Din Merican: the Malaysian DJ Blogger
The desire to write grows with writing–Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus

Zaid Ibrahim fumbles on PKR, says Netto

October 21, 2010

Zaid Ibrahim fumbles on PKR, says Terence Netto

COMMENT: This column has espoused the view that the contest for the deputy presidency of PKR is a bridge that’s being crossed too early and that the current choice is a false one.

All that is academic now that the race is off to a start, and all eyes are focused on the outcome of this unique exercise in direct voting of a political party’s principal office-bearers.

But the latest bloviations of Zaid Ibrahim, one of three contestants for the No 2 slot, serve to underscore the contest’s presumption more than its factiousness.

Speaking like he has just emerged from long hibernation, Zaid said in a blog posting (below) that securing justice for Anwar Ibrahim has become the sole struggle of PKR and that it was “unworthy” for it to become a “one-issue party”.

Zaid’s candidacy for the No 2 post was from the start a protest of Anwar’s stultifying control of PKR. But Zaid is fumbling badly with the arguments around which to configure his opposition to that control.

Anwar’s legal problems are emblematic of the UMNO-imposed flaws in our polity. Liberation from those flaws must mean emancipation for our politics and society.  That lawyer Zaid misses this salient point is plenty troubling.

Judiciary used to remove political rival

His contention that Anwar has the best legal team and presumably on those grounds is adequately protected recalls a similar observation in the mid-1970s by former Lord President Suffian Hashim who denounced Harun Idris from the bench, saying that the impugned Selangor menteri besar had no reason to fear due process because he had the best lawyer in town.

Arraigned for corruption, the popular Harun, fast emerging as rival for power in UMNO, was defended by RR Chelliah, arguably the best trial lawyer in town then.

Suffian was credulous about the motive behind the indictment of Harun, an early instance, albeit more genteel, of the misuse of the judicial process to remove a rival for power in UMNO.

Thirteen years later when Salleh Abbas was removed as Lord President, in comparable circumstances of peril to the UMNO supremo, the now-retired Suffian’s publicly expressed dismay was like the regrets of the owner who bolts the barn after the horses had fled the stable.

Zaid Ibrahim’s latest arguments are not calculated to encourage his auditors to be persuaded by the merits of his case that the hand Anwar wields smothers rather than sustains PKR.

Zaid Ibrahim: Empowering PKR

KeADILan needs to be molded into a genuine political force, one that the Rakyat and our coalition partners can rely on to forge a better future. This election is about the future of the party and the nation. But we need to fix ourselves before we can even think about fixing the nation. We need to position ourselves to be leaders in Pakatan Rakyat, to provide a genuine platform for the public and steer the coalition towards winning GE13. Our coalition partners deserve better from us.

Whilst we need to secure justice for Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim, there are so many more injustices facing the people of this nation that require our attention. The people are clamouring for economic and social justice and the right to be treated with respect and dignity in accordance with the rule of law. It is unworthy of us to reduce this party as a one-issue party. It is unworthy for those we seek to represent. We are not merely the party of reformasi, but also of reform. My interest is in that future. But this election isn’t about positions and power play. It isn’t about who is next. It is about what is next.

Pemilihan 2010 is both a first for our country and for our party. Every member has a vote, and every vote counts. For the first time in history, the party can choose to elect its leaders on principles and not just on blind loyalty. The party can decide on a candidate based entirely on his or her contributions and commitment.

I believe that our party members are mature enough to evaluate the existing leaders for themselves. I leave my proposal and vision to their judgement because I am confident that this is the way towards real change in our Government.

 I am thankful and grateful for the confidence and support shown by members and party branches through their nominations. It is, after all, for them that I have stood up and spoken out. I do not seek this position for glory. I do it because of the challenges it brings. I do it because of the hard work that still remains. While other candidates harp on their ability to protect Anwar, I believe he has mustered the best legal team to protect him. I, too, care about him and his family, but above all, it is the struggle and interests of the people that is paramount. And I know that the party members will be able to make that distinction.

 The future of Malaysia is inextricably intertwined with the future of our party. We have to stay on course. The people have chosen to trust us. And so, I humbly ask for your faith that we may work together in reclaiming our party’s ideals at this defining moment in history.

Nine Points on How to Revitalise the Party and the Country

–(1) We need to reinvigorate our grassroots. For the success of a political party needs to be measured by its grassroots activities. Our branches are made up of eager and committed individuals but sadly lack the vitality and dynamism due to lack of finances. I am in a position to find solutions in order to enable a more efficient and effective political machinery to support these leaders and their good work. It is crucial that the Cabangs are more energetic and engaged in the party process. It is crucial for party activities to reflect the enthusiasm and drive of the branch leaders. I will encourage membership recruitment; although quality and committed members are more important than numbers. We must discard those who have left the party at heart but merely keep their names on the register. We will actively outline the party’s struggle to maintain focus instead of merely dwelling on the same old issues.

–(2) We must empower our party stalwarts through further democratisation, irrespective of their position. We need to move away from feudalistic politics, we need to decentralise and empower the party branches and state level committees. Those who are closest to the issues and are best equipped to address them. We can no longer afford to assume that the central leadership knows everything. I will work with party members at every level to develop just and sustainable policies for better management.

–(3) We need to extend our membership to those who are able and willing to contribute, without discrimination. The party needs to be more inclusive. Many former members who have been marginalised, or disillusioned, or have just lost interest, need to be welcomed back to the fold. We need to identify members who are capable, to give them the opportunity to take on bigger responsibilities and roles. For we are only as credible as the leaders we put up. They need to be selected based on the most rigorous of standards. They need to be a reflection of the communities they represent. The Sabahans, for example, should be allowed to elect their own chiefs. As should the Sarawakians.

–(4) We need to strive to be the multiracial and multi-religious party that this country needs. That will be our strength. We need to unite members from every colour and creed in this country. That will be a stark contrast to the ruling coalition which has failed to unite the nation after 53 years. We need to seize this opportunity, to demonstrate that we can unite the entire country. I will work tirelessly to extinguish prejudice and suspicion between the various groups, races, and religions.

–(5) We need to move past the divide and rule policy as practised by the present ruling party. It is neither healthy, nor progressive. As a progressive political party, KeADILan can transcend the boundaries of race, religion, and culture in the context of the existing Constitution. This diversity is our strength.  I will promote a model for a political party that is more transparent and democratic. We cannot sap our energies operating in different groups — East Malaysians versus West Malaysians, reformists versus Islamists, Anwaristas and Socialists versus everyone else.

–(6) We need to be consistent in what we say and do. Leaders in both PKR and Pakatan Rakyat must always place the nation’s interest above all else. There needs to be a consensus on what we stand for as a group. As the PR coordinator, I am able to serve this well.

–(7) We need to be clear on where we stand on the rights and liberties of our citizens. We must champion the plight of all Malaysians. I believe that the party should defend the Federal Constitution and seek justice for every ethnic group without fear of being accused of neglecting our own race.

–(8) I will make sure our prize asset, Selangor, will remain strong and free of infighting. I will ensure that Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim will be given all the support needed to achieve electoral success and accelerate developmental activities so that the people will retain PKR and Pakatan Rakyat in Selangor.

–(9) We must, as the opposition, fulfil our central role of providing checks and balances to the current administration. Our primary role is to keep the government of the day accountable. And we can only do so if we convince our rakyat that we have capable leaders in the party. To achieve that, I shall appoint only the best and the brightest to aid us and our Parliamentarians — members of the public, intellectuals, technocrats, people with the ability and the know-how to best aid us. I shall create a formal platform to engage the population. To govern in consultation with the electorate.

Advertisement

17 Responses to “Zaid Ibrahim fumbles on PKR, says Netto”

  1. I think Zaid is spot on. He is not fumbling, PKR is more than just Anwar or a struggle to vindicate him. Its about Malaysia and its future.

  2. Sabah Sifu,
    Fumbling not the right choice. Remember Din has issues with Khalid, likewise Zaid too. Actually, come to think about it, the headline where Zaid said that Anwar is “unworthy” for the next struggle of PKR. You can blame for misinterpretation. However, I expect Zaid to perform better….There are many things to articulate your views.
    Zaid can play the role of Rajaratnam. The Thinker/the drummer. Lets he demonstrate the leadership ability. Rajaratnam too has difference of opinions with top leaders….And yet

  3. Perhaps there are many things that I need to articulate, but as it is now there are three in a race. To me there are only 2 possible choices between the 2 I have to make my choice. And I think you know where I stand.

  4. Zaid to perform better??

    The problem with PKR is not personalities. If Anwar had formed PKR as an all Malay party it would have been better for the country. As a multi-racial party in the current political climate, it will never work.

  5. What happen to your blog Bro. Din?

    Tahan lama 1-3 jam. Losyen sapu. Isteri puas. Dijamin. RM67.00

    Zaid to perform better??

    And this by Mr Bean – October 21, 2010 at 2:15 am
    http://dinmerican.wordpress.com/2010/10/20/new-culture-and-political-model-for-umno-open-and-inclusive/

  6. “ … securing justice for Anwar Ibrahim has become the sole struggle of PKR and that it was “unworthy” for it to become a “one-issue party”.

    There are times in the life of any political party when a political make-over would be the only way to remain viable and politically relevant. Perhaps for PKR the time is now. But sadly this is being window dressed as an issue which in the end would prove divisive. The party may not survive a major leadership crisis so early.

  7. G-spot politics, anybody??

  8. The real problem is that they are all at one time “BELONGED” to a PARTY before!

    They were trained and educated in such a manner!
    Brainwashed & propagated, you name it!
    Their die hard ways are real HARD to rid off!
    They still carry the same attitude!
    They are blinded by POWER & Positions!
    The bigger picture is LOST forever and ever!
    Unless they change their MINDSET and say we want to change this country into a better PLACE!
    PKR is just another political party in this country.

    MONEY = Power = Everything!
    The most difficult and frightening is = there are some TROJAN HORSES AS WELL!
    Most of all nobody really knows who and where they are actually!
    Planted agents, double agents and triple agents !
    ALL WORKING FOR LOTS OF MONEY !
    MY DEAR FRIENDS …..MONEY MAKES THE WORLD MOVE!
    Lest they are ANGELS!
    Devils disguise as ANGEL’s are aplenty!

    We shall see one fine day….as I have always say, the day will eventually and finally COME!

  9. Sabah Sifu,
    Me know where you stand. You know where me stand? Hehehe….To beat Azmin, Zaid must demonstrate himself as a leader that rises above all. The recent comment does not look on him. It’s nothing to do with Anwar Ibrahim being untouchable.

    Sabah Sifu,
    Ku Li’s Semangat 46 lost the race because of Kadazan headgear. LKS lost the race to grab Penang state government because of Robocop image. Ah so, if Zaid does not realise the danger….ahem…..
    DP post is actually de facto pares inter primus. First question to Zaid……When all the election ends, If Zaid win, how to pull ranka among those who fall from grace.
    Azmin has said that Zaid was promised a role to play. Now, to Zaid, so how now?

  10. It’s always about ‘I ‘ when Zaid talks. That has always been even when in UMNO. Yes Zaid, you will ensure……

  11. If Azmin said Zaid was promised a role to play, Zaid can also say he will give Azmin a toy to play.

    But both of you must tell Mongkut where the G spot, for him and voters to play.

  12. “..a protest of Anwar’s stultifying control of PKR.”
    Yessir, most assuredly. Could it have been otherwise?
    Angels or demons, i don’t know, but whoever enters the fray must be able to withstand the horse-shit and blowflies. Since i don’t belong to any political party, just rabidly anti Be-End – i’ll just state my piece and get outta here before the ejaculates smudge me:

    My preference would be Azmin, for no other reason than he’s faithful to Cicero (Anwar), but as nepostic and tough as they come. Zaid will have to wait for a turn, if not an aeon. How about the national treasurers post, so he can top up what’s lacking?

  13. a not so smart deputy perkins would be a better solution for pkr for the time being. Muhidin fits the bill , the only difference he is in umno. If zahid is serious in wanting reforms then he should refrain from seeking party positions but rather play a more nuetral role and by doing so ,elevate himself beyond politics. Azmin is a mere self serving politician no better than bung mukthar . Zahid a reformist as he claims to be should not stoop so low by going after a post craved by this guy

  14. Why didn`t Zaid articulate these actions/stand when in BN. He just joined PKR and immediately want to really change it from Top to Bottom. A political party take time to mature. People come , people go. it doesn`t matter who is head of PKR. BN will try all means to blacken him or her. Today Anuar tommorrow Nurrul or Azim or Zaid. Millions and millions are being spent to woe PKR people from top to bottom. It is amazing. What if the top leadership in PKR just defect to BN and leave to an untimely death. They must be careful who they choose as leaders now. Don`t repeat the bad choice of people for State and Parliment seats last GE. I`m for Anuar in this issue.

  15. Wow so many mind readers here. Madame Zelda and gang led by Netto seem to have a field day.

  16. Dear blogger,

    Reading through Zaid’s letter of appeal to PKR members for votes, nothing wrongis found in it. The use of “I” throughout is understandable because until he is elected to the office he sought he cannot yet carry “we” syndrome.

    On the issue of PKR has become “Anwar defence issue” it is correct and agreeable that the party which will be facing a GE13 should get itself instead into a shifted gear and become a party of many issues which our nation has myriad of them.

    In your insinuation you are tasking Zaid more than what is currently needed. You say that Zaid’s statement to party voters might distract from the issue of defending Anwar. And you translated defending Anwar to defending against all the abuses, the uses of public offices and state instruments and apparatus mustered against its political opponent., (which I would add) against abuses of power, corruption in high places, extravagant expenditures out of public purse, the latter of which we have seen examples in the submarines, jet fighter aircrafts, the marine bases when this Nation is not fighting any war, and now the crazy 100 tower at the traffic-crazy Kuala Lumpur centre that this nation can ill affords, especially at the time when Sarawak and Sabah make more demands, rightly, for better roads, more amenities, and better services to the people especially education and scholarships. jobs in civil and diplomatic services and GLCs, opportunities in the timber, mining, land development and survey of native lands,and more to the Dayaks who have been left behind (for 50 years since Merdeka di anak-tirikan: the above list is just only a small part. I agree that. However here is a catch 22 situation.

    But it is preferable that PKR and its partners in PR focussed at GE13 by getting the party ready to be seen to be a party for all peoples.

    In short only if won GE13 can it be better positioned to change all those abuses.

    And it can defend Anwar even better. Also by then, if what is said by Anwar that his SODOMY II is politically orchestrated but otherwise is without any basis, the system will have to be changed. And those who have abused the court process for political ends should be brought to justice, and including all those who have amassed huge wealth out of their elected offices. These vices should be got rid off.

    So I say, in this, if PKR to be a one-issue party – of Anwar defence, it would not be able to address to the Nation at large. For this reason I agree with Zaid in his statement to party’s voters. After all it is Zaid is to face an election for a party position soon, and good luck be unto him. Anyway open system of voting is surely reliable to bring about the correct choice: PKR will make the choice, the best of it.

    If Zaid wins his tenure will see PKR through the next GE13 only. Within his tenure of office he can address using “we”, not now yet. And after that another person maybe elected. In open election for party offices there is no chance of bribery will work. Hence anyone in the top spot of the party will last only until the next party’s election. And so there is no chance of a president for life scenario. This will be the proof whereof democracy at works is good for this Nation.

  17. Din, i like this caption from Zaid

    “We must, as the opposition, fulfil our central role of providing checks and balances to the current administration. Our primary role is to keep the government of the day accountable.”

    How can you lead government when your mentality still as opposition? Appear that he need to leapfrog his mind.

    Cheers, Harrun


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 208 other followers