Din Merican: the Malaysian DJ Blogger
The desire to write grows with writing–Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus

Privacy and Our Political Culture: In Defense of Elizabeth Wong

posted by din merican—February 16, 2009

February 16. 2009

By Farish A. Noor*

Politics, we must remember, is something that takes place in the public domain. And it is in that public domain that politicians are judged for their actions, good and bad, right and wrong. The worth of a politician and her standing depends entirely on her conduct in the execution of the responsibilities that have been entrusted upon them by the public who voted them into office. And if they fail in the execution of those duties, then we the public have every justifiable right to demand an explanation from them. In the final analysis, it is we the public who determine the fate of the politicians we elect to represent us, and never vice-versa.

Politics, however, has its limits and the frontier of the political ends where the private domain begins. Politicians are human beings and it would be the mistake of the public to assume and expect our politicians to behave in a manner that is extraordinary by public standards. For that simple reason the public also has no right to expect politicians to be and remain politicians every hour, every day and every year of their lives; for politicians too have every right to be human and to have the privacy that we expect for ourselves. In the same way that we hope and wish that our elected representatives will defend the privacy of our lives, so should we extend that very same right to them, for they too are ultimately citizens like the rest of us.

It is therefore sad, to say the least, that the level of Malaysian politics and political culture has descended to a new low with the latest revelation of yet another sex scandal that involves a democratically elected state assemblywoman serving in the state government of Selangor, Ms Elizabeth Wong. This comes not too long after another sordid scandal involving another politician – Chua Soi Lek – who was likewise scandalised by revelations of his private life being made public. In both cases one can only assume that the motivation behind this intrusion into the private domain was political in nature.

Much has already been written about the two cases and the facts remain unclear over what actually happened in the case of the unfortunate Ms Wong, so I will not dwell upon that here.My contention however is this: When will we Malaysians come to understand and accept the fact that living in a modern plural constitutional democracy means having to respect the private space and private lives of all citizens, be they politicians or shopkeepers? Political motivations aside, the core of the matter is that another Malaysian citizen has had her private space intruded into and has been personally violated in the most abusive and despicable manner. This is something that no-one should relish, not even for the worst of our enemies. When it happens to a politician whose commitment to democracy and human rights is well known to all, then our sense of moral outrage should be all the greater.

Let us remind ourselves of the simple fact that the private lives of the victims in question have been without any taint whatsoever. Ms Wong is an adult woman who is capable of making decisions and choices of her own, and like any of us she is entitled to live her private life in the manner she sees fit. No crime has been committed, no public funds embezzled, no state secrets revealed and no Mongolian models blown to bits. The pathetic demonstration of moral outrage on the part of some conservative quarters should therefore be exposed for what it is: an instance of gross hypocrisy and double-standards at their most vile.

In the wake of the elections of March 2008, Malaysian society has demonstrated our desire for change, and for a new politics that befits and mirrors the new Malaysia we live in. This was the clearest call ever for a new political culture where feudalism, corruption, nepotism, hypocrisy and double standards are done away with once and for all. We are sick and tired of the vacuous moral claims of those who speak of morality and religion on the one hand, while robbing the state and eroding our fundamental human rights at the same time.

Defending the private lives and private spaces of our politicians is therefore part and parcel of the process to regain and defend the private domain of all Malaysians, where we may live, love, pray, hope and strive for the betterment of ourselves and the fulfilment of our destinies in peace. It is that fundamental right that entitles us to be what we are. No human being should be denied that privacy for the loss of that privacy entails the loss of something greater: the loss of the right simply to be what we are. The entire democratic process and democratic endeavour rests on that.

For now however, it is our moral obligation to rally in support for a fellow Malaysian whose right to privacy has been violated. Let us not be indecisive here, for we clearly know who has been the victim. For those whose lives have been violated thus, one can only imagine the personal anguish they must be going through.

History books tell us that when King Charles the First faced his penultimate judgement, he was robbed of all his rights and dignity. King Charles was known to be a man who stuttered and faltered whenever he spoke; but at that defining moment of his life when his very existence was at stake, he delivered what was said to be the most eloquent speeches he ever gave; which til today ranks as one of the most beautiful and elegant pieces of prose in the English language.

Each and every one of us will sooner or later face such a defining moment in our lives, when our mettle will be tested and when we will finally realise who and what we are and what resources we possess. Perhaps this is the defining moment for Ms Wong. We hope that she will meet this challenge with the dignity that she possesses, and emerge stronger. So chin up, Elizabeth; and keep a smile on your face. Don’t let the detractors get you down. The struggle for a better Malaysia has just begun, and there is still a long road ahead.

*Dr. Farish (Badrol Hisham) Ahmad-Noor is Senior Fellow, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Advertisement

11 Responses to “Privacy and Our Political Culture: In Defense of Elizabeth Wong”

  1. “It is therefore sad, to say the least, that the level of Malaysian politics and political culture has descended to a new low …”

    It has not gone to a new low! It is just catching up with the west.

  2. It is the privacy of the individual versus the right of the public to know.

  3. All that she can do is to weather the storm. Learn from it.

  4. I hope the authorities in power will not only work sincerely in defending Ms Wong’s private space by denouncing the act of distributing (and perhaps also taking) nude photographs of her but also making sure that the police catch the culprit/s involved. Unless we can do this we have not taken a step forward.

  5. “Obviously the photos (which I’ve not seen) were taken by someone she knows and from her past but that in no way reflects on her morality but her poor judgment of whom she chose to share her privacy with. This is no way diminishes her capacity to serve in public office and this incident should not have any bearing on her capacity to serve her constituents…”

    It has nothing to do with one’s morals. Let’s hope no one next comes and say one’s sexual preference has everything to do with holding public office because lesbians and homosexuals are immoral and sinners.

    Let us admit it. It does interfere with her work. When a representative of the people takes office, he or she swears to do the work of the people faithfully and to the best of his or her ability. She is now distracted and will continue to be distracted whenever she appears in public, when someone hurls insults at her etc. It is never going to end.

    I would resign from public office. It is not a question of right or wrong. It has nothing to do with integrity. It does not cast aspersions on my ability to choose the company I keep or my judgement. Barack Obama and Bill Clinton and many others smoked weed in their youth. Bush was an alcoholic. It is a question of your ability to carry out the oath of office one takes when assuming public office. I can no longer say I can faithfully carry out that oath. The people’s work is more important and someone else should fill my place.

  6. We do not know what other photographs are out there which may surface from time to time! It exposes a representative of the people to black mail.

  7. Yes to blackmail if you think that what you did is wrong. I for one do not think she did any wrong if what I hear in the grapevine is accurate. So how to be blackmailed.

    You can only be blackmailed if you want to hide things!

  8. I don’t know the facts of the case to comment on specifics.

    The point I’m making though, is if there is something that interferes with your work and you’re unable to carry out the oath of office that you’ve sworn to do, then you ought to resign and let someone who can take over. It is a leadership issue.

  9. “Yes to blackmail if you think that what you did is wrong. You can only be blackmailed if you want to hide things!” romerz

    Why then did she hide behind locked doors of her office? She should be accessible at all times to her constituents. They pay her salary and all the salaries of public officials, don’t they?? What makes her different?

  10. The whole thing is awfully hypocritical, but it seems to work all over the world


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 208 other followers