on thick make up during the day when everyone can see the thick layer of ‘paint and powder’.
Transformation programs that go nowhere
Then Najib went on to try to transform several major things but he failed to see what the causes were that led to past failures. All the sounds and bombast of his Economic Transformation Program may have seem rather impressive to the layman, but what are the results so far? Unfortunately we have not been able to feel good about anything that Najib and his ETP people have announced.
His main showpieces are the six National Key Results Areas (NKRA), twelve National Key
Economic Areas (NKEA) – all part of his Economic Transformation Program. On November 23, Bernama reported that Najib underlined six high impact programs to boost the growth of the Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to 8.7 by 2020 but, what about now or next year?
The economic policies that the UMNO-BN government under Najib have been undertaken but show no improvement in the economy. Thus, until now, it has been ‘nothing for nothing Najibnomics’.
As for Najib’s Political Transformation Program, it has proven to be a farce – heavy on proclamations and full of doublespeak as in the recent Peaceful Assembly Bill, which actually restricts our freedom and not grant greater democratic space as he had promised.
Old habits die hard
Even at this very critical juncture, in the last lap to the “Mother of all Elections”, UMNO still continues to award contracts without following the proper procedures. At present there are several projects under the various ministries that have been allocated to their cronies and when the time comes, by hook or by crook, these projects will come to light whether UMNO-BN wins the GE-13 or not. So too will all the money-making schemes planned with guarded secrecy, the PKFZ scandal, the Scorpene scandal and the Gemas NFC debacle.
The Najib government has also told the rakyat that it will not be involved in financing the mega-projects he has announced; they are mostly under the Private Financing Initiatives (PFI), he assures. But we were not told that the UMNO cronies will have to borrow from the banks and none of the clear minded private banks would ever lend them any money.
The private banks know that these projects are just money-making schemes without any guarantee of success and will eventually need bailouts. Thus all the burden of financing has been given to Bank Pembangunan, the government bank, with money from the government. Still the money will be taken from our already depleting EPF and Tabung Haji or borrowed somewhere and bringing Malaysia closer to becoming another Greece.
Chaos at the ministries
The Ministry of Defense has set the plan moving for the purchase of new fighter planes from Russia as reported in a defense magazine but Ahmad Zahid Hamidi denied this recently. The ministry will also continue with the building of the exorbitantly expensive naval ships and boats.
The Ministry of Education has embarked on building several campuses in Perlis and Pahang and even the HUKM pediatric hospital in KL and being awarded to their cronies.
The Ministry of Transport has already approved the KVMRT project, the Integrated Transport Terminal in Subang Jaya with another going to be in Gombak and in Melaka and as we all know Malaysia Airports Holding Bhd has a free hand to impose any charges on passengers and complete the KLIA2 tour at whatever cost.
The Ministry of Agriculture will eventually bail out the failed Gemas NFC project and the wasteful rice bowl “National Rice Bowl” project in Sarawak will get more money – some to be reinvested and the rest pocketed.
The Ministry of Finance will continue paying the PKFZ thieves and continue dumping more money into MAS despite the purported win-win share swap with AirAsia as MAS has already announced RM400 in losses recently. PETRONAS has been set to bail out TNB by absorbing the gas cost.
The Ministry of Tourism too have their money-making schemes through various advertisement projects, while the Ministry of Information uses FINAS through the loans and grants issued for movie productions and the misuse of FINAS assets for some influential individuals. The other ministries too have their problems and these could be revealed later.
Enough is enough
Najib has turned Malaysia backwards by not trying to reject the wrong doings of UMNO-BN. Where his father was too busy, Najib’s problem may be because he has his own scandals; thus a change of government is the only true means of saving this country. The recent UMNO AGM showed the country the party’s true colors; its racists/fascist bent and the fact that it had no real agenda for the country.
So after tracking through the 6 Prime Ministers, all of whom came from UMNO, it is clear the party is the cause, the main ingredient, the catalyst and the main element of all the failures that have befallen the nation.
Malaysia- Chronicle
In a nutshell, UMNO is the root cause, having ruled the country spanning 54 years, 6 PMs, and leading the country to the brink of a failed nation. Do we need a 7th PM from UMNO? Well, the writing is on the wall. Yes, it is appropriate to say ” Enough is enough”. The road map on nation building was good but the implementation was skewed.
Rosli Kamarudin - December 6, 2011 at 11:23 am
“The British did not really want Malayans to be united as one, like in Onn’s vision. Neither did the British really want the Malayan Union to succeed. So the Malays were led into rejecting the Malayan Union, paving the way for its dissolution.”
What crock !!
Mr Bean - December 6, 2011 at 12:04 pm
This article must be made available to the young Malay population.
Sam01 - December 6, 2011 at 12:18 pm
All we heard are about projects after projects and how much money to invest into these projects actually are far more higher than the budgeted amount.We hardly heard about returns from these projects but are very familiar with bailouts. I remember LKY targeted 10 years to recoup the investment spent on the MRT and they did it.
This essay is ideal for economics students. Let critique whether it is economically sane or insane?
vic - December 6, 2011 at 1:42 pm
I am aghast at what had happened to our country over the last 54 years. The national soul is rotting faster now since the young are taught by example how to be rich quickly without hard work and dedication. When the culture is corrupt and people are basically rent seekers, it will take some undoing to get back on track. Malaysia is becoming a basket case of corruption and abuses of power.–Din Merican
dinobeano - December 6, 2011 at 3:11 pm
Kick them out at the next GE and put them on trial for:
1. Abuse of power e.g. selective application of the law & abusing the institutions of the state to persecute individual political dissidents and social critics
2. Gross mismanagement of the economy e.g. financial scandal after financial scandal
3. Squandering away the enormous wealth generated from our oil and natural gas resources
4. Incitement of racial and religious tension e.g. sponsorship/encouragement of fascist groups such as Perkasa
5. Reckless endangerment of the health of the public e.g. Lynas project
6. Neglect of worsening environmental problems e.g. no action taken to reduce production of greenhouse gases
Phua Kai Lit - December 6, 2011 at 3:57 pm
Top 10 universities in SEA! (Msia not in)
According to Webometric Ranking of World
Universities, the Top 10 universities in South-East of Asia are :
1. NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE
2. NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, SINGAPORE
3. KASETSART UNIVERSITY, THAILAND
4. CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY, THAILAND
5. PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY, THAILAND
6. ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY THAILAND
7. CHIANG MAI UNIVERSITY, THAILAND
8. THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY, THAILAND
9. ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY OF THAILAND
10. KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY, THAILAND
Out of the top 10 ranking South East Asia universities, 2 are from Singapore , and the balance 8 universities are from Thailand . Also, on the Top 100 list, Thailand has 41 universities, Myanmar 18, Indonesia 14, the Philippines 13, and Singapore 7.
In Asia , the Top 10 universities are :
1. UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO
2. NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY
3. KYOTO UNIVERSITY
4. BEIJING UNIVERSITY
5. KEIO UNIVERSITY
6. NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE
7. UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
8. CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
9. NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY
10. NAGOYA UNIVERSITY
Out of the Top 10 ranking universities in ASIA, 4 are from Japan , 5 are from China , and the remaining 1 is from Singapore . We are also nowhere near the Top 100 universities in Asia . In terms of Global Ranking, None of Malaysia ‘s universities are anywhere near the TOP 1000 universities.
Well, the fact speaks for itself ! Thailand , Myanmar , Indonesia , Philippines, and Singapore are way ahead of Malaysia . Despite all our constant shouting of Malaysia boleh this and that, and all the emotional rhetoric of shiok sendiri and self denials, we are already an academic backwaters nation in South East Asia , I shake my head…
I have always personally railed against Man’s dependency on numeric evidence as proof of superiority but before I get too ahead with this argument, let me explain.
‘Numeric evidence’ means the use of numbers to represent one’s status. If you have $500,000 and I have $100, you are wealthier than I or so the numeric evidence suggests. If you have a 5-litre engine motorcar, it is definitely a better car than my 1.6-litre car or so the numeric evidence suggests. If you have 10 titles bestowed on your life by the Sultan and the King, you are most assuredly a better person than most of us are. And so it goes that if a student scores an exemplary number of distinctions (A’s in Malaysia ) in a public exam, he/she is considered the pinnacle of what the country’s education system is capable of producing. He/she is expected to go through tertiary education anywhere in the world with flushing success. So what could possibly have happened if she fails abroad?
Malaysia’s education system has always been a laughing stock. Based purely on numeric superiority and mindless rote learning methods that even the British has long abandoned decades earlier, Malaysia continues to believe that the more A’s a student attains, the better equipped he/she is. It doesn’t matter how he/she gets the A’s so long as the aim is to get them and get as many in the process. So if the student were to labour over numerous past year exam papers in the library, memorise the answers and focus only on what the teacher ‘suggests’ are likely to come out for the exam, that’s alright by everyone. The education system doesn’t teach the students to UNDERSTAND the material. It doesn’t encourage proactive teaching methods that encourage students to discover knowledge but to merely be taught.
When a student with 17 Distinctions fail in the real world, it is not a surprise. Perhaps it is to many Malaysians, but it’s a system that is waiting to reward its students with spectacular failure when they leave the shores and compete overseas or when they enter the workforce. Many organisations in the private sector have continued to be horrified at the performance of such students during interviews. Communication skills are absent. Standard ethics are absent. Common courtesy codes are absent. Presentation skills as well as personal grooming are absent. What has the education system taught them?
If Malaysia continue to embark on the road of plain numeric superiority instead of to challenge the students to think, provoke them to create their own opinions and to communicate expressively, to eloquently define their standing in the world, there can never be an international leader in any field or industry emanating from Malaysia. It never produced one in the last 20 years. It never will for the next 100 years.
FRIDAY, JULY 24, 2009
The Failure of Nur Amalina (who scored 17As)
I was really shocked and speechless to be informed about Nur Amalina Che Bakri.
Nur Amalina had held briefly the record of the most A’s scored in the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia. Upon the announcement of results of SPM 2004 on 26 March 2005, she received 17 1As – a record for number of A’s received by a student in the history of Malaysian education back then. She was sponsored by Bank Negara Malaysia to study medicine in the United Kingdom, and did her A-levels at the Cheltenham Ladies College in the UK.
Now I am informed that she had failed her second year medical study at the University of Edinburgh . I really hope this is not true……if it is, what went wrong?
Could English language be the problem? We are going back to Malay medium again and that means trouble.
Maths & Science in English please !!!
tourman53 - December 6, 2011 at 4:28 pm
I hate to say this but Malaysia education system are all fixed. Just like our election. The system is to undermine the younger generation on how to fight for hands out rather than to be street smart. Rubbish in rubbish out mentality.
vic - December 6, 2011 at 4:42 pm
Education?
Here’s how it works over here. University or college education is not as it used to be. It is today more accessible to the public. More are attending colleges. Over here it is not free, or state sponsored. Tuition fees are paid for by the students themselves through loans which they will then have to pay back. I have a niece whose high school is paid for by the state – not because she could ill afford an education but she has the grades required. She is top of her class in every state she went, every school she attended. They offered her a place in a special school. Her future is bright because even before completing her high school they have offered her a full scholarship and a place at a university of her choice. She chose to do medicine. One year could set you back by some US$50k at a good university. She is today still a high school senior.
With the economic recession, university graduates (the lucky ones) entering the job market for the first time could only expect to earn half of what their predecessors used to earn and having to compete for jobs they would go for after high school. That’s how bleak the future of a college grad is today in the U.S. That has become the reality today.
What do you think happened? Accessibility is one. Economy is the other. But accessibility is the long term issue here and has changed forever.
Malaysia up to the late ’60s had only one university and only 1-2% of the school population ended up in university. How many universities do we have today? I lost count. Also in my days for anybody to get 5 As at GCE/MCE level was rare. Now they come with 17As?? And in the hundreds? Does that mean students are smarter than they were before? If more of our students are failing abroad it tells you something is seriously flawed with the selection process. And what’s worse. Their failures are being paid for by taxpayers.
Competition and the free market is still the best way to select the best and the brightest. My niece is an exceptional student. Not many are like her. But the best and brightest do not fall through the cracks over here. They are noticed early and are given all the facilities they need.
In Malaysia our politicians have messed up.
Mr Bean - December 6, 2011 at 6:43 pm
And what’s more? Race has nothing to do with it.
Mr Bean - December 6, 2011 at 6:57 pm
Now about history and the Malayan Union.
Malayan Union failed to take off because the Malays saw they had everything to lose.
1.The Brits had opened the floodgates to uncontrolled immigration to meet the demand for labor in the tin mines and the rubber plantations and the railways; and the flow of immigrants from countries that had no similarities in culture, language and way of life and customs with the host country presented the country with some very serious long term socio-economic and cultural problems and these have not gone unnoticed. The Malayan Union with its adherence to the principle of jus soli would have meant that the Malays would be reduced to a minority in their own country in record time.
2. The other issue is over the role sultans would play. Removing the sultans completely would not be in the best interest of the Malays. They decided instead on a constitutional monarchy to preserve the Malay and Islamic character of the country’s administration and prevent a complete break from its past. All these would be under threat had they gone ahead with the Malayan Union.
Nawawi’s analysis is crock. Unsupported by the facts and history. He has to do better than spin a conspiracy theory.
Mr Bean - December 6, 2011 at 7:24 pm
An alternate Universe scenario.
The Malayan Union and Gandhi’s “Swaraj” (India’s independence from the British Raj) had things in common. They were created way before the World could accept them. Not then, not since nor in the foreseeable future.. We are essentially Tribal, are we not?
But if it had succeeded, would we be in a mess like this?
The idea was good and cogent and had it been implemented, Race and Religion would no longer been an issue of such divisiveness.
C.L. Familaris - December 6, 2011 at 7:38 pm
Having lived through all six Umno PMs, Nawawi’s exhortations and theory, in spite of the “crock”, are true. The mother of all crooks is of course, Al Kutty. Need I say more?
Tok Cik - December 6, 2011 at 8:33 pm
Nawawi’s exhortations and theory are true?? It is like you say a theory of what really happened. You cannot re-write history with a theory.
Mr Bean - December 6, 2011 at 8:52 pm
Today he writes something you agree — even if it means re-writing history. The next time he may write something you may not agree.
scarlet.pimpernel - December 6, 2011 at 9:08 pm
It doesn’t matter, Bean. So long it’s not Umno-crafted history, I can live with it. What we have today is too many shitty stuff so much so that the truth is lost forever.
Having lived through the troubled era and having seen some of the errors of commission by the ruling elite, we can definitely separate truth from fiction.
Tok Cik - December 6, 2011 at 9:42 pm
Mongkut Bean
To do medicine at a good school would set you back by US$ 50k per semester not per year. Been there and done that.
semper fi - December 6, 2011 at 9:58 pm
Tok Cik, you may want to meet up with Sharizat in a secure and undisclosed location to discuss constitutional law and history. It is only fair to point out that the history she is familiar with is written by western historians who have no vested interests to protect. Since then our school children have been fed with half-truths and distortions of the truth about the role played by UMNO politicians. UMNO may have earned the legitimacy to rule in the early years leading up to independence but has recently lost that legitimacy through misrule.
Mr Bean - December 6, 2011 at 9:59 pm
Touche, Bean…
Tok Cik - December 6, 2011 at 10:06 pm
My bad Semper. She is offered a place and a full scholarship at University of Mississippi. She was toying with law at Harvard but settled for medicine.
Mr Bean - December 6, 2011 at 10:10 pm
Good for her. She will do well compared to the 17A’s SPM scorer who can’t make it past second year. In the US Law and Med are graduate program. Students need to have a first degree. In case they don’t make it they can fall back on their first degree. In Malaysia it’s SPM and straight to Med school. Most Malaysian parents want their kids to do Med and some with 8 or 9A’s insist their children be given scholarship to do Med. Shucks, let the kid decide what he/she wants to do.
semper fi - December 6, 2011 at 11:36 pm
Unfortunately Semper, many parents (having missed the opportunities themselves earlier) seek to live their lives through their children and forget children have minds of their own.
In the US, to go to Law School you will need first to pass high school and have the right score in the SAT, graduate college with a first degree and then sit for the LSAT. Law in the U.K. (like in Malaysia) is an undergrad course and if you want to sit for the State Bar exam in the U.S. you will need to pass your Bar exam in the U.K. a post-grad course equivalent to a Master’s degree.
Our AG Gani Patail would not qualify because he has a third class degree in Law from Malaysia. But more important, he is part of an organization that persecutes his own citizens. That’s a no-no when it comes to admission to the Bar (of any state in the U.S.).
Mr Bean - December 7, 2011 at 1:13 am
The British-Commonwealth system for entry into med school has always been different from the US and Europe.
The minimum requirements for my time in the early-mid 70′s for MU was a min of 2A’s and 2B’s and distinction in General Paper in the Cambridge A-levels/HSC for Nons.. But these were hard to achieve compared to nowadays – in both STPM and GCE A-levels. Some of us got in by default, for achieving those grades – but actually wanted to do something else. We were shunted there because the other half of the quota was made up of matriculated premed Bumis, and were informed that Pure science and Engineering was outta the question. Who were we to argue with the Establishment, esp when our parents couldn’t afford to send us overseas to pursue courses of our choosing? Who knows..? I might even have given Hugh Hefner a run for his money.
Nowadays they have premed in local varsities even in the ‘private’ ones. Premed is the generic term for pre-anesthesia. Yeah, sleep inducing. Our local med students are a bunch misanthropic retards, who have ‘exam’ smarts, little else. So they came up with a brilliant solution – a pre-admission viva voce! Pure b.s. I have wannabe students asking me how to get thru such lie detector tests. No swaet – just tell them you’re the offspring/related to a Titled gentleman or you have the cash to pay up front!
You can bet your bottom ringgit that more than 80% of these clowns are getting into the course becuz their parents told them so. They lack perseverance, empathy and those who come from ‘privileged’ backgrounds don’t give a shit about ‘sickos’. More important is the prefix before their name – that often opens doors to politics or some other unsavory preoccupations.
It seems to me that, the better educated parents are the ones who often let their children decide their career choices. The wealthy, barely literate noveau rich or bourgeoisie, just want buy their kids the Prefix – no matter how retarded they are. The younger generation of Medics, are exactly what our politicos have degenerated into – imbeciles. Of course there are exceptions – and these are the long-suffering ones who have to cover up for the rest of their incompetent colleagues.
And that’s why ROS has deregistered MMA, for dereliction of their own statutes! Professionals? Bah – more like Incompetents.
C.L. Familaris - December 7, 2011 at 1:28 am
RoS deregistered MMA so who’s looking out for the public in case of malpractice? MMC also not effective by approving med schools in distant lands without proper oversight and careful study og the med program. Some of the med schools in Russia and CIS are diploma mills yet JPA together with MMC sends Malaysian students by the hundreds. Royal College in Ireland is now more like Royal College Malaysia as they even have a kampong melayu there.
semper fi - December 7, 2011 at 2:13 am
from the above article, the things that I can deduced are:
(a) the writer does not truly know about 1Malaya history?
as according to Prof.ZKLING??? nie 1Malaya mana penah dijajahi wehh? sapa suruh itu tunku gi UK – melancong ka?
(b) corruption – is another sibling of the malay- bukan Melayu Islam ttpi melayu yang selam cam kapal selam – duk terapung aje?
(c) racist/racism – is another sibling, this one more likely Malay anugerah lah…indeed, in 1Malaya, this so called rampant idea has been broadcasted to the whole 1Malaya.
Better stil, just change this 1Malaya to 1CorruptRacist Malaya!
malaun - December 7, 2011 at 10:05 am
I think the writer should give more credit to Tunku abdul Rahman. He is portrayed as an incapable leader. The political landscape and economic demand is not as we have today and his action and goal had nevertheless been for the interest of the rakyat. Come on compare him to Najib Razak, I vote Tunku anytime.
starlight - December 8, 2011 at 12:48 am