May 24, 2010
AsiaOne
PRIME MINISTER LEE HSIEN LOONG’S EULOGY FOR DR GOH KENG SWEE
May 23, 2010
The Family of the late Dr Goh Keng Swee
Mr President
Distinguished Guests
Friends and Fellow Singaporeans
May I, on behalf of the government and people of Singapore, convey our deepest condolences to Mrs Goh and the family of the late Dr Goh Keng Swee on his passing at the age of 91.
Great leaders shape and influence the course of events through their actions and ideas. Singapore is a small country with a short history. But we too have had giants in our midst – men who have turned the tide for Singapore, and created a successful nation against the odds.
Dr Goh was one of our nation’s founding fathers. In our formative years, he dealt with the most pressing problems of the day. But more importantly, he introduced sweeping initiatives that set the basis for the country’s long-term prosperity and security. Without him, much of today’s Singapore would not exist.
Dr Goh was a nationalist and a strong advocate for independence from British rule. After earning his PhD in England, he worked for a few years in the social welfare department, while supporting the People’s Action Party (PAP) from behind the scenes. In 1959, Singapore won self-governing status from the British, and general elections were held. Dr Goh resigned as a civil servant to contest as a PAP candidate. When the PAP won, Dr Goh became our first Finance Minister.
Dr Goh soon discovered that the government was almost broke, and expected a budget deficit of $14 million
that year. Prudent and thrifty by nature, Dr Goh immediately introduced drastic measures to cut spending, including cutting civil service salaries. This was obviously unpopular, but Dr Goh stood firm. When he delivered the Budget at the end of the year, he proudly declared that the government had achieved a small surplus of $1 million. He had drafted the speech personally, after secluding himself on the remote island of Raffles Lighthouse to concentrate on the task. Dr Goh set the tone for the PAP government, which ever since has steadfastly upheld budget discipline and fiscal prudence.
Dr Goh next turned his attention to jump-starting the stagnant economy. He decided on a strategy of rapid industrial’isation, attracting investments from MNCs to create jobs and exports. This was a radical and untested approach. It was contrary to the conventional wisdom then, that poor countries could achieve economic development through import substitution, and that MNCs were new colonial powers out to exploit impoverished workers in the Third World.
Key to the industrialisation programme was an ambitious project to transform the swamps of Jurong into a modern industrial estate. Dr Goh saw this as “an act of faith in the people of Singapore”. He and his friend Mr Hon Sui Sen, then Chairman of the Economic Development Board, set out to develop Jurong with energy and determination.
The strategy did not work immediately. Investors were put off by the instability and mayhem created by the Communists and their sympathisers. There were more troubles after Singapore joined Malaysia, and the federal government in Kuala Lumpur controlled the award of Pioneer Certificates (for tax holidays) to investors. Not a single application for Pioneer Certificates was approved during this period. Given these problems, Jurong made little progress. Cynics mocked the venture, calling it “Goh’s Folly”.
But after independence we left these problems behind. The industrialisation strategy proved its worth, and Jurong industrial estate took off. By 1968, almost 300 factories operated in Jurong, employing 21,000 workers. Today, the Jurong project has far outgrown its geographical boundaries. Jurong Town Corporation was renamed JTC Corporation, because it was managing industrial estates all over Singapore, not just in Jurong. JTC Corporation has also spun off commercial arms, like Ascendas and JTC International, which have planned and built industrial parks and townships in many Asian countries. These successes have won Singapore an international reputation as a first class infrastructure provider.
Dr Goh pioneered many other economic institutions. He helped create the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), where he laid out the policies that produced a stable Singapore Dollar and preserved the purchasing power of Singaporeans, not least their CPF savings. Years after Dr Goh retired, I served as Chairman of MAS. My task was to revise and update MAS’ policies, many of which traced back to Dr Goh. We changed course very cautiously, always mindful of the good reasons and careful analysis that underpinned the original policies. For example, Dr Goh firmly opposed allowing market players free rein to speculate on the Singapore dollar, say by borrowing Singapore dollars in order to short the currency. Our small, open economy depended too much on a stable exchange rate. MAS applied a very strict policy, famously known as “the non-internationalisation of the Singapore dollar”. By the late 1990s, we needed to relax these restrictions, in order to grow the fund management industry in Singapore. We did so in careful, incremental steps, over several years, loosening the implementation but never giving up the principle.
Beyond economics, Dr Goh helped to steer our nation through its difficult birth. His was often a backroom role, developing strategies and arguments to counter first the communists and then the communalists. But his robust attitude encouraged the whole team to press on against seemingly unwinnable odds, eventually to prevail and create today’s Singapore.
Once Singapore became independent, we faced a pressing need to develop a defence capability and safeguard ourselves in a dangerous world. Although Dr Goh initially knew little about military matters, he took on the heavy responsibility as our first Defence Minister, and built up the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) from scratch.
Dr Goh took a personal interest in all aspects of the SAF. No detail was too small for him. I once followed him to visit a field engineer defence exercise. We passed one site where the troops were digging a large bunker. It was a hive of activity: all the soldiers swarming over the work site, hard at work. This did not escape Dr Goh’s practised eye. He commented that the soldiers should have been divided up into shifts – one third working, one third resting, and one third on guard. They should not all be working at once, and especially not to impress the minister.
Dr Goh understood that what counted most to the SAF was ability and talent. The SAF needed commanders and staff officers with the leadership qualities, intellectual abilities and professional competence to build and operate a modern, high-tech defence force. He created Project Wrangler, a talent management scheme overseen personally by the Minister, to identify promising officers, and systematically track, groom and advance them to key command and staff appointments. He introduced the SAF Scholarship scheme to induct top talent into the SAF. But he did not forget the older officers, mostly non-graduates, who had got the SAF off the ground: so he implemented a programme to enable deserving ones among them to study for Master’s degrees at Duke University in military history and strategy. This is why today we have a cadre of capable and committed SAF leaders who understand defence technology, appreciate the strategic context, and can make sound decisions on and off the battlefield to ensure Singapore’s security. Without such a team, we could not have built up, nor could we operate the 3G SAF, a professional and credible deterrent force respected alike by Singaporeans, partners and other armed forces in Asia and around the world.
I was in the first batch of SAF Scholars. Dr Goh took a special interest in us, and met us before we left for our overseas studies. He presented us each with two military classics: Sun Tzu’s Art of War and Liddell Hart’s Strategy: The Indirect Approach. He had specially ordered the books, and inscribed them to each of the young second lieutenants, “wishing you a successful military career”. Dr Goh’s gesture showed both his grasp of strategy and security issues, as well as his keen interest in nurturing talent for the SAF.
Dr Goh’s last ministry was education. Here too he introduced major reforms, leaving his imprint on a fundamentally changed education system. His approach was systematic, analytical, and results oriented. Today, nearly every student completes secondary education, masters both English and a mother tongue, and attains standards of mathematics and science that are among the highest in any country. As in so many other areas, Dr Goh’s work laid the foundation on which his successors have built, to reach greater heights.
With a creative mind and wide-ranging interests, Dr Goh had a tremendous zest for life and work. He would come up with new ideas every day for the civil servants to study and implement. Submissions to him frequently came back covered with corrections, to polish the language and sharpen the arguments, or sometimes demolish them. Many young officers benefited from his guidance. Their careers and lives were changed by their interaction with Dr Goh, who more than once intervened at critical points to overcome an obstacle or to guide them in the right direction. They included President S R Nathan, Mr Goh Chok Tong, Mr Wong Kan Seng, Mr Mah Bow Tan, and Mr S Dhanabalan, as well as Permanent Secretaries like Ngiam Tong Dow, Lim Siong Guan, Philip Yeo, and Joe Pillay, and many others.
Dr Goh was a hard task-master but also a teacher and mentor. He recognised good work, and would back officers who had done well. He promoted and appointed people on merit, disregarding seniority in order to get the job done. He would fight for their promotions, which were not always within his dispensation because he needed to persuade the Public Service Commission. He would stand up for them publicly. I remember when I resigned from the SAF to enter politics, an opposition MP filed a Parliamentary question which was obviously targeted at me. Dr Goh was then no longer the Minister for Defence, but he nevertheless rose in Parliament to defend me, and the integrity of MINDEF’s personnel and promotion system, in his usual robust style. Many other officers who served him had similar experiences.
Dr Goh also had a fun side to him. In MINDEF, he became frustrated that directives from headquarters to the units were having so little effect. As an experiment, he ordered a directive issued to all units that comprised nothing but the Bible passage on Noah’s Ark. The directive made its way through the organisation – some units simply passed it on to their subordinate units for implementation, others filed it for reference, and only one person asked what it was for. Dr Goh wrote up the results into a paper, which he entitled “Noah’s Ark Progresses through the SAF”.
Dr Goh’s writings and speeches reflected his depth of thinking and broad range of reference. He published three volumes – The Practice of Economic Growth, The Economics of Modernization, and The Wealth of East Asian Nations. Many of the pieces are gems that remain well worth reading today, decades later. Those wishing to learn about economic management and governance in modern Singapore will gain much from studying them.
A whole generation of Singaporeans has grown up enjoying the fruits of growth and prosperity, because one of our ablest sons decided to fight for Singapore’s independence, progress and future. Instead of pursuing a private career, Dr Goh chose to serve the larger good, and stayed in public service for more than 25 years.
Thousands have paid their last respects to Dr Goh this last week, in gratitude for what he had done for Singapore, and often personally to themselves. The media have reported a few of their stories – the old lady who was visited by Dr Goh when the family was very poor; another lady whom Dr Goh had come across as a little girl weeping in school, and had comforted; the young navy officer who reported to Dr Goh after making a grave mistake, but was forgiven because he owned up. These personal gestures and kindnesses reflected Dr Goh’s character and compassion, which underpinned his enormous contributions to Singapore.
Singapore is forever indebted to Dr Goh Keng Swee.
Mr Merican
Please write about the agreement reached between Malaysia and Singapore on KTM, Water and CIQ.
din merican .. thank you very much for these 3 eulogies from His Excellency The President of Singapore , from Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and from The Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong , paying tribute to DR Goh Keng Swee upon his passing on.
Together they not only make excellent reading , but they also represent a ” first hand ” testament on what a great man Dr Goh Keng Swee was for Singapore.
I am sure you will agree with me when i say that the father of racism should read these tributes . HEREIN IS WHAT REPRESENTS A STATESMAN . I for one don’t think crooks and petty thieves who made it as prime minister, WOULD EVER GET AN EULOGY SIMILAR TO ANYONE OF THE THREE YOU HAVE REPRODUCED HERE . EULOGIES LIKE THESE THREE , ARE ONLY FOR GENUINE AND SELFLESS LEADERS . DR MAHATHIR DOES NOT QUALIFY NOR DOES HE HAVE THE CUT.
may Dr. Goh’s soul be blessed.
A true public servant and patriot.
Phua,
There are plenty of “Malaysians” we have lost to Singapore. Come to think of it, consider me in as well. Where to find the present Chief Justice of Singapore, Chan Sek Keong, Ipoh born, schooled in Anderson, Ipoh, ended in Singapore.
How I wish if that Chief Justice of Singapore, Chan Sek keong become Malaysia Lord President
Hi looes74,
Can we picture a day when (presumably after a regime change here in Malaysia) there will be an economic union between Malaysia and Singapore? An economic union to the benefit of all.
And no more Dr M-style “shit stirring” that strains relationships between the two countries.
I have to say that I am not exactly a fan of the PAP. It has lost its early Fabian socialist ideals and is now run by an elite of Thorstein Veblen-style “engineers” (actually, engineers, economists and former military brass with First Class Honours) who pursue economic rationality at the expense of the non-economic welfare of its people. Literally fulfilling Max Weber’s warnings about the “iron cage of rationality”. For that reason, a regime change in Singapore is probably good for its masses too.
The extraordinary thing about Singapore is the superb quality of its political leadership. The Ministers, gifted with high intellect, think and plan long-term, work extremely hard to take care of the needs of the people for now and the future. They are selfless and are as white as their party attire. All the tribute goes to LKY for grooming such a talented successive leadeship – a process that is set to be ongoing.
The only Malaysian leader, I can think of having come near matching the quality of leaders in Singapore, is Dr Mahathir. Intellectually gifted with authoritarian streaks, he gave his everything for Malaysia as PM. He achieved more for the country economically than any other PM that Malaysia has seen. Tengku was good no doubt but he faced a relatively favourable political and economic environment. Dr Mahathir’s era was the opposite with global financial crisis and enormous challenges. My only regret is that he had made several fundamental mistakes that have subverted the character of major institutions of the nation and he is not acknowledging them.
The eulogies for Dr Goh Keng Swee are appropriate and well appreciated. What is the stature of LKY? I have a nagging feeling that when the turn of LKY comes, some of the world leaders, including those from US, UK and China would fly down to pay personal tributes to this great man. May God bless him with a long and healthy life.
It surprises me that LHL did not mutter a word at the demise of JR. So typically Asian.
Das,
Spare me on Mahathir. Mahathir is nothing as compared to these leaders. Mahathir can’t even come close to Tengku Razaleigh. If Tengku Razaleigh were the PM, Malaysia would have been different.
Das,
To me, the best Malaysian leaders were Tan Siew Sin & Dr Ismail. That’s about it.
Phua,
LKY has mentioned this starking remark on the merger in one of the forum. In fact, Dr Ismail shared the same vision too when he came to Singapore. I think when Malaysia is moving towards Malaysian Malaysia, I think there is no significant different anymore.
It’s been my dream then & now. The only reason why I still keep Malaysian passport.
You are half right about current Singaporean leaderships. You may say that Goh Keng Swee & LKY are elitist. So does second leaders such as Tony Tan. but there are plenty of socialist there. You don’t know Singapore politics as much as I do. Look at people like
1) Raymond Tan ( Singapore Think Centre)
2) Thaman Shanmuratnam (The one I would like to see him as next PM)
3) Vivian Balakrisnan
These are socialists leaders. Plus, NTUC plays big part in PAP politics. Malaysia counterpart, MTUC also play big part in PKR. That’s why I say Anwar learn from LKY as a mentor. Instead of whacking Singapore……
Phua,
There are so many Malaysians lost to Singapore. Irene Ng (Bukit Mertajam born, NTUC starwart), Khaw Boon Wah (Penang born , current Health Minister of Singapore). Isn’t that a sad thing?
Lim Kit Siang said in one ceramah, Malaysia would have been a wealthy nation if they keep people from leaving Singapore.
The Big 3 Old Guards. Goh Keng Swee, Toh Chin Chye & S Rajaratnam were Malaysians once
You Malaysians should stop being awed by Singapore and their leaders. Read the book Fajar Generations and you will see the present leaders are here in power through fraud and manipulation since 1959. All their monster 6 member constituencies and media control render the repeated elections
shams. What is so great about Goh Keng Swee, he is just a colourless leader, overrated and dumped by LKY long ago and went into womenising after retirement, constantly keeping company with the other womeniser Lien Ying Chow. His idiotic remarks should be laughed at, not admired.
Actually, Singapore was a member of the Federation of Malaysia from 1963-65. It was also one of the Straits Settlements and part of Malaya. So to say that people were ‘once Malaysians’ is true for some people in some ways only. My parents were born Malayans, I was born British, we are all Singaporeans now. I have a lot of family in KL and Melaka.
What some Malaysians should remember is that it is a Federation and that individual states have rights, some of which are being transgressed.