Food Fears Return
May 9, 2011
Food Fears Return
by Jomo Kwame Sundaram*
Lack of food is rarely the reason that people go hungry. The world today produces enough food to feed everyone. The problem is that more and more people simply cannot afford to buy the food they need. Even before the recent food-price increases, a billion people were suffering from chronic hunger, while another two billion were experiencing malnutrition, bringing the total number of food-insecure people to around three billion, or almost half the world’s population.
Global food prices are at the highest level since the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) started monitoring them in 1990. The World Bank estimates that recent food-price increases have driven an additional 44 million people in developing countries into poverty.
The rapid rise in world prices for all basic food crops – corn, wheat, soybeans, and rice – along
with other foods like cooking oils, has been devastating for poor households all over the world. But almost everybody’s standard of living has been reduced.
Middle-class people are increasingly careful about their food purchases; the near-poor are losing headway and falling below, rather than staying above, the poverty line; and the poor and vulnerable, not surprisingly, are suffering even more.
Food production increased greatly with the quest for food security and the Green Revolution from the 1960’s to the 1980’s, owing to considerable government and international not-for-profit support. But agricultural experts have warned of the risks of the flagging efforts to boost food output since the 1980’s.
As food-supply growth has slowed, demand has continued to rise, owing not only to population increase, but also for reasons such as growing use of food crops to sustain livestock. The problem is exacerbated by the significant drop in official development assistance for agricultural development in developing countries. Aid for agriculture fell by more than half in the quarter-century after 1980, as the World Bank cut agricultural lending from $7.7 billion in 1980 to $2 billion in 2004.
With cuts continuing, agricultural research and development – needed to improve crop productivity – has fallen for all crops in all developing countries. Meanwhile, in the private sector,agribusinesses spend much more on research than all public agricultural research institutes together.
Developing-country governments also stopped subsidizing farmers or being involved in food marketing, storage, transportation, or credit provision. Meanwhile, rich countries continue to subsidize and protect their farmers, thereby undermining food production in developing countries.
The World Bank and the World Trade Organization still insist that further agricultural trade liberalization is the best medium-term solution. Since the 1980’s, governments have been pressed to promote exports to earn foreign exchange and import food. As a result, many poor countries have turned to the world market to buy cheap rice and wheat, instead of growing their own. Some countries and regions that were previously self-sufficient in food now import large quantities of it. This drives up food prices, causing even more anguish for the world’s poorest people.
Other factors have contributed to the food crisis. Climate changes resulting from greenhouse-gas emissions exacerbate water-supply problems, accelerate desertification and water stress, and worsen the unpredictability and severity of weather events, all of which adversely affect agriculture in much of the world. Deforestation, growing population pressure, urbanization, soil erosion, over-fishing, and the impact of foreign domination over marketing, inputs, processing, and even farming also play a role.
Increased oil prices are also affecting the price of food. Commercial agriculture uses petroleum, oil, and gas to operate machinery, transport goods, and produce agro-chemicals needed for fertilizers and pesticides.
Moreover, food crops are being grown to produce bio-fuels, reducing their availability for
human consumption. Rich countries have provided generous subsidies and other incentives for increased bio-fuel production, while poorer countries encouraging bio-fuel production have provided far fewer market-distorting incentives to farmers.
Certainly, some bio-fuels are far more cost-effective and energy-efficient than others, while different bio-fuel stocks have very different opportunity costs (for example, sugar has not experienced any significant price increase). Hence, the debate over bio-fuels needs to be far more nuanced.
Speculation and hoarding have also been contributing to food-price spikes. More securitization, easier online trading, and other financial-market developments in recent years have facilitated greater speculative investments, especially in commodity futures and options markets.
As the financial crisis deepened and spread from late 2007, speculators began investing in commodities, and the dollar’s decline relative to other currencies has also induced such investments. Indeed, this may explain recent food-price surges better than the factors underlying longer-term gradual upward price trends.
In that case, the problem that many people around the world are facing today is one of food security, not a lack of food. Of course, if you are hungry or undernourished today as a result of food-price increases, that is a distinction without a difference.
Jomo Kwame Sundaram is United Nations Assistant Secretary-General for Economic Development.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2011.
www.project-syndicate.org
Donplaypuks,
There are millions of people in the world who are dying from malnutrition and hunger. I have been to some parts of our country and have seen undernourished rural kids with bloated stomachs. What is the future for these young people? Do policy makers care about them? I wonder. They are too busy playing politics to bother.
Prof. Jomo, a former University of Malaya don and top Malaysian Economist with the United Nations, has highlighted the severity of the food problem and raises concerns about food security.–Din Merican
dinobeano - May 9, 2011 at 10:38 pm
Din Merican
Have you read Rocky’s blog on why do you hate Abu Kassim.It invited so many nasty comments about you and your wife. Looks like some of them know you and you are not well-liked. Don’t know who to believe. This is the second time Rocky wrote about you and drew so many anti-Din comments. What say you?
__________
Guna, not to worry. I know who I am and what I am. I write on the basis of facts. Go to Din Merican’s Welcome where I fully explain the purpose of my blog and what I expect of people who comment on my blog. I can’t do much about the anti-Din types. It is natural in this world to have friends and enemies. Even our Prime Minister has more than his share of detractors and supporters. If he were to worry about them and attempts to respond, he will have no time left to lead and govern our country.
Rocky Bru does not really know me. We met when I started to blog in 2007. He is neither my classmate nor colleague at work. I am 72 years old. He is at least 2 decades younger than I. I leave it at that. You have a choice: to believe or not what he writes about me. It is your call, my man. My life goes on.–Din Merican
Gunaratnam - May 10, 2011 at 8:21 am
I twice wrote to the Malaysian Agricultural Minster, Datuk Seri Noh Omar telling him about food shortage and accompanied by a proposal which I call ‘community farming’ (the first letter was published in The Star and NST). He did reply but he’s just wasn’t interested in my proposal and prefer instead to import them rather than growing them ourselves.
Best regards.
HAK
Hussaini Abdul Karim - May 10, 2011 at 8:54 am
Guna, if I were RockyBru, I would be more interested to find out, why he didn’t even question the corrupt CM of Sarawak and Abu Kassim is not into this matter of public interest. I have been reliably inform that Rocky and gang were engaged in Sarawak Election supporting Sarawak CM.
It is wrong to say Din hated Abu Kassim. He merely stated facts of someone of high public trust and responsibility in a wellness center. Just like the AG, he too decided to remain silent!! SOP??
Drinthehouse - May 10, 2011 at 9:54 am
We can never please everybody in this world, but we must always endeavour to have a clear conscience to lead our live. I always believe that righteousness will triumph over evil. May God bless those who live their life with a clear conscience.
On the food shortage and rising price of food, the politicians are well fed, and all they worried is their own survival and power struggle. They have very little time to care much about the well beings of the nation, other than politiking on it if need be. SO we have to work and fight for our own survival, and do not rely on our leaders to fend for our well being.
concerned citizen - May 10, 2011 at 10:37 am
Noam Chomsky said
“To live a life of honesty and integrity is a responsibility of every decent person”
Aung San Suu Kyi also said that people of integrity are at peace with themselves.
Phua Kai Lit - May 10, 2011 at 11:36 am
Din is better off comparing himself to Anwar.
He has been accused of everything under the sun.
Yet he still stands tall.
My hair stands on end when I read the comments on Rocky’s blog.
Gunaratnam - May 10, 2011 at 12:33 pm
Guna,
UMNO bloggers can make up baseless stories. I’m sure their followers can too. It’s part and parcel of being imbeciles. Playing holier-than-thou role while spreading lies and hate? That’s not very Islamic is it? Under the guise of anonymity on the internet, anybody can say anything even without presenting any strong evidence. I can also accuse anybody of doing something and there will be people bound to believe that story.
didi - May 10, 2011 at 12:38 pm
It’s funny how some on Rocky’s blog accuse Dato’ of being a w***re (sorry Dato’ can’t find a better word) for selling himself to the highest bidder yet they are commenting on Rocky’s blog. I just laugh at the irony. Oh never mind. Haters will just be haters.
didi - May 10, 2011 at 12:44 pm
Didi
That’s what I meant. The commentators seem like Din and wife’s friends. They seem to know everything about them.Some are very graphic.
Gunaratnam - May 10, 2011 at 1:50 pm
Guna,
Yeah they seemed to know so much about the people they hate. I think they are probably sleeping under their beds. Creepy…
didi - May 10, 2011 at 1:54 pm
Guna,
They seem to do that even to a Minister like Rais Yatim. They are caught in a circle of lies; they really do not know me or for that matter my wife . I don’t socialize with them.
I would rather spend my time reading a good book and evaluating it. The graphic stuff is figment of his imagination. I want to provoke me. No, I will not be drawn into Rockybru’s political game.–Din Merican
dinobeano - May 10, 2011 at 2:01 pm
I’ve always wonder why anyone would like to read or indulge in gossip about other people’s lives, when they can’t sort out their own.
It must be fallen Man’s unquenchable thirst to beggar and bugger their neighbor.
I have never read rocky’s rants nor barking magpie etc, and i shan’t ever.
It’s called choice, self integrity and conscience.
Discussing substantive issues and being partisan to facts are principles and cannot to be bought and sold as emotive-subjective commerce.
Now you know why Metro Harian and tabloid trash outsells the Economist and AWSJ, by a factor of a zillion to one.
Meanwhile, it’s good that some of you are watching the ‘Enemy’.
C.L. Familiaris - May 10, 2011 at 2:16 pm
CLFamiliaris
When they are editors of trash tabloids they can only write such trashy articles. They can’t write a well researched or an intelligent news article but have to resort to gossips to sell their wares. It reflects on the schools of journalism in Malaysia and their personal integrity in indulging in such journalism.
semper fi - May 10, 2011 at 10:08 pm