Take Not The Road to Zimbabwe
Take Not The Road to Zimbabwe
by Dr Azly Rahman
‘In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king” – H G Wells
How is Malaysia not like a Zimbabwe and how must it not be transformed into one? This is a 220 billion Ringgit question, taking 22 years to be answered.
The first convention by Pakatan Rakyat and the launching of its framework for change interests me as a student of Chaos and Complexity theory.
I have always been a disinterested observer of Malaysian politics since the first day Dr Mahathir Mohamad got into office and ruled for 22 hegemonic years.
Many might say that we are better off than Sierra Leone, Rwanda, Afghanistan, Pakistan or even Zimbabwe, as popularly quoted. The media continued to harp on the idea of ‘gratefulness of what this country has given to her people”.
Media spin doctors over the decades have played on this theme of Malaysia’s abundance and plenty whilst peoples of other countries live on landfills and huge garbage dumps.
But why compare to these countries and not to Switzerland, Sweden, Singapore, or even Denmark and New Zealand. Those African countries are failed states. Many of them, borrowing Gabriel Garcia Marquez, are run by generals who build labyrinths for their people.
Uganda, especially under Idi Amin the dictator has been a long gone case. Rwanda is a gone case. Sierra Leone is painfully recovering. Nigeria is a gone case. South Africa is recovering very slowly.
Zimbabwe is out of this world. Robert Mugabe was still holding on to power whilst his people en masse eat from garbage cans and get mass diarrhea.
Malaysia might be travelling down the road of these nations if the trend of authoritarianism is not halted. To have one in power for two, three, four, or five terms is a recipe for Zimbabwe-isation of nations.
Nations go through Kondratieff cycles of ups and down and a lot of these have got to do with the political-economic structure of the country and the level of its people’s understanding of democracy.
How we treat cats and dogs in Malaysia compared to how Americans do it for example tells us the level of democratic consciousness these two nations have mastered.
Indicators of serious deterioration of Malaysia’s state of civility, respect for the rule of law, democratic institutions, accountability, transparency, guarding of financial institutions – all these are evident especially after the veil of authoritarianism of Mahathirism is lifted.
Data and anecdotes from the Wall Street Journal writer Barry Wain in his book Malaysian Maverick suggest the colossal magnitude of the problem – Malaysia’s road to Zimbabwe. The impact, cyclical it may seem, will be felt sooner. The street protests we have been seeing over the last few years are an indicator of the breakdown of civility.
Averting Zimbabwe-isation
From my reading of the situation in Malaysia, we will be seeing a most interesting next General Election in which the forces of change will be met with the forces of control.
I foresee that this is a natural progression of this country’s path towards not becoming a Zimbabwe. The old regime is going to face a big challenge this time around because Nature will dictate the process of change.
“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” said Lord Acton. Essentially one cannot allow many-term rule – example abound in Africa – from Idi Amin to Sani Abacha and beyond. In Asia – from Suharto to Marcos to all those despotic leaders.
The recent declaration of a coalition of the three Opposition parties (Pakatan Rakyat) is an indication of the natural progression of political events.
The end of Mahathir era, as a postmodern theorist would say, signal a ‘rupture’ or a ‘breakaway’ or a Kuhnian revolution (a term to describe a paradigm shift/Scientific Revolution in which the Copernican idea is replaced by Galileo’s) in Malaysian politics.
We are seeing a two-party system evolving and we must be ready for this big change – a “megatrend” as futurist John Naisbitt would say. Naisbitt, Alvin Toffler, and Lester Thurow would have predicted that phase of Malaysia’s evolution.
When one sees the data on the magnitude of corruption and wastage during the regime of Mahathir Mohamad, can one not make a conclusion that we are indeed in trouble as a country? Troubling at least and one thinks of this – how did all these happen and what will be the future of this beloved country if this trend continues? How could the entire nation let this happen?
Malaysians must understand that major shifts in political-economic and socio-cultural are inevitable when the condition is ripe. It is an evolving process and cannot be stopped. The challenge is to accept changes and work within the framework and to become critical of any government that will assume power.
We might even have to learn how to think like an American – either of the Democrat or Republican American – and be ready to depose of any regime that is not meeting the needs of the people. The American Revolution is based on this idea – to oppose taxation without representation.
When the people are alienated from the ruler and when they suffer while the ruler goes all over the world parading wealth and power and consuming conspicuously, the ‘social contract’ or the agreement between Sang Sapurba and Demang Daun Lebar become null and void. Revolution is then ripe.
‘The only permanent thing is change,’ said the Chinese sage Lao Tzu.
DR AZLY RAHMAN who was born in Singapore and grew up in Johor Bahru, is a member of the Kappa Delta Phi International Honour Society in Education and the International Understanding Honor Society. He holds a Columbia University (New York) doctoral degree in International Education Development and Masters degrees in the fields of Education, International Affairs, Peace Studies, and Communication. He has taught more than 40 courses in six different departments and have written more than 300 analyses on Malaysia. His teaching experience spans both in Malaysia and in the United States and in a wide range of teaching context; from elementary to graduate education. He currently resides in the United States.
Tun Mahathir threatens to sue Lim Kit Siang, Malaysiakini and Barry Wain and others who dare criticise his 22 year Administration. At the same time, he calls for a Royal Commission to deal with his Administration and also Badawi’s. What do you guys think? Will a Truth Commission ala South Africe be a better alternative?–Din Merican
dinobeano - December 22, 2009 at 8:15 pm
Zaid Ibrahim*’s views on Royal Commission proposed by Mahathir as reported in the Malaysian Insider (December 22, 2009):
“Can the good people of this country stop asking for the appointment of Royal Commissions to investigate abuse and wrongdoings by high public officials? It’s just a waste of time. And taxpayers money.
No investigation will be done regardless of how damning and strong the recommendations of the Royal Commission will be.
Just look back to the VK Lingam Video Scandal. The findings of the Royal Commission were unanimous clear and categorical. But surprise, surprise. Nothing happened. Now I understand why even Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is “so brave” in now asking for the setting up of the Royal Commission to investigate whether RM100 billion was lost under his regime.
He knows that no such Commission will be set up and even if there is one is he knows the findings will just be stashed in some corner. And by putting a condition that the same Commission also investigate Pak Lah’s handling of various projects, he is making sure that his challenge will never be acted upon or taken seriously. Smart man.”
* Datuk Zaid Ibrahim is a PKR supreme council member and former Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department in Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s last Cabinet”
dinobeano - December 22, 2009 at 9:06 pm
I agree with Datuk Zaid that big fishes in this land using “Royal Commission” and “I see you in Court” as alternative to the undiplomatic saying of ” you people can go to hell, I am above the law”.
It is easy because once you are in court either you set up the kangaroo court or you just say, i cannot remember or i don’t know.
At the end of the day people are getting fed up and slowly forgetting the subject. After all, we always hear new earth rattling news every alternate weeks. So people will forget, the commission reports collecting dust, the investigation will progress endlessly and the screwing continue as usual.
But there will come a day when all the culprits, whoever they are, big or small, will be staring at the ceiling and counting their last breath. By then it will be too late to regret.
Mahathir is very smart and he is trying to drag Abdullah into the same carcass pits. Indirectly he is also giving signal to Najib that if you drag me than why must stop at Abdullah?…
You think Najib, Gani Pat ta.., musa…dare to touch him?
Sorry folks, we are crossing the ocean to Zimbabwe.
tean - December 22, 2009 at 10:52 pm
We’re dealing with one crafty and conniving man who’ll stop at nothing to see his legacy ingrained in the minds of Malaysians. He thinks he’s God-sent and the Saviour of this wretched land known as Malaysia Boleh. Whatever that spouts from his filthy mouth must be taken as the Gospel truth.
To Maha Firaun no mortals are above him. Even the erstwhile French Guianian panel colony of Devil’s Island may not be suitable for this omnipotent megalomaniac. Forget Kamunting.
Tok Cik - December 22, 2009 at 11:52 pm
Barry Wain’s book is the definitive reference now?
And TDM is allowed to defend himself,… is that it?
carlos - December 22, 2009 at 11:55 pm
Tun Mahathir will be laughing all the way to his grave. No one will be able to touch him as long as he is alive - that is how cunning he was, he made sure that everyone around him gets their percentage. Hell, it can be said that he even provided them with the locks,read: closets, to hide dem bones ! The only people who can take him down (in court) will be those who were never involved or linked to his shady past !
_________
Ocho, he is a brilliant politician but a maligned one. He uses blackmail, etc ala Machiavelli.—Din Merican
ocho-onda - December 23, 2009 at 12:36 am
And you can bet. like Anwar, he has dossiers on everyone and of records of their naughty transactions.
ocho-onda - December 23, 2009 at 12:46 am
Nice post..Keep them coming
Thanks for sharing.
Nulled Scripts - December 23, 2009 at 6:06 am
” When the people are alienated from the ruler and when they suffer while the ruler goes all over the world parading wealth and power and consuming conspicuously, the ’social contract’ or the agreement between Sang Sapurba and Demang Daun Lebar become null and void. Revolution is then ripe.”
No need Revolution ! PR needs to send out a very LOUD and CLEAR Message of VOTER EMPOWERMENT to the Rakyat to make sure that the fence sitters and the new voters come out to vote, that their votes COUNT, that it is their votes that will bring the CHANGE !!
ocho-onda - December 23, 2009 at 7:32 am